Technical Papers
May 29, 2018

Maintenance Scheduling for Railway Tracks under Limited Possession Time

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 144, Issue 8

Abstract

Maintenance planning for busy railway systems is challenging because there is growing pressure on increasing operation time, which reduces the infrastructure-accessible time for maintenance. This paper proposes an optimization model that is aimed at finding the best maintenance schedule for multiple components in a railway track to minimize the total cost in the planning horizon. One distinct and practical feature of the model is that the track accessible time for maintenance is limited. We formulate all relevant costs in the component’s life cycle, including maintenance cost, fixed track-closure (possession) cost, social-economic cost related to the effects of maintenance time on the train operation, and service-life shortening cost due to the shifting of activities. Generally, it is beneficial to cluster and maintain several components in a single possession because this helps reduce the cost by occupying the track only once. However, the decision must depend on the available possession time. A sensitivity analysis is performed to highlight the effects of available possession time on the number of required possessions as well as the total cost incurred.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Andrade, A., and P. Teixeira. 2011. “Biobjective optimization model for maintenance and renewal decisions related to rail track geometry.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2261: 163–170. https://doi.org/10.3141/2261-19.
Budai, G. 2009. “Operations research models for scheduling railway infrastructure maintenance. Tinbergen Institute.” Accessed August 5, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/16008; http://repub.eur.nl/pub/16008/.
Budai, G., D. Huisman, and R. Dekker. 2006. “Scheduling preventive railway maintenance activities.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57 (9): 1035–1044. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602085.
Caetano, L. F., and P. F. Teixeira. 2013. “Availability approach to soptimizing railway track renewal operations.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (9): 941–948. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000575.
Caetano, L. F., and P. F. Teixeira. 2016. “Predictive maintenance model for ballast tamping.” J. Transp. Eng. 142 (4): 04016006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000825.
Cheung, B. S. N., K. P. Chow, L. C. K. Hui, and A. M. K. Yong. 1999. “Railway track possession assignment using constraint satisfaction.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 12 (5): 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(99)00025-1.
Dao, C. D., M. Zuo, and M. Pandey. 2014. “Selective maintenance for multi-state series-parallel systems under economic dependence.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 121: 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.003.
Dekker, R., R. E. Wildeman, and F. A. Schouten. 1997. “A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence.” Math. Model. Oper. Res. 45 (3): 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194788.
Gorman, M. F., and J. J. Kanet. 2010. “Formulation and solution approaches to the rail maintenance production gang scheduling problem.” J. Transp. Eng. 136 (8): 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:8(701).
Higgins, A. 1998. “Scheduling of railway track maintenance activities and crews.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49 (10): 1026–1033. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600612.
Levy, G. 2012. “Optimal planning of track work.” In Proc., Cost Optimization Track Maintenance and Renewal Congress. Paris, France: Réseau ferré de France.
Lidén, T. 2015. “Railway infrastructure maintenance—A survey of planning problems and conducted research.” Transp. Res. Procedia 10: 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.011.
Lidén, T., and M. Joborn. 2016. “Dimensioning windows for railway infrastructure maintenance: Cost efficiency versus traffic impact.” J. Rail Transp. Plann. Manage. 6 (1): 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2016.03.002.
Nicolai, R. P., and R. Dekker. 2008. “Optimal maintenance of multi-component systems: A review.” In Complex system maintenance handbook, 263–286. London, UK: Springer.
Pargar, F., O. Kauppila, and J. Kujala. 2017. “Integrated scheduling of preventive maintenance and renewal projects for multi-unit systems with grouping and balancing.” Supplement, Comput. Ind. Eng. 110: 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.024.
Peng, F., and Y. Ouyang. 2014. “Optimal clustering of railroad track maintenance jobs.” Comput.-Aid. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 29 (4): 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.2014.29.issue-4.
Pouryousef, H., P. Teixeira, and J. Sussman. 2010. “Track maintenance scheduling and its interactions with operations: Dedicated and mixed high-speed rail (HSR) scenarios.” In Proc., 2010 Joint Rail Conf., 317–326. New York: ASME.
Uzarski, D., and S. McNeil. 1994. “Technologies for planning railroad track maintenance and renewal.” J. Transp. Eng. 120 (5): 807–820. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1994)120:5(807).
Vale, C., I. Ribeiro, and R. Calçada. 2012. “Integer programming to optimize tamping in railway tracks as preventive maintenance.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (1): 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000296.
Vale, C., and I. M. Ribeiro. 2014. “Railway condition-based maintenance model with stochastic deterioration.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 20 (5): 686–692. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802711.
Vansteenwegen, P., T. Dewilde, S. Burggraeve, and D. Cattrysse. 2016. “An iterative approach for reducing the impact of infrastructure maintenance on the performance of railway systems.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252 (1): 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.037.
Wildeman, R. E., R. Dekker, and A. C. J. M. Smit. 1997. “A dynamic policy for grouping maintenance activities.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 99 (3): 530–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00319-6.
Zhao, J., A. Chan, A. Stirling, and K. Madelin. 2006. “Optimizing policies of railway ballast tamping and renewal.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1943: 50–56. https://doi.org/10.3141/1943-07.
Zhao, J., A. H. C. Chan, and M. P. N. Burrow. 2009. “A genetic-algorithm-based approach for scheduling the renewal of railway track components.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 223 (6): 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT273.
Zorita, A. L., O. Duque, M. A. Fernández, and L. A. García-Escudero. 2010. “Determination and optimization of the maintenance frequencies in the overhead contact line system.” J. Transp. Eng. 136 (11): 964–972. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000166.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 144Issue 8August 2018

History

Received: Oct 23, 2017
Accepted: Feb 16, 2018
Published online: May 29, 2018
Published in print: Aug 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 29, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Construction Management and Engineering, Univ. of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede 7500 AE, Netherlands (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3322-1243. Email: [email protected]
Rob Basten
Associate Professor, Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven Univ. of Technology, P.O. Box 513, Eindhoven 5600 MB, Netherlands.
Andreas Hartmann
Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction Management and Engineering, Univ. of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede 7500 AE, Netherlands.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share