Case Studies
May 17, 2022

Hydrologic and Water Quality Performance of Two Bioswales at an Urban Farm

Publication: Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Volume 8, Issue 3

Abstract

Many postindustrial cities are transforming underused areas into urban agriculture, which presents unique stormwater management challenges. One way to manage runoff from urban agriculture is to use green stormwater infrastructure; however, to date, green stormwater infrastructure has largely been applied to treat runoff from impervious surfaces and its application to urban agricultural runoff is underexplored. This study seeks to fill this gap by monitoring two bioswales collecting and treating runoff from an urban farm in Milwaukee, WI. To do so, the influent and effluent at each bioswale was sampled and tested for total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus, and total nitrogen. Both bioswales were effective at reducing volume, peak flows, total phosphorus concentrations, and high concentrations of TSS (>25  mg/L) but had mixed results in reducing total nitrogen concentrations and TSS at low influent concentrations (25  mg/L). Large volume capture and exfiltration resulted in load reduction (median 98%) across all pollutants. Overall, this project demonstrates the feasibility of bioswales for reducing pollutant loads from urban farms, which may have different pollutant concentrations within stormwater runoff than other typical urban settings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, including all monitoring data.

References

American Public Health Association. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, edited by A. D. Eaton, L. S. Clesceri, M. A. H. Franson, E. W. Rice, and A. E. Greenberg. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
Bloomberg, M. R., and C. Holoway. 2010. NYC green infrastructure plan: A sustainable strategy for clean waterways. New York: The City of New York.
Braswell, A. S., R. J. Winston, and W. F. Hunt. 2018. “Hydrologic and water quality performance of permeable pavement with internal water storage over a clay soil in Durham, North Carolina.” J. Environ. Manage. 224 (Oct): 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.040.
Brown, R. A., and W. F. Hunt III. 2011. “Impacts of media depth on effluent water quality and hydrologic performance of undersized bioretention cells.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 137 (3): 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000167.
Carlet, F., J. Schilling, and M. Heckert. 2017. “Greening US legacy cities: Urban agriculture as a strategy for reclaiming vacant land.” Agroecol. Sustainable Food Syst. 41 (8): 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1311288.
Chen, H. J., and H. Chang. 2014. “Response of discharge, TSS, and E. coli to rainfall events in urban, suburban, and rural watersheds.” Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts 16 (10): 2313–2324. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00327F.
City of Philadelphia & USEPA. 2011. Green city, clean waters partnership agreement. Philadelphia: City of Philadelphia.
Clary, J., J. Jones, M. Leisenring, P. Hobson, and E. Strecker. 2020. International stormwater BMP database 2020 summary statistics. Alexandria, VA: Water Research Foundation.
Davis, A. P. 2008. “Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 13 (2): 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:2(90).
Dietz, M. E. 2016. “Modified bioretention for enhanced nitrogen removal from agricultural runoff.” J. Environ. Eng. 142 (12): 06016007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001144.
Farnsworth, R. K., E. S. Thompson, M. Baldrige, J. V. Byrne, R. E. Hallgren, and A. A. Administrator. 1982. NOAA technical report NWS 34: Mean monthly, seasonal, and annual pan evaporation for the United States. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Ghane, E., A. Z. Ranaivoson, G. W. Feyereisen, C. J. Rosen, and J. F. Moncrief. 2016. “Comparison of contaminant transport in agricultural drainage water and urban stormwater runoff.” PLoS One 11 (12): e0167834. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167834.
Hach. 2014. Nitrogen, total, persulfate digestion method 10071, 0.5 to 25 mg/L N (LR), 1–8. Loveland, CO: Hach Company.
Hach. 2015. ULR phosphorus, reactive (Orthophosphate) and total, ascorbic acid method, 30 to 1500 μg/L PO4 3–, 10 to 500 μg/L PO4–P or 46 to 2300 μg/L P2O5, method 10209 reactive and 10210 total, 1–8. Loveland, CO: Hach Company.
Hach. 2016a. Phosphorus, reactive (Orthophosphate) and total, ascorbic acid method, 0.15 to 4.50 mg/L PO4 3– or 0.05 to 1.50 mg/L PO4 3–-P (LR) method, method 10209/10210, 1–8. Loveland, CO: Hach Company.
Hach. 2016b. Phosphorus, reactive (Orthophosphate) and total, ascorbic acid method 1.5 to 15.0 mg/L PO4 3– or 0.5 to 5.0 mg/L PO4–P (HR) method, method 20109/10210, 1–8. Loveland, CO: Hach Company.
Horst, M., N. McClintock, and L. Hoey. 2017. “The intersection of planning, urban agriculture, and food justice: A review of the literature.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 83 (3): 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2017.1322914.
Hunt, W. F., A. R. Jarrett, J. T. Smith, and L. J. Sharkey. 2006. “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 132 (6): 600–608. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600).
Hunt, W. F., J. T. Smith, S. J. Jadlocki, J. M. Hathaway, and P. R. Eubanks. 2008. “Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in Urban Charlotte, N.C.” J. Environ. Eng. 134 (5): 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:5(403).
Kokkinos, J. 2017. Bioretention in a mixed-use agricultural landscape: Lessons learned from the application of low-phosphorus compost and panicum virgatum. Burlington, VT: Univ. of Vermont.
Lee, J. H., K. W. Bang, J. H. Ketchum, J. S. Choe, and M. J. Yu. 2002. “First flush analysis of urban storm runoff.” Sci. Total Environ. 293 (1–3): 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00006-2.
Li, H., L. J. Sharkey, W. F. Hunt, and A. P. Davis. 2009. “Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 14 (4): 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(407).
Li, L., and A. P. Davis. 2014. “Urban stormwater runoff nitrogen composition and fate in bioretention systems.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (6): 3403–3410. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4055302.
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District. 2018. Deep tunnel: MMSD. Milwaukee, WI: Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewage District.
Open Channel Flow. 2020. H flume flow equation and tables. Atlanta: Open Channel Flow.
Passeport, E., W. F. Hunt, D. E. Line, R. A. Smith, and R. A. Brown. 2009. “Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce storm-water runoff pollution.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 135 (4): 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006.
Poresky, A., C. Bracken, E. Strecker, and J. Clary. 2012. “Expanded analysis of volume reduction in bioretention BMPs.” Accessed December 1, 2021. http://www.bmpdatabase.org/.
Poresky, A., J. Clary, E. Strecker, and A. Earles. 2011. International stormwater best management practices (BMP) database technical summary: Volume reduction. Alexandria, VA: Water Research Foundation.
Purvis, R. A., R. J. Winston, W. F. Hunt, B. Lipscomb, K. Narayanaswamy, A. McDaniel, M. S. Lauffer, and S. Libes. 2019. “Evaluating the hydrologic benefits of a bioswale in Brunswick County, North Carolina (NC), USA.” Water (Switzerland) 11 (6): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061291.
Shrestha, P., J. W. Faulkner, J. Kokkinos, and S. E. Hurley. 2020. “Influence of low-phosphorus compost and vegetation in bioretention for nutrient and sediment control in runoff from a dairy farm production area.” Ecol. Eng. 150 (Dec): 105821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105821.
Snavely, N., S. M. Seitz, and R. Szeliski. 2008. “Modeling the world from internet photo collections.” Int. J. Comput. Vision 80 (2): 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-007-0107-3.
USEPA. 2005. National management measures to control nonpoint source pollution from urban areas. Washington, DC: USEPA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Volume 8Issue 3August 2022

History

Received: Sep 21, 2021
Accepted: Feb 18, 2022
Published online: May 17, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 17, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Elizabeth Regier
Master’s Student, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Marquette Univ., 1515 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53233.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Marquette Univ., 1515 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53233 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-7908. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Green Infrastructure in Series Reduces Thermal Impacts of Stormwater Runoff, Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 10.1061/JSWBAY.SWENG-486, 9, 2, (2023).
  • Hydrologic and water quality performance of a subsurface gravel wetland treating stormwater runoff, Journal of Environmental Management, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116120, 322, (116120), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share