Technical Papers
Feb 25, 2022

Mode Choice between Bus and Bike-Sharing for the Last-Mile Connection to Urban Rail Transit

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148, Issue 5

Abstract

Previous studies show that the popularity of bike-sharing systems has a significant impact on public transit ridership, mainly reflected in two aspects: substitution and supplement. However, a mode choice of the users between bike-sharing and bus for the last-mile connection to urban rails has not been sufficiently studied using actual traffic sensor data. Therefore, in this study, the binomial choice behavior between bike-sharing and buses as a last-mile connection to urban rails in Beijing, China, is analyzed and modeled using the feeder subchain information of bus and bike-sharing for 1 week that is extracted from transit smart card data, cycling record data, and station location information data. We specifically focus on the moderate distance (0.5–3 km), within which distance the bike-sharing is a rival and suitable alternative to the bus. A binomial logit model is constructed to examine the mode choice between buses and shared bikes as a last-mile connection to urban rail. In addition to the general explanatory variables (i.e., travel distance, travel time, and cost), built environments such as housing density, land uses, and bike-lane conditions are also considered in our study. Results show that the walking distance from the metro station has a stronger effect on the users’ mode choice than the total subchain distance. A longer travel time increases the preference for taking the bus. We also find that users are most likely to choose the bus in the evening rush hours, followed by offpeak times and the morning rush hours. The existence of bike lanes, especially with isolation belts alongside them, increases the probability that people choose shared bikes. As bus and bike-sharing are the two most popular and economically competitive urban rail egress modes for a moderate distance in China, understanding the determinants of mode choice contributes to better planning and operational strategies for both feeder bus and bike-sharing systems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 8212010) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71771007). The authors also thank Joint Laboratory for Future Transport and Urban Computing of Amap for data support.

References

Beijing LianJia Real Estate Development Company. 2001. “Looking for an apartment on Beijing Map: price, layout, floor space etc.” Accessed March 1, 2021. https://map.lianjia.com/map/110000/ESF/.
Beijing Transport Institute. 2020. “Annual reports on Beijing traffic development.” Accessed July 1, 2020. https://www.bjtrc.org.cn/List/index/cid/7.html.
Ben-Akiva, M. E., and S. R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brakewood, C., G. S. Macfarlane, and K. Watkins. 2015. “The impact of real-time information on bus ridership in New York City.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 53 (Apr): 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.021.
Campbell, K. B., and C. Brakewood. 2017. “Sharing riders: How bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 100 (Jun): 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.017.
Cervero, R. 1995. Rail access modes and catchment areas for the BART system. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California at Berkeley.
Chakour, V., and N. Eluru. 2014. “Analyzing commuter train user behavior: A decision framework for access mode and station choice.” Transportation 41 (1): 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9509-y.
Chang, M.-S., and P.-R. Lu. 2013. “A multinomial logit model of mode and arrival time choices for planned special events.” J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 10: 710–727. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.10.710.
Chu, J., Y. Duan, X. Yang, and L. Wang. 2021. “The last mile matters: Impact of dockless bike sharing on subway housing price premium.” Manage. Sci. 67 (1): 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3550.
Daniels, R., and C. Mulley. 2013. “Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply.” J. Transp. Land Use 6 (2): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v6i2.308.
Dieleman, F. M., M. Dijst, and G. Burghouwt. 2002. “Urban form and travel behaviour: Micro-level household attributes and residential context.” Urban Stud. 39 (3): 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220112801.
Ding, C., S. Mishra, Y. Lin, and B. Xie. 2015. “Cross-nested joint model of travel mode and departure time choice for urban commuting trips: Case study in Maryland–Washington, DC region.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 141 (4): 04014036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000238.
Dissanayake, D., and T. Morikawa. 2002. “Household travel behavior in developing countries: Nested logit model of vehicle ownership, mode choice, and trip chaining.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1805 (1): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.3141/1805-06.
Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2001. “Travel and the built environment: A synthesis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1780 (1): 87–114. https://doi.org/10.3141/1780-10.
Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2010. “Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 76 (3): 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766.
Fan, A., X. Chen, and T. Wan. 2019. “How have travelers changed mode choices for first/last mile trips after the introduction of bicycle-sharing systems: An empirical study in Beijing, China.” J. Adv. Transp. 2019 (3): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5426080.
Frank, L., M. Bradley, S. Kavage, J. Chapman, and T. K. Lawton. 2008. “Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice.” Transportation 35 (1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9136-6.
Fuller, D., L. Gauvin, Y. Kestens, P. Morency, and L. Drouin. 2013. “The potential modal shift and health benefits of implementing a public bicycle share program in Montreal, Canada.” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 10 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-66.
Greene, W. H. 2018. Econometric analysis. 8th ed. London: Pearson.
Guo, Y., and S. Y. He. 2020. “Built environment effects on the integration of dockless bike-sharing and the metro.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 83 (Jun): 102335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102335.
Ker, I., and S. Ginn. 2003. “Myths and realities in walkable catchments: The case of walking and transit.” Road Transp. Res. 12 (2): 69–80.
Koh, P. P., and Y. D. Wong. 2015. “Walking and cycling as an urban transport option in Singapore.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 168 (2): 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.13.00033.
Li, X., Y. Luo, T. Wang, P. Jia, and H. Kuang. 2020. “An integrated approach for optimizing bi-modal transit networks fed by shared bikes.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 141 (Sep): 102016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102016.
Lin, T. G., J. C. Xia, T. P. Robinson, K. G. Goulias, R. L. Church, D. Olaru, J. Tapin, and R. Han. 2014. “Spatial analysis of access to and accessibility surrounding train stations: A case study of accessibility for the elderly in Perth, Western Australia.” J. Transp. Geogr. 39 (Jul): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.022.
Liu, C., E. Bardaka, R. Palakurthy, and L.-W. Tung. 2020a. “Analysis of travel characteristics and access mode choice of elderly urban rail riders in Denver, Colorado.” Travel Behav. Soc. 19 (Apr): 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.11.004.
Liu, L., X. Wang, Q. Yuan, and X. Ma. 2020b. “How can bikesharing systems benefit transit service in Beijing? A data-driven approach.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Transportation and Development 2020. 39–48. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483152.004.
Ma, T., C. Liu, and S. Erdoğan. 2015. “Bicycle sharing and transit: Does capital bikeshare affect Metrorail ridership in Washington, D.C.?” Transp. Res. Rec. 2534 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2534-01.
Ma, X., X. Zhang, X. Li, X. Wang, and X. Zhao. 2019. “Impacts of free-floating bikesharing system on public transit ridership.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 76 (Nov): 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.014.
Martin, E. W., and S. A. Shaheen. 2014. “Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: A tale of two US cities.” J. Transp. Geog. 41 (Dec): 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.026.
Meng, M., P. Koh, and Y. Wong. 2016. “Influence of socio-demography and operating streetscape on last-mile mode choice.” J. Public Transp. 19 (2): 38–54. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.19.2.3.
Mohamed, K., E. Côme, L. Oukhellou, and M. Verleysen. 2017. “Clustering smart card data for urban mobility analysis.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 18 (3): 712–728. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2600515.
National Bureau of Statistics. 2010. China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
Shaheen, S. A., S. Guzman, and H. Zhang. 2010. “Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, present, and future.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2143 (1): 159–167. https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-20.
Tang, G., S. Keshav, L. Golab, and K. Wu. 2018. “Bikeshare pool sizing for bike-and-ride multimodal transit.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19 (7): 2279–2289. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2814583.
Thrane, C. 2015. “Examining tourists’ long-distance transportation mode choices using a multinomial logit regression model.” Tourism Manage. Perspect. 15 (Jul): 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2014.10.004.
Tilahun, N., and M. Li. 2015. “Walking access to transit stations: Evaluating barriers with stated preference.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2534 (1): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.3141/2534-03.
Tilahun, N., P. V. Thakuriah, M. Li, and Y. Keita. 2016. “Transit use and the work commute: Analyzing the role of last mile issues.” J. Transp. Geogr. 54 (Jun): 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.021.
Wang, Z.-J., Y. Liu, and F. Chen. 2018. “Evaluation and improvement of the interchange from bus to metro using smart card data and GIS.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 144 (2): 05018004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000435.
Wu, L., W. Gu, W. Fan, and M. J. Cassidy. 2020. “Optimal design of transit networks fed by shared bikes.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 131 (Jan): 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.11.003.
Yan, X., J. Levine, and X. Zhao. 2019. “Integrating ridesourcing services with public transit: An evaluation of traveler responses combining revealed and stated preference data.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 105 (Aug): 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.029.
Zhang, Y., and Y. Zhang. 2018. “Associations between public transit usage and bike sharing behaviors in the United States.” Sustainability 10 (6): 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061868.
Zhang, Z., C. Qian, and Y. Bian. 2019. “Bicycle–metro integration for the ‘last mile’: Visualizing cycling in Shanghai.” Environ. Plann. A Econ. Space 51 (7): 1420–1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18816695.
Zhou, Y., M. Zhao, W. H. K. Lam, A. Chen, N. N. Sze, Y. Chen, and S. Tang. 2021. “Modeling the impact of dock-less bike-sharing system on outpatient trips.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 69 (Jun): 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102853.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 5May 2022

History

Received: Sep 16, 2021
Accepted: Dec 22, 2021
Published online: Feb 25, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 25, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang Univ., Beijing 100191, China. Email: [email protected]
Hui Kong, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Email: [email protected]
Tianliang Liu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Economics and Management, Beihang Univ., Beijing 100191, China. Email: [email protected]
Xiaolei Ma, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data and Brain Computing, Beihang Univ., Beijing 100191, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Exploring Travel Mobility in Integrated Usage of Dockless Bike-Sharing and the Metro Based on Multisource Data, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10.3390/ijgi13040108, 13, 4, (108), (2024).
  • Microcirculation Bus Routes Design and Coordinated Schedules Considering the Impact of Shared Bicycles, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-8396, 150, 10, (2024).
  • Exploring the modal integration of bike-sharing and urban rail transit: Multi-Criteria Evaluation in GIS for the city of Salvador (Bahia – Brazil), Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101182, 16, (101182), (2024).
  • What Is the Impact of a Dockless Bike-Sharing System on Urban Public Transit Ridership: A View from Travel Distances, Sustainability, 10.3390/su151410753, 15, 14, (10753), (2023).
  • What motivates the use of shared mobility systems and their integration with public transit? Evidence from a choice experiment study, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104286, 155, (104286), (2023).
  • Multi-task supply-demand prediction and reliability analysis for docked bike-sharing systems via transformer-encoder-based neural processes, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104015, 147, (104015), (2023).
  • Investigating factors affecting university students' use of subway before and after COVID-19 outbreak: A case study in Tehran, Journal of Transport Geography, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103461, 105, (103461), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share