Technical Papers
Aug 10, 2021

Analysis of Intersection Site-Specific Characteristics for Type II Dilemma Zone Determination

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Dilemma zone could be an effective surrogate safety measure of a signalized intersection because its length and location are significantly correlated with right-angle and rear-end conflicts and vary from one site to another. Two popular methods, Zegeer’s method and time-temperature indicator (TTI) based method, are available in transportation literature to quantify Type II dilemma zones. The existing methods, however, have limitations to quantify the dilemma zone because the former requires extensive data collection and analysis efforts, and the latter is solely dependent on a single variable (i.e., speed). The objective of the present study is to develop effective methods of quantifying Type II dilemma zones using important site-specific characteristics of signalized intersections (e.g., the operating speed, the approach grade, and the amount of truck traffic). The present study also seeks to address the methodological shortcoming of the TTI-based method. Driver behavior at 46 high-speed signalized intersection approaches where the posted speed limit is 80.47 km/h (50  mi/h) or higher was analyzed to see if there is a relationship between the dilemma zone and the intersection site-specific characteristics. The results show that the approach grade, the operating speed, and the amount of truck traffic at the signalized intersection have strong correlations with the dilemma zone. It was also found that the dilemma zone length is longer, and its location is farther from the stop bar if the approach grade is the steeper (toward negative values), if the operating speed is higher, or if more truck traffic operates at the intersection approach. The developed models were compared with the TTI-based method, which uses 2.5 and 5.5  s of the travel time to the intersection stop bar (TTI) to determine the dilemma zone start and endpoints. The analysis showed that the developed site-specific dilemma zone models outperform the TTI-based method and well fit the observed data with pseudo R20.9 and p value 0.05.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows. Study conception and design: Min-Wook Kang; funding acquisition and administration: Min-Wook Kang; framework development: Min-Wook Kang and Moynur Rahman; draft manuscript preparation: Moynur Rahman and Min-Wook Kang; and data collection and analysis: Moynur Rahman and Min-Wook Kang. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was partially supported by the Alabama Department of Transportation (Grant No. 930-937).

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions as well as the facts and the accuracy of data presented in this paper are solely based on the views and opinions of the authors. This paper does not necessarily reflect the purpose and policies of the Alabama Department of Transportation.

References

ALDOT (Alabama DOT). 2017. “2017 Alabama statewide freight plan. Freight network.” Accessed June 6, 2020. https://www.dot.state.al.us/oeweb/freightPlanning.html.
Amer, A., H. Rakha, and I. El-Shawarby. 2012. “Novel stochastic procedure for designing yellow intervals at signalized intersections.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (6): 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000381.
Bar-Gera, H., O. Musicant, E. Schechtman, and T. Ze’evi. 2016. “Quantifying the yellow signal driver behavior based on naturalistic data from digital enforcement cameras.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 96 (Nov): 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.040.
Bonneson, J., D. Middleton, K. Zimmerman, H. Charara, and M. Abbas. 2002. Intelligent detection-control system for rural signalized intersections. Washington, DC: FHWA, USDOT.
Boyle, L. N., S. Chrysler, and M. Karlaftis. 2016. “Analytical methods for quantifying driver behavior in a dilemma zone prologue.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 96 (Nov): 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.025.
Chang, M. S., C. J. Messer, and A. J. Santiago. 1985. “Timing traffic signal change intervals based on driver behavior.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1027: 20–30.
Elhenawy, M., A. Jahangiri, H. A. Rakha, and I. El-Shawarby. 2015. “Modeling driver stop/run behavior at the onset of a yellow indication considering driver run tendency and roadway surface conditions.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 83 (Oct): 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.016.
El-Shawarby, I., H. Rakha, A. Amer, and C. McGhee. 2011. “Impact of driver and surrounding traffic on vehicle deceleration behavior at onset of yellow indication.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2248 (1): 10–20. https://doi.org/10.3141/2248-02.
Gates, T. J., H. McGee, K. Moriarty, and H. U. Maria. 2012. “Comprehensive evaluation of driver behavior to establish parameters for timing of yellow change and red clearance intervals.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2298 (1): 9–21. https://doi.org/10.3141/2298-02.
Gates, T. J., and D. A. Noyce. 2010. “Dilemma zone driver behavior as a function of vehicle type, time of day, and platooning.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2149 (1): 84–93. https://doi.org/10.3141/2149-10.
Gates, T. J., D. A. Noyce, L. Laracuente, and E. V. Nordheim. 2007. “Analysis of driver behavior in dilemma zones at signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2030 (1): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.3141/2030-05.
Gazis, D., R. Herman, and A. Maradudin. 1960. “The problem of the amber signal light in traffic flow.” Oper. Res. 8 (1): 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.8.1.112.
Hurwitz, D. S., M. A. Knodler, and B. Nyquist. 2011. “Evaluation of driver behavior in type II dilemma zones at high-speed signalized intersections.” J. Transp. Eng. 137 (4): 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000219.
Hurwitz, D. S., H. Wang, M. A. Knodler, D. Ni, and D. Moore. 2012. “Fuzzy sets to describe driver behavior in the dilemma zone of high-speed signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Part F 15 (2): 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.11.003.
Jahangiri, A., H. Rakha, and T. A. Dingus. 2016. “Red-light running violation prediction using observational and simulator data.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 96 (Nov): 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.009.
James, G., D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2017. An introduction to statistical learning. 8th ed. Berlin: Springer.
Kang, M.-W., M. Rahman, and J. Lee. 2020. “Determination and utilization of dilemma zone length and location for safety assessment of rural high-speed signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (4): 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120911929.
Köll, H., M. Bader, and K. W. Axhausen. 2004. “Driver behaviour during flashing green before amber: A comparative study.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 36 (2): 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00005-8.
Liu, Y., G. L. Chang, R. Tao, T. Hicks, and E. Tabacek. 2007. “Empirical observations of dynamic dilemma zones at signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2035 (1): 122–133. https://doi.org/10.3141/2035-14.
Lu, G., Y. Wang, X. Wu, and H. X. Liu. 2015. “Analysis of yellow-light running at signalized intersections using high-resolution traffic data.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 73 (Mar): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.001.
Machiani, S. G., and M. Abbas. 2016. “Safety surrogate histograms (SSH): A novel real-time safety assessment of dilemma zone related conflicts at signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 96 (Nov): 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.024.
Mahalel, D., D. Zaidel, and T. Klein. 1985. “Driver’s decision process on termination of the green light.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 17 (5): 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(85)90091-0.
McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in economics. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
McGee, H., K. Moriarty, K. Eccles, M. Liu, T. Gates, and R. Retting. 2012. NCHRP report 731: Guidelines for timing yellow and all-red intervals at signalized intersections. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Nagelkerke, N. 1991. “A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination.” Biometrika 78 (3): 691–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691.
Papaioannou, P. 2007. “Driver behavior, dilemma zone and safety effects at urban signalized intersections in Greece.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 39 (1): 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.014.
Parsonson, P. S. 1978. “Signalization of high-speed, isolated intersections.” Transp. Res. Rec. 681: 34–42.
Parsonson, P. S. 1992. NCHRP synthesis of highway practice 172: Signal timing improvement practices. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Pathivada, B. K., and V. Perumal. 2017. “Modeling driver behavior in dilemma zone under mixed traffic conditions.” Transp. Res. Procedia 27 (Sep): 961–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.120.
Pawar, D. S., V. Kumar, N. Singh, and G. R. Patil. 2016. “Analysis of dilemma zone for pedestrians at high-speed uncontrolled midblock crossing.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 70 (Sep): 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.04.012.
Pawar, D. S., D. Pathak, and G. R. Patil. 2020. “Modeling dynamic distribution of dilemma zone at signalized intersections for developing world traffic.” J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 2020 (Nov): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2020.1852464.
Pugh, N., and H. Park. 2018. “Prediction of red-light running using an artificial neural network.” In Proc., SoutheastCon 2018, 1–4. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2018.8479222.
Savolainen, P. T., A. Sharma, and T. J. Gates. 2016. “Driver decision-making in the dilemma zone—Examining the influences of clearance intervals, enforcement cameras and the provision of advance warning through a panel data random parameters probit model.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 96 (Nov): 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.020.
Schrock, E. M., and H. L. Lefevre. 2020. “Understanding regression analyses.” In The good and the bad news about quality. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003065937-27.
Sharma, A., D. Bullock, and S. Peeta. 2011. “Estimating dilemma zone hazard function at high speed isolated intersection.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 19 (3): 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.05.002.
Sharma, A., D. M. Bullock, and S. Peeta. 2007. “Recasting dilemma zone design as a marginal cost-benefit problem.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2035 (1): 88–96. https://doi.org/10.3141/2035-10.
Sheffi, Y., and H. Mahmassani. 1981. “A model of driver behavior at high speed signalized intersections.” Transp. Sci. 15 (1): 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.15.1.50.
van Haperen, W., A. Pirdavani, T. Brijs, and T. Bellemans. 2016. “Evaluating traffic safety and performance effects of countdown timers on signalized intersections: A driving simulator study.” Adv. Transp. Stud. 1: 7–22.
Wang, Y., Y. Li, H. Cao, M. Xiong, Y. Y. Shugart, and L. Jin. 2015. “Efficient test for nonlinear dependence of two continuous variables.” Supplement, BMC Bioinf. 16 (S12): S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S12-S1.
Zegeer, C. V., and R. C. Deen. 1978. “Green extension system at high-speed intersection.” Inst. Transp. Eng. 48 (11): 19–24.
Zhang, Y., C. Fu, and L. Hu. 2014. “Yellow light dilemma zone researches: A review.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 1 (5): 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-7564(15)30280-4.
Zimmerman, K., and J. A. Bonneson. 2004. “Intersection safety at high-speed signalized intersections: Number of vehicles in dilemma zone as potential measure.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1897 (1): 126–133. https://doi.org/10.3141/1897-16.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Nov 12, 2020
Accepted: May 13, 2021
Published online: Aug 10, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 10, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Moynur Rahman
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Coastal, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Coastal, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4384-7899. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Dilemma Zone: A Comprehensive Study of Influential Factors and Behavior Analysis, 2024 Forum for Innovative Sustainable Transportation Systems (FISTS), 10.1109/FISTS60717.2024.10485546, (1-8), (2024).
  • Safety Evaluation of the Combined Effect of Offset Left-Turn Lanes and Flashing-Yellow-Arrow Signals at Signalized Intersections on Multilane Divided Highways in Alabama Using the Empirical Bayes Method, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981231213076, (2023).
  • Dynamic dilemma zone protection system for high-speed signalized intersections: A comprehensive safety -operational assessment, Transportation Engineering, 10.1016/j.treng.2023.100174, 12, (100174), (2023).
  • Machine Learning Based Automated Left-Turn Vehicle Counts With Conventional Presence Mode Long-Loop Detectors: Alabama Case Studies, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981221090519, 2676, 10, (570-587), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share