Technical Papers
Jun 28, 2023

Constitutive Behavior of a Homogenized AT61 Magnesium Alloy under Different Strain Rates and Temperatures: An Experimental and Numerical Investigation

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 9

Abstract

The performance of a structure is primarily determined by its material characteristics under different loading conditions, strain rates, and temperatures. In the present work, the plastic flow response of a homogenized AT61 magnesium alloy was constitutively analyzed under a wide variety of quasi-static and dynamic strain rates. The quasi-compression test was conducted at 25°C–250°C with strain rates from 104 to 101  s1. The dynamic loading of AT61 alloy was performed on a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus under a strain rate of 1,0004,000  s1. The material shows hardening behavior throughout the strain rate regime, whereas the plastic flow stress significantly reduces with an increase in deformation temperature. At a very high strain rate, the accumulated energy around the cracks is attributed to the dynamic recrystallisation with the onset of adiabatic temperature rises in the materials. A phenomenological Johnson-Cook (JC) model was also calibrated and used for numerical simulation in ABAQUS/Explicit to predict the material flow response. It was observed that a strong correlation exists between experimental and numerical results.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Abbasi-Bani, A., A. Zarei-Hanzaki, M. H. Pishbin, and N. Haghdadi. 2014. “A comparative study on the capability of Johnson–Cook and Arrhenius-type constitutive equations to describe the flow behavior of Mg-6Al-1Zn alloy.” Mech. Mater. 71 (Apr): 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.12.001.
Ahmad, I. R., X. Jing, and D. W. Shu. 2014. “Effect of temperature on the mechanical behavior of magnesium alloy AZ91D in the range between 30°C and 250°C.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 86 (Sep): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.04.010.
Andrade, U., M. A. Meyers, K. S. Vecchio, and A. H. Chokshi. 1994. “Dynamic recrystallization in high-strain, high-strain-rate plastic deformation of copper.” Acta Metall. Mater. 42 (9): 3183–3195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(94)90417-0.
Armstrong, R. W., and F. J. Zerilli. 1988. “Dislocation mechanics based analysis of material dynamics behavior.” J. Phys. Colloques 49 (C3): 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1988374.
Bajargan, G., G. Singh, D. Sivakumar, and U. Ramamurty. 2013. “Effect of temperature and strain rate on the deformation behavior and microstructure of a homogenized AZ31 magnesium alloy.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 579 (Sep): 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.088.
Barnett, M. R., M. D. Nave, and C. J. Bettles. 2004. “Deformation microstructures and textures of some cold rolled Mg alloys.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 386 (1–2): 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(04)00942-6.
Chakraborty, P., M. K. Singha, and V. Tiwari. 2022. “Dynamic tensile and compressive behavior of AA7475-T7351 alloy under different strain rates and temperatures.” Structures 46 (Dec): 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.037.
Chakraborty, P., and V. Tiwari. 2023. “Dynamic fracture behavior of AA7475-T7351 alloy at different strain rates and temperatures.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 279 (Feb): 109065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109065.
Chao, H. Y., H. F. Sun, W. Z. Chen, and E. D. Wang. 2011. “Static recrystallization kinetics of a heavily cold drawn AZ31 magnesium alloy under annealing treatment.” Mater. Charact. 62 (3): 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2011.01.007.
Clausen, A. H., T. Børvik, O. S. Hopperstad, and A. Benallal. 2004. “Flow and fracture characteristics of aluminium alloy AA5083–H116 as function of strain rate, temperature and triaxiality.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 364 (1–2): 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.027.
Deshpande, V. M., P. Chakraborty, T. Chakraborty, and V. Tiwari. 2022. “Application of copper as a pulse shaper in SHPB tests on brittle materials—Experimental study, constitutive parameters identification, and numerical simulations.” Mech. Mater. 171 (Aug): 104336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104336.
E04 Committee. 2022. Standard test methods for determining average grain size. ASTM E112-13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Engineers and Builders. 2017. “Standard tools and techniques for dynamic characterization of materials. Design book of engineers and builders.” Accessed December 30, 2021. https://www.engineersandbuilders.com/.
Friedrich, H., and S. Schumann. 2001. “Research for a ‘new age of magnesium’ in the automotive industry.” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 117 (Nov): 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00780-4.
Gaurav, G., R. Sarvesha, S. S. Singh, R. Prasad, and J. Jain. 2019. “Study of static recrystallization behavior of a Mg-6Al-3Sn alloy.” J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28 (6): 3468–3477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04104-0.
Guo, P., L. Li, X. Liu, T. Ye, S. Cao, C. Xu, and S. Li. 2017. “Compressive deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of AM80 magnesium alloy under quasi-static and dynamic loading.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 109 (Nov): 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.004.
Haghdadi, N., A. Zarei-Hanzaki, and H. R. Abedi. 2012. “The flow behavior modeling of cast A356 aluminum alloy at elevated temperatures considering the effect of strain.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 535 (Feb): 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.076.
Hirsch, J., and T. Al-Samman. 2013. “Superior light metals by texture engineering: Optimized aluminum and magnesium alloys for automotive applications.” Acta Mater. 61 (3): 818–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.044.
Iqbal, D., and V. Tiwari. 2019. “Investigations on the influence of projectile shape on the transient and post impact response of thin sheet structures.” Thin-Walled Struct. 145 (Dec): 106402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106402.
Ishikawa, K., H. Watanabe, and T. Mukai. 2005. “High strain rate deformation behavior of an AZ91 magnesium alloy at elevated temperatures.” Mater. Lett. 59 (12): 1511–1515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.01.012.
Johnson, G. R., and W. H. Cook. 1983. “A constitutive model and data for materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures.” In Proc., 7th Inf. Symp. Ballistics, 541–547. Hague, Netherlands: Scientific Research Publishing.
Khan, A. S., and R. Liang. 1999. “Behaviors of three BCC metal over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures: Experiments and modeling.” Int. J. Plast. 15 (10): 1089–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00030-3.
Krishnan, S. A., C. Phaniraj, C. Ravishankar, A. K. Bhaduri, and P. V. Sivaprasad. 2011. “Prediction of high temperature flow stress in 9Cr–1Mo ferritic steel during hot compression.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 88 (11–12): 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.07.009.
Kulekci, M. K. 2008. “Magnesium and its alloys applications in automotive industry.” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 39 (9): 851–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1279-2.
Kumar, A., and R. G. Kumble. 2003. “Viscous drag on dislocations at high strain rates in copper.” J. Appl. Phys. 40 (9): 3475. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1658222.
Kumar, P., J. LeBlanc, D. S. Stargel, and A. Shukla. 2012. “Effect of plate curvature on blast response of aluminum panels.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 46 (Aug): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.02.004.
Lee, W. S., and C. F. Lin. 1998. “Plastic deformation and fracture behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy loaded with high strain rate under various temperatures.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 241 (1–2): 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00471-1.
Lesuer, D. R. 2000. Experimental investigations of material models for TI-6A1-4V titanium and 2024-T3 aluminum. Rep. No. DTFA03–97Z-90007. Washington, DC: US DOT.
Lin, Y. C., X. M. Chen, and G. Liu. 2010. “A modified Johnson–Cook model for tensile behaviors of typical high-strength alloy steel.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527 (26): 6980–6986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.061.
Liu, S., D. Kent, H. Zhan, N. Doan, M. Dargusch, and G. Wang. 2020. “Dynamic recrystallization of pure zinc during high strain-rate compression at ambient temperature.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 784 (May): 139325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139325.
Liu, Y., Y. Li, Q. Zhu, H. Zhang, X. Qi, J. Wang, P. Jin, and X. Zeng. 2021. “Twin recrystallization mechanisms in a high strain rate compressed Mg-Zn alloy.” J. Magnesium Alloys 9 (2): 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2019.12.011.
Luo, A. A., P. Fu, L. Peng, X. Kang, Z. Li, and T. Zhu. 2012. “Solidification microstructure and mechanical properties of cast magnesium-aluminum-tin alloys.” Metall. Mater. Trans. A 43 (1): 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0820-y.
Malik, A., W. Yangwei, C. Huanwu, M. A. Khan, F. Nazeer, A. Rui, B. Jiawei, and W. Mingjun. 2019. “Fracture behavior of twin induced ultra-fine grained ZK61 magnesium alloy under high strain rate compression.” J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8 (4): 3475–3486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.018.
Outinen, J., J. Kesti, and P. Mäkeläinen. 1997. “Fire design model for structural steel S355 based upon transient state tensile test results.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 42 (3): 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(97)00018-7.
Outinen, J., and P. Mäkeläinen. 2004. “Mechanical properties of structural steel at elevated temperatures and after cooling down.” Fire Mater. 28 (2–4): 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.849.
Pekguleryuz, M. O., K. Kainer, and A. A. Kaya. 2013. Fundamentals of magnesium alloy metallurgy. Philadelphia: Woodhead Publishing.
Poddar, P., and K. L. Sahoo. 2012. “Microstructure and mechanical properties of conventional cast and rheocast Mg-Sn based alloys.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 556 (Oct): 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.088.
Poddar, P., K. L. Sahoo, S. Mukherjee, and A. K. Ray. 2012. “Creep behavior of Mg-8% Sn and Mg-8% Sn-3% Al-1% Si alloys.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 545 (May): 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.007.
Prakash, G., N. K. Singh, and N. K. Gupta. 2020. “Mechanical behavior of magnesium alloy AZ61 at different strain rates and temperatures under tensile, compressive, and flexural loads.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (11): 04020336. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003436.
Prakash, G., N. K. Singh, and N. K. Gupta. 2021. “Flow stress behavior of AZ81 magnesium alloy under dynamic loads.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 33 (3): 04020486. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003607.
Prawoto, Y., M. Fanone, S. Shahedi, M. S. Ismail, and W. B. Wan Nik. 2012. “Computational approach using Johnson–Cook model on dual phase steel.” Comput. Mater. Sci. 54 (Mar): 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.021.
Quan, G.-Z., Y. Shi, Y.-X. Wang, B.-S. Kang, T.-W. Ku, and W.-J. Song. 2011. “Constitutive modeling for the dynamic recrystallization evolution of AZ80 magnesium alloy based on stress-strain data.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528 (28): 8051–8059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.064.
Rittel, D., and Z. G. Wang. 2008. “Thermo-mechanical aspects of adiabatic shear failure of AM50 and Ti6Al4V alloys.” Mech. Mater. 40 (8): 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2008.03.002.
Rollett, A., F. Humphreys, G. S. Rohrer, and M. Hatherly. 2004. Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Shen, J., K. Kondoh, T. L. Jones, S. N. Mathaudhu, L. J. Kecskes, and Q. Wei. 2016. “Effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of magnesium alloy AMX602.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 649 (Jan): 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.022.
Song, W. Q., P. Beggs, and M. Easton. 2009. “Compressive strain-rate sensitivity of magnesium-aluminum die casting alloys.” Mater. Des. 30 (3): 642–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.050.
Su, C. W., L. Lu, and M. O. Lai. 2008. “Recrystallization and grain growth of deformed magnesium alloy.” Philos. Mag. 88 (2): 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430701805566.
Ulacia, I., N. V. Dudamell, F. Gálvez, S. Yi, M. T. Pérez-Prado, and I. Hurtado. 2010. “Mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of a Mg AZ31 sheet at dynamic strain rates.” Acta Mater. 58 (8): 2988–2998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.029.
Wang, F., S.-J. Sun, Z. Wang, B. Yu, P.-L. Mao, and Z. Liu. 2022. “Microstructure, mechanical properties and first-principle analysis of vacuum die-cast Mg-7Al alloy with Sn addition.” Rare Metals 41 (6): 1961–1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-015-0585-3.
Wang, H. Y., E. S. Xue, W. Xiao, Z. Liu, J. B. Li, and Q. C. Jiang. 2011. “Influence of grain size on deformation mechanisms in rolled Mg-3Al-3Sn alloy at room temperature.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528 (29–30): 8790–8794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.052.
Wang, H.-Y., X.-L. Nan, N. Zhang, C. Wang, J.-G. Wang, and Q.-C. Jiang. 2012. “Strong strain hardening ability in an as-cast Mg-3Al-3Sn alloy.” Mater. Chem. Phys. 132 (2–3): 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.12.036.
Wang, H.-Y., E.-S. Xue, X.-L. Nan, T. Yue, Y.-P. Wang, and Q.-C. Jiang. 2013. “Influence of grain size on strain rate sensitivity in rolled Mg-3Al-3Sn alloy at room temperature.” Scr. Mater. 68 (5): 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.10.019.
Xie, Q., Z. Zhu, G. Kang, and C. Yu. 2016. “Crystal plasticity-based impact dynamic constitutive model of magnesium alloy.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 119 (Dec): 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.10.012.
Zhang, H., W. Cheng, J. Fan, B. Xu, and H. Dong. 2015. “Improved mechanical properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets by repeated cold rolling and annealing using a small pass reduction.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 637 (Jun): 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.057.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: Oct 16, 2022
Accepted: Feb 28, 2023
Published online: Jun 28, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Krishna Institute of Engineering & Technology Group of Institutions, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201206, India; Dept. of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2819-7744. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-5449. Email: [email protected]
Vikrant Tiwari [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A comparative study of different constitutive models to predict the dynamic flow behaviour of a homogenised AT61 magnesium alloy, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.074, 54, (631-643), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share