Technical Papers
Dec 12, 2023

Parking Lot Pricing Optimization Strategy Considering Autonomous Vehicle User Choice Behavior

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150, Issue 2

Abstract

The unbalanced distribution of parking demand is a primary source of parking problems. The autonomous driving system and parking assist system of fully autonomous vehicles provide a possibility to alleviate the uneven distribution of parking demand in the city. Exploring the parking behavior of autonomous vehicle (AV) users is necessary for assessing parking pricing policies. In turn, the distribution of parking demand and people’s preference for parking lots may be impacted by the change in the AV parking lot’s parking charge. Thus, this paper aims to provide an effective optimization method for AV parking lot price strategy, based on the analysis of the parking behavior of AV users. A stated choice experiment is designed to understand AV users’ parking behavior. To estimate the impact of attributes and social-demographic factors, the multinomial logit model is adopted. From the results, we find a farther but cheaper parking lot is more attractive than a closer but more expensive parking lot to AV users. Based on the estimated results, a bilayer optimization model based on parking behavior is built to optimize AV parking lot prices. The Lagrangian relaxation method is employed to solve the model. By empirical testing, the AV parking price optimization model based on parking behavior is proven to be feasible and effective. According to the case study’s findings, the parking lot pricing optimization model and algorithm proposed in this paper can not only meet the benefits of parking lots and the utility of autonomous vehicle users, but also alleviate the demand for parking concentrated in the city center, which means the parking difficulties caused by the distribution of parking demand can be alleviated through the optimization of AV parking lots’ parking price.

Practical Applications

Parking difficulties in the city center are a major problem in urban traffic. Higher demand for parking in the city center may cause a series of problems, such as traffic congestion, emissions, and traffic safety. The autonomous driving system and parking assist system of fully autonomous vehicles provide a possibility to alleviate these problems. by exploring of AV users’ choice preference on parking lots, we find a farther but cheaper parking lot is more attractive than a closer but more expensive parking lot. This indicates that people may change their parking lot choice behavior. However, it is not enough to balance parking demand by relying on autonomous vehicles and user choice preferences alone. Without the guidance of reasonable parking lot prices, parking lots far away from the city center cannot attract users who originally choose parking lots in the city center. As a result, by the research on the parking lot selection preferences of autonomous vehicle users, the pricing optimization of autonomous vehicle parking lots can effectively adjust the distribution of urban parking demand, thus alleviating urban parking difficulties.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52372313 and 52272413).

References

Anderson, C. M., C. Das, and T. J. Tyrrell. 2006. “Parking preferences among tourists in Newport, Rhode Island.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 40 (4): 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.06.005.
Axhausen, K. W., and J. W. Polak. 1991. “Choice of parking: Stated preference approach.” Transportation 18 (Mar): 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150559.
Chaniotakis, E., and A. J. Pel. 2015. “Drivers’ parking location choice under uncertain parking availability and search times: A stated preference experiment.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 82 (Dec): 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.10.004.
Dell’Olio, L., A. Ibeas, and J. L. Moura. 2009. “Paying for parking: Improving stated-preference surveys.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.: Transp. 162 (1): 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.2009.162.1.39.
Fagnant, D. J., and K. Kockelman. 2015. “Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 77 (Jul): 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003.
Gillen, D. W. 1978. “Parking policy, parking location decisions and the distribution of congestion.” Transportation 7 (1): 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148372.
Harper, C. D., C. T. Hendrickson, and C. Samaras. 2018. “Exploring the economic, environmental, and travel implications of changes in parking choices due to driverless vehicles: An agent-based simulation approach.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 144 (4): 04018043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000488.
Hensher, D. A., and J. King. 2001. “Parking demand and responsiveness to supply, pricing and location in the Sydney central business district.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 35 (3): 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00054-3.
Hess, S., and J. W. Polak. 2004. “An analysis of parking behaviour using discrete choice models calibrated on SP datasets.” In Proc., 44th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Regions and Fiscal Federalism.” Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: European Regional Science Association.
Hester, A. E., D. L. Fisher, and J. Collura. 2002. “Drivers’ parking decisions: Advanced parking management systems.” J. Transp. Eng. 128 (1): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:1(49).
Hunt, J. D., and S. Teply. 1993. “A nested logit model of parking location choice.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 27 (4): 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(93)90035-9.
Ibeas, A., L. Dell’Olio, M. Bordagaray, and J. Ortúzar de D. 2014. “Modelling parking choices considering user heterogeneity.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 70 (Dec): 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.001.
Khalid, M., Y. Cao, N. Aslam, C. Suthaputchakun, M. Arshad, and W. Khalid. 2019. “Optimized pricing & scheduling model for long range autonomous valet parking.” In Proc., 2018 Int. Conf. on Frontiers of Information Technology, FIT 2018, 65–70. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIT.2018.00019.
Lambe, T. A. 1996. “Driver choice of parking in the city.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 30 (3): 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(96)00008-0.
Ma, X., X. Sun, Y. He, and Y. Chen. 2013. “Parking choice behavior investigation: A case study at Beijing Lama Temple.” Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 96 (Nov): 2635–2642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.294.
Ma, X., and H. Xue. 2020. “Intelligent smart city parking facility layout optimization based on intelligent IoT analysis.” Comput. Commun. 153 (Mar): 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.01.055.
Maurer, M., G. Christian, B. Lenz, and H. Winner. 2016. “Autonomous driving technical, legal and social aspects.” In Autonomous driving. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_19.
McCoy, P. T., M. Ramanujam, M. Moussavi, and J. L. Ballard. 1990. “Safety comparison of types of parking on urban streets in Nebraska.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1270: 28–41.
Mei, Z. Y., Y. Q. Xiang, J. Chen, and W. Wang. 2010. “Optimizing model of curb parking pricing based on parking choice behavior.” J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 10 (1): 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1570-6672(09)60027-1.
Millard-ball, A. 2019. “The autonomous vehicle parking problem.” Transp. Policy 75 (Mar): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.01.003.
Najmi, A., M. Bostanara, Z. Gu, and T. H. Rashidi. 2021. “On-street parking management and pricing policies: An evaluation from a system enhancement perspective.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 146 (Apr): 128–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.02.009.
Qin, H., F. Zheng, B. Yu, and Z. Wang. 2022. “Analysis of the effect of demand-driven dynamic parking pricing on on-street parking demand.” IEEE Access 10 (Jun): 70092–70103. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3187534.
Shoup, D. 2021. “Pricing curb parking.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 154: 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.012.
Simićević, J., N. Milosavljević, G. Maletić, and S. Kaplanović. 2012. “Defining parking price based on users’ attitudes.” Transp. Policy 23 (Sep): 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.009.
Soto, J. J., L. Márquez, and L. F. Macea. 2018. “Accounting for attitudes on parking choice: An integrated choice and latent variable approach.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 111 (May): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.003.
Van Der Goot, D. 1982. “A model to describe the choice of parking places.” Transp. Res. Part A General 16 (2): 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(82)90003-6.
Van der Waerden, P., H. Timmermans, and A. Borgers. 2002. “Pamela: Parking analysis model for predicting effects in local areas.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1781 (1): 10–18. https://doi.org/10.3141/1781-02.
Van Der Waerden, P., and H. Oppewal. 1996. “Modelling the combined choice of parking lot and shopping destimation.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., World Transport Research: Proc. 7th World Conf. on Transport Research, 129–137. London: Pergamon.
Van Der Waerden, P., H. Oppewal, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 1993. “Adaptive choice behaviour of motorists in congested shopping centre parking lots.” Transportation 20 (Dec): 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01100466.
Wang, J., H. Wang, and X. Zhang. 2020. “A hybrid management scheme with parking pricing and parking permit for a many-to-one park and ride network.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 112 (Mar): 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.020.
Wang, S. 2015. Operations research. Boston: Strome College of Business Old Dominion Univ. https://doi.org/10.1515/les.1979.24.3.108.
Zakharenko, R. 2016. “Self-driving cars will change cities.” Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 61 (Nov): 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.09.003.
Zheng, N., and N. Geroliminis. 2016. “Modeling and optimization of multimodal urban networks with limited parking and dynamic pricing.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 83 (Jan): 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRB.2015.10.008.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150Issue 2February 2024

History

Received: Feb 27, 2023
Accepted: Sep 19, 2023
Published online: Dec 12, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 12, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhihui Tian [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Intelligent Transportation Technology and System, Ministry of Education and School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang Univ., Beijing 100191, PR China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9166-013X. Email: [email protected]
M.D. Candidate, School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Mingheng Zhang [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8508-8632. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share