Technical Papers
Mar 26, 2019

Driver Response to Variable Speed Limits on I-66 in Northern Virginia

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 145, Issue 6

Abstract

Variable speed limits (VSLs) are components of active traffic management (ATM) systems that are increasingly being used as safety and operational treatments in urban areas. Studies have shown safety and operational benefits associated with VSLs; however, the level of benefit is dependent on the degree to which drivers comply with the VSL. Although several studies have quantified macroscopic safety and operational benefits of VSL, limited studies have examined the degree to which drivers adhere to the posted VSL signs. This study evaluated how speed changed in response to an advisory VSL system on Interstate-66 (I-66) in Northern Virginia. Compliance in this study was defined as when vehicle speeds in a time interval were at or less than the speed posted on an advisory VSL sign. The study generally revealed that noncompliance increased as the posted VSL speed increased. The analysis further showed that the observed speed of all drivers was at or below the posted VSLs’ speed 37% and 40% of the time downstream and upstream of I-66 VSL gantries, respectively. About 47% and 51% of observed interval speeds exceeded the posted VSL by more than 2.235 m/s (5  mi/h) downstream and upstream of the VSL gantries, respectively. The analysis also showed relatively higher compliance levels when VSLs were spaced closer together and had lower VSL posted speeds than when higher VSLs were posted with longer distances between gantries. These higher levels of compliance at low VSLs likely indicate that traffic was restricting the ability to travel above the posted VSL. The results comparing speeds upstream of gantries showed a similar pattern based on the speed posted, but no pattern was observed with respect to compliance over space. This study may be useful to transportation and law enforcement agencies in determining when to perform targeted enforcement and in planning for future deployments.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdel-Aty, M., J. Dilmore, and A. Dhindsa. 2014. “Evaluation of variable speed limits for real-time freeway safety improvement.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 38 (2): 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.010.
Chun, P., and M. D. Fontaine. 2016. Evaluation of the impact of the I-66 active traffic management system. Richmond, VA: Virginia Dept. of Transportation.
Debnath, A. K., R. Blackman, and N. Haworth. 2014. “A Tobit model for analyzing speed limit compliance in work zones.” Saf. Sci. 70: 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.07.012.
Dutta, N., R. A. Boateng, and M. D. Fontaine. 2018a. “Safety and operational effects of the interstate 66 active traffic management system.” J. Transp. Eng., Part A: Syst. 145 (3): 04018089. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000220.
Dutta, N., M. D. Fontaine, R. A. Boateng, and M. Campbell. 2018b. “Evaluation of the impact of the I-66 active traffic management system: Phase II.” Accessed November 16, 2018. http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc /main/online_reports/pdf/19-r7.pdf.
Elliott, M. A., C. J. Armitage, and C. J. Baughan. 2003. “Drivers’ compliance with speed limits: An application of the theory of planned behavior.” J. Appl. Psychol. 88 (5): 964. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.964.
Fudala, N. J., and M. D. Fontaine. 2010. “Work zone variable speed limit systems effectiveness and system design issues.” Accessed February 16, 2018. http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/10-r20.pdf.
Habtemichael, F., and L. de Picado Santos. 2013. “Safety and operational benefits of variable speed limits under different traffic conditions and driver compliance levels.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2386 (1): 7–15. https://doi.org/10.3141/2386-02.
Haghani, A., M. Hamedi, and K. F. Sadabadi. 2009. I-95 Corridor coalition vehicle probe project: Validation of INRIX data. College Park, MD: I-95 Corridor Coalition.
Hellinga, B., and M. Mandelzys. 2011. “Impact of driver compliance on the safety and operational impacts of freeway variable speed limit systems.” J. Transp. Eng. 137 (4): 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000214.
Kattan, L., R. Tay, and S. Acharjee. 2011. “Managing speed at school and playground zones.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (5): 1887–1891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.009.
Kockelman, K., J. Bottom, Y. J. Kweon, J. Ma, and X. Wang. 2006. Vol. 90 of Safety impacts and other implications of raised speed limits on high-speed roads. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kwon, E., D. Brannan, K. Shouman, C. Isackson, and B. Arseneau. 2007. “Development and field evaluation of variable advisory speed limit system for work zones.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2015 (1): 12–18. https://doi.org/10.3141/2015-02.
MacDonald, M. 2008. ATM monitoring and evaluation: 4-Lane variable mandatory speed limits, 12 month report (primary and secondary indicators). Bristol, UK: Highways Agency.
Mannering, F. 2007. “Effects of interstate speed limits on driving speeds: Some new evidence.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Mekker, M. M., S. M. Remias, W. A. Bunnell, D. W. Krohn, E. D. Cox, and D. M. Bullock. 2016. “Variable speed limit study upstream of an Indiana work zone with vehicle matching.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2555 (1): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/2555-07.
Riggins, G., R. Bertini, W. Ackaah, and M. Margreiter. 2016. “Evaluation of driver compliance to displayed variable advisory speed limit systems: Comparison between Germany and the US.” Transp. Res. Procedia 15: 640–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.054.
Strawderman, L., M. M. Rahman, Y. Huang, and A. Nandi. 2015. “Driver behavior and accident frequency in school zones: Assessing the impact of sign saturation.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 82: 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.026.
Weikl, S., K. Bogenberger, and R. Bertini. 2013. “Traffic management effects of variable speed limit system on a German Autobahn: Empirical assessment before and after system implementation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2380 (1): 48–60. https://doi.org/10.3141/2380-06.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 145Issue 6June 2019

History

Received: Apr 25, 2018
Accepted: Oct 22, 2018
Published online: Mar 26, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Aug 26, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Richard A. Boateng [email protected]
Doctoral Student/Research Assistant, Center for Transportation Studies, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Thornton Hall D101, 351 McCormick Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22904 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Michael D. Fontaine, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Director, Dept. of Safety, Operations, and Traffic Engineering, Virginia Transportation Research Council, 530 Edgemont Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903. Email: [email protected]
Zulqarnain H. Khattak [email protected]
Doctoral Student/Research Assistant, Center for Transportation Studies, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Thornton Hall D101, 351 McCormick Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22904. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share