Technical Papers
Mar 19, 2019

Analysis of Pedestrian Conflict with Right-Turning Vehicles at Signalized Intersections in India

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 145, Issue 6

Abstract

The interaction between pedestrians and right-turning vehicles at a signalized intersection is a usual scenario in urban locations in which both have to share a common space on the road. Due to the rapid growth of vehicular traffic in developing countries such as India, pedestrian–vehicle conflicts are increasing tremendously. This study evaluated pedestrian safety by examining the interaction between pedestrians and right-turning traffic (left-hand driving) at signalized intersections using the traffic conflict technique. Five time-based conflict indicators, namely postencroachment time (PET), time to vehicle (TTV), deceleration to safety time of pedestrians (DSTped), time to accident (TTA), and deceleration to safety time of vehicles (DSTveh) were used to analyze the conflict situation. Four signalized intersections were selected in two cities (Kolkata and New Delhi) of India. For every possible conflict situation, PET, TTV, DSTped, TTA, and DSTveh were estimated and the severity of conflicts was identified based on pedestrian demography and their crossing behavior. The k-means clustering technique was used to classify the conflict indicators into four levels of severity. Silhouette plots were developed to validate the clusters. A binary logistic regression model was developed to identify significant contributing factors to the risk-taking behavior of pedestrians. The model’s results showed that pedestrians’ age, gender, waiting time, and speed; type of crossing; pedestrian with company; the occurrence of conflicts in different quarters of the green interval; and right-turning vehicle volume have a significant effect on the risk-taking behavior of pedestrians. The findings of this study may help to identify various factors that affect pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at signalized intersections.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alhajyaseen, W. K., M. Asano, and H. Nakamura. 2012. “Estimation of left-turning vehicle maneuvers for the assessment of pedestrian safety at intersections.” IATSS Res. 36 (1): 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.03.002.
Almodfer, R., S. Xiong, Z. Fang, X. Kong, and S. Zheng. 2016. “Quantitative analysis of lane-based pedestrian-vehicle conflict at a non-signalized marked crosswalk.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 42 (3): 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.004.
Archer, J. 2005. “Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modelling: A study of urban and suburban intersections.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Infrastructure, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan.
Archer, J., and W. Young. 2010. “The measurement and modelling of proximal safety measures.” In Vol. 163 of Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, 191–201. London: Thomas Telford.
Brosseau, M., S. Zangenehpour, N. Saunier, and L. Miranda-Moreno. 2013. “The impact of waiting time and other factors on dangerous pedestrian crossings and violations at signalized intersections: A case study in Montreal.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 21 (6): 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.09.010.
Cafiso, S., A. G. Garcia, R. Cavarra, and M. A. R. Rojas. 2010. “Pedestrian crossing safety improvements: Before and after study using traffic conflict techniques.” In Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on Highway Geometric Design. Valencia, Spain: Universidad Polytecnica deValencia.
Ferenchak, N. N., and W. E. Marshall. 2018. “Spontaneous order of pedestrian and vehicle intersection conflicts in the Indian context.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 55: 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.025.
Gang, R. E. N., G. U. Cheng, L. U. Lili, Z. H. O. U. Zhuping, and D. I. N. G. Chenzi. 2012. “Modeling risk degree of conflicts between crossing pedestrians and vehicles at signalized intersections.” J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 12 (5): 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-6672(11)60224-9.
Guha, S., Rastogi, R., and K. Shim. 1998. “CURE: An efficient clustering algorithm for large databases.” In Vol. 27 of ACM sigmod record, 73–84. Seattle: ACM.
Hayward, J. 1972. Near miss determination through use of a scale of danger. Washington, DC: Highway Research Board.
Hussein, M., T. Sayed, P. Reyad, and L. Kim. 2015. “Automated pedestrian safety analysis at a signalized intersection in New York City: Automated data extraction for safety diagnosis and behavioral study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2519: 17–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/2519-03.
IRC (Indian Roads Congress). 2012. Guidelines for pedestrian facilities. IRC: 103. New Delhi, India: IRC.
Iryo-Asano, M., W. K. Alhajyaseen, and H. Nakamura. 2015. “Analysis and modeling of pedestrian crossing behavior during the pedestrian flashing green interval.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16 (2): 958–969. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2346154.
Ismail, K., T. Sayed, and N. Saunier. 2010. “Automated analysis of pedestrian–vehicle conflicts: Context for before-and-after studies.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2198 (1): 52–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/2198-07.
Ismail, K., T. Sayed, and N. Saunier. 2011. “Methodologies for aggregating indicators of traffic conflict.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2237 (1): 10–19. https://doi.org/10.3141/2237-02.
Jahandideh, Z., B. Mirbaha, and A. A. Rassafi. 2017. “Modeling the risk intensity of crossing pedestrians in intersections based on selected critical time to collision: A case study of Qazvin City.” In Proc., 96th Annual Meeting on Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kadali, B. R., and P. Vedagiri. 2013. “Modelling pedestrian road crossing behaviour under mixed traffic condition.” Euro. Transp. 55 (3): 1–17.
Kutner, M. H., C. J. Nachtsheim, J. Neter. 2004. “Applied linear regression models.” In Operations and decision sciences. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series.
Lord, D. 1996. “Analysis of pedestrian conflicts with left-turning traffic.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1538: 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196153800108.
MoRTH (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways). 2016. Road accidents in India. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India.
Ni, Y., M. Wang, J. Sun, and K. Li. 2016. “Evaluation of pedestrian safety at intersections: A theoretical framework based on pedestrian-vehicle interaction patterns.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 96: 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.030.
Paul, M., and I. Ghosh. 2017. “A novel approach of safety assessment at uncontrolled intersections using proximal safety indicators.” European TransporT-Trasporti Europei 65: 1–14.
Paul, M., and I. Ghosh. 2018. “Speed-based proximal indicator for right-turn crashes at unsignalized intersections in India.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 144 (6): 04018024. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000139.
Pratt, M. P., J. A. Bonneson, and P. Songchitruksa. 2013. “Effect of left-turn operational mode on pedestrian safety: Development of models and guidelines.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2393 (1): 95–103. https://doi.org/10.3141/2393-11.
Rousseeuw, P. J. 1987. “Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis.” J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20: 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7.
Sacchi, E., and T. Sayed. 2015. “Bayesian estimation of conflict-based safety performance functions.” J. Transp. Saf. Securit. 8 (3): 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2015.1030807.
Sayed, T., and S. Zein. 2007. “Traffic conflict standards for intersections.” Transp. Plann. Technol. 22 (4): 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069908717634.
Spector, P. 2011. “Stat 133 class notes 2013—Spring, 2011.” Univ. of California, Berkeley, 2011. Accessed July 25, 2016. http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Es133/all2011.pdf.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2014. Global status report on road safety. Geneva: WHO.
Xin, F., C. Sun, and X. Wang. 2016. “Risk evaluation of conflicts between crossing pedestrians and right-turning vehicles at intersections.” In Proc., 95th Annual Meeting on Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Zaki, M., T. Sayed, A. Tageldin, and M. Hussein. 2013. “Application of computer vision to diagnosis of pedestrian safety issues.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2393: 75–84. https://doi.org/10.3141/2393-09.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 145Issue 6June 2019

History

Received: May 10, 2018
Accepted: Nov 8, 2018
Published online: Mar 19, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Aug 19, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Abhinav Kumar [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Madhumita Paul, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India. Email: [email protected]
Indrajit Ghosh, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share