Technical Papers
Dec 28, 2017

Developing a Systematic Method for Identifying and Ranking Freeway Bottlenecks Using Vehicle Probe Data

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 144, Issue 3

Abstract

Traffic congestion and freeway bottlenecks continue to challenge existing transportation networks. This study presents a systematic method to evaluate freeway performance and locate and rank freeway bottlenecks while accounting for both intensity and reliability dimensions of traffic congestion. A data-driven approach is used to determine a local range of the weighting factor. Based on the vehicle probe data collected on four interstate freeways in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, a case study is conducted to illustrate this new method. Numerical results clearly indicate that although two freeway segments have nearly identical reliability values, their intensity levels can be significantly different, and vice versa. Hence, quantifying both dimensions of traffic congestion in freeway bottleneck studies is necessary. The research results can provide insightful and objective information for decision makers and transportation professionals to systematically assess traffic conditions along freeway segments and objectively locate and rank freeway bottlenecks, competently develop congestion mitigation strategies, and thus allocate limited transportation funding in a more effective and efficient manner.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) for sponsoring this project. The content of this paper reflects the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the sponsoring organization. The probe speed data and TMC segment information used in this paper were obtained from INRIX, Inc.

References

AZTech Strategy Task Force. (2012). “AZTech traffic management performance measures: Phoenix metropolitan region.” Phoenix.
Banks, J. H. (2009). “Automated analysis of cumulative flow and speed curves.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2124, 28–35.
Bechtel, A. J., Brennan, T. M., and Araujo, J. M. (2016). “Characterizing bridge functional obsolescence using congestion performance measures determined from anonymous probe-vehicle data.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04015027.
Bertini, R. (2003). “Toward the systematic diagnosis of freeway bottleneck activation.” Proc., IEEE 6th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ.
Bertini, R. L., Fernandez, R., Wieczorek, J., and Li, H. (2008). “Using archived ITS data to automatically identify freeway bottlenecks in Portland, Oregon.” Proc., 15th World Congress on ITS, ITS America, Washington, DC.
Cambridge Systematics. (2011). “Bottleneck performance in the I-95 corridor: Baseline analysis using vehicle probe data.”, College Park, MD.
CDM Smith. (2014). “Travel time based Oklahoma congestion analysis: Pilot study.” ⟨http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/p-r-div/lrp_2015_2040/2040_LRTP_TM_Travel_Time.pdf⟩ (Nov. 17, 2015).
Chen, C., Skabardonis, A., and Varaiya, P. (2004). “Systematic identification of freeway bottlenecks.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1867, 46–52.
Day, C. M., et al. (2015). “Performance ranking of arterial corridors using travel time and travel time reliability metrics.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2487, 44–54.
Dowling, R. G., Parks, K. L., Nevers, B., Josselyn, J., and Gayle, S. (2015). “Incorporating travel-time reliability into the congestion management process: A primer.”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Elefteriadou, L., and Cui, X. (2005). “Review of definitions of travel time reliability.” ⟨http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/statistics/mobilitymeasures/define-ttr.pdf⟩ (Oct. 23, 2015).
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). (2011). “SIS bottleneck study (Technical Memorandum No. 2—Methodology to identify bottlenecks).” ⟨http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/programs/mspi/pdf/Tech%20Memo%202.pdf⟩ (Sep. 7, 2015).
Gong, L., and Fan, W. (2017). “Applying travel time reliability measures in identifying and ranking recurrent freeway bottlenecks at network level.” Proc., 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, DC.
Hall, F. L., and Agyemang-Duah, K. (1991). “Freeway capacity drop and the definition of capacity.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1320, 91–98.
Haghani, A., Zhang, Y., and Hamedi, M. (2014). “Impact of data source on travel time reliability assessment.” ⟨http://www.mautc.psu.edu/docs/UMD-2013-01.pdf⟩ (Apr. 6, 2017).
INRIX. (2014). “INRIX interface guide.” ⟨http://trafficjam.to/downloads/INRIX_Dev_Guide.pdf⟩ (Nov. 3, 2016).
Kittelson and Associates. (2013). “Evaluating alternative operations strategies to improve travel time reliability.” ⟨http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2prepubL11.pdf⟩ (Dec. 22, 2016).
Lomax, T., et al. (1997). “Quantifying congestion. Volume 1—Final report.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Noland, R. B., and Polak, J. W. (2002). “Travel time variability: A review of theoretical and empirical issues.” Transp. Rev., 22(1), 39–54.
Peterson, L. (2014). “WSDOT’s handbook for corridor capacity evaluation.” ⟨http://wsdot.wa.gov/publications/fulltext/graynotebook/CCR14_methodolo-gy.pdf⟩ (Oct. 20, 2015).
Pu, W. (2011). “Analytic relationships between travel time reliability measures.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2254, 122–130.
Remias, S. M., et al. (2014). “Spatially referenced probe data performance measures for infrastructure investment decision makers.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2420, 33–44.
Saberi, M., and Bertini, R. L. (2010). “Beyond corridor reliability measures: Analysis of freeway travel time reliability at the segment level for hot spot identification.” Proc., 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, DC.
Sadabadi, K. F., Jacobs, T. H., Erdogan, S., Ducca, F. W., and Zhang, L. (2015). “Value of travel time reliability in transportation decision making: Proof of concept—Maryland.” ⟨https://www.nap.edu/download/22280⟩ (Mar. 14, 2015).
Schrank, D., Eisele, B., Lomax, T., and Bak, J. (2015). “2015 urban mobility scorecard.” ⟨http://d2dtl5nnlpfr0r.cloudfront.net/tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility-scorecard-2015.pdf⟩ (Nov. 3, 2015).
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2010). “Highway capacity manual.” National Research Council, Washington, DC.
University of Arizona, Portland Metro, and RST International. (2014). “Value of travel time reliability in transportation decision making: Proof of concept—Portland, Oregon, metro.” ⟨http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2prepubL35A.pdf⟩ (Apr. 9, 2017).
USDOT and FHWA (U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration). (2015). “Urban congestion trends: Improved data for operations decision making.” ⟨http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15006/fhwahop15006.pdf⟩ (Sep. 27, 2015).
Wolniak, M., and Mahapatra, S. (2014). “Data- and performance-based congestion management approach for Maryland highways.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2420, 23–32.
Woodard, D., Nogin, G., Koch, P., Racz, D., Goldszmidt, M., and Horvitz, E. (2017). “Predicting travel time reliability using mobile phone GPS data.” Transp. Res. C Emerging Technol., 75, 30–44.
Zhang, L., and Levinson, D. (2004). “Some properties of flows at freeway bottlenecks.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1883, 122–131.
Zhao, W., McCormack, E., Dailey, D. J., and Scharnhorst, E. (2013). “Using truck probe GPS data to identify and rank roadway bottlenecks.” J. Transp. Eng., 1–7.
Zhou, X. (2016). “DTALite: Light-weight dynamic traffic assignment engine.” ⟨⟩ (Sep. 20, 2016).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 144Issue 3March 2018

History

Received: Nov 18, 2016
Accepted: Aug 25, 2017
Published online: Dec 28, 2017
Published in print: Mar 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 28, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Linfeng Gong, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223. E-mail: [email protected]
Wei (David) Fan, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Director, U.S. Dept. of Transportation Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education; Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share