Technical Papers
Jul 14, 2022

Utilizing In Situ Ultraviolet-Visual Spectroscopy to Measure Nutrients and Sediment Concentrations in Stormwater Runoff

Publication: Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Volume 8, Issue 4

Abstract

The capacity to collect meaningful data to estimate stormwater runoff water quality and subsequent system removal performance is key to selecting the appropriate solutions to protect water resources. Historically, grab sampling and automated composite sampling approaches have been used with training and comprehensive quality assurance protocols to produce defensible data. Innovative approaches use real-time ultraviolet-visual spectrometry (UV-Vis) can provide a powerful tool for understanding pollutant loading regionally. This study found that real-time UV-Vis sensing is a potential new tool for understanding stormwater effluent pollutant dynamics. Researchers compared data from real-time sensing using UV-Vis spectrometers to develop calibration curves for predicting pollutant concentrations in stormwater flows. Results from paired laboratory data and raw spectral data established calibrations for the stormwater runoff composition and support further investigations of the use of this technology to predict in situ concentrations of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total phosphorus (TP), total suspended solids (TSS), total nitrogen (TN), and nitrate as nitrogen (NO3N) resulted in robust models with R2 values in the range 0.99–0.93. Using partial least squares regression (PLSR) methods, the study demonstrated a strong correlation between concentrations generated by the raw absorbance data across the full available spectrum (220 to 730 nm). These results indicate the potential for developing specific stormwater calibration curves for pollutants of interest representative of stormwater runoff. Collectively, these results indicate that real-time UV-Vis spectrometers can redefine stormwater control monitoring by potentially delivering more accurate, more repeatable laboratory quality data instantaneously, with greater efficiency.

Practical Applications

Results from single grab samples of stormwater events are insufficient to develop estimates of storm event mean concentrations (EMCs). Commonly grab samples are taken during the rising limb of a hydrograph and used to characterize first flush phenomena. It is now known that first flush is a simple way to think about pollutant build-up and wash-off dynamics; however, it is a more theoretical concept because actual runoff concentrations for different pollutants vary due to many watershed and pollutant characteristics. Analyzing individual samples may be helpful to identify trends in loading rates of various constituents over a storm event and their changing intensities, but this significantly adds to laboratory costs and personnel hours to manage and process each event. Composite samples, on the other hand, offer affordable analytics and management but represent average pollutant concentrations that cannot be further discretized. These methods coupled with the difficulty of predicting dynamic storm variations in real time necessary to appropriately sample the storm leads to masked representation of what is happening in real time. The results of this paper introduce a real-time analytical method for stormwater chemistry assessment that bridges many of the contemporary sampling pitfalls. Regressions were within typical acceptable ranges allowed in stormwater chemistry analytical results from certified labs. These results encourage advancing the use of these technologies with greater efficiency and at a lower overall cost than conventionally available methodologies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data and models that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The specific programing code is not available.
Data including real-time storm event characteristics and water quality results with spectral fingerprint outputs are available on the UNH Stormwater Center website: https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/default/files/media/uv-vis_data_and_models.xlsx.

References

Asmala, E., C. A. Stedmon, and D. N. Thomas. 2012. “Linking CDOM spectral absorption to dissolved organic carbon concentrations and loadings in boreal estuaries.” Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 111 (Oct): 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.06.015.
Burton, G. A., Jr., and R. Pitt. 2001. Stormwater effects handbook: A tool box for watershed managers, scientists, and engineers. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Chin, W. W. 1998. “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling.” Chap. 10 in Modern methods for business research, edited by G. A. Marcoulides, 295–336. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Crumpton, W. G., T. M. Isenhart, and P. D. Mitchell. 1992. “Nitrate and organic N analyses with second-derivative spectroscopy.” Limnol. Oceanogr. 37 (4): 907–913. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.4.0907.
Dahlén, J., S. Karlsson, M. Bäckström, J. Hagberg, and H. Pettersson. 2000. “Determination of nitrate and other water quality parameters in groundwater from UV/Vis spectra employing partial least squares regression.” Chemosphere 40 (1): 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00242-8.
Etheridge, J. R., F. Birgand, M. R. Burchell, and B. T. Smith. 2013. “Addressing the fouling of in situ ultraviolet-visual spectrometers used to continuously monitor water quality in brackish marsh waters.” J. Environ. Qual. 42 (6): 1896–1901. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.02.0049.
Etheridge, J. R., F. Birgand, J. A. Osborne, C. L. Osburn, M. R. Burchell, and J. Irving. 2014. “Using in situ ultraviolet-visual spectroscopy to measure nitrogen, carbon, phosphorus, and suspended solids concentrations at a high frequency in a brackish tidal marsh.” Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 12 (1): 10–22. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.10.
Ferree, M. A., and R. D. Shannon. 2001. “Evaluation of a second derivative UV/Visible spectroscopy technique for nitrate and total nitrogen analysis of wastewater samples.” Water Resour. 35 (1): 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00222-0.
Fichot, C. G., and R. Benner. 2011. “A novel method to estimate DOC concentrations from CDOM absorption coefficients in coastal waters.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 (3): L03610. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046152.
Finch, M. S., D. J. Hydes, C. H. Clayson, B. Weigl, J. Dakin, and P. Gwilliam. 1998. “A low power ultra violet spectrophotometer for measurement of nitrate in seawater: Introduction, calibration and initial sea trials.” Anal. Chim. Acta 377 (2–3): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00616-3.
Helms, J. R., A. Stubbins, J. D. Ritchie, E. C. Minor, D. J. Kieber, and K. Mopper. 2008. “Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of molecular weight, source, and photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter.” Limnol. Oceanogr. 53 (3): 955–969. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.0955.
Houle, J. J., T. P. Ballestero, and T. A. Puls. 2017. “The performance analysis of two relatively small capacity urban retrofit stormwater controls.” J. Water Manage. Model. 25: C417. https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.C417.
Howie, D. 2018. Technical guidance manual for evaluating emerging stormwater treatment technology—Technology assessment protocol–ecology (TAPE). Olympia, WA: Washington State Dept. of Ecology.
Johnson, K. S., and L. J. Coletti. 2002. “In situ ultraviolet spectrophotometry for high resolution and long-term monitoring of nitrate, bromide and bisulfide in the ocean.” Deep-Sea Res. 49 (7): 1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(02)00020-1.
Kirchner, J. W., X. Feng, C. Neal, and A. J. Robson. 2004. “The fine structure of water-quality dynamics: The (high-frequency) wave of the future.” Hydrol. Processes 18 (7): 1353–1359. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5537.
Langergraber, G., N. Fleischmann, and F. Hofstadter. 2003. “A multivariate calibration procedure for UV/VIS spectrometric quantification of organic matter and nitrate in wastewater.” Water Sci. Technol. 47 (2): 63–71. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0086.
Lepot, M., J. B. Aubin, and J. L. Bertrand-Krajewski. 2013. “Accuracy of different sensors for the estimation of pollutant concentrations (total suspended solids, total and dissolved chemical oxygen demand) in wastewater and stormwater.” Water Sci. Technol. 68 (2): 462–471. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.276.
Li, J., Y. Tong, L. Guan, S. Wu, and D. Li. 2018. “Optimization of COD determination by UV–vis spectroscopy using PLS chemometrics algorithms.” Optik 174 (Dec): 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.08.111.
Olsen, K. K. 2008. “Multiple wavelength ultraviolet determinations of nitrate concentration, method comparisons from the Preakness Brook monitoring project, October 2005 to October 2006.” Water Air Soil Pollut. 187 (1): 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9508-8.
Pellerin, B. A., J. F. Saraceno, J. B. Shanley, S. D. Sebestyen, G. R. Aiken, W. M. Wollheim, and B. A. Bergamaschi. 2012. “Taking the pulse of snowmelt: In situ sensors reveal seasonal, event and diurnal patterns of nitrate and dissolved organic matter variability in an upland forest stream.” Biogeochemistry 108 (1): 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9589-8.
Pons, M. N., A. Assaad, C. Oucacha, S. Pontvianne, B. Pollier, P. Wagner, and F. Guérold. 2017. “Nitrates monitoring by UV–vis spectral analysis.” Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 17 (1): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2016.12.001.
Rieger, L., H. Langergraber, and H. Siegrist. 2006. “Uncertainties of spectral in situ measurements in wastewater using different calibration approaches.” Water Sci. Technol. 53 (12): 187–197. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.421.
Roseen, R. M., T. P. Ballestero, J. J. Houle, P. Avelleneda, R. Wildey, and J. Briggs. 2006. “Stormwater low-impact development, conventional structural, and manufactured treatment strategies for parking lot runoff.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1984 (1): 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106198400113.
Sakamoto, C. M., K. S. Johnson, and L. J. Coletti. 2009. “Improved algorithm for the computation of nitrate concentrations in seawater using an in situ ultraviolet spectrophotometer.” Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 7 (1): 132–143. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2009.7.132.
s::can GmbH. 2020. Specification sheet surface water global calibration. Vienna, Austria: s::can GmbH.
Selbig, W. R. 2016. “Evaluation of leaf removal as a means to reduce nutrient concentrations and loads in urban stormwater.” Sci. Total Environ. 571 (Nov): 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.003.
Sinha, V., K. Pakshirajan, and R. Chaturvedi. 2014. “Chromium (VI) accumulation and tolerance by Tradescantia pallida: Biochemical and antioxidant study.” Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 173 (8): 2297–2306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1035-7.
Suzuki, N., and R. Kuroda. 1987. “Direct simultaneous determination of nitrate and nitrite by ultraviolet second-derivative spectrophotometry.” Analyst 112 (7): 1077–1079. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9871201077.
Torres, A., and J. L. Bertrand-Krajewski. 2008. “Partial least squares local calibration of a UV-visible spectrometer used for in situ measurements of COD and TSS concentrations in urban drainage systems.” Water Sci. Technol. 57 (4): 581–588. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.131.
USEPA. 2002. Urban stormwater BMP performance monitoring. EPA-821-B-02-001. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Vaughan, M. C. H., et al. 2017. “High-frequency dissolved organic carbon and nitrate measurements reveal differences in storm hysteresis and loading in relation to land cover and seasonality.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (7): 5345–5363. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020491.
Walsh, C. J., D. B. Booth, M. J. Burns, T. D. Fletcher, R. L. Hale, L. N. Hoang, and A. Wallace. 2016. “Principles for urban stormwater management to protect stream ecosystems.” Freshwater Sci. 35 (1): 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1086/685284.
Washington State Dept. of Ecology (WA DOE). 2011. Technology assessment protocol—Ecology (TAPE). Olympia, WA: Water Quality Program.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Volume 8Issue 4November 2022

History

Received: Dec 3, 2021
Accepted: Apr 8, 2022
Published online: Jul 14, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 14, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Director, UNH Stormwater Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New Hampshire, 35 Colovos Rd., 334 Gregg Hall, Durham, NH 03824 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2121-2785. Email: [email protected]
Project Engineer, UNH Stormwater Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3563-4738. Email: [email protected]
Thomas P. Ballestero, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824. Email: [email protected]
Timothy A. Puls [email protected]
Project Manager, Underwood Engineers, 25 Vaughan Mall, Portsmouth, NH 03801. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share