Technical Papers
Aug 5, 2020

Impact of Adverse Weather on Freeway Bottleneck Performance

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146, Issue 10

Abstract

Congestion on freeways occurs when demand exceeds the available capacity. Common causes of recurring congestion, also known as freeway bottlenecks, include lane drops, on-ramp merges, and weaving sections. Adverse weather can reduce the maximum queue discharge flow, but this effect has not been systematically investigated. This research examined the relationship between discharge flow and weather characteristics including rainfall intensity, wind speed, and visibility. Queue discharge rates at four isolated merge bottlenecks were measured using an established methodology of cumulative count and occupancy curves. An analysis of discharge variation by rainfall intensity revealed reduced discharge ranging from 5% in drizzle (rainfall <0  in./h) to 27% in heavy rainfall [rainfall >2.54mm/h (>0.1  in./h)]. However, rain intensity accounts for only a portion of the variability in discharge flow. Two hypotheses were tested using the additional variables of wind speed and visibility as well as dividing the periods of discharge flow into multiple groupings. Analyses based on these hypotheses described the variation in queue discharge flow better than the analysis with a single independent variable. This research showed that weather characteristics are an important predictor of bottleneck queue discharge rates.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository online in accordance with funder data retention policies. Traffic data are available from the California PeMS database, while eather information is available from the National Weather Service archive hosted by the University of Utah (mesowest.utah.edu). Full citations for traffic data (CALTRANS 2019) and weather data (University of Utah 2019) can be found in the reference list.

References

Agarwal, M., T. Maze, and R. Souleyrette. 2005. “Impacts of weather on urban freeway traffic flow characteristics and facility capacity.” In Proc., Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symp., 18–19. Ames, IA: Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State Univ.
Brilon, W., and M. Ponzlet. 1996. “Variability of speed-flow relationships on German autobahns.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1555 (1): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196155500112.
Byun, J., J. Daniel, and S. Chien. 2010. “Speed-flow relationships under adverse weather conditions.” In Proc., 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
CALTRANS (California DOT). 2019. “Performance Measurement System (PeMS).” Accessed September 3, 2013. http://pems.dot.ca.gov.
Cassidy, M., and R. Bertini. 1999. “Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 33 (1): 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00023-X.
Cools, M., and L. Creemers. 2013. “The dual role of weather forecasts on changes in activity level behavior.” J. Transp. Geogr. 28 (Apr): 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.002.
Cools, M., E. Moons, and G. Wets. 2010. “Assessing the impact of weather on traffic intensity.” Weather Clim. Soc. 2 (1): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WCAS1014.1.
Dehman, A. 2012. “Effect of inclement weather on two capacity flows at recurring freeway Bottlenecks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2286 (1): 84–93. https://doi.org/10.3141/2286-10.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2006. Empirical studies on traffic flow in inclement weather. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Goodwin, L. 2002. Weather impacts on arterial flow, 4–8. Falls Church, VA: Mitretek Systems.
Ibrahim, A. T., and F. Hall. 1994. “Effect of adverse weather conditions on speed-flow occupancy relationships.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1457: 184–191.
Khattak, A., and A. de Palma. 1997. “The impact of adverse weather conditions on the propensity to change travel decisions: A survey of Brussels commuters.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 31 (3): 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(96)00025-0.
Kilpelainen, M., and H. Summala. 2007. “Effects of weather and weather forecasts on driver behaviour.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 10 (4): 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.11.002.
Kim, J., H. Mahmassani, and J. Dong. 2010. “Likelihood and duration of flow breakdown: Modeling the effect of weather.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2188: 19–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/2188-03.
Kyte, M., Z. Khatib, P. Shannon, and F. Kitchener. 2001. “Effect of weather on free-flow speed.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1776 (1): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.3141/1776-08.
Maze, T., M. Agrawal, and G. Burchett. 2006. “Whether weather matters to traffic demand, traffic safety and traffic operations and flow.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1948 (1): 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106194800119.
Rahka, H., M. Farzaneh, M. Arafeh, and E. Sterzin. 2008. “Inclement weather impacts on freeway traffic stream behavior.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2071 (1): 8–18.
Royston, P., D. Altman, and W. Sauerbrei. 2006. “Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: A bad idea.” Stat. Med. 25 (1): 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2331.
Saberi, M., and R. Bertini. 2010. “Empirical analysis of the effects of rain on measured freeway traffic parameters.” In Proc., 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Sauerbrei, W., and P. Royston. 2010. “Continuous variables: To categorize or to model?” In Proc., 8th Annual Conf. on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS). Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
Smith, B., K. Byrne, R. Copperman, S. Hennessey, and N. Goodall. 2004. “An investigation into the impact of rainfall on freeway traffic flow.” In Proc., 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Snelder, M., and S. Calvert. 2016. “Quantifying the impact of adverse weather conditions on road network performance.” Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 16 (1): 128–149. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2016.16.1.3118.
Transportation Research Board. 2010. Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
University of Utah. 2019. “MesoWest.” Accessed September 3, 2013. http://mesowest.utah.edu.
Van Stralen, W., S. Calvert, and E. Molin. 2014. “The influence of adverse weather conditions on the probability of congestion on Dutch motorways.” In Proc., 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146Issue 10October 2020

History

Received: Aug 14, 2019
Accepted: May 19, 2020
Published online: Aug 5, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5167-1638. Email: [email protected]
Alexander Skabardonis, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor-In-Residence, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1720. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share