Abstract
The ethical implications for the engineering profession of the development and deployment of automated vehicles (AVs) can be explored by analyzing the implications of AVs across three major socio-technical systems—technology, transportation systems, and policy. Mapping the ethical canons of professional engineering societies to these domains provides a lens to investigating existing ethical issues and uncovering issues that still need attention. The codes of ethics for five engineering societies direct engineers to consider, identify, mitigate, and manage how their work affects the public. AV ethics literature in the technology domain has focused mainly on crashes, AV software capabilities, and hardware. This narrow focus signifies that engineers in the technology domain can do more to understand potential impacts beyond AV crash behavior. In the transportation systems domain, among the many ethical issues affected by AVs, how engineers design and deploy surface transportation infrastructure is an example of an ethical system-level problem yet to be addressed. Lastly, the policy domain has begun addressing primary effects like protecting the public from physical harm, but other ethical aspects remain unaddressed. All three domains could benefit from more holistic system-level assessments of the ethical implications of AVs. Engineers can use their professional engineering organization ethical canons to evaluate their contribution to managing ethical issues in these AV domains and improve how automated vehicles serve and safeguard the public.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by US DOT University Transportation Center grant Award No. DTRT12GUTC11, K&L Gates Presidential Fellowship, and Argonne National Laboratory Project 7F-30155. We thank David Danks and Chris Hendrickson for helpful discussions. The authors are solely responsible for the content of this paper. This article was prepared while Samaras was affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not reflect the view of the United States government or any other organization.
References
.
Alarfaj, A. F., W. M. Griffin, and C. Samaras. 2020. “Decarbonizing US passenger vehicle transport under electrification and automation uncertainty has a travel budget.” Environ. Res. Lett. 15 (9): 0940c2.
Anderson, J. M., N. Kalra, K. D. Stanley, P. Sorensen, C. Samaras, and O. A. Oluwatola. 2016. Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Applin, S. 2017. “Autonomous vehicle ethics stock or custom?” IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 6 (3): 108–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2017.2684917.
ASCE. 2020. Code of ethics | ASCE. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASME. 2012. ASME society policy ethics. New York: ASME.
Association for Computing Machinery. 2018. “Code of ethics.” Accessed April 8, 2019. https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics.
Awad, E., S. Levine, M. Kleiman-Weiner, S. Dsouza, J. B. Tenenbaum, A. Shariff, J.-F. Bonnefon, and I. Rahwan. 2018. “Blaming humans in autonomous vehicle accidents: Shared responsibility across levels of automation.” Preprint, submitted March 19, 2018. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.07170.
Bagloee, S. A., M. Tavana, M. Asadi, and T. Oliver. 2016. “Autonomous vehicles: Challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies.” J. Mod. Transp. 24 (4): 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-016-0117-3.
Bezai, N. E., B. Medjdoub, A. Al-Habaibeh, M. L. Chalal, and F. Fadli. 2020. “Future cities and autonomous vehicles: Analysis of the barriers to full adoption.” Energy Built Environ. 2 (1): 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2020.05.002.
Birnbacher, D., and W. Birnbacher. 2017. “Fully autonomous driving: Where technology and ethics meet.” IEEE Intell. Syst. 32 (5): 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2017.3711644.
Borenstein, J., J. Herkert, and K. Miller. 2017a. “Self-driving cars: Ethical responsibilities of design engineers.” IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 36 (2): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2017.2696600.
Borenstein, J., J. R. Herkert, and K. W. Miller. 2017b. “Self-driving cars and engineering ethics: The need for a system level analysis.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 25 (2): 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0006-0.
Cellario, M. 2001. “Human-centered intelligent vehicles: Toward multimodal interface integration.” IEEE Intell. Syst. 16 (4): 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.941364.
Center for Global Policy Solutions. 2017. Stick shift: Autonomous vehicles, driving jobs, and the future of work. Washington, DC: Center for Global Policy Solutions.
Chase, N., J. Maples, and M. Schipper. 2018. Autonomous vehicles: Uncertainties and energy implications. Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration.
Csiszár, C., and A. Zarkeshev. 2017. “Demand-capacity coordination method in autonomous public transportation.” Transp. Res. Procedia 27: 784–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.109.
Data Center Frontier. 2019. For autonomous vehicles, the road ahead is paved with data. Lawrenceville, NJ: Data Center Frontier.
Davnall, R. 2019. “Solving the single-vehicle self-driving car trolley problem using risk theory and vehicle dynamics.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 26 (1): 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00102-6.
Duarte, F., and C. Ratti. 2018. “The impact of autonomous vehicles on cities: A review.” J. Urban Technol. 25 (4): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1493883.
Engineering Council. 2017. “Statement of ethical principles.” Accessed April 8, 2019. https://www.engc.org.uk/standards-guidance/guidance/statement-of-ethical-principles/.
Epting, S. 2016. “The moral dimensions of infrastructure.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 22 (2): 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9663-z.
Fagnant, D. J., and K. Kockelman. 2015. “Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 77 (Jul): 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003.
Feigon, S., C. Murphy, and American Public Transit Association. 2016. Shared mobility and the transformation of public transit. Chicago: American Public Transit Association.
Fink, P., J. Holz, and N. Guidice. 2021. “Fully autonomous vehicles for people with visual impairment: Policy, accessibility, and future directions.” ACM Trans. Accessible Comput. 14 (3): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471934.
Flipse, S. M., and S. Puylaert. 2018. “Organizing a collaborative development of technological design requirements using a constructive dialogue on value profiles: A case in automated vehicle development.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 24 (1): 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9877-3.
Freemark, Y., A. Hudson, and J. Zhao. 2019. “Are cities prepared for autonomous vehicles?” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 85 (2): 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1603760.
Gerla, M., E. K. Lee, G. Pau, and U. Lee. 2014. “Internet of vehicles: From intelligent grid to autonomous cars and vehicular clouds.” In Proc., 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things, 241–246. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Gogoll, J., and J. F. Müller. 2017. “Autonomous cars: In favor of a mandatory ethics setting.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 23 (3): 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9806-x.
González-González, E., S. Nogués, and D. Stead. 2019. “Automated vehicles and the city of tomorrow: A backcasting approach.” Cities 94 (Nov): 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.034.
Goodall, N. J. 2016. “Away from trolley problems and toward risk management.” Appl. Artif. Intell. 30 (8): 810–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2016.1229922.
Goodall, N. J. 2017. “From trolleys to risk: Models for ethical autonomous driving.” Am. J. Public Health 107 (4): 496. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303672.
Greenblatt, J. B., and S. Saxena. 2015. “Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles.” Nat. Clim. Change 5 (9): 860–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2685.
Hanna, M. J., and S. C. Kimmel. 2017. “Current US federal policy framework for self-driving vehicles: Opportunities and challenges.” Computer 50 (12): 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.4451211.
Harper, C. D., C. T. Hendrickson, S. Mangones, and C. Samaras. 2016b. “Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 72 (Nov): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003.
Harper, C. D., C. T. Hendrickson, and C. Samaras. 2016a. “Cost and benefit estimates of partially-automated vehicle collision avoidance technologies.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 95 (Oct): 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.017.
Harper, C. D., C. T. Hendrickson, and C. Samaras. 2018. “Exploring the economic, environmental, and travel implications of changes in parking choices due to driverless vehicles: An agent-based simulation approach.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 144 (4): 04018043.
Hayeri, Y. M., C. Hendrickson, and A. D. Biehler. 2015. “Potential impacts of vehicle automation on design, infrastructure and investment decisions—A state DOT perspective.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Heaslip, K., W. Louisell, and J. Collura. 2009. “A methodology to evaluate transportation resiliency for regional networks.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hevelke, A., and J. Nida-Rumelin. 2015. “Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: An ethical analysis.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 21 (3): 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5.
Hoffmann, A. L. 2018. “Data violence and how bad engineering choices can damage society.” Accessed October 21, 2019. https://medium.com/s/story/data-violence-and-how-bad-engineering-choices-can-damage-society-39e44150e1d4.
Holstein, T., G. Dodig-Crnkovic, and P. Pelliccione. 2018. “Ethical and social aspects of self-driving cars.” Preprint, submitted February 5, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04103.
Howard, A., and J. Borenstein. 2018. “The ugly truth about ourselves and our robot creations: The problem of bias and social inequity.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 24 (5): 1521–1536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9975-2.
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. 2018. “IEEE code of ethics.” Accessed September 14, 2017. https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html.
Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2017. “Canons of ethics for members.” Accessed April 8, 2019. https://www.ite.org/pub/? id=e1bb9395-2354-d714-51c8-36f82bef9364.
Kalra, N. 2017. Challenges and approaches to realizing autonomous vehicle safety. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Keeling, G. 2019. “Why trolley problems matter for the ethics of automated vehicles.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 26 (1): 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00096-1.
Khan, A., C. D. Harper, C. T. Hendrickson, and C. Samaras. 2019. “Net-societal and net-private benefits of some existing vehicle crash avoidance technologies.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 125 (Apr): 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.003.
Kockelman, K., et al. 2016. Implications of connected and automated vehicles on the safety and operations of roadway networks: A final report. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas, Austin.
Leben, D. 2017. “A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles.” Ethics Inf. Technol. 19 (2): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9419-3.
Levin, M. W., and S. D. Boyles. 2015. “Effects of autonomous vehicle ownership on trip, mode, and route choice.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2493 (1): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3141/2493-04.
Lewenstein, B. V. 2006. “What counts as a social and ethical issue in nanotechnology?” In Nanotechnology challenges, 201–216. Singapore: World Scientific.
Litman, T. 2018. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning. Victoria, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Liu, H.-Y. 2016. “Structural discrimination and autonomous vehicles: Immunity devices, trump cards and crash optimisation.” In What social robots can and should do, edited by J. Seibt, M. Norskov, and S. S. Andersen, 164–173. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Lyons, D. A. 2015. “Autonomous vehicles: A policy roadmap for law enforcement.” Ph.D. thesis, Naval Postgraduate School.
Marchant, G. E., and R. A. Lindor. 2012. The coming collision between autonomous vehicles and the liability system symposium article, 1321–1340. Santa Clara, CA: Santa Clara Law Review.
Martinson, R. 2017. “Resilience in a transportation system: A whole system approach.” In Transportation systems resilience: Preparation, recovery, and adaptation, transportation research circular. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Matthias, A. 2004. “The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata.” Ethics Inf. Technol. 6 (3): 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1.
Mersky, A. C., and C. Samaras. 2016. “Fuel economy testing of autonomous vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 65 (Apr): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.001.
Milakis, D., B. Arem, and B. Wee. 2017. “Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research.” J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 21 (4): 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351.
Mladenovic, M. N., and T. McPherson. 2016. “Engineering social justice into traffic control for self-driving vehicles?” Sci. Eng. Ethics 22 (4): 1131–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9690-9.
Montgomery, W. D., R. Mudge, E. L. Groshen, S. Helper, J. P. MacDuffie, and C. Carson. 2018. America’s workforce and the self-driving future: Realizing productivity gains and spurring economic growth. Washington, DC: Securing America’s Future Energy.
Murray, G., M. E. Chase, E. Kim, and M. McBrayer. 2012. Ridesharing as a complement to transit. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nyholm, S., and J. Smids. 2018. “Automated cars meet human drivers: Responsible human-robot coordination and the ethics of mixed traffic.” Ethics Inf. Technol. 22 (4): 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9445-9.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2015. Urban mobility system upgrade how shared self-driving cars could change city traffic.pdf. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Roe, M., and C. Toocheck. 2017. Curb appeal: Curbside management strategies for improving transit reliability. Basel, Switzerland: Sustainability.
Rouse, D. C., J. Henaghan, K. Coyner, L. Nisenson, and J. Jordan. 2018. Preparing communities for autonomous vehicles. Chicago: American Planning Association.
Ryan, M. 2020. “The future of transportation: Ethical, legal, social and economic impacts of self-driving vehicles in the Year 2025.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 26 (3): 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00130-2.
Stark, L., and A. L. Hoffmann. 2019. “Data is the new what? Popular metaphors & professional ethics in emerging data culture.” J. Cult. Anal. 4 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22148/16.036.
Stone, T., F. Santoni de Sio, and P. E. Vermaas. 2019. “Driving in the dark: Designing autonomous vehicles for reducing light pollution.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 26 (1): 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00101-7.
Thomson, J. J. 1984. “The trolley problem.” Yale LJ 94 (6): 1395. https://doi.org/10.2307/796133.
Tse, J., D. E. Schrader, D. Ghosh, T. Liao, and D. Lundie. 2015. “A bibliometric analysis of privacy and ethics in IEEE security and privacy.” Ethics Inf. Technol. 17 (2): 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9369-6.
US Department of Transportation. 2017. Automated driving systems: A vision for safety. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
US Department of Transportation. 2018. Preparing for the future of transportation: Automated vehicle 3.0. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
Vasebi, S., Y. M. Hayeri, C. Samaras, and C. Hendrickson. 2018. “Low-level automated light-duty vehicle technologies provide opportunities to reduce fuel consumption.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (24): 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118796401.
Wadud, Z., D. MacKenzie, and P. Leiby. 2016. “Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 86 (Apr): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001.
Wang, G., and K. M. Kockelman. 2018. “Three methods for anticipating and understanding uncertainty of outputs from transportation and land use models.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (49): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118801339.
W.E. Upjohn Institute, and E. L. Groshen. 2019. Is a driverless future also jobless? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.
Winkelman, Z., M. Buenaventura, J. M. Anderson, N. M. Beyene, P. Katkar, and G. C. Baumann. 2019. “When autonomous vehicles are hacked, who is liable?” Accessed November 15, 2019. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2654.html.
Zmud, J. P., and I. N. Sener. 2017. “Towards an understanding of the travel behavior impact of autonomous vehicles.” Transp. Res. Procedia 25 (Jan): 2500–2519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.281.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148 • Issue 6 • June 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 2, 2021
Accepted: Jan 5, 2022
Published online: Mar 23, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 23, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Fabio Fossa, Fabio Fossa, Who Is in Control? Autonomy, Responsibility, Explainability, Ethics of Driving Automation, 10.1007/978-3-031-22982-4_5, (95-116), (2023).