Average Travel Time, Planning Time Index, and Buffer Time Index Thresholds for Freeway Weaving Sections, Merging Areas, and Diverging Areas
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 9
Abstract
Efforts were initiated through the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) to quantify level of service (LOS) based on travel time and travel time reliability. To contribute to this goal, this study adopted a microscopic simulation-based method and researched the applicability of average travel time (ATT), planning time index (PTI), and buffer time index (BTI) to quantify freeway weaving section, merging area, and diverging area operational performance by the posted speed limit and number of lanes. A calibrated microscopic traffic simulation model was developed and validated using existing conditions data and then modified to generate density and travel time as outputs for various hypothetical analytical scenarios. Each simulation scenario included weaving sections, merging areas, and diverging areas with different posted speed limits, number of lanes, and traffic volumes. The ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi), PTI, and BTI were computed and compared with the density to examine the relationships and identify thresholds by the posted speed limit and number of lanes. The ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) thresholds increase from LOS A through LOS F, whereas the PTI and BTI thresholds increase from LOS A through LOS D or LOS E and decrease thereafter. The ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) thresholds increase as the posted speed limit decreases or the number of lanes decreases. However, the PTI and BTI thresholds could decrease as the posted speed limit decreases. The trends are fairly consistent for weaving sections, merging areas, and diverging areas. The differences in thresholds for merging and diverging areas, merging areas, and diverging areas indicate that separate thresholds are needed for merging areas and diverging areas, unlike what is currently provided in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Caution must be exercised when applying PTI and BTI thresholds for very uncongested or congested conditions. It is, therefore, recommended to categorize the PTI and BTI thresholds as highly reliable, moderately reliable, and unreliable, unlike the standard six ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) or density LOS A through F categories. Alternatively, they could be used in conjunction with ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) or density thresholds to assess congestion or reliability-related affects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this research are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the staff of the Florida DOT for their help with some data required for this research.
References
Bell, M., and Y. Iida. 2003. “The network reliability of transport.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
CSI (Cambridge Systematics, Inc). 2005. “Traffic congestion and reliability: Trends and advanced strategies for congestion mitigation.” Accessed May 31, 2014. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/congestion_report/.
Dowling, R., A. Skabardonis, and V. Alexiadis. 2004. “Traffic analysis toolbox volume III: Guidelines for applying traffic microsimulation software.” Accessed May 31, 2014. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysistools/tat_vol3/vol3_guidelines.pdf.
Dowling, R. G., K. L. Parks, B. Nevers, J. Josselyn, and S. Gayle. 2015. “Incorporating travel-time reliability into the congestion management process: A primer.” Accessed September 3, 2017. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop14034/fhwahop14034.pdf.
Imran, M. S. 2015. “Modeling freeway level-of-service based on travel time and travel time reliability.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Kittelson, W., and M. Vandehey. 2013. “Incorporation of travel time reliability into the HCM.” Accessed May 31, 2014. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2prepubL08report.pdf.
Kodupuganti, S. R., and S. S. Pulugurtha. 2019. “Link-level travel time measures-based level of service thresholds by the posted speed limit.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (6): 04017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001288.
Lomax, T., D. Schrank, S. Turner, and R. Margiotta. 2003. Selecting travel reliability measures. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univ.
Martchouk, M., F. L. Mannering, and D. Bullock. 2011. “Analysis of freeway travel time variability using Bluetooth detection.” J. Transp. Eng. 137 (4): 697–704. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000253.
Martchouk, M., F. L. Mannering, and L. Singh. 2010. Travel time reliability in Indiana. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Nicholson, A., J.-D. Schmocker, M. G. H. Bell, and Y. Iida. 2003. Assessing transport reliability: Malevolence and user knowledge, 1–22. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
PTV Group. 2014. “PTV Vissim.” Accessed May 31, 2014. https://www.ptvgroup.com/en/solutions/products/ptv-vissim/.
Pulugurtha, S. S., and M. S. Imran. 2017. “Modeling basic freeway section level-of-service based on travel time and reliability.” Case Stud. Transp. Policy J. 8 (1): 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2017.08.002.
Pulugurtha, S. S., P. Penmetsa, and V. R. Duddu. 2021. “Travel time reliability value and thresholds in North Carolina.” Adv. Transp. Stud. Int. J. 53 (Apr): 103–114.
Susilawati, S., M. Taylor, and S. Somenahalli. 2010. “Travel time reliability measurement for selected corridors in the Adelaide metropolitan area.” J. Eastern Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 8 (86): 86–102. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.8.86.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2010. Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC: TRB.
TRI (Transportation Research Institute). 2008. “Analysis of freeway weaving sections.” Accessed May 31, 2014. https://hcm2010.org/system/datas/69/original/NCHRP%203-75%20Final%20Report.pdf.
Tu, H., T. Dijker, and H. van Zuylen. 2006. “Travel time variability of freeway weaving sections.” IFAC Proc. Volumes 39 (12): 615–620.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 11, 2020
Accepted: Mar 4, 2021
Published online: Jul 13, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.