Technical Papers
Jan 21, 2021

Optimizing Transit Equity and Accessibility of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, by Integrating Transit Gap Index, a General Transit Feed Specification Data-Relevant Performance Metric

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

Public transit is a critical component of transportation planning. One important task is to optimize the public transit service for people by improving current service or having new investments. Under such circumstances, the main objective of this study is to develop optimization models for improving transit equity and accessibility for people by integrating the transit gap index (TGI), a performance metric using the General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) data. TGI was developed by considering demographic features, as well as spatial and temporal transit service characteristics. Two models were built with the intention to optimize the transit equity by mitigating the transit deficiency (i.e., TGI). Two different conditions were considered while developing both models: (1) maximizing the level of transit services under the constraint of a limited budget that will be invested in the new constructions of public transit stops; and (2) minimizing the total cost for constructing new public transit stops with constraints on certain improvements of transit services for a certain amount of block groups. Finally, a case study in the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, was conducted, and comprehensive numerical results and analyses based on the proposed models are provided.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to express their deepest gratitude to the financial support by the United States Department of Transportation, University Transportation Center through the Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education (CAMMSE) at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (Grant No. 69A3551747133).

References

Anderson, K., S. D. Blanchard, D. Cheah, and D. Levitt. 2017. “Incorporating equity and resiliency in municipal transportation planning: Case study of mobility hubs in Oakland, California.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2653 (1): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.3141/2653-08.
Antrim, A., and S. J. Barbeau. 2013. “The many uses of GTFS data—Opening the door to transit and multimodal applications.” In Proc., 23rd Annual Meeting and Expo ITS America, 4. Tampa, FL: Univ. of South Florida.
Bertolaccini, K., and N. E. Lownes. 2014. “Effects of scale and boundary selection in assessing equity of transit supply distribution.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2350 (1): 58–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/2350-07.
CATA (Capital Area Transit Authority). 2011. Michigan/Grand river avenue transportation study. Lansing, MI: CATA.
Catala, M., S. Dowling, and D. Hayward. 2011. Expanding the Google transit feed specification to support operations and planning. Tallahassee, FL: Florida DOT.
Charlotte City Council. 2018. “FY 2018 proposed budget.” Accessed December 18, 2018. https://charlottenc.gov/newsroom/Documents/PrelimSOP_v9FINALFORWEBSITE.pdf.
Chen, P. W., and Y. M. Nie. 2017. “Analysis of an idealized system of demand adaptive paired-line hybrid transit.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 102: 38–54.
City of Charlotte. n.d. “Charlotte city council districts.” Accessed December 18, 2018. https://clt-charlotte.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/dc81ea7a87a440f282776f79fa7e1485_0.
Coffey, C., R. Nair, F. Pinelli, A. Pozdnoukhov, and F. Calabrese. 2012. Missed connections: Quantifying and optimizing multi-modal interconnectivity in cities. In Proc., 5th ACM SIGSPATIAL Int. Workshop on Computational Transportation Science, 26–32. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Daniels, R., and C. Mulley. 2013. “Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply.” J. Transport Land Use 6 (2): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v6i2.308.
El-Geneidy, A., M. Grimsrud, R. Wasfi, P. Tétreault, and J. Surprenant-Legault. 2014. “New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: Identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas.” Transportation 41 (1): 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9508-z.
Fourer, R., D. M. Gay, and B. W. Kernighan. 2003. AMPL: A modeling language for mathematical programming. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
Jiang, Y., P. C. Zegras, and S. Mehndiratta. 2012. “Walk the line: Station context, corridor type and bus rapid transit walk access in Jinan, China.” J. Transport Geogr. 20 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.09.007.
Jiao, J., and M. Dillivan. 2013. “Transit deserts: The gap between demand and supply.” J. Public Transp. 16 (3): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.16.3.2.
Jiao, J., and A. Nichols. 2015. Identifying transit deserts in Texas cities: The gap between supply and demand. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas.
Karner, A. 2016. “Planning for transportation equity in small regions: Towards meaningful performance assessment.” Transport Policy 52 (Nov): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.004.
Li, Y., and W. D. Fan. 2020. “Modeling and evaluating public transit equity and accessibility by integrating general transit feed specification data: Case study of the City of Charlotte.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A. Syst. 146 (10): 04020112. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000426.
Mamun, S. A., N. E. Lownes, J. P. Osleeb, and K. Bertolaccini. 2013. “A method to define public transit opportunity space.” J. Transport Geogr. 28 (Apr): 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.007.
NC OneMap. n.d. “Parcel boundaries and standard fields, integrated cadastral data exchange, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.” Accessed December 18, 2018. https://dit-cgia-gis-data.s3.amazonaws.com/NCOM-data/parcels/mecklenburg_parcels.zip.
NCDOT (North Carolina DOT). n.d. “Statewide system & non-system road routes.” Accessed December 18, 2018. https://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/gisdot/DistDOTData/NCRoutes_SHP.zip.
Oh, J. S., C. S. Smith, R. Qatra, and M. Al-Akash. 2017. Estimating and enhancing public transit accessibility for people with mobility limitations. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan Univ.
O’Sullivan, S., and J. Morrall. 1996. “Walking distances to and from light-rail transit stations.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1538 (1): 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196153800103.
Porter, G. 2014. “Transport services and their impact on poverty and growth in rural Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of recent research and future research needs.” Transport Rev. 34 (1): 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.865148.
Rodnyansky, S. 2018. “Do it yourself: Obtaining updated transit stop and route shapefiles in urban and nonurban areas.” Cityscape 20 (1): 205–214.
Schmitt A. 2018. “Why we need a bus shelter at every stop.” Accessed December 18, 2018. https://usa.streetsblog.org/2018/10/01/opinion-we-should-put-a-bus-shelter-at-every-stop-in-america/.
Schweiger, C. L. 2015. Open data: Challenges and opportunities for transit agencies. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Steiss, T. 2006. Calculating/analyzing transit dependent populations using 2000 census data and GIS. Census transport. Census transportation planning package 2000 status report. Washington, DC: USDOT.
TRANSITLAND. n.d. “GTFS data of Charlotte area transit system.” Accessed December 18, 2018. https://github.com/transitland/gtfs-archives-not-hosted-elsewhere/blob/master/charlotte-cats.zip.
US Census Bureau. 2011. “American community survey Puerto Rico community survey 2009 subject definitions.” Accessed December 18, 2017. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/tech_docs/subject_definitions/2016_ACSSubjectDefinitions.pdf.
Wei, R., A. Golub, L. Wang, and T. Cova. 2018. Evaluating and enhancing public transit systems for operational efficiency, service quality and access equity. Portland, OR: Transportation Research and Education Center.
Wong, J. 2013. “Leveraging the general transit feed specification for efficient transit analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2338 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.3141/2338-02.
Zhao, J., and W. Deng. 2013. “Relationship of walk access distance to rapid rail transit stations with personal characteristics and station context.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 139 (4): 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000155.
Zhong, Q., A. Karner, M. Kuby, and A. Golub. 2017. “A multiobjective optimization model for locating affordable housing investments while maximizing accessibility to jobs by public transportation.” Environ. Plann. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 46 (3): 490–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317719708.
Zygo, A. 2017. “Measuring and improving seniors’ access to medical facilities.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147Issue 4April 2021

History

Received: Apr 3, 2020
Accepted: Nov 6, 2020
Published online: Jan 21, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 21, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Assistant, USDOT Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education, Charlotte, NC 28223; Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5358-7835. Email: [email protected]
P.E.
Director, USDOT Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education, Charlotte, NC 28223; Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9815-710X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share