Case Studies
Sep 18, 2019

Evaluation of Truck-Mounted Automated Flagger Assistance Devices in Missouri: Case Study

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 145, Issue 12

Abstract

To improve work zone safety by replacing human flaggers, a new Automated Flagger Assistance Device (AFAD) developed by the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) was investigated through field and driving simulator studies. The MoDOT AFAD configuration, including STOP/SLOW paddles, Red/Yellow lights, and a changeable message sign, was incorporated into a truck-mounted attenuator. Driver behavior measures were collected to compare the effectiveness of the MoDOT AFAD, its alternative designs, and human flaggers. In the field study, the MoDOT AFAD was able to slow vehicle approach speeds and stop vehicles farther back than flaggers. In the driving simulator study, the MoDOT AFAD and its alternative designs significantly reduced average approach speeds and increased the distance between completely stopped vehicles and the AFAD/flagger. Surveys conducted after each study showed that drivers understood the AFAD well and preferred it over flaggers, especially the MoDOT AFAD configuration. Overall, this case study demonstrated that the AFAD has the potential to improve the safety of work zones and workers.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 2011. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Antonucci, N., K. Hardy, J. Bryden, T. Neuman, R. Pfefer, and K. Slack. 2005. Guidance for implementation of the AASHTO strategic highway safety plan—Volume 17: A guide for reducing work zone collisions. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
ATSSA (American Traffic Safety Services Association). 2012. Guidance on the use of automated flagger assistance devices. Fredericksburg, VA: ATSSA.
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cottrell, B. H., Jr. 2006. Evaluation of the autoflagger in Virginia. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Debnath, A. K., R. Blackman, N. Haworth, and Y. Adinegoro. 2017. “Influence of remotely operated stop-slow controls on driver behavior in work zones.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2615 (1): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3141/2615-03.
FHWA. 2005a. “Technical provisions for AFADs.” Accessed April 5, 2018. https://www.atssa.com/galleries/default-file/TechnicalProvisionsforAFADs.pdf.
FHWA. 2005b. “Revised interim approval for the use of automated flagger assistance devices in temporary traffic control zones (ia-4r) memorandum.” Accessed April 5, 2018. https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/res-memorandum_afads012705.htm.
FHWA. 2009. Manual on uniform traffic control devices. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Finley, M. 2013. “Field evaluation of automated flagger assistance devices in work zones on two-lane roads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2337 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141/2337-01.
Finley, M. D., J. M. Jenkins, and P. Songchitruksa. 2015. Evaluation of alternative methods of temporary traffic control on rural one-lane, two-way highways. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ. System.
Hager, M., S. Wilson, T. Pollak, and P. Rooney. 2003. “Response rates for mail surveys of nonprofit organizations: A review and empirical test.” Nonprofit Voluntary Sect. Q. 32 (2): 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003032002005.
Harris, L. 2002. “RC flagman gets test run in Washington County.” KUTC Newsletter. January 28, 2002.
Ishak, S., Y. Qi, and P. Rayaprolu. 2012. “Safety evaluation of joint and conventional lane merge configurations for freeway work zones.” Traffic Inj. Prev. 13 (2): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2011.644606.
Jessberger, R. 1999. RC flagman evaluation. Columbus, OH: Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Kaptein, N., J. Theeuwes, and R. Van Der Horst. 1996. “Driving simulator validity: Some considerations.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1550 (1): 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196155000105.
Kennedy, R. S., N. E. Lane, K. S. Berbaum, and M. G. Lilienthal. 1993. “Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness.” Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3 (3): 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3.
Klein, N., and J. Brooks. 2008. “Impact of luminance and blur combinations on older drivers acuity and preferred speed.” J. Vision 8 (6): 425. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.6.425.
MnDOT (Minnesota Department of Transportation). 2005. Autoflagger research project. St. Paul, MN: MnDOT.
MoDOTKC. 2017. “Green light TMA test.” Youtube. Accessed August 15, 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuKFPSRfnFM.
MoDOT (Missouri Department of Transportation). 2006. “District 9 pilots new flagging system.” Connections Newsletter. April 1, 2006.
MoDOT (Missouri Department of Transportation). 2008. “Evaluation of automatic flagger assistance devices.” Accessed August 17, 2018. https://library.modot.mo.gov/RDT/reports/Ri05037/ss08005.pdf.
MoDOT (Missouri Department of Transportation). 2009. Engineering policy guide. Jefferson City, MO: MoDOT.
Perreault, W. D. 1975. “Controlling order-effect bias.” Public Opin. Q. 39 (4): 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1086/268251.
Safety Technologies. 2015. “AutoFlagger 54.” Accessed August 20, 2018. http://www.autoflagger.com/products/autoflagger-54/.
Srinivasan, S., G. Carrick, X. Zhu, K. Heaslip, and S. Washburn. 2008. Analysis of crashes in freeway work-zone queues: A case study. Gainesville, FL: Transportation Research Center, Univ. of Florida.
Sun, C., Z. Qing, P. Edara, B. Balakrishnan, and J. Hopfenblatt. 2017. “Driving simulator study of J-Turn acceleration-deceleration lane and U-Turn spacing configurations.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2638 (1): 26–34. https://doi.org/10.3141/2638-04.
Terhaar, E. F. 2014. Implementation of automatic flagger assistance devices (AFADs) for Minnesota Department of Transportation Flagger Operations. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, Research Services & Library.
Trout, N., M. Finley, and B. Ullman. 2013. “Motorists’ understanding of automated flagger assistance devices in work zones.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2337 (1): 42–49. https://doi.org/10.3141/2337-06.
Trout, N. D., and G. L. Ullman. 1997. Devices and technology to improve flagger/worker safety. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ. System.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 145Issue 12December 2019

History

Received: May 22, 2018
Accepted: Mar 21, 2019
Published online: Sep 18, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Missouri, E2509 Lafferre Hall, Columbia, MO 65211. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-6971. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Missouri, E2509 Lafferre Hall, Columbia, MO 65211. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-730X. Email: [email protected]
Henry Brown [email protected]
P.E.
Research Engineer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Missouri, E2509 Lafferre Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Carlos Sun, Ph.D. [email protected]
J.D.
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Missouri, E2509 Lafferre Hall, Columbia, MO 65211. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share