Evaluation of Deflection Bowl Parameters in Low-Volume Roads
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 149, Issue 4
Abstract
Evaluation of pavement deflection bowl using nondestructive testing (NDT) is an ideal method for assessing the structural capacity of individual layers of a pavement system. However, the cost of modern NDT equipment and the complexity involved in the back-calculation process makes it difficult for the road agencies to back-calculate individual layer properties and evaluate the in situ condition of existing pavements. This study developed low-cost equipment (LCE) for evaluating the pavement deflection bowl under static loading conditions and to correlate the results with the deflection bowl observed under dynamic loading on same pavement combinations. The study also analyzed the deflection bowl parameters through an understanding of the load distribution evaluated using linear elastic software. The moduli of the individual pavement layer were back-calculated using back-calculation software and correlated with the deflection bowl parameters. The study concluded that the deflection bowl under dynamic loading was only 0.65–0.75 times that of the deflection bowl under static loading. The difference of deflection measured at radial distances of 0 and 450 mm of the deflection bowl correlated well with the base-layer modulus, and the difference of deflection measured at radial distances of 300 and 600 mm correlated well with the subbase-layer modulus. Based on the deflection bowl data collected from nine test sections, it was found that emulsion-treated base layers exhibited 40%–60% higher moduli values than the conventional base layers during the monsoon season. Low-volume roads with dense surface mixes 30 mm thick exhibited significantly improved structural performance compared with that of low-volume roads with open-graded surface mixes 20 mm thick with a 6-mm seal coat.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the Local Self Government Department (LSGD), Government of Kerala, for providing the financial assistance to construct test sections. The authors also acknowledge the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB) for offering the technical support necessary for the data collection using the falling weight deflectometer.
References
Choudhary, R., S. K. Singh, A. Kumar, and S. S. Porwal. 2016. “Permeability characteristics of bituminous premix carpet and mix seal surfacing.” J. Indian Road Congress 77 (2): 383–392.
Elbagalati, O., M. Elseifi, K. Gaspard, and Z. Zhang. 2016. “Development of the pavement structural health index based on falling weight deflectometer testing.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 19 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1149838.
Horak, E., and S. Emery. 2006. “Falling weight deflectometer bowl parameters as analysis tool for pavement structural evaluations.” In Proc., ARRB Conf. Port Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Australian Road Research Board.
Horak, E., A. Hefer, J. Maina, and S. Emery. 2014. “Structural number determined with the falling weight deflectometer and used as benchmark methodology.” In Proc., IEEE Hong Kong. New York: IEEE.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 1997. Guidelines for strengthening of flexible road pavements using Benkelman beam deflection technique (first revision). IRC:81. New Delhi, India: IRC.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2012. Tentative guidelines for the design of flexible pavements (third revision). IRC:37. New Delhi, India: IRC.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2014. Guidelines for structural evaluation and strengthening of flexible road pavements using falling weight deflectometer (FWD) technique (first revision). IRC:115. New Delhi, India: IRC.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2015. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements for low volume rural roads (first revision). IRC:SP-72. New Delhi, India: IRC.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2018. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements (fourth revision). IRC:37. New Delhi, India: IRC.
Lacante, S. C., M. de Beer, and E. Horak. 1991. Comparison between Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) and Benkelman Beam deflection basin parameters and back-calculation of layer moduli. Pretoria, South Africa: Annual Transportation Convention.
MoRD (Ministry of Rural Development). 2014. Specification for rural roads, first revision. New Delhi, India: Indian Road Congress.
MoRTH (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways). 2013. Specification for road and bridge works, fifth revision. New Delhi, India: Indian Road Congress.
Norouzi, M., S. Nassiri, and A. Bayat. 2013. “Evaluation of seasonal variation in mechanistic responses of flexible pavements through use of falling weight deflectometer data.” J. Transp. Res. Board 2369 (1): 30–37. https://doi.org/10.3141/2369-04.
Patra, B. 2015. “Structural evaluation of in-service flexible pavements using the falling weight deflectometer technique.” M.Tech thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology.
Ramanath, A. M., A. Venkateshappa, A. M. Srinivasarao, and V. Amirthalingam. 2020. “Benchmarking falling weight deflectometer deflection bowl parameters: Case study for Indian conditions and the applications to rehabilitation design.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B Pavements 146 (3): 05020003. https://doi.org/10.1061/jpeodx.0000204.
Sahoo, U. C., and K. S. Reddy. 2011. “Performance criterion for thin-surface low-volume roads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2203 (1): 178–185. https://doi.org/10.3141/2203-22.
Setiadji, B. H. 2018. “Application of deflection bowl parameters for assessing different structures of road pavement.” In Proc., MATEC Web of Conf. Surakarta, Indonesia: Sebalas Maret Univ.
Solanki, U. J., P. J. Gundaliya, and M. D. Barasara. 2015. “A review on structural evaluation of flexible pavements using falling weight deflectometer.” Trends Transport Eng. Appl. 2 (1): 1–10.
Southern African Bitumen Association. 2020. Technical Guideline: Bitumen stabilised materials: A guideline for the design and construction of bitumen emulsion and foamed bitumen stabilised materials. TG2. Pretoria, South Africa: Asphalt Academy.
Zhang, X., F. Otto, and M. Oeser. 2021. “Pavement moduli back-calculation using artificial neural network and genetic algorithms.” Constr. Build. Mater. 287 (Jun): 123026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123026.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 149 • Issue 4 • December 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 29, 2022
Accepted: May 30, 2023
Published online: Jul 31, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 31, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.