Evaluating the Quality of High-Resolution Private Sector Data for Providing Nonfreeway Travel Times
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 12
Abstract
Travel time to a destination is a key piece of information that motorists desire. Traditionally, transportation agencies collect traffic state information with costly measurement sensors. In the last decade, private sector data, as an emerging data source, has been gradually adopted by many public agencies for performance measurement and travel time provision, mostly on freeways. Agencies have also used data from infrastructure sensors and floating cars to validate the quality of the private sector data on both freeways and arterials under different conditions. Although freeway data quality has been validated by many studies, nonfreeway travel time data have been considered unreliable, particularly when the segment is congested and high-density signals exist. In recent years, data vendors started to provide high-resolution travel time data, which are provided on much shorter segments than conventional traffic message channels (TMC). This study investigates the data quality of this new data source for providing travel times on nonfreeways. It evaluates the selected private sector data on nonfreeways by using floating car and Wi-Fi travel time data as the ground truth. The results show that the new private sector data on nonfreeways are generally acceptable for segments with low and moderate congestion. With higher congestion, the data quality is site-dependent. A neural network model is proposed to implicitly identify the error of a site and provide enhanced travel times. It is recommended that these new data should be validated for the deployment sites due to the site-dependent errors, and advanced data modeling techniques can be used to compensate for such errors.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the Ohio DOT. The authors would like to thank all project team members for collecting floating car data. The work presented in this paper remains the sole responsibility of the authors.
References
Ahsani, V., M. Amin-Naseri, S. Knickerbocker, and A. Sharma. 2018. “Quantitative analysis of probe data characteristics: Coverage, speed bias and congestion detection precision.” J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 23 (2): 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2018.1502667.
Elefteriadou, L., A. Kondyli, and B. S. George. 2014. “Comparison of methods for measuring travel time at Florida freeways and arterials.” Accessed April 12, 2021. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/research/reports/fdot-bdv32-977-02-rpt.pdf.
Espada, I., and P. Bennett. 2015. “Probe data and its application in traffic studies.” In Proc., 2015 Combined IFME World Congress and IPWEA NZ Annual Conf. North Sydney, NSW, Australia: Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia.
Haghani, A., M. Hamedi, and K. F. Sadabadi. 2009. “I-95 Corridor coalition vehicle probe project: Validation of INRIX data.” Accessed April 12, 2021. http://www.i95coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/I-95-CC-Estimation-of-Travel-Times-for-Multiple-TMC-Segments-FINAL2.pdf.
Houston TranStar. 2012. “TranStar description.” Accessed April 12, 2021. http://traffic.houstontranstar.org.
Hu, J., M. D. Fontaine, and J. Ma. 2016. “Quality of private sector travel-time data on arterials.” J. Transp. Eng. 142 (4): 04016010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000815.
INRIX. 2018. “Interface guide.” Accessed April 12, 2021. https://tetcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/I-95_VPP_II_Inteface_Guide-March_2018.pdf.
INRIX. 2020. “INRIX XD monitoring.” Accessed April 12, 2021. https://inrix.com/resources/inrix-xd-monitoring/.
Kondyli, A., B. George, and L. Elefteriadou. 2018. “Comparison of travel time measurement methods along freeway and arterial facilities.” Transp. Lett. 10 (4): 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2016.1245259.
Moonam, H. M., X. Qin, and J. Zhang. 2019. “Utilizing data mining techniques to predict expected freeway travel time from experienced travel time.” Math. Comput. Simul. 155 (Jan): 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2018.01.006.
Palacharla, P. V., and P. C. Nelson. 1999. “Application of fuzzy logic and neural networks for dynamic travel time estimation.” Int. Tran. Oper. Res. 6 (1): 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.1999.tb00148.x.
Pattara-Atikom, W., and R. Peachavanish. 2007. “Estimating road traffic congestion from cell dwell time using neural network.” In Proc., 2007 7th Int. Conf. on ITS Telecommunications, 1–6. New York: IEEE.
Southwest Research Institute. 1998. Automatic vehicle identification model deployment initiative—System design document. San Antonio, TX: TransGuide, Texas DOT, Southwest Research Institute.
Turner, S., J. Richardson, M. Fontaine, and B. Smith. 2011. Guidelines for evaluating the accuracy of travel time and speed data (No. TPF-5 (200)).” Accessed April 12, 2021. http://www.pooledfund.org/Document/Download/2543.
Turner, S. M., W. L. Eisele, R. J. Benz, and D. J. Holdener. 1998. Travel time data collection handbook. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Wang, Y., B. N. Araghi, Y. Malinovskiy, J. Corey, T. Cheng, and Pacific Northwest Transportation Consortium. 2014. “Error assessment for emerging traffic data collection devices.” Accessed 12 April 2021. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/27777.
Young, S. 2015. “I-95 Corridor Coalition vehicle probe project use of probe and Bluetooth data for arterial performance measures in the I-95 Corridor Coalition.” Accessed April 12, 2021. www.I95Coalition.org.
Zhang, X., M. Hamedi, and A. Haghani. 2015. “Arterial travel time validation and augmentation with two independent data sources.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2526 (1): 79–89. https://doi.org/10.3141/2526-09.
Zheng, F., and H. Van Zuylen. 2013. “Urban link travel time estimation based on sparse probe vehicle data.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 31 (Jun): 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.04.007.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147 • Issue 12 • December 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 23, 2020
Accepted: Jun 11, 2021
Published online: Sep 24, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 24, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Bhargava Sana, Xu Zhang, Joe Castiglione, Mei Chen, Gregory D. Erhardt, Using Probe-Based Speed Data and Interactive Maps for Long-Term and COVID-Era Congestion Monitoring in San Francisco, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981211069961, 2676, 6, (48-60), (2022).
- Guangchuan Yang, Daniel Coble, Chris Vaughan, Catherine Peele, Atefeh Morsali, George F. List, Daniel J. Findley, Waiting Time Estimation at Ferry Terminals Based on License Plate Recognition, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000722, 148, 9, (2022).