Technical Papers
Oct 3, 2023

Failure Analysis of Skewed Persian Brick Masonry Barrel Vaults: Experimental and Numerical Study

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 37, Issue 6

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of skew angle on the failure load and structural behavior of Persian brick masonry barrel vaults using experimental and numerical methods. To this end, experiments were conducted to determine the mechanical properties of the materials and the vault’s behavior under gravitational loads. Due to experimental and financial limitations, scaled models of materials and structures were employed. The gravitational loading was applied at a uniform rate and in two modes, symmetric (at mid-span) and asymmetric (at quarter-span). Then a numerical model developed using the nonlinear finite-element method was validated in ANSYS code by comparing the numerical and experimental results using the Willam-Warnke failure criterion. In addition, the effect of four skew angles and three vault dimension (span-to-depth) ratios on seven different geometries of Persian vaults, such as semicircular, pointed (raised, ordinary, and drop), and four-centered (raised, ordinary, and drop) was evaluated. In all modes, the results showed that the skew vault had a lower load-bearing capacity than the nonskew vault. In other words, the skewness of Persian brick vaults reduces their failure load. Moreover, the semicircular and drop pointed brick vaults demonstrated the highest sensitivity (54%) and lowest sensitivity (20.92%) to skew angle (at 45°) and nonskew modes compared to other Persian geometries, respectively. Also, the raised four-centered shape has the highest failure load in the symmetric and asymmetric modes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. (All finite-elements models in ANSYS code and data processing in MS Excel.)

References

Anania, L., A. Badalà, and G. D’Agata. 2013. “The post strengthening of the masonry vaults by the Ω-Wrap technique based on the use of C-FRP.” Constr. Build. Mater. 47 (Oct): 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.012.
Angjeliu, G., G. Cardani, and D. Coronelli. 2019. “A parametric model for ribbed masonry vaults.” Autom. Constr. 105 (Sep): 102785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.006.
ANSYS. 2017. Basic analysis guide for ANSYS 19. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS.
Bertolesi, E., B. Torres, J. M. Adam, P. A. Calderón, and J. J. Moragues. 2020. “Effectiveness of textile reinforced mortar (TRM) materials for the repair of full-scale timbrel masonry cross vaults.” Eng. Struct. 220 (Oct): 110978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110978.
Betti, M., G. A. Drosopoulos, and G. E. Stavroulakis. 2008. “Two non-linear finite element models developed for the assessment of failure of masonry arches.” C. R. Méc. 336 (1–2): 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2007.10.014.
Betti, M., M. Orlando, and A. Vignoli. 2011. “Static behaviour of an Italian medieval castle: Damage assessment by numerical modeling.” Comput. Struct. 89 (21–22): 1956–1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.05.022.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 1983. Testing concrete Part 121: Method for determination of static modulus of elasticity in compression. BS EN 1881-121: 1983. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 1998. Methods of test for masonry: Part 1: Determination of compressive strength. BS EN 1052-1: 1998. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 1999. Methods of test for masonry: Part 2: Determination of flexural strength. BS EN 1052-2: 1999. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2014. Gypsum binder and gypsum plasters: Part 2: Test methods. BS EN 13279-2: 2014. London: BSI.
Cabané, A., S. Saloustros, L. Pelà, and P. Roca. 2021. “Experimental setup and numerical evaluation of the compression test on thin tiles for masonry timbrel vaults.” Constr. Build. Mater. 313 (Dec): 125294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125294.
Chen, W., and D. Han. 1988. Yield and failure criteria: Plasticity for structural engineers. New York: Springer.
De Arteaga, I., and P. Morer. 2012. “The effect of geometry on the structural capacity of masonry arch bridges.” Constr. Build. Mater. 34 (Sep): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.037.
Dell’Endice, A., A. Iannuzzo, M. J. DeJong, T. Van Mele, and P. Block. 2021. “Modelling imperfections in unreinforced masonry structures: Discrete element simulations and scale model experiments of a pavilion vault.” Eng. Struct. 228 (Feb): 111499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111499.
De Santis, S., F. Roscini, and G. de Felice. 2019. “Strengthening of masonry vaults with textile reinforced mortars.” In Structural analysis of historical constructions: An interdisciplinary approach, 1539–1547. New York: Springer International.
Fazeli, H., E. I. Z. Abadi, and S. J. Hoseini. 2023. “Experimental and numerical study of the effect of steel tie-rods on load-bearing capacity of Persian brick arches.” In Structures. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Forgács, T., V. Sarhosis, and K. Bagi. 2018. “Influence of construction method on the load bearing capacity of skew masonry arches.” Eng. Struct. 168 (Aug): 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.005.
Foti, D., V. Vacca, and I. Facchini. 2018. “DEM modeling and experimental analysis of the static behavior of a dry-joints masonry cross vault.” Constr. Build. Mater. 170 (May): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.202.
Hejazi, M., S. Baranizadeh, and M. Daei. 2021. “Performance of Persian brick masonry single-shell domes subjected to uniform pressure and concentrated load.” In Structures. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.100.
Hejazi, M., and A. Mehdian. 2023. “Experimental and numerical investigation on masonry arch bridges under uniform and line loads.” In Structures. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.101.
Hejazi, M., S. M. Moayedian, and M. Daei. 2015. “Structural analysis of Persian historical brick masonry minarets under wind load.” J. Solid Fluid Mech. 5 (1): 165–176. https://doi.org/10.22044/JSFM.2015.420.
Hejazi, M., and R. Sadeghi. 2022. “Effect of brick arrangement on structural behaviour of Persian brick masonry barrel vaults by micro-modelling.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 134 (Apr): 106033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106033.
Hejazi, M., and F. M. Saradj. 2014a. Persian architectural heritage: Architecture, structure and conservation. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Hejazi, M., and Y. Soltani. 2020. “Parametric study of the effect of hollow spandrel (Konu) on structural behaviour of Persian brick masonry barrel vaults.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 118 (Dec): 104838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104838.
Hejazi, M. M. 1997. Historical buildings of Iran: Their architecture and structure. Tehran, Iran: Ashtar Univ. of Technology.
Hejazi, M. M., and F. M. Saradj. 2014b. Persian architectural heritage: Structure. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Mahmoudi, P., P. Asadi, and M. R. Eftekhar. 2022. “The effect of geometric dimensions on the lateral bearing capacity of the masonry arches.” In Structures. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.059.
Malomo, D., M. J. DeJong, and A. Penna. 2019. “Distinct element modelling of the in-plane cyclic response of URM walls subjected to shear-compression.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (12): 1322–1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3178.
Milani, G., and P. B. Lourenço. 2012. “3D non-linear behavior of masonry arch bridges.” Comput. Struct. 110 (Nov): 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.008.
Moayedian, S. M., and M. Hejazi. 2021. “Stress-strain relationships for scaled gypsum mortar and cement mortar brick masonry.” J. Build. Eng. 33 (Jan): 101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101861.
Mohammed, A.-G. 2006. Experimental comparison of brickwork behaviour at prototype and model scales. Cardiff, UK: Cardiff Univ.
Nikooravesh, M., M. Soltani, and E. Mohammadi. 2021. “Seismic retrofitting of Persian arched walls by centercore method: Experimental and numerical investigation.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 17 (3): 450–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2021.1933261.
Pineda, P., M. D. Robador, and M. A. Gil-Marti. 2011. “Seismic damage propagation prediction in ancient masonry structures: An application in the non-linear range via numerical models.” Open Constr. Build. Technol. J. 5 (1): 71–79. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801105010071.
Sarhosis, V., K. Bagi, J. V. Lemos, and G. Milani. 2016. Computational modeling of masonry structures using the discrete element method. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Sarhosis, V., T. Forgács, and J. V. Lemos. 2019. “A discrete approach for modelling backfill material in masonry arch bridges.” Comput. Struct. 224 (Mar): 106108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.106108.
Sarhosis, V., D. V. Oliveira, J. V. Lemos, and P. B. Lourenço. 2014. “The effect of skew angle on the mechanical behaviour of masonry arches.” Mech. Res. Commun. 61 (Oct): 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2014.07.008.
Sarhosis, V., and Y. Sheng. 2014. “Identification of material parameters for low bond strength masonry.” Eng. Struct. 60 (Feb): 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.013.
Sathiparan, N., and U. Rumeshkumar. 2018. “Effect of moisture condition on mechanical behavior of low strength brick masonry.” J. Build. Eng. 17 (May): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.015.
Thaickavil, N. N., and J. Thomas. 2018. “Behaviour and strength assessment of masonry prisms.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 8 (Jun): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2017.12.007.
Thamboo, J. 2020. “Material characterisation of thin layer mortared clay masonry.” Constr. Build. Mater. 230 (Jan): 116932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116932.
Ural, A., F. K. Fırat, Ş. Tuğrulelçi, and M. E. Kara. 2016. “Experimental and numerical study on effectiveness of various tie-rod systems in brick arches.” Eng. Struct. 110 (Mar): 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.038.
Zomarshidi, H. 1988. Vault and arch in Iranian architecture. Iran: Keihan.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 37Issue 6December 2023

History

Received: Feb 16, 2023
Accepted: Jul 17, 2023
Published online: Oct 3, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 3, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Saeid Sinaei [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Najafabad 85141-43131, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Esmaeel Izadi Zaman Abadi [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Najafabad 85141-43131, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Seyed Jalil Hoseini [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Najafabad 85141-43131, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share