Technical Papers
Mar 31, 2023

Systematic Literature Review of Drone Utility in Railway Condition Monitoring

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149, Issue 6

Abstract

Drones have recently become a new tool in railway inspection and monitoring (RIM) worldwide, but there is still a lack of information about the specific benefits and costs. This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) of the applications, opportunities, and challenges of using drones for RIM. The SLR technique yielded 47 articles filtered from 7,900 publications from 2014 to 2022. The SLR found that key motivations for using drones in RIM are to reduce costs, improve safety, save time, improve mobility, increase flexibility, and enhance reliability. Nearly all the applications fit into the categories of defect identification, situation assessment, rail network mapping, infrastructure asset monitoring, track condition monitoring, and obstruction detection. The authors assess the open technical, safety, and regulatory challenges. The authors also contribute a cost analysis framework, identify factors that affect drone performance in RIM, and offer implications for new theories, management, and impacts to society.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors conducted this work with support from North Dakota State University and the Mountain-Plains Consortium, a University Transportation Center funded by the US Department of Transportation.

References

ABI Research. 2020. “Drone industry powers on in a post-COVID-19 world to be worth US$92 billion by 2030.” Cision. Accessed July 15, 2022. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/drone-industry-powers-on-in-a-post-covid-19-world-to-be-worth-us92-billion-by-2030-301143603.html.
Adão, T., J. Hruška, L. Pádua, J. Bessa, E. Peres, R. Morais, and J. Sousa. 2017. “Hyperspectral imaging: A review on UAV-based sensors, data processing and applications for agriculture and forestry.” Remote Sens. 9 (11): 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111110.
Ahirwar, S., R. Swarnkar, S. Bhukya, and G. Namwade. 2019. “Application of drone in agriculture.” Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 8 (1): 2500–2505. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.264.
Alawad, H., and S. Kaewunruen. 2021. “5G intelligence underpinning railway safety in the COVID-19 era.” Front. Built Environ. 7 (Feb): 639753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.639753.
AUAV. 2016. “Drone types: Multi-rotor vs fixed-wing vs single rotor vs hybrid VTOL.” Accessed July 15, 2022. https://www.auav.com.au/articles/drone-types/.
Banh Lau, M., A. Foina, L. Dachuan, L. Yeshun, N. Redondo, X. Aloysius, S. Charlene, and Z. Wei-Bin. 2018. Title evaluation of feasibility of UAV technologies for remote surveying BART rail systems. Berkeley, CA: BART.
Banić, M., A. Miltenović, M. Pavlović, and I. Ćirić. 2019. “Intelligent machine vision based railway infrastructure inspection and monitoring using UAV.” Facta Universitatis Ser.: Mech. Eng. 17 (3): 357–364. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME190507041B.
Baron, W., and M. daSilva. 2019. Using an unmanned aerial vehicle to produce. Washington, DC: US DOT Federal Railroad Administration.
Baron, W., and M. daSilva. 2020. Trespasser detection on railroad property using unmanned aerial vehicles. Washington, DC: US DOT Federal Railroad Administration.
Belmonte, N., S. Staulo, S. Fiorot, C. Luetto, P. Rizzi, and M. Baricco. 2018. “Fuel cell powered octocopter for inspection of mobile cranes: Design, cost analysis and environmental impacts.” Appl. Energy 215 (Apr): 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.072.
Bendris, B., and J. C. Becerra. 2022. “Design and experimental evaluation of an aerial solution for visual inspection of tunnel-like infrastructures.” Remote Sens. 14 (1): 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010195.
Bertrand, S., N. Raballand, F. Viguier, and F. Muller. 2017. Ground risk assessment for long-range inspection missions of railways by UAVs. New York: IEEE.
Bobbe, M., Y. Khedar, J. Backhaus, M. Gerke, Y. Ghassoun, and F. Plöger. 2020. Reactive mission planning for UAV based crane rail inspection in an automated container terminal. Athens, Greece: ICUAS.
Bojarczak, P., and P. Lesiak. 2021. “UAVs in rail damage image diagnostics supported by deep-learning networks.” Open Eng. 11 (1): 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2021-0033.
Bridgelall, R., T. Askarzadeh, and D. Tolliver. 2022. “Introducing an efficiency index to evaluate eVTOL designs.” Social Science Research Network. Accessed April 4, 2022. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4074694.
Cano, M., J. L. Pastor, R. Tomás, A. Riquelme, and J. L. Asensio. 2022. “A new methodology for bridge inspections in linear infrastructures from optical images and HD videos obtained by UAV.” Remote Sens. 14 (5): 1244. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051244.
Chen, S., D. F. Laefer, E. Mangina, S. M. I. Zolanvari, and J. Byrne. 2019. “UAV bridge inspection through evaluated 3D reconstructions.” Bridge Eng. 24 (4): 05019001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001343.
Congress, S. C., and A. J. Puppala. 2021. “Geotechnical slope stability and rockfall debris related safety assessments of rock cuts adjacent to a rail track using aerial photogrammetry data analysis.” Transp. Geotech. 30 (Sep): 100595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100595.
Daly, D. 2022. “A not-so-short history of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV).” Accessed July 15, 2022. https://consortiq.com/uas-resources/short-history-unmanned-aerial-vehicles-uavs.
DeGarmo, M. T. 2004. Issues concerning integration of unmanned aerial vehicles in civil airspace center for advanced aviation system development McLean, Virginia. McLean, VA: Center for Advanced Aviation System Development.
Del Amo, I. F., J. A. Erkoyuncu, R. Roy, R. Palmarini, and D. Onoufriou. 2018. “A systematic review of augmented reality content-related techniques for knowledge transfer in maintenance applications.” Comput. Ind. 103 (1): 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.08.007.
Dering, G. M., S. Micklethwaite, S. T. Thiele, S. A. Vollgger, and A. R. Cruden. 2019. “Review of drones, photogrammetry and emerging sensor technology for the study of dykes: Best practises and future potential.” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 373 (Mar): 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.01.018.
Dronewatch. 2021. “Poland announces €164 million investment in U-space and related services.” Accessed May 7, 2022. https://www.dronewatch.eu/poland-announces-e164-million-investment-in-u-space-and-related-services/.
Dubey, N. 2020. “Usage of drone technology in India: Changing phases.” Accessed July 14, 2022. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/356135.
Equinox’s Drones. 2021. “Railway inspection & monitoring using UAV/drone technology.” Accessed July 15, 2022. https://www.equinoxsdrones.com/blog/railway-inspection-monitoring-using-uav-drone-technology.
ESCAP (Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific). 2019. Inspection and monitoring of railway infrastructure using aerial drones. Bangkok, Thailand: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
Falamarzi, A., S. Moridpour, and M. Nazem. 2019. “A review on existing sensors and devices for inspecting railway infrastructure.” Jurnal Kejuruteraan 31 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2019-31(1)-01.
Farley, R. 2015. “The five most deadly drone powers in the world.” Accessed August 1, 2022. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-five-most-deadly-drone-powers-the-world-12255.
Flammini, F., R. Naddei, C. Pragliola, and G. Smarra. 2016. “Towards automated drone surveillance in railways: State-of-the-art and future directions.” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 10016 (1): 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48680-2_30.
FRA (Federal Railroad Administration). 2019. Using an unmanned aerial vehicle to produce accurate grade crossing profile data. Washington, DC: FRA.
FRA (Federal Railroad Administration). 2020. Trespasser detection on railroad property using unmanned aerial vehicles. Washington, DC: FRA.
FRA (Federal Railroad Administration). 2022. Accident causes. Washington, DC: FRA Office of Safety Analysis.
Frederiksen, M. H., O. A. Vrincianu, M. Mette, and P. Knudsen. 2019. Drones for inspection of infrastructure: Barriers, opportunities and successful uses. Odense, Denmark: Center for Integrative Innovation Management.
French, S. 2022. “Deutsche Bahn: German train system to add drones.” The Drone Girl. Accessed July 7, 2022. https://www.thedronegirl.com/2022/04/15/deutsche-bahn-german-drones-pix4d/.
Gantimurova, S., A. Parshin, and V. Erofeev. 2021. “GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping of the Circum-Baikal railway in Russia using UAV data.” Remote Sens. 13 (18): 3629–3636. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183629.
Geng, Y., F. Pan, L. Jia, Z. Wang, Y. Qin, L. Tong, and S. Li. 2021. UAV-LiDAR-based measuring framework for height and stagger of high-speed railway contact wire, 7587–7600. New York: IEEE.
GeoInformatics. 2017. “Plowman Craven launches Vogel R3D rail survey system.” Accessed July 20, 2022. https://www.geoinformatics.com/plowman-craven-launches-vogel-r3d-rail-survey-system/.
Ghassoun, Y., M. Gerke, Y. Khedar, J. Backhaus, M. Bobbe, H. Meissner, P. K. Tiwary, and R. Heyen. 2021. “Implementation and validation of a high accuracy UAV-photogrammetry based rail track inspection system.” Remote Sens. 13 (3): 384–422. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030384.
Girshick, R., J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik. 2014. “Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation.” In Computer vision and pattern recognition, 580–587. New York: IEEE.
Greyb. 2021. “Impact on the drone industry with the new rules in India.” Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.greyb.com/drone-industry-in-india/.
Guan, L., X. Li, H. Yang, and L. Jia. 2020. A visual saliency based railway intrusion detection method by uav remote sensing image, 291–295. New York: IEEE.
Guclu, E., I. Aydin, and E. Akin. 2021. “Development of vision-based autonomous UAV for railway tracking.” In Innovation and intelligence for informatics, computing, and technologies (3ICT), 120–125. New York: IEEE.
Higgins, C., and X. Liu. 2017. “Modeling of track geometry degradation and decisions on safety and maintenance: A literature review and possible future research directions.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 232 (5): 1385–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409717721870.
Huang, R., M. Jia, and S. Guo. 2020. “Track detection system of UAV based on line structure light.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 30 (1): 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/30/1/048.
Ivashov, S. I., A. B. Tataraidze, V. V. Razevig, and E. S. Smirnova. 2019. “Railway transport infrastructure monitoring by UAVs and satellites.” J. Transp. Technol. 9 (3): 342–353. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2019.93022.
Jabbar, M., H. Al-Battbootti, I. Marin, N. Goga, and R. Popa. 2021. “Oil and gas pipeline monitoring during covid-19 pandemic via unmanned aerial vehicle.” Preprint, submitted November 15, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.09155.
Jarrett, C., K. Perry, and K. A. Stol. 2015. Controller comparisons for autonomous railway following with a fixed-wing UAV, 104–109. New York: IEEE.
Jordan, S., J. Moore, S. Hovet, J. Box, J. Perry, K. Kirsche, D. Lewis, and Z. Tse. 2018. “State-of-the-art technologies for UAV inspections.” IET Radar Sonar Navig. 12 (2): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0251.
Jung, H. J., J. H. Lee, and I. H. Kim. 2018. “Challenging issues and solutions of bridge inspection technology using unmanned aerial vehicles.” In Vol. 10598 of Sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems, 1059802. Denver: SPIE.
Karpowicz, J. 2022. “The ROI of drone technology in infrastructure, transportation and at airports.” Accessed July 3, 2022. https://www.commercialuavnews.com/infrastructure/the-roi-of-drone-technology-in-infrastructure-transportation-and-at-airports.
Kellermann, R., T. Biehle, and L. Fischer. 2020. “Drones for parcel and passenger transportation: A literature review.” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 4 (1): 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100088.
Kiss, L., and K. Géza. 2018. “Possible areas of application of drones in waste management during rail accidents and disasters.” Interdiscip. Description Complex Syst. 16 (3): 360–368. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.16.3.8.
Kochan, A., P. Rutkowska, and W. Mateusz. 2018. “Inspection of the railway infrastructure with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles.” Arch. Transp. Syst. Telematics 11 (2): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.018.
Kovacevic, M. S., K. Gavin, I. Stipanovic Oslakovic, and M. Bacic. 2016. “A new methodology for assessment of railway infrastructure condition.” Transp. Res. Procedia 14 (Jan): 1930–1939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.160.
Kulkarni, A., and R. Nagarajan. 2021. “Drone survey facilitated weeds assessment and impact on hydraulic efficiency of canals.” ISH J. Hydraul. Eng. 27 (2): 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2018.1520653.
Lebedev, A. O., V. V. Vasilev, B. N. Novgorodov, and A. G. Paulish. 2020. “Computer vision controlling an autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle flight over a railway.” In Proc., 2020 1st Int. Conf. Problems of Informatics, Electronics, and Radio Engineering (PIERE). New York: IEEE.
Lemmens, M. 2017. “The fierce rise of airborne lidar: A view on status, developments and trends.” Accessed July 16, 2022. http://www.gdmc.nl/publications/2017/Fierce_Rise_Airborne_Lidar.pdf.
Lesiak, P. 2020. “Inspection and maintenance of railway infrastructure with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles.” Problemy Kolejnictwa 64 (188): 115–127. https://doi.org/10.36137/1883E.
Li, Y., H. Dong, H. Li, X. Zhang, B. Zhang, and Z. Xiao. 2020. “Multi-block SSD based on small object detection for UAV railway scene surveillance.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 33 (6): 1747–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.02.024.
Li, Y., and C. Liu. 2019. “Applications of multirotor drone technologies in construction management.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 19 (5): 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452101.
Lyovin, B. A., A. V. Shvetsov, R. Setola, S. V. Shvetsova, and M. Tesei. 2019. “Method for remote rapid response to transportation security threats on high speed rail systems.” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. 15 (4): 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2019.103015.
Maghazei, O., and M. Steinmann. 2020. “Drones in railways: Exploring current applications and future scenarios based on action research.” Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 20 (3): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000459555.
Mammeri, A., A. Jabbar Siddiqui, and Y. Zhao. 2021. “UAV-assisted railway track segmentation based on convolutional neural networks.” In Proc., 93rd Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC2021-Spring). New York: IEEE.
Manatunga, U., N. Munasinghe, and H. Premasiri. 2017. Development of a methodology to map railway lines and surrounding land use using UAVs, 195–202. Sri Lanka: ISERME.
Masat, M., and M. Kaya. 2019. “The use of unmanned aerial vehicle equipped with auto-pilot system in railway security.” Erzincan Univ. J. Sci. Technol. 12 (2): 668–678. https://doi.org/10.18185/erzifbed.474674.
MassDOT (Massachusetts Department of Transportation). 2019. The application of unmanned aerial systems in surface transportation—Volume II-A: Development of a pilot program to integrate UAS technology to bridge and rail inspections. Boston: MassDOT.
Mathe, K., L. Busoniu, L. Barabas, C. I. Iuga, L. Miclea, and J. Braband. 2016. “Vision-based control of a quadrotor for an object inspection scenario.” In Proc., 2016 Int. Conf. on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 849–857. New York: IEEE.
Meng, X. M., et al. 2021. “Deformation of the Zhangjiazhuang high-speed railway tunnel: An analysis of causal mechanisms using geomorphological surveys and D-InSAR monitoring.” J. Mountain Sci. 18 (7): 1920–1936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6493-5.
Mengist, W., T. Soromessa, and G. Legese. 2020. “Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps.” Sci. Total Environ. 702 (Feb): 134581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134581.
Mind Commerce. 2022. Commercial UAV market by drone type, use cases and applications, supporting infrastructure and services 2022-2027. Seattle: Mind Commerce.
Mittal, S., and D. Rao. 2017. “Vision based railway track monitoring using deep learning.” Preprint, submitted November 17, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06423.
Montanari, A., F. Kringberg, A. Valentini, C. Mascolo, and A. Prorok. 2018. “Surveying areas in developing regions through context aware drone mobility.” In Proc., DroNet 2018—Proc. 2018 ACM Int. Conf. on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, 27–32. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Morgenthal, G., and N. Hallermann. 2014. “Quality assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based visual inspection of structures.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 17 (3): 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.3.289.
Narazaki, Y., V. Hoskere, G. Chowdhary, and B. F. Spencer. 2022. “Vision-based navigation planning for autonomous post-earthquake inspection of reinforced concrete railway viaducts using unmanned aerial vehicles.” Autom. Constr. 137 (1): 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104214.
Nie, Y. Y., Z. Tang, J. F. Yu, Y. R. Zhu, J. Chang, J. J. Zhang, S. H. Guo, and Y. Su. 2017. “Image-based 3D scene reconstruction and rescue simulation framework for railway accidents.” In Proc., 2016 Int. Conf. on Virtual Reality and Visualization (ICVRV), 335–340. New York: IEEE.
Nyberg, R. G., N. Gupta, S. Yella, and M. Dougherty. 2013. “Detecting plants on railway Embankments.” J. Software Eng. Appl. 6 (3B): 8–12. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2013.63B003.
Palavenis, D. 2022. “Russia was lagging behind in drone capabilities, but is now catching up.” Accessed July 18, 2022. https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1648450/russia-was-lagging-behind-in-drone-capabilities-but-is-now-catching-up-comment.
Pall, E., K. Mathe, L. Tamas, and L. Busoniu. 2014. “Railway track following with the AR. Drone using vanishing point detection.” In Automation, quality and testing, robotics (AQTR), 1–6. New York: IEEE.
Prakesch, M. 2020. 2020 business plan: Operations and maintenance cost model documentation. San Fransisco, CA: California High-Speed Rail Authority.
ProDrone. 2022. “PD6B-AW-ARM.” Accessed August 2, 2022. https://www.prodrone.com/products/pd6b-aw-arm/.
Rahman, M. A., and A. Mammeri. 2021. “Vegetation detection in UAV imagery for railway monitoring.” In VEHITS, 457–464. Setúbal, Portugal: Science and Technology Publications.
Rampriya, R. S., and R. Suganya. 2021. Review on various communication mechanism for railway patrol using UAV, 617–625. New York: IEEE.
Sah, B., R. Gupta, and D. Bani-Hani. 2021. “Analysis of barriers to implement drone logistics.” Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 24 (6): 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1782862.
Sahebdivani, S., H. Arefi, and M. Maboudi. 2020. “Rail track detection and projection-based 3D modeling from UAV point cloud.” Sensors 20 (18): 5220. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185220.
Saini, A., and D. Singh. 2021. “DroneRTEF: Development of a novel adaptive framework for railroad track extraction in drone images.” Pattern Anal. Appl. 24 (4): 1549–1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-021-00994-w.
Schotte, K., T. Nuttens, A. De Wulf, P. Van Bogaert, and H. De Backer. 2016. “Monitoring the structural response of the Liefkenshoek rail tunnel to tidal level fluctuations.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (5): 04016007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000863.
Schwab, K. 2020. “Drones for railways: Real-world benefits, use cases and ROI.” Accessed August 4, 2022. https://www.dartdrones.com/drones-for-railways/.
Shcherbakov, V. V., M. A. Altyntsev, and M. A. Altyntseva. 2021. “Application of rail track geometry measuring trolleys for georeferencing of UAV images.” Int. Arch. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLIII-B2-2021 (B2-2021): 101–107. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-101-2021.
Sherrock, E., and K. Neubecker. 2018. Unmanned aircraft system applications in international railroads. Washington, DC: Federal Railroad Administration.
Singh, A. K., A. K. Dwivedi, N. Nahar, and D. Singh. 2021. “Railway track sleeper detection in low altitude UAV imagery using deep convolutional neural network.” In Proc., Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. IGARSS, 355–358. New York: IEEE.
Singh, A. K., A. Swarup, A. Agarwal, and D. Singh. 2019. “Vision based rail track extraction and monitoring through drone imagery.” ICT Express 5 (4): 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2017.11.010.
SNCF (French National Railway Company). 2022. “Drones, the railway and Altametris.” Accessed June 12, 2022. https://www.sncf-reseau.com/en/entreprise/newsroom/sujet/drones-the-railway-and-altametris.
Štroner, M., R. Urban, M. Lidmila, V. Kolář, and T. Křemen. 2021. “Vegetation filtering of a steep rugged terrain: The performance of standard algorithms and a newly proposed workflow on an example of a railway ledge.” Remote Sens. 13 (15): 3050. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13153050.
Stuart, C., and J. Doran. 2020. An automated, drone-based, grade crossing inspection system. RR 20-18. Setúbal, Portugal: Federal Railroad Administration.
Sushant, S., S. Anand, T. James, V. Aravind, and G. Narayanan. 2017. “Localization of an unmanned aerial vehicle for crack detection in railway tracks.” In Proc., 2017 Int. Conf. on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI). New York: IEEE.
Tranfield, D., D. Denyer, and P. Smart. 2013. “Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review.” Br. J. Manage. 14 (3): 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
Upton, L. 2022. “How drones are already being deployed by railways around the world.” SmartRail World. Accessed June 9, 2022. http://www.transportrail.com/drones-already-deployed-railways-around-world/#google_vignette.
Verdiesen, I., A. A. Tubella, and V. Dignum. 2021. “Integrating comprehensive human oversight in drone deployment: A conceptual framework applied to the case of military surveillance drones.” Information 12 (9): 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12090385.
Wu, Y., Y. Qin, Z. Wang, and L. Jia. 2018. “A UAV-based visual inspection method for rail surface defects.” Appl. Sci. 8 (7): 1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071028.
Yaacoub, J. P., H. Noura, O. Salman, and A. Chehab. 2020. “Security analysis of drones systems: Attacks, limitations, and recommendations.” Internet Things 11 (1): 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100218.
Yang, J., X. Cheng, Y. Wu, Y. Qin, and L. Jia. 2019. “Railway comprehensive monitoring and warning system framework based on space-air-vehicle-ground integration network.” In Proc., Prognostics and System Health Management Conf. (PHM-Chongqing), 1314–1319. New York: IEEE.
Zheng, Q., M. Xiao, and H. Shi. 2020. “UAV direction estimation in high-speed railway environment.” In Proc., Resilience and Sustainable Transportation Systems, 485–490. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149Issue 6June 2023

History

Received: Oct 3, 2022
Accepted: Jan 17, 2023
Published online: Mar 31, 2023
Published in print: Jun 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 31, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Transportation, Logistics & Finance, College of Business, North Dakota State Univ., P.O. Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4301-8310. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Transportation, Logistics & Finance, College of Business, North Dakota State Univ., P.O. Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-6652. Email: [email protected]
Denver D. Tolliver, Ph.D. [email protected]
Director, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State Univ., P.O. Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Drone-based displacement measurement of infrastructures utilizing phase information, Nature Communications, 10.1038/s41467-023-44649-2, 15, 1, (2024).
  • Driving Standardization in Infrastructure Monitoring: A Role for Connected Vehicles, Vehicles, 10.3390/vehicles5040101, 5, 4, (1878-1891), (2023).
  • Combined Methodology for Rockfall Susceptibility Mapping Using UAV Imagery Data, Remote Sensing, 10.3390/rs16010177, 16, 1, (177), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share