Technical Papers
Aug 4, 2023

Analyzing Freeway Traffic Incident Clearance Time Using a Deep Survival Model

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149, Issue 10

Abstract

Accurately predicting freeway incident clearance time and analyzing influential factors are essential for developing effective traffic incident management strategies. Existing approaches for analyzing traffic incident clearance time include statistical models and machine learning models. Whereas the statistical approach is able to quantify the impact of influential factors on incident clearance time, it often yields unsatisfactory levels of the prediction accuracy. Conversely, the machine learning approach lacks model interpretability but can generate accurate predictions. To combine the advantages of both approaches, a survival analysis model based on deep neural network (DeepSurv) is applied to predict the traffic incident clearance time. We used the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to interpret the modeling results of the DeepSurv model and analyze the impact of influential factors on traffic incident clearance time. Results show that the DeepSurv model outperforms statistical models (i.e., Cox proportional hazard, accelerated failure time and quantile regressions) and traditional machine learning models (i.e., support vector machine, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting algorithm) in terms of prediction performance. The analysis results indicate that response time, incident type (collision), lane closure type (all travel lanes blocked, total closure), involvement of fire and traffic control are significant influential factors affecting traffic incident clearance time. Our findings indicate that the proposed DeepSurv model is a more effective approach to predict traffic incident clearance time.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.

References

Alkaabi, A. M. S., D. Dissanayake, and R. Bird. 2011. “Analyzing clearance time of urban traffic accidents in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, with hazard-based duration modeling method.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2229 (1): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.3141/2229-06.
Bathaee, Y. 2017. “The artificial intelligence black box and the failure of intent and causation.” Harvard J. Law Technol. 31 (2): 890–938.
Bergstra, J., R. Bardenet, Y. Bengio, and B. Kégl. 2011. “Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization.” In Vol. 24 of Advances in neural information processing systems, 2546–2554. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Chung, Y. 2010. “Development of an accident duration prediction model on the Korean freeway systems.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 42 (1): 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.005.
Chung, Y., and B.-J. Yoon. 2012. “Analytical method to estimate accident duration using archived speed profile and its statistical analysis.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 16 (6): 1064–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1632-3.
Cox, D. R. 1972. “Regression models and life-tables.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 34 (2): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x.
Cui, J., and B. Yang. 2018. “Survey on Bayesian optimization methodology and applications.” J. Software 29 (10): 3068–3090. https://doi.org/10.13328/j.cnki.jos.005607.
Hamad, K., R. Al-Ruzouq, W. Zeiada, S. Abu Dabous, and M. A. Khalil. 2020. “Predicting incident duration using random forests.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Sci. 16 (3): 1269–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2020.1733132.
Hojati, A. T., L. Ferreira, S. Washington, and P. Charles. 2013. “Hazard based models for freeway traffic incident duration.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 52 (Mar): 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.037.
Hojati, A. T., L. Ferreira, S. Washington, P. Charles, and A. Shobeirinejad. 2014. “Modelling total duration of traffic incidents including incident detection and recovery time.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 71 (Oct): 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.006.
Hou, L., Y. Lao, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and Z. Li. 2013. “Modeling freeway incident response time: A mechanism-based approach.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 28 (Mar): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.12.005.
Hu, J., R. Krishnan, and M. Bell. 2011. Incident duration prediction for in-vehicle navigation systems. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Jiang, H., S.-E. Fang, and Y. Chen. 2012. “Multivariate survival analysis models for incident duration with censored data.” J. Tongji Univ.: Nat. Sci. 40 (12): 1808–1813. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2012.12.011.
Kang, G., and S.-E. Fang. 2011. “Applying survival analysis approach to traffic incident duration prediction.” In ICTIS 2011: Multimodal approach to sustained transportation system development: Information, technology, implementation, 1523–1531. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Katzman, J. L., U. Shaham, A. Cloninger, J. Bates, T. Jiang, and Y. Kluger. 2018. “Deep-surv: Personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network.” BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 18 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0482-1.
Khattak, A., X. Wang, and H. Zhang. 2012. “Incident management integration tool: Dynamically predicting incident durations, secondary incident occurrence, and incident delays.” IET Intel. Transport Syst. 6 (2): 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2011.0013.
Khattak, A. J., J. Liu, B. Wali, X. Li, and M. Ng. 2016. “Modeling traffic incident duration using quantile regression.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2554 (1): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.3141/2554-15.
Khattak, A. J., J. L. Schofer, and M.-H. Wang. 1995. “A simple time sequential procedure for predicting freeway incident duration.” J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2 (2): 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10248079508903820.
Korlapati, N. V. S. 2020. “Prognostics in manufacturing systems using Deepsurv.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Kostic, B., M. P. Loft, F. Rodrigues, and S. S. Borysov. 2021. “Deep survival modelling for shared mobility.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 128 (Jul): 103213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103213.
Li, R., F. C. Pereira, and M. E. Ben-Akiva. 2018. “Overview of traffic incident duration analysis and prediction.” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 10 (2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-018-0300-1.
Lin, H., and D. Zelterman. 2002. “Modeling survival data: Extending the Cox model.” Technometrics 44 (1): 85–86. https://doi.org/10.1198/tech.2002.s656.
Lipton, Z. C. 2018. “The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery.” Queue 16 (3): 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236386.3241340.
Lundberg, S. M., and S.-I. Lee. 2017. “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions.” In Vol. 30 of Advances in neural information processing systems, 4768–4777. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Ma, X., C. Ding, S. Luan, Y. Wang, and Y. Wang. 2017. “Prioritizing influential factors for freeway incident clearance time prediction using the gradient boosting decision trees method.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 18 (9): 2303–2310. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2635719.
Manual, H. C. 2000. Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
Nam, D., and F. Mannering. 2000. “An exploratory hazard-based analysis of highway incident duration.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 34 (2): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00065-2.
Nandi, A., and A. K. Pal. 2022. Interpreting machine learning models: Learn model interpretability and explainability methods. Berkeley, CA: Apress.
Peeta, S., J. L. Ramos, and S. Gedela. 2000. Providing real-time traffic advisory and route guidance to manage borman incidents on-line using the hoosier helper program. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Pelikan, M., D. E. Goldberg, and E. Cantú-Paz. 1999. “Boa: The Bayesian optimization algorithm.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conf. GECCO-99, 525–532. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Srivastava, N., G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov. 2014. “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15 (1): 1929–1958. https://doi.org/10.5555/2627435.2670313.
Tang, J., L. Zheng, C. Han, F. Liu, and J. Cai. 2020a. “Traffic incident clearance time prediction and influencing factor analysis using extreme gradient boosting model.” J. Adv. Transp. 2020 (Jun): 6401082. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6401082.
Tang, J., L. Zheng, C. Han, W. Yin, Y. Zhang, Y. Zou, and H. Huang. 2020b. “Statistical and machine-learning methods for clearance time prediction of road incidents: A methodology review.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 27 (Sep): 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2020.100123.
Valenti, G., M. Lelli, and D. Cucina. 2010. “A comparative study of models for the incident duration prediction.” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2 (2): 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-010-0031-4.
Wei, L.-J. 1992. “The accelerated failure time model: A useful alternative to the Cox regression model in survival analysis.” Stat. Med. 11 (14–15): 1871–1879. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780111409.
Yang, X., Y. Zou, and L. Chen. 2022. “Operation analysis of freeway mixed traffic flow based on catch-up coordination platoon.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 175 (Sep): 106780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106780.
Yu, B., Y. Wang, J. Yao, and J. Wang. 2016. “A comparison of the performance of ann and svm for the prediction of traffic accident duration.” Neural Netw. World 26 (3): 271. https://doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2016.26.015.
Zhang, J., A. Florita, B.-M. Hodge, S. Lu, H. F. Hamann, V. Banunarayanan, and A. M. Brockway. 2015. “A suite of metrics for assessing the performance of solar power forecasting.” Sol. Energy 111 (Jan): 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.10.016.
Zhang, Y., Y. Zou, J. Tang, and J. Liang. 2022. “Long-term prediction for high-resolution lane-changing data using temporal convolution network.” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dyn. 10 (1): 849–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2021.1950072.
Zhang, Y., Y. Zou, Y. Zhang, and L. Wu. 2023. “Spatiotemporal interaction pattern recognition and risk evolution analysis during lane changes.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 24 (6): 6663–6673. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3233809.
Zou, Y., J. Tang, L. Wu, K. Henrickson, and Y. Wang. 2017. “Quantile analysis of factors influencing the time taken to clear road traffic incidents.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp. 170 (5): 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.15.00008.
Zou, Y., X. Ye, K. Henrickson, J. Tang, and Y. Wang. 2018. “Jointly analyzing freeway traffic incident clearance and response time using a copula-based approach.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 86 (Jan): 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.11.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149Issue 10October 2023

History

Received: Aug 19, 2022
Accepted: Jun 1, 2023
Published online: Aug 4, 2023
Published in print: Oct 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 4, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yajie Zou, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China. Email: [email protected]
Wanbing Han [email protected]
Master’s Candidate, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-0529. Email: [email protected]
Jinjun Tang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South Univ., Changsha 410075, China. Email: [email protected]
Xinzhi Zhong [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A New Surrogate Safety Measure Considering Temporal–Spatial Proximity and Severity of Potential Collisions, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app14072711, 14, 7, (2711), (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share