Technical Papers
Aug 14, 2024

Empirical Analysis of Drivers’ Merging and Diverging Responses to Autonomous Truck Platooning on Freeway Weaving Segments

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150, Issue 10

Abstract

Autonomous truck platoons hold the potential for substantial economic and environmental advantages. However, there is a lack of comprehensive research on the interactions between drivers and different configurations of truck platoons at waving segments. This study aims to contribute to the literature by achieving three primary objectives: (1) examine the effects of various truck platoon configurations on merging and diverging behaviors [time to merge (TTM) and time to diverge (TTD)]; (2) explore the impact of individual characteristics such as age, gender, education level, and driving experience on TTM and TTD; and (3) investigate the decision-making associated with these maneuvers (merging or diverging in front of the platoon, behind the platoon or cut in through the platoon). A driving simulator study was conducted with 85 participants across 12 distinct scenarios, considering variations in platoon size, intraplatoon spacing, and platoon lane-change behavior. Several statistical methods were employed, including ANOVA, the Cox proportional hazards model, and machine-learning techniques, to analyze the factors impacting TTM and TTD. The results revealed that increasing the headway distances between trucks in a platoon to 13.72 m (45 ft) or 18.29 m (60 ft) substantially decreased TTM, enhancing traffic flow. Furthermore, splitting the truck platoon between two lanes of the freeway before the merging point significantly influenced other drivers’ merging decisions. When half of the trucks in a platoon switched to the left lane before the merging point, a larger proportion of participants chose to merge ahead of the platoon. Age, gender, education level, and self-assessment of driving skills were all found to significantly influence merging and diverging behaviors. Drivers with higher degrees took longer to merge, whereas older, male, and experienced drivers merged faster. The lowest average TTD was observed when half the platoon switched to the left lane before the diverging point.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Louisiana Board of Regents for supporting this project (Award No. AM220469).

References

Braud, T., J. Ivanchev, C. Deboeser, A. Knoll, D. Eckhoff, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. 2021. “AVDM: A hierarchical command-and-control system architecture for cooperative autonomous vehicles in highways scenario using microscopic simulations.” Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 35 (1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-021-09499-6.
Cheng, Z., M.-S. Pang, and P. A. Pavlou. 2020. “Mitigating traffic congestion: The role of intelligent transportation systems.” Inf. Syst. Res. 31 (3): 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0894.
Chowdhury, T., P. Y. Park, and K. Gingerich. 2023. “Operational impact of the through-traffic signal prioritization for heavy commercial vehicle platooning on urban arterials.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2677 (2): 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221127287.
Cigno, R. L., and M. Segata. 2022. “Cooperative driving: A comprehensive perspective, the role of communications, and its potential development.” Comput. Commun. 193 (Sep): 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2022.06.034.
Cox, D. R. 1972. “Regression models and life-tables.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 34 (2): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x.
Demir, E., A. Syntetos, and T. van Woensel. 2022. “Last mile logistics: Research trends and needs.” IMA J. Manage. Math. 33 (4): 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpac006.
Di, X., and R. Shi. 2021. “A survey on autonomous vehicle control in the era of mixed-autonomy: From physics-based to AI-guided driving policy learning.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 125 (Apr): 103008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103008.
Domingos, P., and M. Pazzani. 1997. “On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss.” Mach. Learn. 29 (Nov): 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007413511361.
Duret, A., M. Wang, and A. Ladino. 2020. “A hierarchical approach for splitting truck platoons near network discontinuities.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 132 (Feb): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.04.006.
Gouy, M., K. Wiedemann, A. Stevens, G. Brunett, and N. Reed. 2014. “Driving next to automated vehicle platoons: How do short time headways influence non-platoon drivers’ longitudinal control?” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27 (Nov): 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.003.
Harrell, F. E., R. M. Califf, D. B. Pryor, K. L. Lee, and R. A. Rosati. 1982. “Evaluating the yield of medical tests.” JAMA 247 (18): 2543–2546. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030.
Heikoop, D. D., J. C. F. de Winter, B. van Arem, and N. A. Stanton. 2017. “Effects of platooning on signal-detection performance, workload, and stress: A driving simulator study.” Appl. Ergon. 60 (Apr): 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.10.016.
Heikoop, D. D., J. C. F. de Winter, B. van Arem, and N. A. Stanton. 2018. “Effects of mental demands on situation awareness during platooning: A driving simulator study.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58 (Oct): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.04.015.
Lee, S., C. Oh, and S. Hong. 2018. “Exploring lane change safety issues for manually driven vehicles in vehicle platooning environments.” IET Intel. Transport Syst. 12 (9): 1142–1147. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2018.5167.
Lee, S., C. Oh, and G. Lee. 2021. “Impact of automated truck platooning on the performance of freeway mixed traffic flow.” J. Adv. Transp. 2021 (Jan): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8888930.
Liu, C., and Z. Wang. 2012. “Determination of onramp weaving length for resolving merging dilemma.” Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 1 (1): 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1260/2046-0430.1.1.49.
Nengchao, L., F. Qiang, and W. Chaozhong. 2015. “Analysis traffic safety for highway off-rampbased on visual reaction time on traffic signs.” In Proc., 2015 Int. Conf. on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), 235–239. New York: IEEE.
Paddeu, D., and J. Denby. 2021. “Decarbonising road freight: Is truck automation and platooning an opportunity?” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 24 (Feb): 1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-02020-9.
Papageorgiou, M., I. Papamichail, A. D. Spiliopoulou, and A. F. Lentzakis. 2008. “Real-time merging traffic control with applications to toll plaza and work zone management.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 16 (5): 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.11.002.
Sivanandham, S., and M. S. Gajanand. 2020. “Platooning for sustainable freight transportation: An adoptable practice in the near future?” Transp. Rev. 40 (5): 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1747568.
Wang, M., S. van Maarseveen, R. Happee, O. Tool, and B. van Arem. 2019. “Benefits and risks of truck platooning on freeway operations near entrance ramp.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (8): 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119842821.
Watanabe, D., T. Kenmochi, and K. Sasa. 2021. “An analytical approach for facility location for truck platooning—A case study of an unmanned following truck platooning system in Japan.” Logistics 5 (2): 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5020027.
Yang, D., A. Kuijpers, G. Dane, and T. van der Sande. 2019. “Impacts of large-scale truck platooning on Dutch highways.” Transp. Res. Procedia 37 (Jan): 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.212.
Yao, Y., X. Zhao, Y. Zhang, C. Chen, and J. Rong. 2020. “Modeling of individual vehicle safety and fuel consumption under comprehensive external conditions.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 79 (Feb): 102224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102224.
Zhang, H. 2004. “The optimality of naive Bayes.” In Proc., Seventeenth Int. Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conf. Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
Zhao, C., L. Li, J. Li, K. Li, and Z. Li. 2021. “The impact of truck platoons on the traffic dynamics around off-ramp regions.” IEEE Access 9 (Apr): 57010–57019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072070.
Zhao, Q., H. Zheng, C. Kaku, F. Cheng, and C. Zong. 2022. “Safety spacing control of truck platoon based on emergency braking under different road conditions.” SAE Int. J. Veh. Dyn. Stab. NVH 7 (Oct): 69–81. https://doi.org/10.4271/10-07-01-0005.
Zheng, H., J. Wu, K. Pan, W. Meng, and R. Li. 2020. “Research on control target of truck platoon based on maximizing fuel saving rate.” SAE Int. J. Veh. Dyn. Stab. NVH 4 (Feb): 135–150. https://doi.org/10.4271/10-04-02-0010.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Nov 15, 2023
Accepted: Apr 10, 2024
Published online: Aug 14, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 14, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., USA 3256 Patrick Taylor Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-6282. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor in Transportation Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., USA 3255 Patrick Taylor Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3255-7474. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share