Abstract

The location of curb ramps, crosswalk markings, and curb radius are important contributors to pedestrian safety at intersections, particularly for conflicts and crashes involving right turns. Drivers tend to have higher turning speeds at locations with larger curb radii, which also requires greater stopping sight distance. If the crosswalk is placed further away from the intersection corner (i.e., offset or setback from the intersection corner), it could potentially provide drivers better visibility of pedestrians and increase the available stopping distance. However, no study has previously been conducted to investigate the relationship between crosswalk location and curb radius. This paper presents the results of research that quantifies the relationship between the offset of crosswalks (setback crosswalk) and indirect safety measures (driver stopping, yielding, and speed selection) at intersections with the consideration of other characteristics during simulated driving. The study included field-based observations and driving simulator experiments. A driving simulator experiment with 50 participants was conducted to determine how setback distances, sharpness of curb radii, and presence of pedestrians affect driver stopping decision and position, and speed choice. Approximately 12 h of video (7:00 a.m.–7:00 p.m.) were collected at nine study sites that closely matched the designs tested in the driving simulator. Comparisons of drivers’ speed in a similar scenario obtained from field and simulator data were performed to benchmark the observations from the driving simulator against field data. Stop line speeds were found to be consistent between experiments and turning speeds were found to be slightly higher in the driving simulator experiment. The research results suggest that curb radius should be smaller [less than 9 m (30 ft)] to control driver speed. Additionally, a setback distance of 6 m (20 ft) is a suitable upper bound for crosswalk placement when reconstructing intersections.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this research were obtained from OSU simulator lab or collected by the authors. Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research was sponsored by the Oregon Department of Transportation (SPR 840). The research team would like to thank Mark Joerger and Josh Roll, ODOT Research Coordinators, for expertly facilitating this research.

References

Alhajyaseen, W. K. M., M. Asano, and H. Nakamura. 2013. “Left-turn gap acceptance models considering pedestrian movement characteristics.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 50 (Jan): 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.006.
Alhajyaseen, W. K. M., and H. Nakamura. 2012. “Design criteria for crosswalk width and position at signalized intersections.” J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 6 (7): 844–857.
Alta Planning & Design. 2020. Corner design for all users. Portland, OR: Alta Planning & Design.
Ashmead, D. H., R. Wall, B. L. Bentzen, and J. M. Barlow. 2004. “Which crosswalk? Effects of accessible pedestrian signal characteristics.” ITE J. Inst. Transp. Eng. 74 (9): 26–30.
Bamney, A., N. Gupta, H. Jashami, M. U. Megat-Johari, and P. Savolainen. 2022. “An analysis of changes in county-level travel behavior considering COVID-19–related travel restrictions, immunization patterns, and political leanings.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A. Syst. 148 (11): 04022096. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000748.
Barlow, Z., H. Jashami, A. Sova, D. S. Hurwitz, and M. J. Olsen. 2019. “Policy processes and recommendations for unmanned aerial system operations near roadways based on visual attention of drivers.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 108 (Aug): 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.09.012.
Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using LME4.” J. Stat. Software 67 (1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Bella, F., and M. Silvestri. 2015. “Effects of safety measures on driver’s speed behavior at pedestrian crossings.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 83 (Oct): 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.016.
Dozza, M., C.-N. Boda, L. Jaber, P. Thalya, and N. Lubbe. 2020. “How do drivers negotiate intersections with pedestrians? The importance of pedestrian time-to-arrival and visibility.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 141 (20): 105524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105524.
Emagnu, Y., X. Zhang, M. Iryo-Asano, and H. Nakamura. 2021. “Estimation method of left turn lane capacity under the influence of pedestrians and crosswalk layout at signalized crosswalks.” J. Civ. Eng. 36 (1): 32–40. https://doi.org/10.12962/j20861206.v36i1.9100.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). n.d. Traffic calming—Curb extensions. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2001. Highway design handbook for older drivers and pedestrians. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2009. “Manual on uniform traffic control devices (MUTCD).” In National committee on uniform traffic control devices. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2010. Highway safety manual, 1st ed. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Figliozzi, M. A., and C. Tipagornwong. 2016. “Pedestrian crosswalk law: A study of traffic and trajectory factors that affect non-compliance and stopping distance.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 96 (Nov): 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.011.
Fitzpatrick, K., R. Avelar, M. Pratt, S. Das, and D. Lord. 2021. Crash modification factor for corner radius, right-turn speed, and prediction of pedestrian crashes at signalized intersections. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Fitzpatrick, K., A. Do, R. Avelar, M. Pratt, and S. Das. 2022. “Improving pedestrian safety at signalized intersections: Impacts of corner radius.” ITE J. 92 (6): 37–43.
Fu, T., W. Hu, L. Miranda-Moreno, and N. Saunier. 2019. “Investigating secondary pedestrian-vehicle interactions at non-signalized intersections using vision-based trajectory data.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 105 (Aug): 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.06.001.
Gorrini, A., L. Crociani, G. Vizzari, and S. Bandini. 2018. “Observation results on pedestrian-vehicle interactions at non-signalized intersections towards simulation.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 59 (Sep): 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.016.
Guo, H., W. Wang, W. Guo, X. Jiang, and H. Bubb. 2012. “Reliability analysis of pedestrian safety crossing in urban traffic environment.” Saf. Sci. 50 (4): 968–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.027.
Hurwitz, D., M. Knodler, and D. Dulaski. 2005. “Speed perception fidelity in a driving simulator environment.” In Proc., Driving Simulator Conf.—North America, 343–352. Coralville, IA: Driving Safety Research Institute.
Iryo-Asano, M., W. Alhajyaseen, X. Zhang, and H. Nakamura. 2015. “Analysis of pedestrian speed change behavior at signalized crosswalks.” In Proc., Road Safety & Simulation Int. Conf. Athens, Greece: National Technical Univ. of Athens.
ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers). 2004. Toolbox on intersection safety and design: Traffic signal operations. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Jacquemart, G. 2012. “Determining the ideal location for pedestrian crosswalks at signalized intersections.” ITE J. 82 (9): 44–47.
Jahanger, Q. K. 2013. “Using multiple linear regression technique for predicting the productivity of gypsum plastering works in buildings.” J. Environ. Stud. 12 (1): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.21608/jesj.2013.194908.
Jashami, H., D. Cobb, D. S. Hurwitz, E. McCormack, A. Goodchild, and M. Sheth. 2020. “The impact of commercial parking utilization on cyclist behavior in urban environments.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 74 (Oct): 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.014.
Jashami, H., D. S. Hurwitz, C. Monsere, and S. Kothuri. 2019. “Evaluation of driver comprehension and visual attention of the flashing yellow arrow display for permissive right turns.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (8): 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119843093.
Jurewicz, C., A. Sobhani, J. Woolley, J. Dutschke, and B. Corben. 2016. “Exploration of vehicle impact speed–Injury severity relationships for application in safer road design.” Transp. Res. Procedia 14 (Aug): 4247–4256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.396.
Levine, K. 2012. Curb radius and injury severity at intersections. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Mahmud, M. S., A. Bamney, M. U. Megat Johari, H. Jashami, T. J. Gates, and P. T. Savolainen. 2022. Evaluating driver response to a dynamic speed feedback sign at rural highway curves. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Record.
Miner, K., and T. Arvidson. 2020. Pedestrian crosswalk policy development guidelines (No. MN 2020RIC01). Saint Paul, MI: Minnesota DOT.
Muley, D., M. Kharbeche, W. Alhajyaseen, and M. Al-Salem. 2017. “Pedestrian’s crossing behavior at marked crosswalks on channelized right-turn lanes at intersections.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 109 (Aug): 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.339.
NACTO (National Association of City Transportation Officials). 2015. Curb extensions. Washington, DC: National Association of City Transportation Officials.
NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2014. Design guidance for channelized right-turn lanes. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Schneider, R. J., M. C. Diogenes, L. S. Arnold, V. Attaset, J. Griswold, and D. R. Ragland. 2010. “Association between roadway intersection characteristics and pedestrian crash risk in Alameda County, California.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2198 (1): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.3141/2198-06.
SMOV (Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid). 2012. The relation between speed and crashes [Fact sheet]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Institute for Road Safety Research.
Stipancic, J., L. Miranda-Moreno, J. Strauss, and A. Labbe. 2020. “Pedestrian safety at signalized intersections: Modelling spatial effects of exposure, geometry and signalization on a large urban network.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 134 (Jan): 105265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105265.
Suzuki, K., and H. Ito. 2017. “Empirical analysis on risky behaviors and pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at large-size signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Procedia 25 (Jan): 2139–2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.411.
Yoshihira, M., S. Watanabe, H. Nishira, and N. Kishi. 2016. Developing an autonomous vehicle control system for intersections using obstacle/blind spot detection frames. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
Zhao, J., W. Ma, and P. Li. 2016. “Optimal design of midblock crosswalk to achieve trade-off between vehicles and pedestrians.” J. Transp. Eng. 143 (1): 04016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000444.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150Issue 4April 2024

History

Received: May 14, 2023
Accepted: Oct 27, 2023
Published online: Jan 25, 2024
Published in print: Apr 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 25, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, 1501 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8093-0990. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor (Senior Research), School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, 1501 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-7543. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, 1501 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-6516. Email: [email protected]
Senior Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State Univ., P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2952-169X. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State Univ., P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-307X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share