Technical Papers
Aug 9, 2022

Examining Pedestrian Crash Frequency, Severity, and Safety in Numbers Using Pedestrian Exposure from Utah Traffic Signal Data

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148, Issue 10

Abstract

The focus of this study was twofold: (1) to estimate models of frequency and injury severity in pedestrian crashes at signalized intersections and (2) to examine whether the “safety in numbers” effect applies to pedestrian safety in the United States. Specifically, the analysis used novel and robust measures of pedestrian exposure: pedestrian crossing volumes estimated from 1 year of pedestrian push-button traffic signal data. Multiple negative binomial models—predicting 10-year pedestrian crash counts at 1,606 signals in Utah—were estimated, accounting for different levels of data availability. The models showed similar results, identifying specific characteristics of the signals that saw more pedestrian crashes. These characteristics were higher volumes of pedestrian and motor vehicle traffic, longer average crossing distances, more crosswalks, continental instead of standard markings, no prohibitions of right-turns-on-red, no bike lanes, near-side instead of far-side bus stops, greater shares of commercial or vacant land uses, more employment density, greater intersection density, no schools or places of worship, and greater shares of people with a disability or people of Hispanic or non-White race/ethnicity. To analyze injury severity in pedestrian crashes, an ordered logit model was fitted with 1,483 pedestrian crash observations. The model results indicated that vehicle size, vehicle maneuvering direction, lighting conditions, and involvement of teenage/older driver and DUI/drowsy/distracted driving in crashes were significantly associated with pedestrian crash severity. Notably, the study also found strong support for the “safety in numbers” effect, in which pedestrian–vehicle crash rates decline with an increase in pedestrian volumes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Utah Department of Transportation as Research Project 19.03.16. Thanks to members of UDOT’s Technical Advisory Committee (Robert Chamberlain, Travis Evans, Heidi Goedhart, Andrea Guevara, Peter Tang, and Mark Taylor) for their guidance and feedback on this work. Acknowledgments are also due to Caleb Child, Devan Peterson, Doo Hong Lee, and Keunhyun Park for their help assembling some of the intersection data. The authors alone are responsible for the preparation and accuracy of the information, data, analysis, discussions, recommendations, and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, endorsements, or policies of the Utah Department of Transportation or the US Department of Transportation. Therefore, the Utah Department of Transportation makes no representation or warranty of any kind and assumes no liability.

References

Abdel-Aty, M., C. L. Chen, and J. R. Schott. 1998. “An assessment of the effect of driver age on traffic accident involvement using log-linear models.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 30 (6): 851–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00038-4.
Bhatia, R., and M. Wier. 2011. “Safety in numbers re-examined: Can we make valid or practical inferences from available evidence?” Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (1): 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.015.
Bogel-Burroughs, N. 2019. “Deadliest year for pedestrians and cyclists in U.S. Since 1990.” The New York Times, October 22, 2019.
Brant, R. 1990. “Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression.” Biometrics 46 (4): 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532457.
Brüde, U., and J. Larsson. 1993. “Models for predicting accidents at junctions where pedestrians and cyclists are involved. How well do they fit?” Accid. Anal. Prev. 25 (5): 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(93)90001-D.
Burbidge, S. 2016. Measuring pedestrian exposure and risk in high-risk areas. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah DOT.
Carlson, K., B. Murphy, A. Ermagun, D. Levinson, and A. Owen. 2018. Safety in numbers: Pedestrian and bicyclist activity and safety in Minneapolis. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. of Minnesota.
Cottrill, C. D., and P. V. Thakuriah. 2010. “Evaluating pedestrian crashes in areas with high low-income or minority populations.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 42 (6): 1718–1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.012.
Demetriades, D., J. Murray, M. Martin, G. Velmahos, A. Salim, K. Alo, and P. Rhee. 2004. “Pedestrians injured by automobiles: Relationship of age to injury type and severity.” J. Am. Coll. Surg. 199 (3): 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.03.027.
Dumbaugh, E., and W. Li. 2010. “Designing for the safety of pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists in urban environments.” J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 77 (1): 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.536101.
El-Basyouny, K., and T. Sayed. 2013. “Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts.” Saf. Sci. 51 (1): 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.015.
Elvik, R. 2009. “The non-linearity of risk and the promotion of environmentally sustainable transport.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 41 (4): 849–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.009.
Elvik, R. 2013. “Can a safety-in-numbers effect and a hazard-in-numbers effect co-exist in the same data?” Accid. Anal. Prev. 60 (Nov): 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.010.
Elvik, R., and R. Goel. 2019. “Safety-in-numbers: An updated meta-analysis of estimates.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 129 (Aug): 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.019.
Geyer, J., N. Raford, T. Pham, and D. R. Ragland. 2006. “Safety in numbers: Data from Oakland, California.” Trans. Res. Rec. 1982 (1): 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106198200119.
Gladhill, K., and C. M. Monsere. 2012. “Exploring traffic safety and urban form in Portland, Oregon.” Trans. Res. Rec. 2318 (1): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.3141/2318-08.
Graham, D. J., and S. Glaister. 2003. “Spatial variation in road pedestrian casualties: The role of urban scale, density and land-use mix.” Urban Stud. 40 (8): 1591–1607. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000094441.
Haleem, K., P. Alluri, and A. Gan. 2015. “Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity at signalized and non-signalized locations.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 81 (Aug): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.025.
Harkey, D. L., and C. V. Zegeer. 2004. PEDSAFE: Pedestrian safety guide and countermeasure selection system. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Harwood, D. W., K. M. Bauer, K. R. Richard, D. K. Gilmore, J. L. Graham, I. B. Potts, D. J. Torbic, and E. Hauer. 2008. Pedestrian safety prediction methodology. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Heydari, S., L. Miranda-Moreno, and A. J. Hickford. 2020. “On the causal effect of proximity to school on pedestrian safety at signalized intersections: A heterogeneous endogenous econometric model.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 26 (Jun): 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2020.100115.
Islam, A. 2021. “Safety in numbers: Models of pedestrian and bicycle crash frequency and severity at signalized intersections in Utah using innovative measure of exposure.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ.
Islam, S., and F. Mannering. 2006. “Driver aging and its effect on male and female single-vehicle accident injuries: Some additional evidence.” J. Saf. Res. 37 (3): 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.003.
Jacobsen, P. L. 2015. “Safety in numbers: More walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling.” Inj. Prev. 21 (4): 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.9.3.205rep.
Jacobsen, P. L., F. Racioppi, and H. Rutter. 2009. “Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling.” Inj. Prev. 15 (6): 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2009.022566.
Lam, W. W., S. Yao, and B. P. Loo. 2014. “Pedestrian exposure measures: A time-space framework.” Trav. Behav. Soc. 1 (1): 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2013.10.004.
Leden, L. 2002. “Pedestrian risk decrease with pedestrian flow: A case study based on data from signalized intersections in Hamilton, Ontario.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 34 (4): 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00043-4.
Lee, C., and M. Abdel-Aty. 2005. “Comprehensive analysis of vehicle–pedestrian crashes at intersections in Florida.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 37 (4): 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.019.
Lee, J., M. Abdel-Aty, P. Xu, and Y. Gong. 2019. “Is the safety-in-numbers effect still observed in areas with low pedestrian activities? A case study of a suburban area in the United States.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 125 (Apr): 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.037.
Lindsey, G., T. Tao, J. Wang, and J. Cao. 2019. Pedestrian and bicycle crash risk and equity: Implications for street improvement projects. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. of Minnesota.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., R. Liggett, and H. G. Sung. 2007. “Death on the crosswalk: A study of pedestrian-automobile collisions in Los Angeles.” J. Plan. Edu. Res. 26 (3): 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X06297008.
Lyon, C., and B. Persaud. 2002. “Pedestrian collision prediction models for urban intersections.” Trans. Res. Rec. 1818 (1): 102–107. https://doi.org/10.3141/1818-16.
Mahmoud, N., M. Abdel-Aty, Q. Cai, and O. Zheng. 2021. “Vulnerable road users’ crash hotspot identification on multi-lane arterial roads using estimated exposure and considering context classification.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 159 (Sep): 106294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106294.
Merlin, L. A., E. Guerra, and E. Dumbaugh. 2020. “Crash risk, crash exposure, and the built environment: A conceptual review.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 134 (Aug): 105244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.020.
Merlin, L. A., D. Teoman, M. Viola, H. Vaughn, and R. Buehler. 2021. “Redrawing the planners’ circle: Analyzing trip-level walk distances across two national surveys.” J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 87 (4): 470–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1877181.
Miranda-Moreno, L. F., P. Morency, and A. M. El-Geneidy. 2011. “The link between built environment, pedestrian activity and pedestrian–vehicle collision occurrence at signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (5): 1624–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.005.
Mohamed, M. G., N. Saunier, L. F. Miranda-Moreno, and S. V. Ukkusuri. 2013. “A clustering regression approach: A comprehensive injury severity analysis of pedestrian–vehicle crashes in New York, US and Montreal, Canada.” Safety Sci. 54 (Apr): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.11.001.
NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). 2019a. “Traffic safety facts, 2018 Fatal motor vehicle crashes: Overview.” Accessed August 10, 2021. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812826.
NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). 2019b. “Traffic safety facts, Pedestrians 2017 Data.” Accessed August 10, 2021. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812681.
NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). 2020. “Fatality analysis reporting system.” Accessed August 10, 2021. https://www.nhtsa.gov/research-data/fatality-analysis-reporting-system-fars.
Oh, C., Y. S. Kang, B. Kim, and W. Kim. 2005. “Analysis of pedestrian-vehicle crashes in Korea.” In Proc., 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Prato, C. G., S. Kaplan, T. K. Rasmussen, and T. Hels. 2016. “Infrastructure and spatial effects on the frequency of cyclist-motorist collisions in the Copenhagen Region.” J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 8 (4): 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2015.1055414.
Raford, N., and D. Ragland. 2006. Pedestrian volume modeling for traffic safety and exposure analysis: The case of Boston, Massachusetts. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Safe Transportation Research & Education Center.
Roudsari, B., R. Kaufman, and T. Koepsell. 2006. “Turning at intersections and pedestrian injuries.” Traffic Inj. Prev. 7 (3): 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580600660153.
Sarkar, S., R. Tay, and J. D. Hunt. 2011. “Logistic regression model of risk of fatality in vehicle–pedestrian crashes on national highways in Bangladesh.” Trans. Res. Rec. 2264 (1): 128–137. https://doi.org/10.3141/2264-15.
Singleton, P., M. Mekker, and A. Islam. 2021a. Safety in numbers? Developing improved safety predictive methods for pedestrian crashes at signalized intersections in Utah using push button-based measures of exposure. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah DOT.
Singleton, P. A., K. Park, and D. H. Lee. 2021b. “Varying influences of the built environment on daily and hourly pedestrian crossing volumes at signalized intersections estimated from traffic signal controller event data.” J. Transp. Geogr. 93 (May): 103067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103067.
Singleton, P. A., and F. Runa. 2021. “Pedestrian traffic signal data accurately estimates pedestrian crossing volumes.” Trans. Res. Rec. 2675 (6): 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198121994126.
Singleton, P. A., F. Runa, and P. Humagain. 2020. Utilizing archived traffic signal performance measures for pedestrian planning and analysis. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah DOT.
Sturdevant, J. R., et al. 2012. Indiana traffic signal hi resolution data logger enumerations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Stutts, J. C., W. W. Hunter, and W. E. Pein. 1996. “Pedestrian crash types: 1990s update.” Trans. Res. Rec. 1538 (1): 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196153800109.
Tasic, I., R. Elvik, and S. Brewer. 2017. “Exploring the safety in numbers effect for vulnerable road users on a macroscopic scale.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 109 (Dec): 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.029.
Tulu, G. S., S. Washington, M. M. Haque, and M. J. King. 2015. “Investigation of pedestrian crashes on two-way two-lane rural roads in Ethiopia.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 78 (May): 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.011.
Utah DOT (Utah Department of Transportation). 2021. “Traffic signals.” Accessed August 10, 2021. https://www.udot.utah.gov/connect/business/traffic-signals/.
Utah Geospatial Resource Center. 2021. “Utah mapping portal.” Accessed August 10, 2021. https://gis.utah.gov/.
Vuong, Q. H. 1989. “Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses.” Econometrica: J. Econ. Soc. 57 (2): 307–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912557.
Wier, M., J. Weintraub, E. H. Humphreys, E. Seto, and R. Bhatia. 2009. “An area-level model of vehicle-pedestrian injury collisions with implications for land use and transportation planning.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 41 (1): 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.10.001.
Xu, P., S. Xie, N. Dong, S. C. Wong, and H. Huang. 2019. “Rethinking safety in numbers: Are intersections with more crossing pedestrians really safer?” Inj. Prev. 25 (1): 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042469.
Yasmin, S., and N. Eluru. 2016. “Latent segmentation-based count models: Analysis of bicycle safety in Montreal and Toronto.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 95 (Part A): 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.015.
Zajac, S. S., and J. N. Ivan. 2003. “Factors influencing injury severity of motor vehicle–crossing pedestrian crashes in rural Connecticut.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 35 (3): 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00013-1.
Zegeer, C. V., K. S. Opiela, and M. J. Cynecki. 1985. Pedestrian signalization alternatives. Final report. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Zegeer, C. V., J. R. Stewart, H. H. Huang, and P. A. Lagerwey. 2002. Safety effects of marked vs. unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations: Executive summary and recommended guidelines. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Zegeer, C. V., J. R. Stewart, H. H. Huang, P. A. Lagerwey, J. R. Feaganes, and B. J. Campbell. 2005. Safety effects of marked versus unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations: Final report and recommended guidelines. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 10October 2022

History

Received: Jan 4, 2022
Accepted: Jun 2, 2022
Published online: Aug 9, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 9, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Mirpur Cantonment, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6332-4278. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-4110. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-3641. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-4110 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9319-2333. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Estimating Pedestrian Volumes at Each Crosswalk of Intersections: Comparison of Land-Use Models and Short-Term Count Methods, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-8141, 150, 2, (2024).
  • A data-driven on-site injury severity assessment model for car-to-electric-bicycle collisions based on positional relationship and random forest, Electronic Research Archive, 10.3934/era.2023173, 31, 6, (3417-3434), (2023).
  • Analyzing Pedestrian Fatality Risk in a Developing Country: Empirical Assessment with Insights from Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-7803, 149, 9, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share