Technical Papers
Aug 7, 2024

Understanding the Influence of Behavioral Intention for Using an Electric Carsharing System: Hierarchical Hybrid Choice Model

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150, Issue 10

Abstract

An electric carsharing system (ECS) is a crucial component in the development of a sustainable transportation system. Understanding user behavior toward ECS is essential for successfully implementing such a service. This study investigates the impact of behavioral intentions to use ECS and its determinants on traveler mode choice behavior. A hierarchical hybrid choice model is constructed to analyze the relationship between behavioral intentions and the willingness to choose ECS. The study collected data from 771 respondents in Dalian City, China. The results highlight the importance of behavioral intentions and their constructs, such as performance expectancy, effort expectancy, hedonic motivation, and familiarity with the ECS concept in influencing individuals’ willingness to choose ECS. Additionally, ECS attributes and social characteristics also significantly affect individuals’ decisions. These findings provide valuable insights for researchers and policymakers to promote ECS effectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 51478085.

References

Ajzen, I. 1991. “The theory of planned behavior.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Bagozzi, R. P., and Y. Yi. 1988. “On the evaluation of structural equation models.” J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 16 (Mar): 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327.
Ben-Akiva, M., et al. 2002. “Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges.” Mark. Lett. 13 (Aug): 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020254301302.
Bierlaire, M. 2018. PandasBiogeme: A short introduction. Lausanne, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne.
Cantillo, V., J. Arellana, and M. Rolong. 2015. “Modelling pedestrian crossing behaviour in urban roads: A latent variable approach.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 32 (Jun): 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.008.
Carrone, A. P., V. M. Hoening, A. F. Jensen, S. E. Mabit, and J. Rich. 2020. “Understanding car sharing preferences and mode substitution patterns: A stated preference experiment.” Transp. Policy 98 (Jun): 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.010.
Chin, W. W. 1998. “The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling.” Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 295(2): 295–336.
Clewlow, R. R. 2016. “Carsharing and sustainable travel behavior: Results from the San Francisco Bay Area.” Transp. Policy 51 (Oct): 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.013.
Costain, C., C. Ardron, and K. N. Habib. 2012. “Synopsis of users’ behaviour of a carsharing program: A case study in Toronto.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46 (3): 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.005.
Curtale, R., F. Liao, and E. Rebalski. 2022. “Transitional behavioral intention to use autonomous electric car-sharing services: Evidence from four European countries.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 135 (Dec): 103516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103516.
Curtale, R., F. Liao, and P. van der Waerden. 2021. “User acceptance of electric car-sharing services: The case of the Netherlands.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 149 (Sep): 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.05.006.
Dalian Statistical Yearbook. 2022. “Economic and social aspects of statistical annual data.” Accessed December 1, 2022. https://data.oversea.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=N2023050098.
Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.” MIS Q. 13 (3): 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
de Luca, S., and R. Di Pace. 2014. “Modelling the propensity in adhering to a carsharing system: A behavioral approach.” Transp. Res. Procedia 3 (Dec): 866–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.065.
de Luca, S., and R. Di Pace. 2015. “Modelling users’ behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 71 (Dec): 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.11.001.
Diop, E. B., S. Zhao, and V. D. Tran. 2020. “Modeling travelers’ acceptance of variable message signs: A hierarchical hybrid choice model.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 146 (12): 04020134. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000456.
Duncan, M. 2011. “The cost saving potential of carsharing in a US context.” Transportation 38 (2): 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9304-y.
Efthymiou, D., and C. Antoniou. 2016. “Modeling the propensity to join carsharing using hybrid choice models and mixed survey data.” Transp. Policy 51 (Oct): 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.001.
Efthymiou, D., C. Antoniou, and P. Waddell. 2013. “Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers.” Transp. Policy 29 (Dec): 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.04.009.
Firnkorn, J., and M. Müller. 2015. “Free-floating electric carsharing-fleets in smart cities: The dawning of a post-private car era in urban environments?” Environ. Sci. Policy 45 (Dec): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.005.
Fleury, S., A. Tom, E. Jamet, and E. Colas-Maheux. 2017. “What drives corporate carsharing acceptance? A French case study.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 45 (Feb): 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.12.004.
Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.” J. Mark. Res. 18 (1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
Hensher, D. A. 1994. “Stated preference analysis of travel choices: The state of practice.” Transportation 21 (2): 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098788.
Herrero, Á., and H. San Martín. 2017. “Explaining the adoption of social networks sites for sharing user-generated content: A revision of the UTAUT2.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 71 (Jun): 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.007.
Hoque, R., and G. Sorwar. 2017. “Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model.” Int. J. Med. Inf. 101 (Sep): 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002.
Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.” Struct. Equation Modell. 6 (1): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Huo, H., Z. Yao, K. He, and X. Yu. 2011. “Fuel consumption rates of passenger cars in China: Labels versus real-world.” Energy Policy 39 (11): 7130–7135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.031.
Jain, N. K., K. Bhaskar, and S. Jain. 2022. “What drives adoption intention of electric vehicles in India? An integrated UTAUT model with environmental concerns, perceived risk and government support.” Res. Transp. Bus. Manage. 42 (Jun): 100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100730.
Jewer, J. 2018. “Patients’ intention to use online postings of ED wait times: A modified UTAUT model.” Int. J. Med. Inform. 112 (Jan): 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.008.
Jin, F., E. Yao, and K. An. 2020. “Understanding customers’ battery electric vehicle sharing adoption based on hybrid choice model.” J. Cleaner Prod. 258 (Dec): 120764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120764.
Johnson, F. R., B. Kanninen, M. Bingham, and S. Özdemir. 2007. Experimental design for stated-choice studies BT–Valuing environmental amenities using stated choice studies: A common sense approach to theory and practice. Edited by B. J. Kanninen, 159–202. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Kamargianni, M., M. Ben-Akiva, and A. Polydoropoulou. 2014. “Incorporating social interaction into hybrid choice models.” Transportation 41 (6): 1263–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9550-5.
Khan, M., and R. Machemehl. 2017. The impact of land-use variables on free-floating carsharing vehicle rental choice and parking duration, edited by P. Thakuriah, N. Tilahun, and M. Zellner, 331–347. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Kim, D., J. Ko, and Y. Park. 2015. “Factors affecting electric vehicle sharing program participants’ attitudes about car ownership and program participation.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 36 (Dec): 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.009.
Kim, J., S. Rasouli, and H. Timmermans. 2017a. “Satisfaction and uncertainty in car-sharing decisions: An integration of hybrid choice and random regret-based models.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 95 (Dec): 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.005.
Kim, J., S. Rasouli, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2017b. “Investigating heterogeneity in social influence by social distance in car-sharing decisions under uncertainty: A regret-minimizing hybrid choice model framework based on sequential stated adaptation experiments.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 85 (Dec): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.09.001.
Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
Lane, C. 2005. “PhillyCarShare: First-year social and mobility impacts of carsharing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1927 (1): 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105192700118.
Liao, F., E. Molin, H. Timmermans, and B. van Wee. 2020. “Carsharing: The impact of system characteristics on its potential to replace private car trips and reduce car ownership.” Transportation 47 (2): 935–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9929-9.
Liu, Y.-H., J.-L. Ma, L. Li, X.-F. Lin, W.-J. Xu, and H. Ding. 2018. “A high temporal-spatial vehicle emission inventory based on detailed hourly traffic data in a medium-sized city of China.” Environ. Pollut. 236 (Dec): 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.068.
Madigan, R., T. Louw, M. Dziennus, T. Graindorge, E. Ortega, M. Graindorge, and N. Merat. 2016. “Acceptance of automated road transport systems (ARTS): An adaptation of the UTAUT model.” Transp. Res. Procedia 14 (Jan): 2217–2226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.237.
Madigan, R., T. Louw, M. Wilbrink, A. Schieben, and N. Merat. 2017. “What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 50 (Jun): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007.
Márquez, L., V. Cantillo, and J. Arellana. 2015. “Mobile phone use while driving: A hybrid modeling approach.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 78 (Dec): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.016.
Martins, C., T. Oliveira, and A. Popovič. 2014. “Understanding the internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application.” Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.06.002.
Mounce, R., and J. D. Nelson. 2019. “On the potential for one-way electric vehicle car-sharing in future mobility systems.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 120 (Dec): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.003.
Oliveira, T., M. Faria, M. A. Thomas, and A. Popovič. 2014. “Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM.” Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34 (5): 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.004.
Oliveira, T., M. Thomas, G. Baptista, and F. Campos. 2016. “Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 61 (2016): 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.030.
Paulssen, M., D. Temme, A. Vij, and J. L. Walker. 2014. “Values, attitudes and travel behavior: A hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice.” Transportation 41 (Mar) 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9504-3.
Prato, C. G., S. Bekhor, and C. Pronello. 2012. “Latent variables and route choice behavior.” Transportation 39 (2): 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9344-y.
Prieto, M., G. Baltas, and V. Stan. 2017. “Car sharing adoption intention in urban areas: What are the key sociodemographic drivers?” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 101 (Jul): 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.012.
Rabbitt, N., and B. Ghosh. 2013. “A study of feasibility and potential benefits of organised car sharing in Ireland.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 25 (Jun): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.004.
Rahman, M. M., M. F. Lesch, W. J. Horrey, and L. Strawderman. 2017. “Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 108 (Jun): 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.011.
Raveau, S., R. Álvarez-Daziano, M. F. Yáñez, D. Bolduc, and J. de Dios Ortúzar. 2010. “Sequential and simultaneous estimation of hybrid discrete choice models: Some new findings.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2156 (1): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.3141/2156-15.
Raveau, S., M. F. Yáñez, and J. de Dios Ortúzar. 2012. “Practical and empirical identifiability of hybrid discrete choice models.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 46 (10): 1374–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.006.
Rose, J. M., M. C. J. Bliemer, D. A. Hensher, and A. T. Collins. 2008. “Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 42 (4): 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2007.09.002.
Schmöller, S., and K. Bogenberger. 2020. “Carsharing.” Demand Emerg. Transp. Syst. 1987 (Dec): 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815018-4.00011-5.
Smyth, J., H. Chen, V. Donzella, and R. Woodman. 2021. “Public acceptance of driver state monitoring for automated vehicles: Applying the UTAUT framework.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 83 (Jun): 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.10.003.
Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
Tran, V., S. Zhao, E. B. Diop, and W. Song. 2019. “Travelers’ acceptance of electric carsharing systems in developing countries: The case of China.” Sustainability 11 (19): 5348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195348.
Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.” MIS Q. 27 (3): 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2012. “Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.” MIS Q. 27 (3): 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
Wang, M., E. Martin, and S. Susan. 2011. “Carsharing in Shanghai, China: Analysis of behavioral response to a local survey and potential competition.” Transp. Res. Rec. 3483 (Jun): 54–58. https://doi.org/10.3141/2319-10.
Wang, X., Q. Zhou, M. Quddus, T. Fan, and S. Fang. 2018. “Speed, speed variation and crash relationships for urban arterials.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 113 (Mar): 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.032.
Wappelhorst, S., M. Sauer, D. Hinkeldein, A. Bocherding, and T. Glaß. 2014. “Potential of electric carsharing in urban and rural areas.” Transp. Res. Procedia 4 (Jun): 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.028.
Wolf, A., and S. Seebauer. 2014. “Technology adoption of electric bicycles: A survey among early adopters.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 69 (Mar): 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.007.
Yáñez, M. F., S. Raveau, and J. D. D. Ortúzar. 2010. “Inclusion of latent variables in mixed logit models: Modelling and forecasting.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 44 (9): 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.007.
Yoon, T., C. R. Cherry, and L. R. Jones. 2017. “One-way and round-trip carsharing: A stated preference experiment in Beijing.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 53 (Mar): 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.009.
Yu, C.-S. 2012. “Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model.” J. Electron. Commer. Res. 13 (2): 104–121.
Zhou, B., and K. M. Kockelman. 2011. “Opportunities for and impacts of carsharing: A survey of the Austin, Texas market.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 5 (3): 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568311003717181.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Jan 29, 2024
Accepted: May 23, 2024
Published online: Aug 7, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 7, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, School of Management and Economics, Dalian Univ. of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Rd., Ganjingzi Distrisct, Dalian 116024, PR China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-9036. Email: [email protected]
Shengchuan Zhao, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Graduate School of Business Design, Josai International Univ., 2-3-20 Hirakawa-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0093, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share