Technical Papers
Dec 20, 2018

Safety and Operational Effects of the Interstate 66 Active Traffic Management System

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 145, Issue 3

Abstract

An active traffic management (ATM) system was activated on Interstate 66 (I-66) in northern Virginia in September 2015. The ATM system included advisory variable speed limits (AVSLs), lane-use control signals (LUCS), and dynamic hard shoulder running (HSR). This paper quantifies the operational and safety effects of the ATM system on I-66 using approximately 2 years of crash and operational data following system activation. The operational analysis showed that off-peak hours experienced significant travel time improvement after the ATM system was activated, but peak periods in the peak direction of travel generally did not see improvement. Further analysis revealed that most of these improvements occurred on the HSR sections. The safety evaluation results showed 4%, 4%, and 6% reductions in total (all severity), multiple-vehicle (all severity), and rear-end (all severity) crashes, respectively, across the entire corridor. Segment-level analysis again showed that the most safety benefits were observed at locations with HSR (31%–38% crash reductions), and no significant reductions were found on the sections with only AVSLs and LUCS.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 2010. Highway safety manual. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Aron, M., R. Seidowsky, and S. Cohen. 2013. “Safety impact of using the hard shoulder during congested traffic: The case of a managed lane operation on a French urban motorway.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 28: 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.006.
Bham, G. H., S. Long, H. Baik, T. Ryan, L. Gentry, K. Lall, M. Arezoumandi, D. Liu, T. Li, and B. Schaeffer. 2010. Evaluation of variable speed limits on I-270/I-255 in St. Louis, Missouri. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Dept. of Transportation.
Chun, P., and M. D. Fontaine. 2016. Evaluation of the impact of the I-66 active traffic management system. Richmond, VA: Virginia Dept. of Transportation.
DeGaspari, M., P. J. Jin, W. J. Wall, and M. C. Walton. 2013. “The effect of active traffic management on travel time reliability: A case study of I-5 in Seattle.” In Proc., 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
Dutta, N., M. D. Fontaine, R. A. Boateng, and M. Campbell. 2018. Evaluation of the impact of the I-66 active traffic management system: Phase II. Virginia Transportation Research Council Rep. No. VTRC 19-R7. Accessed November 16, 2018. http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/19-r7.pdf.
Dutta, N., R. Venkatanarayana, and M. D. Fontaine. 2017. “Examining driver understanding and effectiveness of diagonal yellow arrow lane use control signal indication.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2624 (1): 38–47. https://doi.org/10.3141/2624-05.
Garber, N. J., J. S. Miller, X. Sun, and B. Yuan. 2006. “Safety impacts of differential speed limits for trucks and passenger cars on rural interstate highways: A modified empirical Bayes approach.” J. Transp. Eng. 132 (1): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:1(19).
Geistefeldt, J. 2012. “Operational experience with temporary hard shoulder running in Germany.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2278 (1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.3141/2278-08.
Goh, K. C., G. Currie, M. Sarvi, and D. Logan. 2012. “An improved methodology to compute crash modification factors: A case study of bus priority measures in Melbourne.” In Proc., 25th ARRB Conf. Perth, Australia.
Gross, F., B. Persaud, and C. Lyon. 2010. A guide to developing quality crash modification factors. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Haghani, A., M. Hamedi, and K. F. Sadabadi. 2009. I-95 corridor coalition vehicle probe project: Validation of INRIX data July-September 2008.
Hauer, E. 1980. “Bias-by-selection: Overestimation of the effectiveness of safety countermeasures caused by the process of selection for treatment.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 12: 113–117.
Hourdos, J., S. C. Abou, and S. Zitzow. 2013. Effectiveness of urban partnership agreement traffic operations measures in the I-35W corridor. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota.
Hourdos, J., and S. Zitzow. 2014. Investigation of the impact of I-94 ATM systems on the safety of I-94 commons high crash areas. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Dept. of Transportation.
Jacobson, L. 2012. “Smarter highways: Seattle ATM update.” In Proc., 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
Kweon, Y-J., and I.-K. Lim. 2014. Development of safety performance functions for multilane highway and freeway segments maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation. Richmond, VA: Virginia Dept. of Transportation.
Kwigizile, V., et al. 2015. Evaluation of Michigan’s engineering improvements for older drivers. Lansing, MI: Michigan Dept. of Transportation.
Lemke, K., and M. Irzik. 2010. Temporary use of hard shoulders—Experiences and economic assessment. Bergisch Gladbach, Germany: Federal Highway Research Institute.
Lucyshyn, A., R. Morrow, and C. Russo. 2011. “I-4 variable speed limits effectiveness study.” In Proc., 18th ITS World Congress. Orlando, FL.
MacDonald, M. 2008. ATM monitoring and evaluation: 4-lane variable mandatory speed limits, 12 month report. Bristol, UK: Highways Agency.
MacDonald, M. 2011. M42 MM monitoring and evaluation three year safety review. Bristol, UK: Highways Agency.
Mirshahi, M., et al. 2007. Active traffic management: The next step in congestion management. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Mudgal, A., and J. Hourdos. 2017. “Impact of variable speed limits on freeway rear-end collisions.” In Proc., 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
Saito, M., B. K. Brimley, and G. G. Schultz. 2011. Transportation safety data and analysis. Volume 2: Calibration of the highway safety manual and development of new safety performance functions. Salt Lake City: Utah Dept. of Transportation.
Siddiqui, S., and A.-K. Ahmed. 2017. “Assessing potential safety benefits of an advisory variable speed limit system along an urban freeway corridor.” In Proc., 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
Sparmann, J. 2006. “Freeway operation in Germany: Experiences in Hessen.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Freeway and Tollway Operations. Athens, Greece.
Weikl, S., K. Bogenberger, and R. Bertini. 2017. “Traffic management effect of variable speed limit system on a German autobahn.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2380 (1): 48–60. https://doi.org/10.3141/2380-06.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 145Issue 3March 2019

History

Received: Jan 3, 2018
Accepted: Aug 21, 2018
Published online: Dec 20, 2018
Published in print: Mar 1, 2019
Discussion open until: May 20, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nancy Dutta [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Thornton Hall, P.O. Box 400259, Charlottesville, VA 22904 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Richard Atta Boateng
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Thornton Hall, P.O. Box 400259, Charlottesville, VA 22904.
Michael D. Fontaine, Ph.D.
P.E.
Associate Director, Safety, Operations, and Traffic Engineering, Virginia Transportation Research Council, 530 Edgemont Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share