Technical Papers
Jun 29, 2020

Probabilistic Methodology to Quantify User Delay Costs for Urban Arterial Work Zones

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146, Issue 9

Abstract

The total cost of road construction comprises direct costs paid by agencies and indirect costs paid by road users. In densely populated urban areas, work zone instigated user costs could outweigh direct costs and therefore need to be considered in project alternative selection. This paper develops and applies a probabilistic methodology for quantifying user delay cost (UDC) for urban arterial work zones. The methodology incorporates traffic microsimulation and Monte Carlo simulation to establish a distribution of UDCs, which supports risk-based optimization of work zone configuration, justification of accelerated construction methods, and establishment of contractual incentives and disincentives. The paper demonstrates the development of the methodology through a bridge rehabilitation case study in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The results revealed that every hour of work zone operation during the morning peak resulted in 169.2 h of network-wide vehicle delay and a mean UDC of CAD 2,816 (in 2016 Canadian dollars). To further demonstrate the applicability of the methodology, a second case study examined three work zone configurations and concluded that the traditional work zone configuration instigated the lowest UDC.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. These include the traffic microsimulation model inputs and outputs, and the Monte Carlo simulation outputs.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded through a Queen Elizabeth II scholarship and this support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

AASHTO. 2010. User and non-user benefit analysis for highways. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Al Assar, R., Z. He, S. Tighe, and R. Haas. 2000. “Simplified user delay cost model for pavement and bridge life cycle analysis.” In Proc., Annual Conf. of the Transportation Association of Canada. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
Apex Engineering Limited. 2018. Default values for benefit cost analysis in British Columbia 2018. Victoria, BC, Canada: BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Planning and Programming Branch.
Applications Management Consulting Ltd. 2015. Benefit cost model user guide. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Applications Management Consulting.
Bank of Canada. 2015. “Prime rate charged by banks.” Accessed September 1, 2016. http://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/selected_historical_v122148.pdf.
Barutha, P. J., N. Zhang, A. Alipour, and D. D. Gransberg. 2017. “Social return on investment as a metric to prioritize use of accelerated bridge construction in rural regions.” In Proc., 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Chan, A., K. Gregory, and E. Gabler. 2008. “Evaluation of life-cycle cost analysis practices used by the Michigan Department of Transportation.” J. Transp. Eng. 134 (6): 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:6(236).
Chien, S., and P. Schonfeld. 2001. “Optimal work zone lengths for four-lane highways.” J. Transp. Eng. 127 (2): 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:2(124).
City of Calgary. 2001. 2001 Calgary region external truck survey study. Calgary, AB, Canada: City of Calgary.
City of Calgary. 2012. Mobility monitor #40: Downtown mode split and vehicle occupancy methodology. Calgary, AB, Canada: City of Calgary.
City of Calgary. 2014. Vol. 3 of Changing travel behaviour in the Calgary region. Calgary, AB, Canada: City of Calgary.
Daniels, G., D. R. Ellis, and W. R. Stockton. 1999. Techniques for manually estimating road user costs associated with construction projects. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
Enterprise Performance Management Information Development Team. 2016. “Docs.oracle.com: User’s guide.” Accessed August 1, 2016. https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E52437_01/en/crystal_ball_users_guide/frameset.htm?index.html.
Fhwa.dot.gov. 2019. “About every day counts|Federal highway administration.” Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/about-edc.cfm.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2000a. Vol. 2 of Comprehensive truck size and weight study. Washington, DC: USDOT.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2000b. Vol. 3 of Comprehensive truck size and weight study. Washington, DC: USDOT.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2019. Developing a statistically valid and practical method to compute bus and truck occupancy data. Washington, DC: USDOT.
Ghaffari Dolama, M. 2017. “Tool for calculating user delay cost associated with urban arterial construction zone.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Calgary, Canada.
Gilchrist, A., and E. N. Allouche. 2005. “Quantification of social costs associated with construction projects: State-of-the-art review.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 20 (1): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.04.003.
Huen, K., S. Ren, S. Tighe, and B. McCabe. 2006. “Evaluation of work zone strategies and user delay costs associated with strategies and treatments.” In Proc., Annual Conf. of the Transportation Association of Canada. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
Huen, K., S. Tighe, and B. McCabe. 2005. “Incorporating user delay cost in project selection: A Canadian case study.” In Proc., 1st Annual Inter-Univ. Symp. on Infrastructure Management. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Univ. of Waterloo.
Husch, D., and J. Albeck. 2003. SimTraffic 6: Traffic simulation software—User guide. Albany, Canada: Trafficware.
Jia, J., M. Ibrahim, M. Hadi, W. Orabi, M. Ali, and Y. Xiao. 2016. “Estimation of the total cost of bridge construction for use in accelerated bridge construction selection decisions.” In Proc., 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Jia, J., M. Ibrahim, M. Hadi, W. Orabi, and Y. Xiao. 2018. “Multi-criteria evaluation framework in selection of accelerated bridge construction (ABC) method.” Sustainability 10 (11): 4059. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114059.
Lee, E.-B., and D. Alleman. 2018. “Ensuring efficient incentive and disincentive values for highway construction projects: A systematic approach balancing road user, agency and contractor acceleration costs and savings.” Sustainability 10 (3): 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030701.
Mallela, J., and S. Sadavisam. 2011. Work zone road user costs: Concepts and applications. Washington, DC: USDOT.
Moges, M., A. Ayed, G. Viecili, and A. A. El-Halim. 2017. “A review and recommendations for Canadian LCCA guidelines.” In Proc., Annual Conf. of the Transportation Association of Canada. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
Raymond, C. M., S. Tighe, and R. Haas. 2000. “User cost analysis of traffic staging options for resurfacing of divided highways in Ontario.” In Proc., Annual Conf. of the Transportation Association of Canada. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
Sadasivam, S., and J. Mallela. 2015. “Application of work zone road user costs to determine schedule-related incentives and disincentives: Conceptual framework.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2504 (1): 39–45. https://doi.org/10.3141/2504-05.
Sadasivam, S., and J. Mallela. 2016. “Work zone user impact reference charts for bridge lane closures.” In Proc., 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Salem, O., B. Salman, and S. Ghorai. 2018. “Accelerating construction of roadway bridges using alternative techniques and procurement methods.” Transport 33 (2): 567–579. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2017.1300942.
Statistics Canada. 2004. Canadian travel survey domestic travel, 2002. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Statistics Canada. 2016a. “CANSIM—051-0056—Estimates of population by census metropolitan area, sex and age group for July 1, based on the standard geographical classification (SGC) 2011.” Accessed September 1, 2016. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=.
Statistics Canada. 2016b. “CANSIM—111-0008—Neighbourhood income and demographics, taxfilers and dependents with income by total income, sex and age group.” Accessed September 1, 2016. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1110000801.
Statistics Canada. 2016c. “CANSIM—282-0141—Labour force survey estimates (LFS), by national occupational classification (NOC) and sex, unadjusted for seasonality.” Accessed September 1, 2016. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/pick-choisir?lang=eng&p2=33&id=2820141.
Statistics Canada. 2016d. “CANSIM—282-0151—Labour force survey estimates (LFS), wages of employees by type of work, national occupational classification (NOC), sex, and age group, unadjusted for seasonality.” Accessed September 1, 2016. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/pick-choisir?lang=eng&p2=33&id=2820151.
Statistics Canada. 2016e. “CANSIM—326-0022—Consumer price.” Accessed September 4, 2016. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=3260022.
Statistics Canada. 2016f. “CANSIM—380-0066—Price indexes, gross domestic product.” Accessed September 4, 2016. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=3800066.
Statistics Canada. 2016g. “CANSIM—380-0074—Compensation of employees.” Accessed September 1, 2016. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=3800074.
Sudarsana, D. K., H. Sulistio, A. Wicaksono, and L. Djakfar. 2014. “The analysis of work zone road user costs due to the delay completion of the road maintenance project.” Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci. 8 (3): 103–109.
Transborder.bts.gov. 2016. “North American transborder freight data: Value to weight ratios by transportation mode and commodity (import only).” Accessed September 23, 2016. https://explore.dot.gov/t/BTS/views/DataQuery_StatebyPort/QueryData?iframeSizedToWindow=true&:embed=y&:showAppBanner=false&:display_count=no&:showVizHome=no.
Trueblood, M. 2013. “Three case studies highlighting the calibration of SimTraffic.” In Proc., Annual Conf. of the Transportation Association of Canada. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
USDOT. 2003. Valuation of travel time in economic analysis, revised departmental guidance. Washington, DC: USDOT.
USDOT. 2016. Valuation of travel time in economic analysis, revised departmental guidance. Washington, DC: USDOT.
USDOT. 2018. Benefit-cost analysis guidance for discretionary grant programs. Washington, DC: USDOT.
Wilson, C. J., and L. Cowe Falls. 2003. “Construction related user delay costs—The case of the Crowchild Trail Bridge rehabilitation in Calgary.” In Proc., Annual Conf. of the Transportation Association of Canada. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146Issue 9September 2020

History

Received: Jul 24, 2019
Accepted: May 4, 2020
Published online: Jun 29, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 29, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P.Eng.
Ph.D. Student and Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, E1-327 EITC, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6555-9353. Email: [email protected]
Lynne Cowe Falls, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.Eng.
Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, Univ. of Calgary, 2500 Univ. Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4. Email: [email protected]
Jonathan D. Regehr, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-5826 [email protected]
P.Eng.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, E1-310 EITC, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-5826. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share