Technical Papers
Sep 21, 2018

Assessing Whole-Life Carbon Footprint of Under Sleeper Pad Installation for Ballasted Track

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 144, Issue 12

Abstract

Increasing awareness of the problems posed by anthropogenic climate change in recent decades has led to growing concerns over the level of carbon emissions attributable to travel, transport, and infrastructure development. Although rail is a relatively low-carbon mode, there is also pressure to reduce rail’s carbon emissions to help mitigate the extent of climate change. This paper provides a lifecycle analysis study which estimates the effect on carbon emissions of installing under sleeper pads (USPs) during track renewal on two conventional railway lines in the United Kingdom. The aims and scope of the analysis, the lifecycle inventory method, units used, and lifespan of the intervention can all have an important influence on the result. Although the installation of USPs at track renewal could reduce carbon (CO2) emissions, these are very low compared with the associated financial and economic impacts, and some considerable time would be needed to generate these advantages. However, USPs might make rail travel cheaper, and the increased demand could be an important indirect effect on CO2 emissions in the transport system due to the shift from other transport modes. The use of nonrecycled rubber can offset the potential environmental benefits from the reduced requirement for track system interventions (maintenance and renewal needs), so the use of recycled carbon-neutral rubber in USP manufacturing should be incentivized.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the EPSRC-funded TRACK21 project (EP/H044949/1) and Track to the Future (EP/M025276/1) project. A special mention must be given to Dr. Louis Le Pen, who facilitated all the results from the lab tests, and to Dr. James Pritchard, who helped with the Arup input database. However, the authors are entirely responsible for the review and conclusions presented here. The data used in this research have been deposited in the library of the University of Southampton (https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D0128).

References

Abadi, T. 2015. “Effect of sleeper and ballast interventions on rail track performance.” Doctoral thesis, Engineering and the Environment, Univ. of Southampton.
Åkerman, J. 2011. “The role of high-speed rail in mitigating climate change—The Swedish case Europabanan from a life cycle perspective.” Transp. Res. Part D 16 (3): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.004.
Álvarez, A. 2010. “Energy consumption and emissions of high-speed trains.” Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2159: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.3141/2159-04.
Arasteh, I., P. Larsson-Kraik, A. Nissen, and U. Kumar. 2014. “Cost-effective track geometry maintenance limits.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 230 (2): 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409714542859.
Arup. 2013. “Arup CO2ST carbon calculator.” Accessed March 10, 2015. https://www.arup.com/.
ATOC (Association of Train Operating Companies). 2007. Baseline energy statement—Energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions on the railway. London: ATOC.
Banar, M., and A. Özdemir. 2015. “An evaluation of railway passenger transport in Turkey using life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methods.” Transp. Res. Part D 41: 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.017.
Baron, T., M. Tuchschmid, G. Martinetti, and D. Pépion. 2011. “High speed rail and sustainability.” In Background report: Methodology and results of carbon footprint analysis. Paris: International Union of Railways.
Bergin, M., M. Harrell, J. McDill, M. Janssen, L. Driver, R. Fronczak, R. Nath, and D. Seep. 2009. “ERTAC rail: A collaborative effort in building a railroad-related emissions inventory between Eastern States Air Protection Agencies and participation with the railroad industry.” In Proc., 18th Annual International Emission Inventory Conf., 14–17. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
Chang, B., and A. Kendall. 2011. “Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of infrastructure construction for California’s high-speed rail system.” Transp. Res. Part D 16 (6): 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.04.004.
Chester, M. 2008. Life-cycle environmental inventory of passenger transportation in the United States. Berkeley, CA: Transportation UC Berkeley.
Chester, M., and A. Cano. 2016. “Time-based life-cycle assessment for environmental policymaking: Greenhouse gas reduction goals and public transit.” Transp. Res. Part D 43: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.003.
Chester, M., A. Horvath, and S. Madanat. 2010. “Comparison of life-cycle energy and emissions footprints of passenger transportation in metropolitan regions.” Atmos. Environ. 44 (8): 1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.012.
Chester, M., and M. Ryerson. 2014. “Grand challenges for high-speed rail environmental assessment in the United States.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Practice 61: 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.007.
Chester, M. V., and A. Horvath. 2009. “Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains.” Environ. Res. Lett. 4 (2): 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008.
Chester, M. V., and A. Horvath. 2010. “Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: The case of California.” Environ. Res. Lett. 5 (1): 014003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014003.
Craig, A., E. Blanco, and Y. Sheffi. 2013. “Estimating the CO2 intensity of intermodal freight transportation.” Transp. Res. Part D 22: 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.02.016.
Del Pero, F., M. Delogu, M. Pierini, and D. Bonaffini. 2015. “Life cycle assessment of a heavy metro train.” J. Cleaner Prod. 87: 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.023.
Esters, T., and M. Marinov. 2014. “An analysis of the methods used to calculate the emissions of rolling stock in the UK.” Transp. Res. Part D 33: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.08.012.
Facanha, C., and A. Horvath. 2007. “Evaluation of life-cycle air emission factors of freight transportation.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (20): 7138–7144. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070989q.
Gluch, P., and H. Baumann. 2004. “The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: A conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making.” Build. Environ. 39 (5): 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.10.008.
Grossrieder, C. 2011. “Life-cycle assessment of future high-speed rail in Norway.” Master in Industrial Ecology, Dept. of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology.
Guinee, J. B., ed. 2002. Handbook of life cycle assessment: Operation guide to ISO standards. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic.
ISO. 2006a. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Principles and framework. ISO 14040. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2006b. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment: Requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2015. Environmental management. ISO 14000. Geneva: ISO.
Kaewunruen, S., S. Krezo, O. Mirza, Y. He, and J. M. Sussman. 2015. “Achieving carbon efficiency in construction & maintenance of railway turnouts, crossovers and diamonds.” In Proc., 20th National Convention on Civil Engineering. Bangkok, Thailand: Engineering Institute of Thailand.
Kiani, M., T. Parry, and H. Ceney. 2008. “Environmental life-cycle assessment of railway track beds.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustainability 161 (2): 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2008.161.2.135.
Krezo, S., O. Mirza, Y. He, P. Makim, and S. Kaewunruen. 2016. “Field investigation and parametric study of greenhouse gas emissions from railway plain-line renewals.” Transp. Res. Part D 42: 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.021.
Lee, C., J. Lee, and Y. Kim. 2008. “Comparison of environmental loads with rail track systems using simplified life cycle assessment (LCA).” WIT Trans. Built Environ. 101: 367–372. https://doi.org/10.2495/UT080361.
Lee, C. K., Y. K. Kim, P. Pruitichaiwiboon, J. S. Kim, K. M. Lee, and C. S. Ju. 2010. “Assessing environmentally friendly recycling methods for composite bodies of railway rolling stock using life-cycle analysis.” Transp. Res. Part D 15 (4): 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.02.001.
Madu, C. N. 2007. Environmental planning and management. London: Imperial College Press.
Marschnig, S. 2011. “Lowering track lifecycle costs with sleeper pads.” EURAILmag Business & Technology, The magazine for European Rail decision makers, 146–147.
Mason, L. 2013. Life cycle assessment of different forms of railway track. Southampton, UK: Univ. of Southampton.
Mayer, R. M., L. D. Poulikakos, A. R. Lees, K. Heutschi, M. T. Kalivoda, and P. Soltic. 2012. “Reducing the environmental impact of road and rail vehicles.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 32 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.02.001.
Milford, R., and J. Allwood. 2010. “Assessing the CO2 impact of current and future rail track in the UK.” Transp. Res. Part D 15 (2): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.003.
Müller, D. B., G. Liu, A. N. Løvik, R. Modaresi, S. Pauliuk, F. S. Steinhoff, and H. Brattebø. 2013. “Carbon emissions of infrastructure development.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (20): 11739–11746. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402618m.
Network Rail. 2009. Comparing environmental impact of conventional and high speed rail. London: Network Rail.
Objectif Carbone. 2009. 1st Bilan carbone global railway footprint. Besancon, France: Objectif Carbone.
ORR (Office of Rail and Road). 2018. “Office of rail and road station usage database.” Accessed November 15, 2016. http://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/.
Ortega, A., S. Blainey, and J. Preston. 2017. “Installation of under sleeper pads on ballasted railway track: An economic analysis of their potential implementation.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit, 232 (6), 1800–1813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409717748811.
Ortega, A., J. M. Vassallo, A. F. Guzman, and P. J. Pérez-Martínez. 2014. “Are longer and heavier vehicles (LHVs) beneficial for society? A cost benefit analysis to evaluate their potential implementation in Spain.” Transp. Rev. 34 (2): 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.891161.
Peters, G. P., B. Aamaas, M. T. Lund, C. Solli, J. S. Fuglestvedt. 2011. “Alternative ‘global warming’ metrics in life cycle assessment: A case study with existing transportation data.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (20): 8633–8641. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200627s.
Pritchard, J. 2015. Consideration of the potential trade-offs between operational energy consumption and emissions and embedded energy consumption and emissions in rail infrastructure. London: Institution of Mechanical Engineers.
Rempelos, G. 2016. Random fibre reinforcements and rail track performance. Southampton, UK: Univ. of Southampton.
Rozycki, C. V., H. Koeser, and H. Schwarz. 2003. “Ecology profile of the German high-speed rail passenger transport system, ICE.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8 (2): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978431.
RSSB (Rail Safety and Standards Board). 2010. Whole life carbon footprint of the rail industry. London: RSSB.
SERCO. 2014. VTISM user guide. Hook, UK: SERCO.
Sol-Sanchez, M., F. Moreno-Navarro, and C. Rubio-Gamez. 2014. “Viability of using end-of-life tire pads as under sleeper pads in railway.” Constr. Build. Mater. 64: 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.013.
Sol-Sanchez, M., L. Pirozzolo, F. Moreno-Navarro, and C. Rubio-Gamez. 2016. “Reducing railway maintenance: The effectiveness of combining the stoneblowing technique with rubber elements from waste tires.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Spielmann, M., and R. W. Scholz. 2005. “Life cycle inventories of transport services: Background data for freight transport.” Int. J. Life Cycle Anal. 10 (1): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.10.181.10.
Tuchschmid, M. 2009. Carbon footprint of high-speed railway infrastructure (pre-study). Zurich, Switzerland: UIC.
Turner, D., I. Williams, and S. Kemp. 2015. “Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 105 (Part A): 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.026.
Ueda, H., T. Miyauchi, and T. Tsujimura. 2005. “Application of lifecycle assessment to Shinkansen vehicles and cross ties in Japan.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 217 (4): 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440903322712874.
van der Leeuw, S., A. Wiek, J. Harlow, and J. Buizer. 2012. “How much time do we have? Urgency and rhetoric in sustainability science.” Supplement, Sustainability Sci. 7 (S1): 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0153-1.
Yue, Y., T. Wang, S. Liang, J. Yang, P. Hou, S. Qu, J. Zhou, X. Jia, H. Wang, and M. Xu. 2015. “Life cycle assessment of high speed rail in China.” Transp. Res. Part D 41: 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 144Issue 12December 2018

History

Received: May 9, 2017
Accepted: Jun 8, 2018
Published online: Sep 21, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Feb 21, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alejandro Ortega, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Fellow, Transportation Research Group, Univ. of Southampton, Burgess Rd., Southampton SO16 7QF, UK (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Simon Blainey [email protected]
Lecturer, Transportation Research Group, Univ. of Southampton, Burgess Rd., Southampton SO16 7QF, UK. Email: [email protected]
John Preston [email protected]
Professor, Transportation Research Group, Univ. of Southampton, Burgess Rd., Southampton SO16 7QF, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share