Modulus Improvement Factor-Based Design Coefficients for Geogrid- and Geocell-Reinforced Bases
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 148, Issue 3
Abstract
A series of large-scale model experiments were carried out on different geogrid- and geocell-reinforced base courses to evaluate realistic base-layer coefficients to design flexible pavements. The placement depth of reinforcement was first determined under monotonic loading on designed unreinforced pavement sections over a very weak subgrade (resilient modulus of 10 MPa) prepared in a size test chamber. A structural support offered by the reinforcement alone in the base layer was quantified through the modulus improvement factor (MIF) for varying subgrade conditions. The MIF values ranged between 1.5 and 3.5 for geogrid-reinforced bases and 1.4 and 5.0 for geocell-reinforced base layers placed over different subgrade conditions. Further, a range of laboratory-produced MIF values and semiempirical mechanistic design principles were used to analyze the flexible pavements to get the base-layer coefficients for various geogrid- and geocell-reinforced pavements. In this analysis, the traffic was considered from 2 million to 150 million equivalent single-axle loads, subgrade resilient modulus () from 10 to 85 MPa [corresponding a California bearing ratio (CBR) from 1% to 8%], and MIF from 1.2 to 3.5 for geogrids and 1.2 to 5.0 for geocells. A new set of apt base-layer coefficients for geogrid- and geocell-supported base layers was developed through a systematic analysis. The layer coefficients for geogrid-reinforced bases ranged from 0.15 to 0.35 and 0.175 to 0.425 for geocell-reinforced base layers. The proposed models were validated with an as-built pavement section from Montana state and the available design approaches. The proposed design approach has reduced the thickness of a geogrid-reinforced base layer by about 40%, and it is 50% for the geocell-reinforced base layer.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) for funding this project (NHAI/TIC/R&D/108/2016). Also, the authors thank M/s. TechFab (India) Industries Ltd. and M/s. Strata Geosystem (India) Pvt. Ltd. for providing geogrid and geocell material for this study. The authors express their sincere gratitude for anonymous reviewers.
References
AASHTO. 1993. AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2012. Standard method of test for classification of soils and soil-aggregate mixtures for highway construction purposes. AASHTO M 145-91. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2013a. Standard method of test for the California bearing ratio. AASHTO T 193. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2013b. Standard practice for geosynthetic reinforcement of the aggregate base course of flexible pavement structures, standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling testing. AASHTO R 50. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014. Sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. AASHTO T 27. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2015a. Standard method of test for moisture-density relations of soils using a 2.5-kg (5.5-lb) rammer and a 305-mm (12-in.) drop. AASHTO T 99. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2015b. Standard method of test for moisture-density relations of soils using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) drop. AASHTO T 180. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abu-Farsakh, M. Y., I. Akond, and Q. Chen. 2016. “Evaluating the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced unpaved roads using plate load tests.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 17 (10): 901–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1031131.
AI (Asphalt Institute). 2014. Asphalt mix design methods. Manual series No.2. 7th ed. Lexington, KY: AI.
ASTM. 2012a. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort ( ()). ASTM D1557-12e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012b. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort ( ()). ASTM D69812e2. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for CBR (California bearing ratio) of laboratory-compacted soils. ASTM D1883. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Baadiga, R., U. Balunaini, and S. Saride. 2021a. “Influence of geogrid aperture size on the behavior of mechanically stabilized pavements.” In Proc., Int. Airfield and Highway Pavements Conf. 2021, 271–282. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483510.025.
Baadiga, R., S. Saride, U. Balunaini, and M. R. Madhira. 2021b. “Influence of tensile strength of geogrid and subgrade modulus on layer coefficients of granular bases.” Transp. Geotech. 29 (Jul): 100557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100557.
Bauer, G. E., and A. O. A. El Halim. 1987. “The performance of geogrid reinforced road bases.” Constr. Build. Mater. 1 (2): 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(87)90002-X.
Berg, R. R., B. R. Christopher, and S. W. Perkins. 2000. Geosynthetic reinforcement of the aggregate base/subbase courses of pavement structures. Roseville, MI: Geosynthetic Materials Association.
Binquet, J., and K. L. Lee. 1975. “Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 101 (12): 1241–1255. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000219.
Das, B. M., and E. C. Shin. 1999. “Bearing capacity of strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand.” In Proc., 11th Asian Regional Conf. Soil Mechanical Geotechnolgy Engineering, 189–192. Switzerland: Springer.
George, A. M., A. Banerjee, A. J. Puppala, and M. Saladhi. 2019. “Performance evaluation of geocell-reinforced reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) bases in flexible pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 22 (2): 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1587437.
Giroud, J. P., and J. Han. 2013. “Design of geosynthetic-reinforced unpaved and paved roads.” In Proc., Short Course, Geosynthetics 2013. Roseville, MN: Industrial Fabrics Association International.
Goud, G. N., B. Ramu, B. Umashankar, S. Sireesh, and M. R. Madhav. 2022. “Evaluation of layer coefficient ratios for geogrid-reinforced bases of flexible pavements.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 23 (1): 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2020.1812424.
Gu, F., X. Luo, R. Luo, E. Y. Hajj, and R. L. Lytton. 2017. “A mechanistic-empirical approach to quantify the influence of geogrid on the performance of flexible pavement structures.” Transp. Geotech. 13 (Dec): 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.005.
Han, B., J. Ling, X. Shu, W. Song, R. L. Boudreau, W. Hu, and B. Huang. 2019. “Quantifying the effects of geogrid reinforcement in unbound granular base.” Geotext. Geomembr. 47 (3): 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.009.
Han, J. 2013. “Design of planar geosynthetic-improved unpaved and paved roads.” In Proc., Pavement and Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation, 31–41. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412817.003.
Henry, K. S., J. Clapp, W. G. Davids, and L. Barna. 2011. “Back-calculated pavement layer modulus values of geogrid reinforced test sections.” In Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, Geotechnical Special Publication 211, edited by J. Han, and D. E. Alzamora, 4673–4682. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41165(397)478.
Huang, Y. H. 2004. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Ibrahim, E. M., S. M. El-Badawy, M. H. Ibrahim, A. Gabr, and A. Azam. 2017. “Effect of geogrid reinforcement on flexible pavements.” Innovative Infrastruct. Solutions 2 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-017-0102-7.
Imjai, T., K. Pilakoutas, and M. Guadagnini. 2019. “Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced flexible pavements in full-scale field trials.” Geotext. Geomembr. 47 (2): 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.012.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2018. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. IRC:37. New Delhi, India: IRC.
Kief, O., K. Rajagopal, A. Veeraragavan, and S. Chandramouli. 2011. “Modulus improvement factor for geocell-reinforced bases.” In Proc., Geosynthetics India, 14–52. New Delhi, India: Central Board of Irrigation and Power.
Kumar, V. V., and S. Saride. 2016. “Rutting behavior of geocell reinforced base layer overlying weak sand subgrades.” Procedia Eng. 143 (Jan): 1409–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.166.
Kwon, J., and E. Tutumluer. 2009. “Geogrid base reinforcement with aggregate interlock and modeling of associated stiffness enhancement in mechanistic pavement analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2116 (1): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.3141/2116-12.
LTPP (Long-Term Pavement Performance) InfoPave. 2020. “Long-term pavement performance studies conducted under the state highway research program (SHRP).” Accessed March 5, 2019. https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/Data/DataSelection.
MEPDG (Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide). 2015. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide—A manual of practice. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Montanelli, F., A. Zhao, and P. Rimoldi. 1997. “Geosynthetic-reinforced pavement system: Testing and design.” In Proc., Geosynthetics-97, 619–632. Roseville, MN: Industrial Fabrics Association International.
MORTH (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways). 2013. Specifications for road and bridge works. 5th ed. New Delhi, India: MORTH.
Peddinti, P. R. T., B. M. Basha, and S. Saride. 2017. “Probability density functions associated with the resilient modulus of virgin aggregate bases.” In Geotechnical Frontiers 2017: Transportation Facilities, Structures, and Site Investigation, edited by T. L. Brandon and R. J. Valentine, 314–323. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480441.033.
Rajagopal, K., S. Chandramouli, A. Parayil, and K. Iniyan. 2014. “Studies on geosynthetic-reinforced road pavement structures.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 8 (3): 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1179/1939787914Y.0000000042.
Rimoldi, P. 2019. “Design methods for base stabilization of paved roads.” In Geotechnics for transportation infrastructure, 51–80. Singapore: Springer.
Saride, S., and R. Baadiga. 2021. “New layer coefficients for geogrid-reinforced pavement bases.” Indian Geotech. J. 51 (1): 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00484-6.
StrataIndia. 2019. “StrataWeb product data sheet.” Accessed December 10, 2019. http://www.strataindia.com/img/datasheet/StrataWeb-Product%20Data%20sheet_Jan%202015.pdf.
Suku, L., S. S. Prabhu, P. Ramesh, and G. L. S. Babu. 2016. “Behavior of geocell-reinforced granular base under repeated loading.” Transp. Geotech. 9 (Dec): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.06.002.
Tabatabaei Aghda, S. T., A. Ghanbari, and G. Tavakoli Mehrjardi. 2019. “Evaluating the applicability of geocell-reinforced dredged sand using plate and wheel load testing.” Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 6 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-018-00067-2.
Tang, X., S. M. Stoffels, and A. M. Palomino. 2016. “Mechanistic-empirical approach to characterizing permanent deformation of reinforced soft soil subgrade.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (3): 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.004.
Tang, X., and M. Yang. 2013. “Investigation of flexural behavior of geocell reinforcement using three-layered beam model testing.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 31 (2): 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9625-7.
Thakur, J. K., J. Han, and R. L. Parsons. 2016. “Factors influencing deformations of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement bases under cyclic loading.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001760.
TXDOT (Texas DOT). 2007. Testing geogrids. Austin, TX: TXDOT.
Ueshita, K., and G. G. Meyerhof. 1967. “Deflection of multilayer soil system.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 93 (5): 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001023.
Verghese Chummar, A. 1972. “Bearing capacity theory from experimental results.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 98 (12): 1311–1324. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001816.
Williams, S., J. Wright, S. Sonny Kim, M. G. Chorzepa, and S. A. Durham. 2018. “Assessing benefits of using geogrids in pavements founded on problematic soils.” In Proc., Civil Infrastructures Confronting Severe Weathers and Climate Changes Conf., 115–125. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Yetimoglu, T., J. T. H. Wu, and A. Saglamer. 1994. “Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid-reinforced sand.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (12): 2083–2099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2083).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 148 • Issue 3 • September 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 20, 2021
Accepted: Feb 16, 2022
Published online: Apr 29, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 29, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Minchala Divakar, Bharath Gottumukkala, Surya Teja Swarna, Pulikanti Subramanya Prasad, Goli Arunkumar, Performance evaluation of geosynthetic reinforced marginal material as base layer over weak subgrade, International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10.1080/10298436.2024.2318605, 25, 1, (2024).
- Sudeep Biswas, Monowar Hussain, Khwairakpam Lakshman Singh, Behavior of Bamboo and Jute Geocell Overlaying Soft Subgrade under Repeated Wheel Loading, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16528, 36, 2, (2024).
- Anjana R. Menon, Anjana Bhasi, Evaluation of Critical Length of Encasement for Stone Column-Supported Embankment with Basal Geocell, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 10.1007/s13369-024-08778-0, (2024).
- Ramu Baadiga, Umashankar Balunaini, Evaluation of pavement design input parameters of biaxial and triaxial geogrid stabilized flexible pavements overlying soft subgrades, Cleaner Materials, 10.1016/j.clema.2023.100192, 9, (100192), (2023).
- Anjana R. Menon, Anjana Bhasi, Numerical Parametric Study on Time-Dependent Response of Geocell-Reinforced Flexible Pavements, Recent Developments in Water Resources and Transportation Engineering, 10.1007/978-981-99-2905-4_21, (277-291), (2023).
- L.L.R. Zipoli, J.O. Avesani Neto, Evaluation of back-calculated elastic moduli of unreinforced and geocell-reinforced unbound granular material from full-scale field tests, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.05.006, 50, 5, (910-921), (2022).