Modeling Violation Behavior at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Using a Driver Anxiety Surrogate Measure
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 6
Abstract
When responding to changes in the status of traffic controls, drivers may experience uncertainties caused by incomplete and inaccurate information. These uncertainties may result in driver anxiety during the decision-making process and lead to poor decisions. It is hypothesized that a better understanding of the decision-making process, and the associated gate violation behavior at highway-rail grade crossings (HRGCs), will lead to effective gate violation countermeasures and, ultimately, safer HRGCs. This paper examines the relationship between driver anxiety and the characteristics of inappropriate decisions that result in gate violations. Field data were collected at a gated HRGC test bed in Lincoln, Nebraska. A total of 372 vehicles were studied which included 116 first-to-stop and 256 last-to-proceed vehicles, with 76 proceeding vehicles identified as gate violations. A fuzzy-based, degree of anxiety metric is adopted as a surrogate measure of driver anxiety in the decision-making process. The results show that HRGC gate violations were linearly related to the anxiety metric values. In other words, all things being equal, as the anxiety value of the metric increased so did the probability of a violation. The maximum anxiety was felt when drivers were approximately 5 s from the stop line at the onset of the HRGC’s flashing lights. The results provide guidance for applying ancillary or advanced technologies for increasing HRGC safety, such as where to install a roadside prepare-to-stop system, or when to issue an in-vehicle warning in the context of automated driving systems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the City of Lincoln for assisting with the data collection. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the DOT. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented herein and are not necessarily representative of the State of Nebraska, the City of Lincoln, or the DOT.
References
Aycin, M. F., and R. F. Benekohal. 2002. Performance evaluation of the pilot study of advisory on-board vehicle warning systems at railroad grade crossings.. Champaign, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Biswas, S., and I. Ghosh. 2018. “Modeling of the drivers’ decision-making behavior during yellow phase.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22 (11): 4602–4614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0666-6.
Carlson, P. J., and K. Fitzpatrick. 1999. “Violations at gated highway-railroad grade crossings.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1692 (1): 66–73. https://doi.org/10.3141/1692-08.
Carroll, A. A., and J. D. Warren. 2002. “Photo enforcement at highway–rail grade crossings in the United States: July 2000–July 2001.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1801: 46–53.
Chai, C., X. Wang, and Y. D. Wong. 2018. “Fuzzy logic based multi-dimensional driving decision-making model involving driving styles.” In Proc., 97th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting (No. 18-03668). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Chang, M. S., C. J. Messer, and A. J. Santiago. 1985. “Timing traffic signal change intervals based on driver behavior.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1027 (1): 20–30.
Chen, Y., and L. R. Rilett. 2017. “Train data collection and arrival time prediction system for highway–rail grade crossings.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2608 (1): 36–45. https://doi.org/10.3141/2608-05.
Coleman, F., III, and O. J. Moon. 1996. “Design of gate delay and gate interval time for four-quadrant gate system at railroad-highway grade crossings.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1553 (1): 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196155300118.
Davey, J., A. Wallance, N. Stenson, and J. Freeman. 2008. “The experiences and perceptions of heavy vehicle drivers and train drivers of dangers at railway level crossings.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 40: 1217–1222.
Deborja, D. 2013. “The compilation state laws and regulations affecting highway-rail grade crossing (digital edition).” Accessed June 10, 2020. https://www.fra.dot.gov/StateLaws.
Easa, S. M. 1993. “Reliability-based design of intergreen interval at traffic signals.” J. Transp. Eng. 119 (2): 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:2(255).
Elmitiny, N., X. Yan, E. Radwan, C. Russo, and D. Nashar. 2010. “Classification analysis of driver’s stop/go decision and red-light running violation.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 42 (1): 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.007.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2009. Manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways. Washington, DC: DOT.
FRAOSA (Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Analysis). 2015. “FRA safety data.” Accessed June 10, 2020. http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/Default.aspx.
Gates, T. J., and D. A. Noyce. 2010. “Dilemma zone driver behavior as a function of vehicle type, time of day, and platooning.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2149 (1): 84–93. https://doi.org/10.3141/2149-10.
Gates, T. J., D. A. Noyce, L. Laracuente, and E. V. Nordheim. 2007. “Analysis of driver behavior in dilemma zones at signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2030 (1): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.3141/2030-05.
Gazis, D., R. Herman, and A. Maradudin. 1960. “The problem of the amber signal light in traffic flow.” Oper. Res. 8 (1): 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.8.1.112.
Gettman, D., and L. Head. 2003. “Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1840 (1): 104–115. https://doi.org/10.3141/1840-12.
Gilleran, B. F. 2006. “Use of pre-signals in advance of a highway-rail grade crossing: A specialized tool with specific applications.” ITE J. 76 (5): 22–25.
Hurwitz, D. S., H. Wang, M. A. Knodler Jr., D. Ni, and D. Moore. 2012. “Fuzzy sets to describe driver behavior in the dilemma zone of high-speed signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 15 (2): 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.11.003.
ITE (Institute of Traffic Engineers). 1999. Traffic engineering handbook. Washington, DC: ITE.
Kikuchi, S., and P. Chakroborty. 2006. “Place of possibility theory in transportation analysis.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 40 (8): 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2005.09.001.
Kikuchi, S., V. Perincherry, P. Chakroborty, and H. Takahashi. 1992. “Modeling of driver anxiety during signal change intervals.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1399 (1): 27–35.
Kikuchi, S., and M. Pursula. 1998. “Treatment of uncertainty in study of transportation: Fuzzy set theory and evidence theory.” J. Transp. Eng. 124 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:1(1).
Kikuchi, S., and J. R. Riegner. 1992. “Methodology to analyze driver decision environment during signal change intervals: Application of fuzzy set theory.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1368 (Aug): 49–57.
Koonce, P., and L. Rodegerdts. 2008. Traffic signal timing manual. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Li, P., M. Abbas, and R. Pasupathy. 2015. “A stochastic dilemma zone protection algorithm based on the vehicles’ trajectories.” J. Intell. Transp. Sys. 19 (2): 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2014.977043.
Liu, C., R. Herman, and D. C. Gazis. 1996. “A review of the yellow interval dilemma.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 30 (5): 333–348.
Liu, J., B. Bartnik, S. H. Richards, and A. J. Khattak. 2016. “Driver behavior at highway-rail grade crossings with passive traffic controls: A driving simulator study.” Supplement, J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 8 (S1): 37–55.
Liu, Y., and U. Ozguner. 2007. “Human driver model and driver decision making for intersection driving.” In Proc., 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., 642–647. New York: IEEE.
McGee, H. W. 2003. “Making intersections safer: A toolbox of engineering countermeasures to reduce red-light running: An informational report.” Accessed June 15, 2020. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/conventional/signalized/rlr/rlr_toolbox/rlrbook.pdf.
McLeod, R. W., G. H. Walker, and N. Moray. 2005. “Analyzing and modelling train driver performance.” Appl. Ergon. 36 (6): 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.05.006.
Millegan, H., X. Yan, S. Richards, and L. Han. 2009. “Evaluation of effectiveness of stop-sign treatment at highway-railroad grade crossings.” J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 1 (1): 46–60.
Moon, Y. J., and F. Coleman. 2003. “Highway-rail quad gate operation time by system simulation of dynamic dilemma zone.” J. Transp. Eng. 129 (3): 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:3(253).
Mykich, K., and Y. Burov. 2016. “Uncertainty in situational awareness systems.” In Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Modern Problems of Radio Engineering, Telecommunications and Computer Science (TCSET), 729–732. New York: IEEE.
Ogden, B. D., and C. Cooper. 2019. Highway-rail crossing handbook. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Federal Railroad Administration.
Papaioannou, P. 2007. “Driver behaviour, dilemma zone and safety effects at urban signalized intersections in Greece.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 39 (1): 147–158.
Parsonson, P. S., R. W. Roseveare, and J. M. Thomas. 1974. “Small-area detection at intersection approaches.” J. Transp. Eng. 44 (5): 8–17.
Peesapati, L. N., M. Hunter, M. Rodgers, and A. Guin. 2011. “A profiling based approach to safety surrogate data collection.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Road Safety and Simulation. Indianapolis: Indiana Dept. of Transportation. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/2011/RSS/1/Peesapati,L.pdf.
Rakha, H., I. El-Shawarby, and J. R. Setti. 2007. “Characterizing driver behavior on signalized intersection approaches at the onset of a yellow-phase trigger.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 8 (4): 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2007.908146.
Teodorović, D. 1999. “Fuzzy logic systems for transportation engineering: The state of the art.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 33 (5): 337–364.
Urbanik, T., and P. Koonce. 2007. “The dilemma with dilemma zones.” In Proc., ITE District 6th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: ITE. http://www.oregonite.org/2007D6/paper_review/A4_Urbanik_Paper.pdf.
Wang, X., J. Li, C. Zhang, and T. Z. Qiu. 2019. “Active warning system for highway-rail grade crossings using connected vehicle technologies.” J. Adv. Transp. 2019: 3219387.
Wang, X., J. Wang, J. Zhang, and X. Ban. 2015. “Driver’s behavior and decision-making optimization model in mixed traffic environment.” Adv. Mechan. Eng. 7 (2): 1–23.
Yager, R. R. 1982. “Measuring tranquility and anxiety in decision making: An application of fuzzy sets.” Int. J. General Syt. 8 (3): 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081078208547443.
Yager, R. R., and S. Kikuchi. 2004. “On the role of anxiety in decisions under possibilistic uncertainty.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) 34 (2): 1224–1234. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2003.822280.
Yeh, M., and J. Multer. 2008. Driver behavior at highway-railroad grade crossings: A literature review from 1990-2006. Washington, DC: Federal Railroad Administration.
Yeh, M., J. Multer, and T. Raslear. 2016. “An examination of the impact of five grade-crossing safety factors on driver decision making.” Supplement, J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 8 (S1): 19–36.
Zhao, L., and L. R. Rilett. 2017. “Dynamic model of driver approaching behaviors at highway-rail grade crossings.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting (No. 17-05771). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Zimmerman, K. 2007. “Additional dilemma zone protection for trucks at high-speed signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2009 (1): 82–88. https://doi.org/10.3141/2009-11.
Zimmerman, K., and J. A. Bonneson. 2004. “Intersection safety at high-speed signalized intersections: Number of vehicles in dilemma zone as potential measure.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1897 (1): 126–133. https://doi.org/10.3141/1897-16.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147 • Issue 6 • June 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 25, 2020
Accepted: Jan 8, 2021
Published online: Mar 24, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 24, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.