Characterization and Performance Evaluation of Eco-Friendly Angular-Shaped Fly Ash Aggregates as Base Material in Pavement Construction under Cyclic and Shear Loading
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 12
Abstract
Two emerging challenges that could impede infrastructure development in India are achieving 100% utilization of fly ash generated by Indian thermal power plants and meeting the demand for aggregate in the construction sector. The paper discusses the engineering properties and performance of a novel angular-shaped fly ash aggregate (AFA) as a complete replacement for natural stone aggregate in wet-mix macadam (WMM) layer of pavement through laboratory investigation. After curing fly ash blocks in a hot water bath or autoclave, the high-strength blocks were crushed to produce AFA of the required sizes. The study used 98% Class C fly ash with 2% lime mix and 88% Class F fly ash with 12% lime mix for manufacturing two types of AFA in the laboratory. The properties of AFA, such as specific gravity, angularity number, water absorption, impact value, crushing value, abrasion value, and soundness, were compared with the required specifications given in the relevant Indian standards. Compaction characteristics, particle breakage, slake durability and leachability of AFA, were also investigated. The performance of AFA under cyclic and shear loading was investigated using cyclic triaxial tests and large box direct shear tests, respectively. AFA was found to be well-graded before and after the compaction. The results of the slake durability tests showed that AFA performs well even when subjected to severe wet and dry conditions. AFA exhibited resilient modulus () value of 129.1 to 149.7 MPa and internal friction angle of 42.73° to 50.75°. Based on the cyclic triaxial and shear test results, it was found that replacing natural aggregate with AFA in the WMM layer has satisfactory performance under traffic and shear loading. The results of leachate test showed that the AFA is safe for the environment. Depending on the type of fly ash used, the approximate production cost of AFA was estimated to be 16% to 65% lower than the cost of natural aggregate.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the laboratory staff of the Department of Civil Engineering, S V National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India, for their assistance in carrying out the experimental work.
References
AASHTO. 2017. Determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials. AASHTO T-307. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Arulrajah, A., J. Piratheepan, M. M. Disfani, and M. W. Bo. 2013. “Resilient moduli response of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (12): 1920–1928. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000766.
Arulrajah, A., M. A. Rahman, J. Piratheepan, M. W. Bo, and M. A. Imteaz. 2014. “Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials using a modified large-scale direct shear testing apparatus.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (5): 974–982. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000897.
ASTM. 2011. Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM D3080/D3080M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard specification for materials for soil-aggregate subbase, base, and surface courses. ASTM D1241. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard specification for coarse aggregate for asphalt paving mixtures. ASTM D692/D692M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. ASTM D1557. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2022. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM C618. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bakare, M. D., R. R. Pai, S. Patel, and J. T. Shahu. 2019. “Environmental sustainability by bulk utilization of fly ash and GBFS as road subbase materials.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 23 (4): 04019011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000450.
Bakare, M. D., J. T. Shahu, and S. Patel. 2023. “Complete substitution of natural aggregates with industrial wastes in road subbase: A field study.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 190 (Aug): 106856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106856.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2004. Methods of test for pozzolanic materials. IS 1727. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2012. Drinking water—Specification. IS 10500. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2020. Determination of water content-dry density relation using heavy compaction. IS 2720-Part 8. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2021a. Method for determination of slake durability index of rocks. IS 10050. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2021b. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete (mechanical properties). IS 2386-Part 4. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2021c. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete (particle size and shape). IS 2386-Part 1. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2021d. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete (soundness). IS 2386-Part 5. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2021e. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete (specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking). IS 2386-Part 3. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2021f. Methods of test for soils (direct shear test for soils containing gravel). IS 2720-Part 39/1. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Busari, A., E. Adeyanju, T. Loto, and D. Ademola. 2019. “Recycled aggregate in pavement construction: Review of literatures.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1378 (2): 022026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/2/022026.
CEA (Central Electricity Authority). 2021. Report on fly ash generation at coal/lignite based thermal power stations and its utilization in the country for the year 2020-2021. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Power, Government of India.
CPWD (Central Public Work Department). 2021. Delhi schedule of rates. New Delhi: Government of India.
Dash, M. K., and S. K. Patro. 2021. “Performance assessment of ferrochrome slag as partial replacement of fine aggregate in concrete.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 25 (4): 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1539674.
Ferraro, A., F. Colangelo, I. Farina, M. Race, R. Cioffi, C. Cheeseman, and M. Fabbricino. 2021. “Cold-bonding process for treatment and reuse of waste materials: Technical designs and applications of pelletized products.” Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (19): 2197–2231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1776052.
Ghosh, A., A. E. Sáez, and W. Ela. 2006. “Effect of pH, competitive anions and NOM on the leaching of arsenic from solid residuals.” Sci. Total Environ. 363 (1–3): 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.06.018.
Ghosh, A., and C. Subbarao. 2006. “Tensile strength bearing ratio and slake durability of Class F fly ash stabilized with lime and gypsum.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 18 (1): 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:1(18).
Gomathi, P., and A. Sivakumar. 2015. “Accelerated curing effects on the mechanical performance of cold bonded and sintered fly ash aggregate concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 77 (Feb): 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.108.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2018. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. IRC 37. New Delhi, India: IRC.
Kolay, E., and K. Kayabali. 2006. “Investigation of the effect of aggregate shape and surface roughness on the slake durability index using the fractal dimension approach.” Eng. Geol. 86 (4): 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.05.007.
MoRTH (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways). 2013. Specifications for road and bridge works. New Delhi, India: MoRTH.
Nadesan, M. S., and P. Dinakar. 2017. “Structural concrete using sintered flyash lightweight aggregate: A review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 154 (Nov): 928–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.005.
Narattha, C., and A. Chaipanich. 2018. “Phase characterizations, physical properties and strength of environment-friendly cold-bonded fly ash lightweight aggregates.” J. Cleaner Prod. 171 (Jan): 1094–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.259.
Nicks, J., and M. Adams. 2014. “Large-scale direct shear testing of common open-graded aggregates.” In Geo-Congress 2014: Geo-characterization and Modeling for Sustainability, 47–53. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.005.
Patel, S., and J. T. Shahu. 2016. “Resilient response and permanent strain of steel slag-fly ash-dolime mix.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (10): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001619.
Patel, S., and J. T. Shahu. 2017. “Comparative study of slags stabilized with fly ash and dolime for utilization in base course.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (10): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002017.
Patel, S., and J. T. Shahu. 2018. “Comparison of industrial waste mixtures for use in subbase course of flexible pavements.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (7): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002320.
Poon, C. S., and D. Chan. 2006. “Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base.” Constr. Build. Mater. 20 (8): 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.045.
Puppala, A. J., L. R. Hoyos, and A. K. Potturi. 2011. “Resilient moduli response of moderately cement-treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23 (7): 990–998. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000268.
Saberian, M., J. Li, S. T. A. M. Perera, A. Zhou, R. Roychand, and G. Ren. 2021. “Large-scale direct shear testing of waste crushed rock reinforced with waste rubber as pavement base/subbase materials.” Transp. Geotech. 28 (Mar): 100546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100546.
Seoul. 2022. “Aggregates market—Global industry analysis, size, share, growth, trends, regional outlook, and forecast 2022-2030.” Globe News Wire. Accessed June 29, 2022. www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/06/29/2471685/0/en/Aggregates-Market-Size-to-Worth-Around-USD-837-3-Bn-by-2030.html.
Shahane, H. A., and S. Patel. 2021. “Influence of curing method on characteristics of environment-friendly angular shaped cold bonded fly ash aggregates.” J. Build. Eng. 35 (Mar): 101997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101997.
Shahane, H. A., and S. Patel. 2022. “Influence of design parameters on engineering properties of angular shaped fly ash aggregates.” Constr. Build. Mater. 327 (Jan): 126914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126914.
Sharma, A., and N. Shrivastava. 2022. “Proceedings geotechnical assessment and large scale direct shear testing on recycled brick aggregates.” Mater. Today Proc. 65 (Jan): 815–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.318.
Shergold, F. A. 1953. “The percentage voids in compacted gravel as a measure of its angularity.” Mag. Concr. Res. 5 (13): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1953.5.13.3.
Singh, S., and S. Patel. 2023a. “Development of angular-shaped lightweight coarse aggregate with low calcium fly ash using autoclave curing—Experimental and microstructural study.” J. Build. Eng. 79 (Jul): 107860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107860.
Singh, S., and S. Patel. 2023b. “Potential use of fly ash for developing angular-shaped aggregate.” Int. J. Eng. 36 (6): 1114–1120. https://doi.org/10.5829/IJE.2023.36.06C.09.
Sivakugan, N., and B. M. Das. 2009. Geotechnical engineering: A practical problem solving approach. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
Sun, Y., S. Nimbalkar, and C. Chen. 2019. “Particle breakage of granular materials during sample preparation.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 11 (2): 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.12.001.
Tajra, F., M. A. Elrahman, and D. Stephan. 2019. “The production and properties of cold-bonded aggregate and its applications in concrete: A review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 225 (Nov): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.219.
Their, J. M., and M. Özakça. 2018. “Developing geopolymer concrete by using cold-bonded fly ash aggregate, nano-silica, and steel fiber.” Constr. Build. Mater. 180 (Aug): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.274.
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1992. Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). Washington, DC: USEPA.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2017. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36 • Issue 12 • December 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 3, 2023
Accepted: Apr 29, 2024
Published online: Sep 18, 2024
Published in print: Dec 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 18, 2025
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Aggregates
- Ashes
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Environmental engineering
- Fly ash
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Infrastructure
- Laboratory tests
- Load tests
- Materials engineering
- Pavements
- Recycling
- Shear tests
- Soil dynamics
- Soil mechanics
- Tests (by type)
- Transportation engineering
- Triaxial loads
- Triaxial tests
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.