Dynamic Lane-Based Signal Merge Control for Freeway Work Zone Operations
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 145, Issue 12
Abstract
Traditional merge control strategies cannot yield the expected effectiveness under heavy traffic conditions at freeway work zones because inevitable traffic conflicts resulting from complex merging and lane-changing maneuvers could increase the potential of traffic collisions, induce stop-and-go movements, and degrade the operational efficiency. This paper presents a dynamic control model to optimize the signal operations of a new merge system, the lane-based signal merge (LBSM), which uses lane-based signals or variable signs to give drivers in different lanes the right of way to proceed through the open lane(s) in a work zone area. The control objective is to maximize the work zone throughput. A genetic algorithm is employed to solve the model. Results reveal that the proposed method yields promising work zone operational performance under heavy traffic conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the support of the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20151464). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these funding bodies.
References
Alecsandru, C. D. 2006. “A stochastic mesoscopic cell-transmission model for operational analysis of large-scale transportation networks.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ.
Chow, A. H., and H. K. Lo. 2007. “Sensitivity analysis of signal control with physical queuing: Delay derivatives and an application.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 41 (4): 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2006.06.007.
Daganzo, C. F. 1994. “The cell transmission model: A simple dynamic representation of highway traffic.” Transp. Res. Part B 28 (4): 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7.
Daganzo, C. F. 1995. “The cell transmission model. II: Network traffic.” Transp. Res. Part B 29 (2): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(94)00022-R.
Dotoli, M., M. P. Fanti, and C. Meloni. 2006. “A signal timing plan formulation for urban traffic control.” Control Eng. Pract. 14 (11): 1297–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2005.06.013.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2003. Manual on uniform traffic control devices. Washington, DC: DOT.
Gao, Y., Y. Liu, H. Hu, and Y. E. Ge. 2016. “Modeling traffic operation at signalized intersections without explicit left-turn yielding rules with an enhanced cell transmission model.” J. Adv. Transp. 50 (7): 1470–1488. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1411.
Gomes, G., R. Horowitz, A. A. Kurzhanskiy, P. Varaiya, and J. Kwon. 2008. “Behavior of the cell transmission model and effectiveness of ramp metering.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 16 (4): 485–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.10.005.
Idewu, W., and B. Wolshon. 2010. “Joint merge and its impact on merging speeds in lane reduction areas of construction zone.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2169 (1): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.3141/2169-04.
Ishak, S., Y. Qi, and P. Rayaprolu. 2012. “Safety evaluation of joint and conventional lane merge configurations for freeway work zones.” Traffic Inj. Prev. 13 (2): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2011.644606.
Kang, K. P., and G. L. Chang. 2009. “Lane-based dynamic merge control strategy based on optimal thresholds for highway work zone operations.” J. Transp. Eng. 135 (6): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:6(359).
Kang, K. P., G. L. Chang, and J. Paracha. 2006. “Dynamic late merge control at highway work zones: Evaluations, observations, and suggestions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1948 (1): 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106194800110.
Kong, D., X. Guo, X. Xu, and J. Hou. 2015. “Analysis of late merge control at freeway on-ramp based on microscopic simulation.” In Proc., 15th COTA Int. Conf. of Transportation Professionals, 2050–2061. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Li, Z. 2010. “Modeling arterial signal optimization with enhanced cell transmission formulations.” J. Transp. Eng. 137 (7): 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000232.
Lin, P. W., K. P. Kang, and G. L. Chang. 2004. “Exploring the effectiveness of variable speed limit controls on highway work-zone operations.” Intell. Transp. Syst. 8 (3): 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450490492851.
Lin, W. H., and C. Wang. 2004. “An enhanced 0-1 mixed-integer LP formulation for traffic signal control.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 5 (4): 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2004.838217.
Liu, Y., X. Lai, and G. L. Chang. 2006. “Two-level integrated optimization system for planning of emergency evacuation.” J. Transp. Eng. 132 (10): 800–807. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:10(800).
Lo, H. K. 2001. “A cell-based traffic control formulation: Strategies and benefits of dynamic timing plans.” Transp. Sci. 35 (2): 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.35.2.148.10136.
Lo, H. K., and W. Y. Szeto. 2002. “A cell-based dynamic traffic assignment model: Formulation and properties.” Math. Comput. Modell. 35 (7–8): 849–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(02)00055-9.
McCoy, P., and G. Pesti. 2001. “Dynamic late merge-control concept for work zones on rural interstate highways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1745 (1): 20–26. https://doi.org/10.3141/1745-03.
McCoy, P. T., G. Pesti, and P. S. Byrd. 1999. Alternative driver information to alleviate work-zone-related delays. Lincoln, NE: Dept. of Civil Engineering College of Engineering and Technology, Univ. of Nebraska.
Meyer, E. 2004. Project year 2002 evaluations: Construction area late merge (CALM) system. Topeka, KS: Kansas DOT.
Pesti, G., D. Jessen, P. Byrd, and P. McCoy. 1999. “Traffic flow characteristics of the late merge work zone control strategy.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1657 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/1657-01.
PTV (Planung Transport Verkehr). 2013. VISSIM 9 user manual. Karlsruhe, Germany: PTV.
Qi, L., M. Zhou, and W. Luan. 2016. “A two-level traffic light control strategy for preventing incident-based urban traffic congestion.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19 (1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2625324.
Rayaprolu, P., S. Ishak, Y. Qi, and B. Wolshon. 2013. “Operational assessment of joint and conventional lane merge configurations for freeway work zones.” J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17 (4): 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2012.707052.
Taavola, D., J. Jackels, and T. Swenson. 2004. Dynamic late merge system evaluation: Initial deployment on US-10, summer 2003. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota DOT.
Walters, C. H., V. J. Pezoldt, K. N. Womack, S. A. Cooner, and B. T. Kuhn. 2000. Understanding road rage: Summary of first-year project activities. Austin, TX: Texas DOT.
Wang, P., L. S. Jones, and Q. Yang. 2012. “A novel conditional cell transmission model for oversaturated arterials.” J. Cent. S. Univ. 19 (5): 1466–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1163-6.
Yang, N., G. L. Chang, and K. P. Kang. 2009. “Simulation-based study on a lane-based signal system for merge control at freeway work zones.” J. Transp. Eng. 135 (1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:1(9).
Zhang, X., and G. L. Chang. 2014. “Optimal control strategies with an extended cell transmission model for massive vehicular-pedestrian mixed flows in the evacuation zone.” J. Adv. Transp. 48 (8): 1030–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1243.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 6, 2017
Accepted: Jan 11, 2019
Published online: Oct 9, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Mar 9, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.