Abstract

Water seepage in cement concrete structures is one of the main sources of degradation, especially for concrete bridge decks. Therefore, the protection of these strategic structures is a crucial task for civil engineers nowadays. In this context, this study focuses on the use of geocomposites as waterproofing systems for concrete bridge decks. Four geocomposites with different characteristics were compared based on a dedicated testing protocol. The influence of the concrete surface condition (dry or wet) as well as the type and dosage of the primer was also studied. Multilayered slabs, composed of cement concrete, primer, geocomposite, and asphalt concrete, were prepared in the laboratory. The proposed testing protocol includes four types of tests, i.e., shear bond tests (SBT) with the Leutner device, pull-off tests, binder bond strength (BBS) tests, and watertightness tests. Most configurations exhibited good shear resistance and adhesion properties. In general, the geocomposite type and the primer dosage had a significant influence on the behavior of the system, whereas the concrete condition and the primer type had no statistically significant effect. In most cases, the weak point of the system was the interface between cement concrete and primer or between primer and geocomposite. Finally, all geocomposites successfully passed the watertightness test. The proposed testing protocol can be useful for producers to design and optimize their products as well as for road agencies to prequalify the product in the laboratory on the basis of clear performance-based technical specifications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The activities presented in this paper were sponsored by Copernit S.p.A. (Italy), which gave both financial and technical support for the research project. The results and opinions presented are those of the authors.

References

AASHTO. 2022. Method of test for determining asphalt binder bond strength by means of the binder bond strength (BBS) test. AASHTO T 361. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ahmed, H., H. M. La, and N. Gucunski. 2020. “Review of non-destructive civil infrastructure evaluation for bridges: State-of-the-art robotic platforms, sensors and algorithms.” Sensors 20 (14): 3954. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20143954.
Al-Qadi, I. L., R. E. Weyers, and P. D. Cady. 1993. “Field evaluation of preformed membranes.” J. Transp. Eng. 119 (2): 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:2(284.
Al-Shammari, A., and M. Afzali. 2022. “Remaining service life assessment of bridge abutments using different models: Comparative study.” ACI Symp. Publ. 131 (Apr): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.14359/51734672.
Alsharqawi, M., T. Dawood, S. Abdelkhalek, M. Abouhamad, and T. Zayed. 2022. “Condition assessment of concrete-made structures using ground penetrating radar.” Autom. Constr. 144 (Dec): 104627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104627.
Autelitano, F., M. Rinaldi, and F. Giuliani. 2019. “Winter highway maintenance strategies: Are all the sodium chloride salts the same?” Constr. Build. Mater. 226 (Nov): 945–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.292.
Canestrari, F., F. Cardone, E. Gaudenzi, D. Chiola, N. Gasbarro, and G. Ferrotti. 2022. “Interlayer bonding characterization of interfaces reinforced with geocomposites in field applications.” Geotext. Geomembr. 50 (1): 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.09.010.
Canestrari, F., G. Ferrotti, M. Abuaddous, and E. Pasquini. 2016. “Geocomposite reinforcement of polymer-modified asphalt systems.” In Proc., 8th RILEM Int. Symp. on Testing and Characterization of Sustainable and Innovative Bituminous Materials, 383–395. New York: Springer.
Donovan, E. P., I. L. Al-Qadi, and A. Loulizi. 2000. “Optimization of tack coat application rate for geocomposite membrane on bridge decks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1740 (1): 143–150. https://doi.org/10.3141/1740-18.
EAPA (European Asphalt Pavement Association). 2013. Asphalt pavements on bridge decks. Brussels, Belgium: EAPA.
ES (European Standards). 2000. Flexible sheets for waterproofing–Bitumen, plastic and rubber sheets for roof waterproofing–Determination of watertightness. EN 1928. Brussels, Belgium: ES.
ES (European Standards). 2004. Flexible sheets for waterproofing–Waterproofing of concrete bridge decks and other concrete surfaces trafficable by vehicles–Determination of bond strength. EN 13596. Brussels, Belgium: ES.
ES (European Standards). 2017. Flexible sheets for waterproofing–Waterproofing of concrete bridge decks and other concrete surfaces trafficable by vehicles–Determination of the resistance to compaction of an asphalt layer. EN 14692. Brussels, Belgium: ES.
ES (European Standards). 2019. Flexible sheets for waterproofing–Waterproofing of concrete bridge decks and other concrete surfaces trafficable by vehicles–Specimen preparation. EN 13375. Brussels, Belgium: ES.
ES (European Standards). 2021. Bituminous mixtures–Test methods–Part 48: Interlayer bonding. EN 12697-48. Brussels, Belgium: ES.
ES (European Standards). 2022. Bituminous mixtures–Test method–Part 33: Specimen prepared by roller compactor. EN 12697-33 (2019)+A1. Brussels, Belgium: ES.
ES (European Standards). 2011. Cement–Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. EN 197-1. Brussels, Belgium: ES.
Feng, D., M. Xu, and W. Wei. 2014. “Analysis of the influence of cement concrete deck moisture content on the bonding performance of waterproof adhesion layer.” J. Highway Transp. Res. Dev. 8 (2): 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHTRCQ.0000377.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2021. “National bridge inventory.” Accessed March 31, 2023. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/no10/condition21.cfm.
Fischel, M. 2001. Evaluation of selected deicers based on a review of the literature. Denver: Colorado DOT.
Fu, J., L. Wang, G. Gai, and F. Yang. 2021. “Asphalt deck pavement design for concrete bridge under frost climate in the North Sea region.” In Vol. 651 of Proc., IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 032014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/651/3/032014.
Gucunski, N., A. Imani, F. Romero, S. Nazarian, D. Yuan, H. Wiggenhauser, P. Shokouhi, A. Taffe, and D. Kutrubes. 2013. Nondestructive testing to identify concrete bridge deck deterioration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Guo, M., Y. Tan, L. Wang, Z. Ye, Y. Hou, J. Wu, and H. Yang. 2017. “Study on water permeability, shear and pull-off performance of waterproof bonding layer for highway bridge.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 11 (4): 396–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.09.013.
Haynes, M. A., E. Coleri, and I. Obaid. 2021. “Performance of waterproofing membranes to protect concrete bridge decks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2675 (9): 1693–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211009527.
Ingrassia, L. P., A. Virgili, and F. Canestrari. 2020. “Effect of geocomposite reinforcement on the performance of thin asphalt pavements: Accelerated pavement testing and laboratory analysis.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 12 (Jun): e00342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00342.
Jaskula, P., D. Rys, M. Stienns, C. Szydlowski, M. Golos, K. Kornacka, J. Zoltko, and J. Kawalec. 2023. “The effect of multiaxial geocomposite reinforcement on fatigue performance and crack propagation delay in double-layered asphalt beams.” Supplement, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 24 (S1): 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2023.2180998.
Jaskula, P., D. Rys, M. Stienss, C. Szydlowski, M. Golos, and J. Kawalec. 2021. “Fatigue performance of double-layered asphalt concrete beams reinforced with new type of geocomposites.” Materials 14 (9): 2190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092190.
Jin, W., Y. Zhao, W. Wang, and F. He. 2021. “Performance evaluation and optimization of waterproof adhesive layer for concrete bridge deck in seasonal frozen region using AHP.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021 (Mar): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555535.
Kang, H., K. Oh, K. Ahn, B. Jiang, X. He, and S. Oh. 2022. “Property analysis of double-sided composite waterproofing sheet for simultaneous application on asphalt concrete and latex-modified concrete pavements for bridge decks.” Appl. Sci. 12 (19): 9779. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199779.
Krauss, P., J. Lawler, and K. A. Steiner. 2009. Guidelines for selection of bridge deck overlays, sealers and treatments (NCHRP Project 20-07). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Li, S., Y. Huang, and Z.-H. Liu. 2016. “Experimental evaluation of asphalt material for interlayer in rigid-flexible composite pavement.” Constr. Build. Mater. 102 (Jan): 699–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.122.
Liu, M., S. Han, and W. Ren. 2018. “Study on cohesion performance of waterborne epoxy resin emulsified asphalt as interlayer materials.” Constr. Build. Mater. 177 (Jul): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.043.
Liu, W., K. Yan, and H. Ji. 2022. “Bonding performance evaluation on WTR-APAO composite modified asphalt as waterproof adhesive layer for concrete bridge.” Constr. Build. Mater. 349 (Sep): 128667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128667.
Liu, Y., J. Wu, and J. Chen. 2014. “Mechanical properties of a waterproofing adhesive layer used on concrete bridges under heavy traffic and temperature loading.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 48 (Jan): 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.015.
Manning, D. G. 1995. Waterproofing membranes for concrete bridge decks. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Mazzotta, F., C. Lantieri, V. Vignali, A. Simone, G. Dondi, and C. Sangiorgi. 2017. “Performance evaluation of recycled rubber waterproofing bituminous membranes for concrete bridge decks and other surfaces.” Constr. Build. Mater. 136 (Aug): 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.058.
National Highways, Transport Scotland, Welsh Government, Department for Infrastructure. 2022. Waterproofing and surfacing of concrete bridge decks (CD 358). London: National Archives.
Nickless, K., and R. A. Atadero. 2018. “Mechanistic deterioration modeling for bridge design and management.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (5): 04018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001223.
Roelfstra, G., R. Hajdin, B. Adey, and E. Brühwiler. 2004. “Condition evolution in bridge management systems and corrosion-induced deterioration.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (3): 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:3(268).
Russell, H. G. 2012. Waterproofing membranes for concrete bridge decks (NCHRP Synthesis 425). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Solaimanian, M., G. Chehab, and M. Medeiros. 2016. “Evaluating resistance of hot mix asphalt overlays to reflective cracking using geocomposites and accelerated loading.” In The roles of accelerated pavement testing in pavement sustainability: Engineering, environment, and economics, 407–418. Berlin: Springer.
Spadoni, S., L. P. Ingrassia, G. Paoloni, A. Virgili, and F. Canestrari. 2021. “Influence of geocomposite properties on the crack propagation and interlayer bonding of asphalt pavements.” Materials 14 (18): 5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185310.
Vignisdottir, H. R., B. Ebrahimi, G. K. Booto, R. O’Born, H. Brattebo, H. Wallbaum, and A. A. Bohne. 2019. “A review of environmental impacts of winter road maintenance.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 158 (Feb): 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.10.013.
Xu, Q., Q. Zhou, C. Medina, G-K. Chang, and D. K. Rozycki. 2009. “Experimental and numerical analysis of a waterproofing adhesive layer used on concrete-bridge decks.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 29 (5): 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.12.001.
Yang, G., C. Wang, H. Fu, Z. Yan, and W. Yin. 2019. “Waterborne epoxy resin–polyurethane–emulsified asphalt: Preparation and properties.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (11): 04019265. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002904.
Zhang, H., P. Gao, Z. Zhang, and Y. Pan. 2020. “Experimental study of the performance of a stress-absorbing waterproof layer for use in asphalt pavements on bridge decks.” Constr. Build. Mater. 254 (Sep): 119290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119290.
Zhang, K., and Y. Luo. 2018. “Interlaminar performance of waterproof and cohesive materials for concrete bridge deck under specific test conditions.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (8): 04018161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002357.
Zhou, Q., and Q. Xu. 2009. “Experimental study of waterproof membranes on concrete deck: Interface adhesion under influences of critical factors.” Mater. Des. 30 (4): 1161–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.023.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36Issue 2February 2024

History

Received: Apr 20, 2023
Accepted: Jul 13, 2023
Published online: Nov 17, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 17, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Eugenio Mariani [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, and Architecture, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, and Architecture, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7184-8725. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, and Architecture, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0563-6473. Email: [email protected]
Full Professor, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, and Architecture, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0773-6574. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share