Technical Papers
Jul 13, 2023

Numerical Analyses of the Stress and Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Small-Diameter Gas Pipelines under Multiple-Wheel Heavy Vehicle

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 14, Issue 4

Abstract

Vehicle load is the most frequent live load on cross-highway pipelines. Cross-highway pipelines will bear great stress under the rolling action of heavy vehicles, which leads to pipeline failure and damage. However, the current vehicle–road model and the pipeline–soil model are calculated independently of each other, which cannot accurately solve the stress response of buried pipelines in the process of a vehicle rolling in real time. This paper solves this problem. To study the real-time influence of vehicle load, vehicle speed, rolling position, and other dynamic factors on pipelines’ stress, the ultimate bearing capacity of small-diameter gas pipelines under the action of a heavy vehicle rolling was quantified. This paper established the vehicle–pavement–pipeline model by combining Adams version 2020 and Abaqus version 2020, and the pipeline’s dynamic stress response and ultimate bearing capacity under vehicle load were simulated numerically. According to the actual working conditions on-site, an experimental system for buried pipelines was established, and the test was verified with a 7-m-long pipeline. Simulated and experimental results were compared, and showed good agreement. The research results show that the stress on the pipeline is positively related to the vehicle load and diameter. However, with the increase in vehicle speed, the stress on the pipeline tends to decrease. When the burial depth of the pipeline reaches 1.5 m, the protective effect of soil on the pipeline is weakened. The study also found that the internal pressure has a certain protective effect which can reduce the impact of vehicle load on stress increment. This is a new discovery: the closer the rolling position is to the centerline of the pipeline, the greater is the peak stress. Finally, an evaluation method of the ultimate bearing capacity of buried pipelines and the overload warning index is proposed based on the von Mises stress, and vehicle overload warning curves were established. The vehicle overload warning curves can be used to determine whether the current vehicle load will be harmful to the pipeline, or to design the maximum vehicle load of a section in preliminary work. On-site application showed that the vehicle overload warning curves have high accuracy and can provide some guidance for the safe operation of the pipeline.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52174062).

References

Abolmaali, A., and A. Kararam. 2013. “Nonlinear finite-element modeling analysis of soil-pipe interaction.” Int. J. Geomech. 13 (3): 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000196.
Alzabeebee, S., D. Chapman, I. Jefferson, and A. Faramarzi. 2017. “The response of buried pipes to UK standard traffic loading.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 170 (1): 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.15.00190.
Alzabeebee, S., D. N. Chapman, and A. Faramarzi. 2018. “A comparative study of the response of buried pipes under static and moving loads.” Transp. Geotech. 15 (Jun): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.03.001.
API (American Petroleum Institute). 2007. Steel pipelines crossing railroads and highways. Washington, DC: API.
ASTM. 2019. Standard practice for structural design of corrugated steel pipe, pipe-arches, and arches for storm and sanitary sewers and other buried applications. ASTM A796. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Baek, J., Y. Jang, I. Kim, J. Yoo, C. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2022. “Influence of weld joint geometry and strength mismatch on load bearing capacity of API pipeline.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 199 (Oct): 104737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104737.
Bajcar, T., F. Cimerman, B. Širok, and M. Ameršek. 2012. “Impact assessment of traffic-induced vibration on natural gas transmission pipeline.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 (6): 1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.07.021.
Bildik, S., and M. Laman. 2019. “Experimental investigation of soil–structure–pipe interaction.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23 (9): 3753–3763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0134-y.
Chinese Standard. 2002. Structural design code for pipelines of water supply and waste water engineering. GB 50332-2002. Beijing: Chinese Standard.
Craveiro, M. V., and A. G. Neto. 2019. “Lateral buckling of pipelines due to internal pressure: A geometrically nonlinear finite element analysis.” Eng. Struct. 200 (Dec): 109505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109505.
Du, J., S. Wu, Y. Zhang, and S. Hou. 2019. “Dynamic response study of buried pipe subjected to dynamic compaction.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 300 (2): 22055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/300/2/022055.
German Association for Water, Wastewater and Waste. 2000. Static calculation of drains and sewers. ATV-DVWK-A 127E. Hennef, Germany: German Association for Water, Wastewater and Waste.
Glot, I., I. Shardakov, A. Shestakov, and R. Tsvetkov. 2021. “Analysis of wave processes in an underground gas pipeline (mathematical model and field experiment).” Eng. Fail. Anal. 128 (Oct): 105571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105571.
Gnatowski, A., A. Kijo-Kleczkowska, M. Chyra, and D. Kwiatkowski. 2021. “Numerical–experimental analysis of polyethylene pipe deformation at different load values.” Materials 14 (1): 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010160.
Han, C., S. Tan, J. Zhang, and C. Zhang. 2018. “Simulation investigation of dent behavior of steel pipe under external load.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 90 (Aug): 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.03.024.
Haque Chaudhuri, C., and D. Choudhury. 2021. “Semianalytical solution for buried pipeline subjected to horizontal transverse ground deformation.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (4): 04021038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000541.
Jiang, H., T. Xu, and D. Zhao. 2017. “Dynamic response and limit analysis of buried high-pressure gas pipeline under blasting load based on the Hamilton principle.” J. Vibroeng. 19 (1): 376–393. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.17066.
Keller, T., and J. Arvidsson. 2004. “Technical solutions to reduce the risk of subsoil compaction: Effects of dual wheels, tandem wheels and tyre inflation pressure on stress propagation in soil.” Soil Tillage Res. 79 (2): 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.07.008.
Kim, D., R. Salgado, and A. Altschaeffl. 2005. “Effects of supersingle tire loadings on pavements.” J. Transp. Eng. 131 (10): 732–743. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:10(732).
Kouretzis, G. P., K. Krabbenhøft, D. Sheng, and S. W. Sloan. 2014. “Soil-buried pipeline interaction for vertical downwards relative offset.” Can. Geotech. J. 51 (10): 1087–1094. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0029.
Li, J., C.-Y. Zhou, and J.-G. Zhu. 2020. “Limit loads for 180° pipe bends under in-plane bending moment considering geometric nonlinearity.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 183 (April): 104100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104100.
Li, Y., G. Qin, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, and Z. Zhang. 2021. “Ultimate bearing capacities of large diameter pipeline elbows with ellipsoidal pits.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 119 (Jan): 104968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104968.
Liang, L., W. Gou, D. Tian, and R. Tian. 2020. “Analysis on mechanical properties of the buried pipeline considering pipe-soil interaction.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 474 (6): 062016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/474/6/062016.
Liu, M., and R. Ortega. 2021. “Thrust restraint of buried continuous pressure pipe considering pipe–soil interaction.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (4): 04021039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000577.
Longva, V., G. Ji, S. Sævik, N. Ye, J. Gjøsteen, E. Giertsen, and Y. Wang. 2021. “Algorithmic formulation of clay and sand pipe–soil interaction models for on-bottom stability analysis.” Mar. Struct. 78 (Jul): 102985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.102985.
Lu, Y., S. Yang, S. Li, and L. Chen. 2010. “Numerical and experimental investigation on stochastic dynamic load of a heavy duty vehicle.” Appl. Math. Modell. 34 (10): 2698–2710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.12.006.
Ma, B., X. Ma, J. Shuai, and Y. Li. 2020. “Research on the integrity evaluation technology for urban gas pipeline.” J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 20 (3): 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00903-z.
Management Bureau of China National Petroleum Corporation. 1990. Methods of testing cement, part 1. Determination of strength. CECS 15:90. Beijing: Management Bureau of China National Petroleum Corporation.
Minh, N. H., and D. Zhang. 2019. “Soil responses to monotonic and cyclic lateral displacement of a buried pipe.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 10 (3): 04019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000381.
Monshizadeh Naeen, A., and E. Seyedi Hosseininia. 2020. “Numerical investigation on the deformational behavior of continuous buried pipelines under reverse faulting.” Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 45 (10): 8475–8490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04766-2.
Neya, B. N., M. A. Ardeshir, A. A. Delavar, and M. Z. R. Bakhsh. 2017. “Three-dimensional analysis of buried steel pipes under moving loads.” Open J. Geol. 7 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2017.71001.
Ram, R. B. 1984. “Pressure measurement in the soil under the load.” Soil Tillage Res. 4 (2): 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(84)90042-4.
Saboya, F., Jr., S. Tibana, R. M. Reis, A. D. Farfan, and C. M. D. A. R. Melo. 2020. “Centrifuge and numerical modeling of moving traffic surface loads on pipelines buried in cohesionless soil.” Transp. Geotech. 23 (Jun): 100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100340.
She, Y. 2017. “Calculation and analysis of interaction between buried pipeline and soil.” Am. J. Civ. Eng. 5 (4): 220–224. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170504.14.
Sorour, S. S., M. Shazly, and M. M. Megahed. 2019a. “Limit load analysis of thick-walled as-fabricated pipe bends under in-plane moment loading and internal pressure.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 174 (May): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.05.007.
Sorour, S. S., M. Shazly, and M. M. Megahed. 2019b. “Limit load analysis of thin-walled as-fabricated pipe bends with low ovality under in-plane moment loading and internal pressure.” Thin-Walled Struct. 144 (Nov): 106336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106336.
Spangler, M. G. 1956. “Stresses in pressure pipelines and protective casing pipes.” J. Struct. Div. 82 (5): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0000059.
Spangler, M. G., R. L. Barber, and E. S. Hennessy. 1947. “A method of computing live loads transmitted to underground conduits.” In Vol. 26 of Highway Research Board Proc., 179–188. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Tian, Y., H. Liu, X. Jiang, and R. Yu. 2015. “Analysis of stress and deformation of a positive buried pipe using the improved Spangler model.” Soils Found. 55 (3): 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.04.001.
Wang, J., Y. Shuai, R. He, X. Dou, P. Zhang, and C. Feng. 2021. “Ultimate strain capacity assessment of local buckling of pipelines with kinked dents subjected to bending loads.” Thin-Walled Struct. 169 (Dec): 108369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108369.
Wang, Z., Z. Lu, D. Zhang, and H. Liu. 2020. “Stress effect of the interface between buried pipeline and sandy soil layer in a cold environment.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 172 (Apr): 102981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102981.
Wu, H.-G., J.-H. Yu, C.-Z. Shi, and Z. Ma. 2021. “Pipe-soil interaction and sensitivity study of large-diameter buried steel pipes.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 25 (3): 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0392-3.
Xu, R., R. Jiang, and T. Qu. 2021. “Review of dynamic response of buried pipelines.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (2): 03120003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000527.
Yang, C., and S. Li. 2021. “Theoretical analysis and finite element simulation of pipeline structure in liquefied soil.” Heliyon 7 (7): e07480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07480.
Yao, A., T. Xu, X. Zeng, and H. Jiang. 2015. “Numerical analyses of the stress and limiting load for buried gas pipelines under excavation machine impact.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 6 (3): A4014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000137.
Young, O. C., and J. J. Trott. 1984. Buried rigid pipes: Structural design of pipelines. London: Elsevier.
Yu, L., J. Hu, R. Li, Q. Yang, F. Guo, and J. Pei. 2022. “Tire-pavement contact pressure distribution analysis based on ABAQUS simulation.” Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 47 (4): 4119–4132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05903-1.
Zhan, C., and B. Rajani. 1997. “Load transfer analyses of buried pipe in different backfills.” J. Transp. Eng. 123 (6): 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:6(447).
Zhang, J., Z. Han, H. Fang, and L. Yang. 2020. “Analysis for dynamic response of buried steel pipeline in cross-anisotropic layered soils.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 20 (7): 2071006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455420710066.
Zhang, P., H. Lan, X. Dou, J. Wang, and S. Zha. 2021. “Review of load-bearing capacity of dented pipes under typical loads.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 120 (Feb): 105006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105006.
Zhang, Q. L. 2014a. “A leak has occurred along the Hanxi natural gas pipeline.” Wuhan Evening News, July 1, 2014.
Zhang, Y. N. 2014b. “A natural gas leak was caused by a vehicle crushing a pipeline.Qilu Evening News, December 24, 2014.
Zheng, C., L. Luan, H. Qin, and H. Zhou. 2020. “Horizontal dynamic response of a combined loaded large-diameter pipe pile simulated by the Timoshenko beam theory.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 20 (2): 2071003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455420710030.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 14Issue 4November 2023

History

Received: Aug 30, 2022
Accepted: Mar 13, 2023
Published online: Jul 13, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Guoqiang Xia [email protected]
Master’s Student, College of Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum Univ., No. 8 Xindu Ave., Xindu District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, College of Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum Univ., No. 8 Xindu Ave., Xindu District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, PR China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Tengjiao He [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, College of Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum Univ., No. 8 Xindu Ave., Xindu District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Guoxi He, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum Univ., No. 8 Xindu Ave., Xindu District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Dechen Liao [email protected]
Master’s Student, College of Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum Univ., No. 8 Xindu Ave., Xindu District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, PR China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share