Technical Papers
Sep 26, 2024

Strategic Management and Seismic Resilience Enhancement of Water Distribution Network Using Artificial Neural Network Model

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 16, Issue 1

Abstract

The seismic resilience of water distribution networks (WDNs) as the most critical urban infrastructure is a major aspect of crisis management. Developing accurate computational models to evaluate the seismic behavior of WDNs and enhance seismic resilience remains a major research challenge. This paper introduces a novel model to evaluate the seismic vulnerability of WDNs through an artificial neural network (ANN) approach. To generate initial data to develop the seismic damage prediction model, extensive numerical modeling was performed using commercially available software to extract the strain behavior of buried pipes under seismic loading. A total of 720 numerical simulations were performed. The numerical model was validated using an experimental model. The results showed that the numerical model had an error smaller than 10% in evaluating the strain behavior of buried pipes, suggesting satisfactory model performance. This paper used a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm (LMA) because it has shown good performance in regression applications. The sensitivity of the proposed model to the number of hidden layers was analyzed, and the MLP with 15 hidden layers was found to be optimal in predicting the strain of the buried pipe under seismic loading, with a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.301 and a correlation coefficient R=0.969. The proposed seismic damage prediction model was executed on the WDN of Tehran, Iran, based on the initial data set under five seismic loading scenarios, calculating the numbers of breaks and leaks. The seismic resilience of the WDN was evaluated using damage, minimum water demand, and restoration time indices. Several strategies were proposed to enhance the seismic resilience of WDNs. The developed seismic resilience assessment model in this study has the capability to be applied and implemented across other WDNs.

Practical Applications

The water distribution network is critical for urban resilience, and evaluating its seismic vulnerability is essential for managing earthquake impacts, particularly in ensuring postearthquake water supply and firefighting capabilities. This study introduces a novel ANN model designed to assess seismic resilience in urban water distribution networks. The model employs advanced computational techniques to comprehensively evaluate resilience and propose enhancement strategies. A case study conducted in Tehran, Iran, validated the model’s accuracy in assessing earthquake damage and resilience strategies specific to the water distribution network. The results demonstrate the model’s effectiveness in improving urban infrastructure performance during seismic events. The seismic vulnerability prediction model and seismic resilience analysis of the water distribution network presented in this study can serve as a comprehensive tool for urban stakeholders and planners. This model is adaptable and can be applied to assess vulnerability and enhance resilience in various urban water distribution networks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tehran Province Water and Wastewater Company for providing data for the research.

References

Adachi, T., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2008. “Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (1): 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.014.
ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2001. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Anderson, R. T. 2000. The natural attenuation and engineered bioremediation of benzene in petroleum-contaminated aquifers under anaerobic conditions. Amherst, MA: Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst.
Assad, A., O. Moselhi, and T. Zayed. 2020. “Resilience-driven multiobjective restoration planning for water distribution networks.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (4): 04020072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001478.
Bata, M. T. H., R. Carriveau, and D. S. K. Ting. 2022. “Urban water supply systems’ resilience under earthquake scenario.” Sci. Rep. 12 (1): 20555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23126-8.
Bollin, C., R. Hidajat, and J. Birkmann. 2006. “Community-based risk index: Pilot implementation in Indonesia.” In Vol. 271 of Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, 89. New Delhi, India: The Energy and Resources Institute Press.
Bruneau, M., S. E. Chang, R. T. Eguchi, G. C. Lee, T. D. O’Rourke, A. M. Reinhorn, M. Shinozuka, K. Tierney, W. A. Wallace, and D. Von Winterfeldt. 2003. “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Engineering 19 (4): 733–752.
Cekirge, H. M. 2015. “Quantitative risk assessment for crude oil pipelines.” Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 3 (3): 147–153.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Eurocode 8, Part 4: Silos, tanks and pipelines. CEN EN 1998-4. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chang, S. E., T. McDaniels, J. Fox, R. Dhariwal, and H. Longstaff. 2014. “Toward disaster-resilient cities: Characterizing resilience of infrastructure systems with expert judgments.” Risk Anal. 34 (3): 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12133.
Cheng, X., C. Ma, R. Huang, S. Huang, and W. Yang. 2019. “Failure mode analysis of X80 buried steel pipeline under oblique-reverse fault.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 125 (Oct): 105723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105723.
Cimellaro, G. P., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2010. “Seismic resilience of a hospital system.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 6 (1–2): 127–144.
Cimellaro, G. P., A. Tinebra, C. Renschler, and M. Fragiadakis. 2016. “New resilience index for urban water distribution networks.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001433.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2007. Oil and gas pipeline system. CSA-Z662. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
Dong, J.-Q., S.-S. Zheng, X. K. Xie, F. Yang, S.-L. Che, and X.-H. Liu. 2023. “Seismic vulnerability analysis of pipeline considering the influence of near-fault pulse-type ground motion.” Eng. Mech. 40 (5): 104–116. https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.10.0823.
Dueñas-Osorio, L., J. I. Craig, and B. J. Goodno. 2007. “Seismic response of critical interdependent networks.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (2): 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.626.
Farahmandfar, Z., K. R. Piratla, and R. D. Andrus. 2017. “Resilience evaluation of water supply networks against seismic hazards.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 8 (1): 04016014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000251.
Germoso, C., O. Gonzalez, and F. Chinesta. 2021. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of buried pipelines: A 3D parametric study.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 143 (Apr): 106627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106627.
Haghighi, M., A. Delnavaz, P. Rashvand, and M. Delnavaz. 2024. “Assessment through machine learning of groundwater vulnerability after seismic damage to fuel pipeline.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 15 (3): 04024021. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1543.
Huang, H., and H. V. Burton. 2022. “Dynamic seismic damage assessment of distributed infrastructure systems using graph neural networks and semi-supervised machine learning.” Adv. Eng. Software 168 (Jun): 103113.
Huang, T., and B. Dilkina. 2020. “Enhancing seismic resilience of water pipe networks.” In Proc., 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, 44–52. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3378393.3402246.
Hwang, H. H., H. Lin, and M. Shinozuka. 1998. “Seismic performance assessment of water delivery systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 4 (3): 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1998)4:3(118).
Ito, A., M. Okutsu, A. Furukawa, G. Shoji, and T. Suzuki. 2022. “Earthquake damage prediction of underground steel pipe with screw joint using machine learning.” In Proc., Lifelines 2022, 613–620. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kammouh, O., P. Gardoni, and G. P. Cimellaro. 2020. “Probabilistic framework to evaluate the resilience of engineering systems using Bayesian and dynamic Bayesian networks.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 198 (Jun): 106813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106813.
Karamy Moghadam, A., and M. Mahdavi Adeli. 2020. “Application of artificial neural networks for seismic analysis and design of buried pipelines in heterogeneous soils.” J. Hydraul. Struct. 6 (4): 60–74.
Li, F., W. Wang, J. Xu, J. Yi, and Q. Wang. 2019. “Comparative study on vulnerability assessment for urban buried gas pipeline network based on SVM and ANN methods.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 122 (Feb): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.11.014.
Liu, Y., and Y. Bao. 2023. “Intelligent monitoring of spatially-distributed cracks using distributed fiber optic sensors assisted by deep learning.” Measurement 220 (Oct): 113418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113418.
Liu, Y., M. Hajj, and Y. Bao. 2022. “Review of robot-based damage assessment for offshore wind turbines.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 158 (Apr): 112187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112187.
Makhoul, N., C. Navarro, and J. Lee. 2018. “Earthquake damage estimations of Byblos potable water network.” Nat. Hazards 93 (Sep): 627–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3319-7.
Makrakis, N., P. N. Psarropoulos, and Y. Tsompanakis. 2022. “ANN-based assessment of soft surface soil layers’ impact on fault rupture propagation and kinematic distress of gas pipelines.” Infrastructures 8 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8010006.
Markov, I., M. Grigoriu, and T. D. O’Rourke. 1994. An evaluation of seismic serviceability of water supply networks with application to the San Francisco auxiliary water supply system. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Moser, A. P., and S. Folkman. 2008. Buried pipe design. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nariman, A., M. H. Fattahi, N. Talebbeydokhti, and M. S. Sadeghian. 2023. “Assessment of seismic resilience in urban water distribution network considering hydraulic indices.” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 47 (2): 1165–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00941-7.
Ni, P., S. Mangalathu, and K. Liu. 2020. “Enhanced fragility analysis of buried pipelines through Lasso regression.” Acta Geotech. 15 (2): 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0719-5.
O’Rourke, T. D., M. D. Grigoriu, and M. M. Khater. 1985. “Seismic response of buried pipelines.” In Pressure vessel and piping technology—1985: A decade of progress, 281–323. New York: ASME.
Paez, D., et al. 2020. “Battle of postdisaster response and restoration.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 146 (8): 04020067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239.
Qian, L., S. Wei, Y. Tianlai, W. Tiancheng, and H. Mohamed. 2023. “Mathematical methodology in the seismic resilience evaluation of the water supply system.” Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 8 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.2.00212.
Reinhorn, A. M., S. Viti, G. Cimellaro, and C. Z. Chrysostomou. 2005. “Retrofit of structures: Strength reduction with damping enhancement.” In Proc., 37th UJNR Panel Meeting on Wind and Seismic Effects, 16–21. Tsukuba, Japan: Public Works Research Institute.
Renschler, C. S., A. E. Frazier, L. A. Arendt, G. P. Cimellaro, A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2010. A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: The PEOPLES resilience framework. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Salgado-Gálvez, M. A., D. Zuloaga, S. Henao, G. A. Bernal, and O. D. Cardona. 2018. “Probabilistic assessment of annual repair rates in pipelines and of direct economic losses in water and sewage networks: Application to Manizales, Colombia.” Nat. Hazards 93 (Sep): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2987-z.
SelÇuk, A. S., and M. S. Yücemen. 2000. “Reliability of lifeline networks with multiple sources under seismic hazard.” Nat. Hazards 21 (Jan): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008146906319.
Shi, P. 2006. Seismic response modeling of water supply systems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
Shinozuka, M., R. Y. Tan, and T. Toike. 1981. “Serviceability of water transmission systems under seismic risk.” In Proc., Lifeline Earthquake Engineering: The Current State of Knowledge, 97–110. New York: ASCE.
Tan, X., L. Fan, Y. Huang, and Y. Bao. 2021. “Detection, visualization, quantification, and warning of pipe corrosion using distributed fiber optic sensors.” Autom. Constr. 132 (Dec): 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103953.
Tang, H., Q. Zhong, C. Chen, and I. Martek. 2023. “The adaptive seismic resilience of infrastructure systems: A Bayesian networks analysis.” Systems 11 (2): 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020084.
Tanircan, G., N. Tsereteli, E. Garaveliev, B. Siyahi, O. Varazanashvili, T. Mammadli, Q. Yethirmishli, T. Cehlidze, A. Axundov, and E. Safak. 2011. “Seismic hazard assessment for southern Caucasus-eastern Turkey energy corridor.” In Vol. 13 of Proc., EGU Conf. Munich, Germany: Geophysical Research Abstracts.
Toprak, S., and F. Taskin. 2007. “Estimation of earthquake damage to buried pipelines caused by ground shaking.” Nat. Hazards 40 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0002-1.
Tsatsis, A., M. Loli, and G. Gazetas. 2019. “Pipeline in dense sand subjected to tectonic deformation from normal or reverse faulting.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 127 (Dec): 105780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105780.
Uma, S. R., F. Scheele, E. Abbott, and J. Moratalla. 2021. “Planning for resilience of water networks under earthquake hazard: A case study for Rotorua District, New Zealand.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 54 (2): 135–152. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.54.2.135-152.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2019. World urbanization prospects 2018: Highlights. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Wang, Y. 2006. Seismic performance evaluation of water supply systems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
Wisner, B., and P. Walker. 2005. “The world conference on disaster viewed through the lens of political ecology: A dozen big questions for Kobe and beyond.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 16 (2): 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455750500108351.
Xu, R., R. Jiang, and T. J. Qu. 2021. “Review of dynamic response of buried pipelines.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (2): 03120003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000527.
Yang, Y., S. T. Ng, F. J. Xu, and M. Skitmore. 2018. “Towards sustainable and resilient high density cities through better integration of infrastructure networks.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 42 (Oct): 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.013.
Zhai, C., Y. Zhao, W. Wen, H. Qin, and L. Xie. 2023. “A novel urban seismic resilience assessment method considering the weighting of post-earthquake loss and recovery time.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 84 (Jan): 103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103453.
Zhang, P., Y. Wang, and G. Qin. 2019. “A novel method to assess safety of buried pressure pipelines under non-random process seismic excitation based on cloud model.” Appl. Sci. 9 (4): 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9040812.
Zhou, W., G. Kalonji, C. Chen, and I. Martek. 2022. “Seismic resilience of rural water supply systems; factor analysis of cases set in Sichuan Province, China.” Front. Public Health 10 (Feb): 840379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.840379.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 16Issue 1February 2025

History

Received: Dec 30, 2023
Accepted: Jun 10, 2024
Published online: Sep 26, 2024
Published in print: Feb 1, 2025
Discussion open until: Feb 26, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Mahnaz Haghighi [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Science and Research Branch, Tehran 14778-93855, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Ali Delnavaz [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Qazvin Branch, Qazvin 34719-93116, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Majid Safehian [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Science and Research Branch, Tehran 14778-93855, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Mohammad Delnavaz [email protected]
Associate Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kharazmi Univ., Tehran 15719-14911, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share