Traffic Volume Benchmarks for Major Arterial Widening versus Expressway Construction: Exploratory Approach
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 143, Issue 8
Abstract
There exist several classes of physical interventions to address congestion at arterials, including widening (construction of additional lanes) and upgrading to expressway standards where possible. For each class of intervention, a key question is the threshold or benchmark traffic volume (BTV) at which the intervention is feasible. For long-term congestion mitigation planning for multiple arterial sections in a network and for planning-phase corridor development, agencies desire to identify BTVs for congestion mitigation interventions. The existing literature addresses this issue largely in feasibility analysis for specific projects, with little or no guidance regarding network-level planning considerations. In addressing this gap, this paper presents a detailed network-level planning methodology that is rooted in economic efficiency. The methodology first establishes three basic alternatives—Do-Nothing, Widening, and Upgrade-to-Expressway—and expresses the total lifecycle cost for each alternative as a function of the current traffic volume in terms of average daily traffic (ADT). The BTV is identified as the ADT at which the lifecycle costs of any two alternatives are equal. This paper demonstrates the application of the proposed methodology using data from in-service roads, and the results indicate that the relative weights assigned to the agency and user costs significantly influence the BTVs. In addition, results are presented for the scenario where these two cost categories are assigned equal weights; for this scenario, widening is never the best option. In the probabilistic situation, it is found that, at an 80% confidence level, it is economically attractive to upgrade a four-lane major arterial to an expressway when the ADT reaches 6,000; at the 100% confidence level, it is economically attractive to upgrade to an expressway when the ADT reaches 19,000.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the accuracy of facts and data. A part of this work is related to a past study conducted by the authors for the Indian Planning Commission, in conjunction with Harral Winner Thompson Sharp Klein, Inc. In addition, the work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51308335) and Chang’an University in China (Project No. 310821161001). The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of any organization, nor do they constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
References
AASHTO. (2010). “User and non-user benefit analysis for highways.” Washington, DC.
Bhandari, A., and Sinha, K. C. (1979). “Optimal timing for paving low-volume gravel roads.” Transp. Res. Rec., 702, 83–87.
Choocharukul, K., Sinha, K. C., and Nagle, J. L. (2002). “Development of a congestion management system methodology for the Indiana state highway network.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1781, 40–48.
Davis, G. A., and Xiong, H. (2007). “Access to destinations: Travel time estimation on arterials.”, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.
Dojutrek, M. S., Volovski, M., and Labi, S. (2014). “Elemental decomposition and multicriteria method for valuing transportation infrastructure.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2460, 137–145.
Fan, W., and Gurmu, Z. (2014). “Combined decision making of congestion pricing and capacity expansion: Genetic algorithm approach.” J. Transp. Eng., 04014031.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2005). “HERS-ST v4.4 Technical Rep.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2015). “Traffic congestion and reliability: Trends and advanced strategies for congestion mitigation.” Washington, DC.
Haider, S., and Dwaikat, M. (2013). “Estimating optimum timings for treatments on flexible pavements with surface rutting.” J. Transp. Eng., 485–493.
INDOT (Indiana Department of Transportation). (2011a). “Final environmental impact statement.” ⟨http://www.us31hamiltoncounty.in.gov/%5B∼87∼%5D⟩ (Dec. 15, 2013).
INDOT (Indiana Department of Transportation). (2011b). “Record of decision.” ⟨http://www.us31plysb.com/public-records.html⟩ (Jun. 13, 2011).
Irfan, M. (2010). “A framework for developing optimal pavement life-cycle activity profiles.” Ph.D. thesis, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
Khurshid, M., Irfan, M., and Labi, S. (2011). “Optimal performance threshold determination for highway asset interventions: Analytical framework and application.” J. Transp. Eng., 128–139.
Lai, Y.-C., and Barkan, C. P. L. (2011). “Comprehensive decision support framework for strategic railway capacity planning.” J. Transp. Eng., 738–749.
Lamptey, G., Ahmad, M., Labi, S., and Sinha, K. C. (2005). “Life cycle cost analysis for INDOT pavement design procedures.” Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
Li, Z., and Madanu, S. (2009). “Highway project level life-cycle benefit/cost analysis under certainty, risk, and uncertainty: Methodology with case study.” J. Transp. Eng., 135(8), 738–749.
Lu, J., Ashuri, B., Wang, X., and Kashani, H. (2012). “Optimal timing of investment in highway expansion.” Proc., 91st Annual Meeting of the Transport Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
MOC (Ministry of Communications). (2003). “Technical standards for highway engineering.” People’s Republic of China.
NRAL (National Roads Agency Limited). (2002). “Code of procedure for the planning and design of highway and road structures in South Africa.” Pretoria, South Africa.
Paredes, M. (2007). “The timing of capacity expansion investments in oligopoly under demand uncertainty.” Investment Manage. Financial Innovations, 4(1), 40–55.
Sinha, K. C., and Labi, S. (2007). Transportation decision making: Principles of project evaluation and programming, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
SPHSDI (Shaanxi Provincial Highway Survey and Design Institute). (1999). “Feasibility study on Erlianhaote-Hekou National Highway from Yumenkou to Yanliang.” Shaanxi Sheng, China.
SPHSDI (Shaanxi Provincial Highway Survey and Design Institute). (2005). “Feasibility study on Erlianhaote-Hekou National Highway from Ningqiang to Qipanguang.” China.
SPHSDI (Shaanxi Provincial Highway Survey and Design Institute). (2007). “Feasibility study on Shiyan-Tianshui National Freeway from Ankang to Hanzhoong.” China.
TNZ (Transit New Zealand). (2010). State highway geometric design manual, Wellington, New Zealand.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2003). “Providing a highway system with reliable travel times: Future strategic highway research plan area 3.” Washington, DC.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2010). Highway capacity manual, Washington, DC.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2012). “Framework for collaborative decision making on additions to highway capacity SHRP 2 capacity project C01.” Washington, DC.
USDOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). (1964). “Traffic assignment manual.” Bureau of Public Roads, Washington, DC.
USDOT (U.S. Department of Transportation). (2002). “Life-cycle cost analysis primer.” Washington, DC.
Walls, J. III, and Smith, M. R. (1998). “Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design—Interim technical bulletin.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Zhao, T., Sundararajan, S. K., and Tseng, C. (2004). “Highway development decision-making under uncertainty: A real options approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 23–32.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 8, 2016
Accepted: Feb 14, 2017
Published online: Jun 5, 2017
Published in print: Aug 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Nov 5, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.