Algorithm to Estimate the Lateral Position of Wheel-Rail Contact and Corresponding Rail Profile Radius
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 3
Abstract
This article develops and validates an algorithm to estimate the lateral position of wheel-rail contact and the corresponding rail profile radius. The lateral contact position and contact radius are two novel rail profile performance measures that enable more refined characterization of the rail profile and its influence on rail wear and vehicle dynamics. Leveraging recent advancements in rail profile monitoring techniques, the algorithm contributes to rail maintenance research and practice by developing new measures of performance based solely on commonly available rail profile data. The algorithm developed in this article is an automated process that estimates the lateral position of wheel-rail contact and the corresponding rail profile radius along a rail segment. It uses measured rail profile data as an input and applies rigid contact theory to model contact between a linear wheel profile and the rail profile. The lateral contact position and contact radius are calculated using computer programming that provides graphical and numerical results on a profile-by-profile basis as well as summary statistics for each rail segment. This methodology produces expected results when subjected to validation tests. The validation process analyzes the rationality of algorithmic output against a series of expected results using rail profile data from selected tangent segments of a closed-loop captive-fleet North American rail transit property. The algorithm output does not significantly deviate from any of the expected results, and as such, the algorithm is considered validated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with consent from all relevant parties. These include
•
algorithm codes, and
•
rail profile data.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial contributions of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Advanced Rail Management (Canada) Inc.
References
Abadpour, A. 2007. Railroad profile: Civil engineering. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Univ. of Manitoba.
Bosso, N., M. Spiryagin, A. Gugliotta, and A. Somà. 2013. “Review of wheel-rail contact models.” In Mechatronic modeling of real-time wheel-rail contact, 5–19. Berlin: Springer.
Bosso, N., and N. Zampieri. 2019. “Numerical stability of co-simulation approaches to evaluate wheel profile evolution due to wear.” Int. J. Rail Transp. 8 (2): 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2019.1672588.
Cannon, D. F., K. Edel, S. L. Grassie, and K. Sawley. 2003. “Rail defects: An overview.” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 26 (10): 865–886. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00693.x.
Chiacchiari, L., and G. Loprencipe. 2015. “Measurement methods and analysis tools for rail irregularities: A case study for urban tram track.” J. Mod. Transp. 23 (2): 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-015-0070-6.
Contact Patch. 2012. “R.1605: The steel rail.” Accessed July 23, 2020. https://the-contact-patch.com/book/rail/r1605-the-steel-rail.
Grassie, S. L. 2005. “Rail corrugation: Advances in measurement, understanding and treatment.” Wear 258 (7–8): 1224–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.066.
Grassie, S. L. 2009. “Rail corrugation: Characteristics, causes, and treatments.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 223 (6): 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT264.
Hornaday, J. 2010. “A preliminary correlation of rails’ gauge and vertical wear variation in top-of-rail peak position in a short Caltrain tangent track section.” Accessed February 24, 2020. http://www.caltrain.com/assets/_engineering/engineering-standards-2/criteria.
Iwnicki, S., S. Björklund, and R. Enblom. 2009. “Wheel-rail contact mechanics.” In Wheel-rail interface handbook, 58–92. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Iwnicki, S., M. Spiryagin, C. Cole, and T. McSweeney. 2020. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Kalay, S. 2001. “Vehicle/track inspection and condition monitoring.” In Guidelines to best practices for heavy haul railway operations: Management of the wheel and rail interface, edited by J. Leeper and R. Allen, 6.1–6.53. Omaha, NE: Simmons-Boardman Books.
Lewis, R., and U. Olofsson. 2009. Wheel-rail interface handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lundén, R., and B. Paulsson. 2009. “Introduction to wheel-rail interface research.” In Wheel-rail interface handbook, 3–33. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Magel, E., and K. Oldknow. 2018. “Quality indices for managing rail through grinding.” In Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems, CM 2018, 658–667. Ottawa: National Research Council.
Mansouri, M. K. 2019. “Trending and correlation analysis of performance indicators for measuring and monitoring rail profile.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba.
Mathworks. 2017. “MATLAB—MathWorks—MATLAB & Simulink.” Accessed February 25, 2020. https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html.
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. 2012. Track design handbook for light rail transit. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Olofsson, U., Y. Zhu, S. Abbasi, R. Lewis, and S. Lewis. 2013. “Tribology of the wheel-rail contact-aspects of wear, particle emission and adhesion.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 51 (7): 1091–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.800215.
Parida, A., U. Kumar, D. Galar, and C. Stenström. 2015. “Performance measurement and management for maintenance: A literature review.” J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 21 (1): 2–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-10-2013-0067.
Piotrowski, J., and H. Chollet. 2005. “Wheel-rail contact models for vehicle system dynamics including multi-point contact.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 43 (6–7): 455–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110500141144.
Piotrowski, J., and H. Chollet. 2007. “Vehicle system dynamics wheel-rail contact models for vehicle system dynamics including multi-point contact wheel-rail contact models for vehicle system dynamics including multi-point contact.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 43 (7): 455–483.
Piotrowski, J., and W. Kik. 2008. “A simplified model of wheel/rail contact mechanics for non-Hertzian problems and its application in rail vehicle dynamic simulations.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 46 (1–2): 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110701586444.
Regehr, S., G. Grande, J. D. Regehr, and G. Bachinsky. 2017. “Repeatable procedure for determining a representative average rail profile.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2607 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3141/2607-01.
Regehr, S. C. 2016. “A repeatable procedure to determine a representative average rail profile.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba.
Solomon, B. 2001. Railway maintenance: The men and machines that keep the railroads running. Beverly, MA: Voyageur Press.
Sroba, P., and M. Roney. 2003. “Rail grinding best practices.” In Proc., 2003 American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association Annual Conf. Calgary, Canada: National Research Council.
Tournay, H. 2001. Guidelines to best practices for heavy haul railway operations: Management of the wheel and rail interface. Omaha, NE: Simmons-Boardman.
TTCI (Transportation Technology Center Inc.). 2020. “NUCARS.” Accessed March 3, 2020. http://nucars.aar.com/.
Zakeri, J.-A., M. Fathali, and N. Boloukian Roudsari. 2012. “Effects of rail cant on wheel-rail contact forces in slab tracks.” Int. J. Mech. Appl. 1 (1): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.mechanics.20110101.02.
Zarembski, A. M., J. Palese, and T. L. Euston. 2005. “Monitoring grinding effectiveness.” Railway Track Struct. 101 (6): 45–48.
Zhi, S., J. Li, and A. M. Zarembski. 2016. “Predictive modeling of the rail grinding process using a distributed cutting grain approach.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 230 (6): 1540–1560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409715605139.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 5, 2020
Accepted: Oct 20, 2020
Published online: Dec 31, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 31, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.