Numerical Modeling of Gas-Phase Waste in Incinerator: Focus on Emissions and Energy Recovery under Air-Fuel Ratio and Air Volume Control
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 10
Abstract
Traditional incinerators achieve the thermal requirements through heat transfer and heat radiation. However, the early recovery of flue gas preheats the air and yields nitrogen oxide (NOx) to rise in the combustion of overoxygen. The operation of an incinerator inevitably implies the release of greenhouse gases and emissions of NOx harmful to the human health. The administrator of one laboratory incinerator in Taiwan sought to optimize the operation conditions such as temperature or oxygen level of the combustion products within the combustion chamber to minimize the release of pollutants and maximize the efficiency of combustion. In this phase, air-fuel ratio control and air volume control are regarded as the first priority. A numerical model of the laboratory-scale plant in southern Taiwan is established by using enhanced wall treatment and coupling the thermochemical conversion of volatile waste to the gaseous combustion of the released syngas. The model allows users to characterize the temperature and retention time of the combustion products for the verification of the fulfillment of the existing regulation for NOx and oxygen level in incineration plants. It shows trade-off relationship between combustion efficiency of fuel and emissions (NOx and CO) in surveying cases of air-fuel ratio (AFR) ranges from to according to numerical results. Increasing the air volume enhances this trend. In this study, it shows the lowest emissions of NOx in case of , but worse combustion efficiency. Meanwhile, to increase the air volume by 1.15 times suppress most CO and about 28% NOx, but increases by 6% the residual fuel. The averaged distribution of retention time of particles in this study ranged from 30 to 50 s, and is provided for further improvement of geometry in the next phase.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
Acknowledgments
This research is financially supported by Sustainable Environmental Research Laboratories, National Cheng-Kung University (Project No. 112-A02).
References
Abuelnuor, A. A. A., M. A. Wahid, H. A. Mohammed, and A. Saat. 2014. “Flameless combustion role in the mitigation of NOx emission: A review.” Int. J. Energy Res. 38 (7): 827–846. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3167.
Bergström, J. 2018. CFD for mixing efficiency in commercial and industrial advanced air oxidation. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Chemical Science and Engineering.
Clements, A. G., S. Black, J. Szuhanszki, K. Stęchły, A. Pranzitelli, W. Nimmo, and M. Pourkashanian. 2015. “LES and RANS of air and oxy-coal combustion in a pilot-scale facility: Predictions of radiative heat transfer.” Fuel 151 (Jul): 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.089.
Hasegawa, T., S. Mochida, and A. K. Gupta. 2002. “Development of advanced industrial furnace using highly preheated combustion air.” J. Propul. Power 18 (2): 233–239. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5943.
Katsuki, M., and T. Hasegawa. 1998. “The science and technology of combustion in highly preheated air.” Symp. Combust. 27 (2): 3135–3146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80176-8.
Khoshhal, A., M. Rahimi, S. R. Shabanian, and A. A. Alsairafi. 2010. “CFD modeling of reduction in NOx emission using HiTAC technique.” Int. J. Mech. Mechatron. Eng. 4 (2): 207–212.
Krastev, V. K., L. Silvestri, and G. Bella. 2018. “Effects of turbulence modeling and grid quality on the zonal URANS/LES simulation of static and reciprocating engine-like geometries.” SAE Int. J. Engines 11 (6): 669–686. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0173.
Krastev, V. K., L. Silvestri, and G. Falcucci. 2017. “A modified version of the RNG turbulence model for the scale-resolving simulation of internal combustion engines.” Energies 10 (12): 2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122116.
Lin, S. L., J. L. Wu, K. C. Lin, H. Wu, Z. Guo, and C. W. Tu. 2021. “A novel flameless oxidation and in-chamber melting system coupled with advanced scrubbers for a laboratory waste plant.” Waste Manage. 126 (May): 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.043.
Lückerath, R., W. Meier, and M. Aigner. 2008. “FLOX combustion at high pressure with different fuel compositions.” J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 130 (1): 011505. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2749280.
Luo, Z., W. Chen, Y. Wang, Q. Cheng, X. Yuan, Z. Li, and J. Yang. 2021. “Numerical simulation of combustion and characteristics of fly ash and slag in a ‘V-type’ waste incinerator.” Energies 14 (22): 7518. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227518.
Ma, X., G. Liu, and Z. Yu. 2008. “Combustion optimization of municipal solid waste incinerator based on CFD.” J. South China Univ. Technol. 36 (2): 101–106.
Miyagoshi, Y., T. Tatefuku, M. Nishino, T. Yokoyama, and S. Kadowaki. 2004. “Advantageous effects of low air ratio combustion in an advanced stoker-type waste incinerator.” WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 79 (Aug): 155–165. https://doi.org/10.2495/WMJ040171.
Miyagoshi, Y., T. Tatefuku, M. Nishino, T. Yokoyama, and S. Kadowaki. 2007. “Advantages of low air-ratio combustion in a stoker-type incinerator.” J. Environ. Eng. 2 (1): 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1299/jee.2.183.
Panagopoulos, A. 2022. “Techno-economic assessment and feasibility study of a zero liquid discharge (ZLD) desalination hybrid system in the Eastern Mediterranean.” Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 178 (Aug): 109029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2022.109029.
Perpignan, A. A. V., and A. G. Rao. 2019. “Effects of chemical reaction mechanism and NOx formation pathways on an inter-turbine burner.” Aeronaut. J. 123 (1270): 1898–1918. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2019.12.
Sharma, S., A. Chowdhury, and S. Kumar. 2020. “A novel air injection scheme to achieve MILD combustion in a can-type gas turbine combustor.” Energy 194 (Mar): 116819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116819.
Shiehnejadhesar, A., R. Scharler, R. Mehrabian, and I. Obernberger. 2015. “Development and validation of CFD models for gas phase reactions in biomass grate furnaces considering gas streak formation above the packed bed.” Fuel Process. Technol. 139 (Nov): 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.07.029.
Song, Z., and B. Lin. 2010. “Numerical simulation of excess-enthalpy combustion flame propagation of coal mine methane in ceramic foam.” Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 20 (2): 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-5264(09)60192-7.
Sorrentino, G., U. Göktolga, M. de Joannon, J. van Oijen, A. Cavaliere, and P. de Goey. 2017a. “An experimental and numerical study of MILD combustion in a cyclonic burner.” Energy Procedia 120 (Aug): 649–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.173.
Sorrentino, G., P. Sabia, P. Bozza, R. Ragucci, and M. de Joannon. 2017b. “Impact of external operating parameters on the performance of a cyclonic burner with high level of internal recirculation under MILD combustion conditions.” Energy 137 (Oct): 1167–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.135.
Szymczyk, J., I. Cieslak, A. Jach, R. Pyszczek, A. Teodorczyk, and W. Cao. 2017. “Improvement of energy efficiency of natural gas combustion by applying a homogeneous combustion.” E3S Web Conf. 17 (May): 00093. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20171700093.
Weber, R., A. K. Gupta, and S. Mochida. 2020. “High temperature air combustion (HiTAC): How it all started for applications in industrial furnaces and future prospects.” Appl. Energy 278 (Nov): 115551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115551.
Weber, R., S. Orsino, N. Lallemant, and A. Verlaan. 2000. “Combustion of natural gas with high-temperature air and large quantities of flue gas.” Proc. Combust. Inst. 28 (1): 1315–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80345-8.
Wu, J.-L., T.-C. Lin, L.-C. Wang, and G.-P. Chang-Chien. 2014. “Memory effects of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and furan emissions in a laboratory waste incinerator.” Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 14 (4): 1168–1178. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.05.0179.
Xu, Q., Z. Zou, Y. Chen, K. Wang, Z. Du, J. Feng, C. Ding, Z. Bai, Y. Zang, and Y. Xiong. 2020. “Performance of a novel-type of heat flue in a coke oven based on high-temperature and low-oxygen diffusion combustion technology.” Fuel 267 (May): 117160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117160.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149 • Issue 10 • October 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 27, 2023
Accepted: Jun 4, 2023
Published online: Aug 8, 2023
Published in print: Oct 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 8, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Air pollution
- Case studies
- Chemical processes
- Chemistry
- Combustion
- Computational fluid dynamics technique
- Emissions
- Energy infrastructure
- Energy recovery
- Engineering fundamentals
- Environmental engineering
- Fluid dynamics
- Fluid mechanics
- Hydrologic engineering
- Incineration
- Infrastructure
- Lifeline systems
- Measurement (by type)
- Methodology (by type)
- Models (by type)
- Numerical models
- Pollution
- Research methods (by type)
- Temperature effects
- Temperature measurement
- Waste management
- Waste treatment
- Water and water resources
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.