Abstract

The actions exerted by yawed wind on the crossarm substantially differ from those on the tower body due to the presence of the angle between the crossarm’s cross-section and the incoming flow, and this phenomenon deserves a better understanding. Focusing on the tubular crossarms with round-section members, this paper aims to determine insights into wind actions, as affected by various factors, such as the tower type, the mean width to mean height ratio, the solidity ratio, and the wind incidence angle, and thereby derive the wind loads for design. Accordingly, a succession of wind tunnel tests was conducted by using quadrilateral and triangular crossarm models with various solidity ratios and mean width to mean height ratios. The method of direct force measurement (DFM) is employed for the high frequency force balance (HFFB) test to attain the transverse and longitudinal forces on the crossarm simultaneously. It was found that the wind load coefficients increase with increases of the mean width to mean height ratio and decreases of the solidity ratio. Moreover, in the case of the incoming flow perpendicular to the crossarm face, it is concluded that compared to the quadrilateral crossarm, the triangular crossarm possesses a relatively smaller drag coefficient, provided a moderate mean width to mean height ratio of 1.19. Furthermore, an analysis of the experimental results shows that the skewed wind load factor specified in the relevant codes would overestimate the effects of the wind incidence angle and the variations in mean width to mean height ratio, which is evident in the tests but not considered in the codes. It is worth noting that the experimental results show that the crosswind force is pronounced, which is usually ignored in the skewed wind load factor-based approach. Comparatively, using wind load distribution factors seems to be more rational. Thus, the corresponding estimating equations are proposed for the wind load-distribution factors of the crossarms, which agree well with the experimental results. The developed equations would greatly facilitate the determination of wind loads on tubular crossarms.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 51838012, 51878607, and 52178511. These supports are greatly appreciated. The opinions and statements do not necessarily represent those of the sponsors.

References

Abd-Elaal, E. S., J. E. Mills, and X. Ma. 2018. “A review of transmission line systems under downburst wind loads.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 179 (Aug): 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.07.004.
Aboshosha, H., A. Elawady, A. El Ansary, and A. El Damatty. 2016. “Review on dynamic and quasi-static buffeting response of transmission lines under synoptic and non-synoptic winds.” Eng. Struct. 112 (Apr): 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.003.
ASCE. 2010. Guidelines for electrical transmission line structural loading. ASCE Manual No. 74: 2010. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2020. Guidelines for electrical transmission line structural loading. ASCE Manual No. 74: 2020. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2021. Wind tunnel testing for building and other structures. ASCE Manual No. 49: 2021. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Azzi, Z., A. Elawady, P. Irwin, A. G. Chowdhury, and C. Abi Shdid. 2021. “Aeroelastic modeling to study the wind-induced response of a self-supported lattice tower.” Eng. Struct. 245 (Oct): 112885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112885.
Balczó, M., I. Goricsán, T. Kovács, T. Lajos, T. Regért, and P. Sebestyén. 2006. “Prediction of wind load acting on telecommunication masts.” In Proc., IABSE Annual Meetings and Symp. Budapest, Hungary: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Bayar, D. C. 1986. “Drag coefficients of latticed towers.” J. Struct. Eng. 112 (2): 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(417).
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Design of steel structures—Part 3–1: Towers, masts and chimneys—Towers and masts. BS EN 1993-3-1, Eurocode 3. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2012. Overhead electrical lines exceeding AC 1 kV—Part 1: General requirements—Common specifications. BS EN 50341-1: 2012. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Deng, H., J. Zhang, Q. Shuai, and Q. Chen. 2010. “Wind-tunnel investigation on pressure coefficient of steel tubular transmission tower.” [In Chinese.] Power Syst. Technol. 34 (9): 190–194. https://doi.org/10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2010.09.024.
EPPEI (China Electric Power Planning and Engineering Institute). 2012. Technical code for the design of tower and pole structures of overhead transmission line. [In Chinese.] DL/T 5154-2012. Beijing: China Planning Press.
EPPEI (China Electric Power Planning and Engineering Institute). 2018. Load code for the design of overhead transmission line. [In Chinese.] DL/T 5551-2018. Beijing: China Planning Press.
Huang, M., W. Lou, L. Yang, B. Sun, G. Shen, and K. T. Tse. 2012. “Experimental and computational simulation for wind effects on the Zhoushan transmission towers.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 8 (8): 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.497540.
JEC (Japanese Electrotechnical Committee). 1979. Design standard on structures for transmissions. JEC-127-1979. Tokyo: JEC.
JEC (Japanese Electrotechnical Committee). 2015. Design standard on structures for transmissions. JEC-127-2015. Tokyo: JEC.
JTC (Joint Technical Committee). 2011. Structural design actions—Part 2: Wind actions. AS/NZS 1170.2: 2011. Australia: JTC.
Li, Y., Z. Li, E. Savory, Y. Zhong, and Z. Yan. 2020. “Wind tunnel measurement of overall and sectional drag coefficients for a super high-rise steel tube transmission tower.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 206 (Nov): 104363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104363.
Li, Y., Z. Li, B. Yan, and Z. Yan. 2017. “Wind forces on circular steel tubular lattice structures with inclined leg members.” Eng. Struct. 153 (Dec): 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.032.
Liang, S., L. Zou, D. Wang, and H. Cao. 2015. “Investigation on wind tunnel tests of a full aeroelastic model of electrical transmission tower-line system.” Eng. Struct. 85 (Feb): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.042.
Lou, W., B. Sun, and J. Tang. 2000. “Aeroelastic model investigation and spectral analysis of a tall lattice tower.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 3 (2): 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369433001502067.
Lou, W., D. Wang, G. Shen, and X. Jin. 2013. “Wind tunnel tests for wind load-distribution and shape coefficient of angle-made-transmission towers.” [In Chinese.] J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Med. 41 (4): 114–118. https://doi.org/10.13245/j.hust.2013.04.023.
Mara, T. G., and T. C. E. Ho. 2011. “Design loads for transmission towers under skewed wind loading.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2011, 1246–1257. Reston, VA: ASCE.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China). 2012. Load code for the design building structures. [In Chinese.] GB 50009-2012. Beijing: China Architecture and Industrial Press.
Pezo, M. L., and V. V. Bakic. 2014. “Numerical determination of drag coefficient for guyed mast exposed to wind action.” Eng. Struct. 62–63 (Mar): 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.025.
Shen, G., C. S. Cai, B. Sun, and W. Lou. 2011. “Study of dynamic impacts on transmission-line systems attributable to conductor breakage using the finite-element method.” ASCE J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 25 (2): 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000133.
Shen, G., G. Xiang, Y. Xing, Y. Guo, B. Sun, and W. Lou. 2014. “Experimental investigation of steel latticed towers with cylindrical members based on force balance tests under two wind flows.” [In Chinese.] J. Zhejiang Univ. (Eng. Sci.) 48 (4): 704–710. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2014.04.021.
Xie, Q., Y. Cai, and S. Xue. 2017. “Wind-induced vibration of UHV transmission tower line system: Wind tunnel test on aero-elastic model.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 171 (Dec): 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.011.
Yang, F. 2017. “Study on skewed wind load factor on cross arms of angle steel transmission towers under skewed wind.” [In Chinese.] Eng. Mech. 34 (4): 150–159. https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.10.0845.
Yang, F., H. Dang, H. Niu, H. Zhang, and B. Zhu. 2016. “Wind tunnel tests on wind loads acting on an angled steel triangular transmission tower.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 156 (Sep): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.07.016.
Yang, F., J. Yang, H. Niu, and H. Zhang. 2015. “Design wind loads for tubular-angle steel cross-arms of transmission towers under skewed wind loading.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 140 (Dec): 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.012.
Yao, J., W. Lou, G. Shen, Y. Guo, and Y. Xing. 2019. “Influence of inflow turbulence on the flow characteristics around a circular cylinder.” Appl. Sci. 9 (17): 3595. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173595.
Zhang, W., Y. Xiao, C. Li, Q. Zheng, and Y. Tang. 2022. “Wind load investigation of self-supported lattice transmission tower based on wind tunnel tests.” Eng. Struct. 252 (Feb): 113575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113575.
Zhou, Q., B. Ma, Q. Zhu, and H. Zhang. 2019a. “Investigation on wind loads on angle-steel cross-arms of lattice transmission towers via direct force measurement.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 191 (Aug): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.06.004.
Zhou, Q., H. Zhang, B. Ma, and Y. Huang. 2019b. “Wind loads on transmission tower bodies under skew winds with both yaw and tilt angles.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 187 (Apr): 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.01.013.
Zhou, Q., L. Zhao, Q. Zhu, and Y. Zhu. 2021. “Mean wind loads on equilateral triangular lattice tower under skewed wind loading.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 208 (Jan): 104467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104467.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149Issue 3March 2023

History

Received: Dec 15, 2021
Accepted: Nov 3, 2022
Published online: Dec 24, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 24, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3528-4117. Email: [email protected]
Jianfeng Yao [email protected]
Assistant Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ. of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. Email: [email protected]
Wenjuan Lou [email protected]
Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. Email: [email protected]
Senior Engineer, Energy Engineering Group Zhejiang Power Design Institute Co. Ltd., 68 Gucui Rd., Hangzhou 310012, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share