Case Studies
Jun 28, 2023

New Repair Material for Ordinary Concrete Substrates: Investigating Self-Compacting Sand Concrete and Its Interaction with Roughness of the Substrate Surface

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 9

Abstract

This experimental investigation studied the development and use of a new self-compacting sand concrete (SCSC) to perform repairs on ordinary concrete (OC) substrates. This type of concrete should have the following characteristics: excellent fluidity, optimum stability, and acceptable bond strength. In addition, a new pouring method was used for the application of the repair layers. For this, nine SCSC compositions were tested for slump flow using an Abrams cone, passing ability by the L-box test, segregation resistance by the screen stability test, and compressive strength. The results obtained from these tests were then employed for selecting the best composition to use as a repair material. In addition, the volume of permeable pore and water absorption was determined by immersion tests. The compressive strength tests were carried out at three different ages, i.e., 7, 28, and 90 days, for the purpose of determining the physical and mechanical characteristics of ordinary concrete (OC) and those of SCSC, separately. The bond strength between the substrate (OC) and the repair concrete (SCSC) was evaluated by performing two tests: a tensile splitting test (indirect tension test) and a concrete pull-off test (direct tensile test), which was also used for the evaluation of the tensile strength of the concrete substrate (OC) and that of the repair concrete (SCSC). The resulting bond strength values showed that it is indeed possible to use SCSC as a repair material in thin and narrow places, and even those having complex geometries.

Practical Applications

This research aims to develop a novel, highly fluid, self-compacting sand concrete (SCSC) that is intended to be used as a cementitious repair material for the rehabilitation or reinforcement of civil engineering structures. The high fluidity of this type of concrete makes it an exceptionally workable material that has the capacity to flow through tightly reinforced elements or circulate into sections having geometrically complex shapes. SCSC is exceptionally effective for repairing narrow areas, such as the intersection of reinforced concrete members where reinforcement is overlapped, and for fixing sections below horizontal surfaces, such as bridge decks and other similar structures. The results obtained are very encouraging, with more than 70 MPa for the compressive strength and more than 3 MPa for the tensile strength. In addition, the ingredients making up this concrete are readily available almost everywhere. They can be utilized without specific manufacturing efforts. Some of the constituents of self-compacting sand concrete are fine natural sand, recycled sand and aggregates, and sand recovered from limestone waste.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the MESRS and the DGRSDT for their financial support throughout the duration of the research.

References

Abidelah, A., A. Bouchair, D. Kerdal, and K. Ayed. 2009. “Characterization of a self-compacting sand concrete using the quarry waste.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 36 (11): 1773–1782. https://doi.org/10.1139/L09-111.
Abo Sabah, S. H., M. H. Hassan, N. Muhamad Bunnori, and M. A. Megat Johari. 2019. “Bond strength of the interface between normal concrete substrate and GUSMRC repair material overlay.” Constr. Build. Mater. 216 (Aug): 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.270.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2006. Guide for the selection of materials for the repair of concrete. ACI 546.3R-06. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ASTM. 1997. Standard test method for air content of freshly mixed concrete by the pressure method. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2006. Standard test method for measuring pavement macrotexture depth using a volumetric technique. E965-96. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2013a. Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. ASTM C 642-13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2013b. Standard test method for tensile strength of concrete surfaces and the bond strength or tensile strength of concrete repair and overlay materials by direct tension (pull-off method). C1583-04. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for determining bond strength between hardened roller compacted concrete and other hardened cementitious mixtures (point load test) 1. ASTM C1245/C1245M-03. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Bédérina, M., M. M. Khenfer, R. M. Dheilly, and M. Quéneudec. 2005. “Reuse of local sand: Effect of limestone filler proportion on the rheological and mechanical properties of different sand concretes.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (6): 1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.006.
Beushausen, H., B. Höhlig, and M. Talotti. 2017. “The influence of substrate moisture preparation on bond strength of concrete overlays and the microstructure of the OTZ.” Cem. Concr. Res. 92 (Feb): 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.017.
Bonaldo, E., J. A. O. Barros, and P. B. Lourenço. 2005. “Bond characterization between concrete substrate and repairing SFRC using pull-off testing.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 25 (6): 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.01.002.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2000. Testing hardened concrete—Part 2: Making and curing specimens for strength tests. EN 12390-2:2019. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2009. Testing hardened concrete—Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. EN 12390-3:2019. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2010. Testing fresh concrete—Part 8: Self-compacting concrete. Slump-flow test. EN 12350-8: 2010. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2017. Testing fresh concrete—Part 10: Self-compacting concrete. L-box test. EN 12350-10 2010. London: BSI.
Carbonell Muñoz, M. A., D. K. Harris, T. M. Ahlborn, and D. C. Froster. 2014. “Bond performance between ultrahigh-performance concrete and normal-strength concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (8): 04014031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000890.
Courard, L. 2000. “Parametric study for the creation of the interface between concrete and repair products.” Mater. Struct. 33 (1): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481698.
Diab, A. M., A. E. M. Abd Elmoaty, and M. R. Tag Eldin. 2017. “Slant shear bond strength between self compacting concrete and old concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 130 (Jan): 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.023.
Dreux, G., and J. Festa. 1995. New concrete guide: Components and properties, composition and dosage, manufacture, transport and implementation, control and standardization. Paris: Eyrolles.
European Project Group. 2005. The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete. Brussels, Belgium: The European Union.
France and European Standards 2010. Essai pour béton frais–Partie 11: Béton auto-plaçant–Essai de stabilité au tamis [Test for fresh concrete-Part 11: Self-compacting concrete-sieve stability test]. NF EN 12350-11. Brussels, Belgium: France and European Standards.
Gadri, K., and A. Guettala. 2017. “Evaluation of bond strength between sand concrete as new repair material and ordinary concrete substrate (The surface roughness effect).” Constr. Build. Mater. 157 (Dec): 1133–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.183.
Garbacz, A., M. Górka, and L. Courard. 2005. “Effect of concrete surface treatment on adhesion in repair systems.” Mag. Concr. Res. 57 (1): 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2005.57.1.49.
Gillani, S., A. Toumi, and A. Turatsinze. 2020. “Effect of surface preparation of substrate on bond tensile strength of thin bonded cement-based overlays.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 13 (2): 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0101-5.
Haber, Z. B., J. F. Munoz, I. De la Varga, and B. A. Graybeal. 2018. “Bond characterization of UHPC overlays for concrete bridge decks: Laboratory and field testing.” Constr. Build. Mater. 190 (Nov): 1056–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.167.
Hamah Sor, N. 2018. “The effect of superplasticizer dosage on fresh properties of self-compacting lightweight concrete produced with coarse pumice aggregate.” J. Garmian Univ. 5 (2): 190–209. https://doi.org/10.24271/garmian.336.
Júlio, E. N. B. S., F. A. B. Branco, and V. D. Silva. 2004. “Concrete-to-concrete bond strength. Influence of the roughness of the substrate surface.” Constr. Build. Mater. 18 (9): 675–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.023.
Makhloufi, Z., T. Bouziani, M. Bederina, and M. Hadjoudja. 2014. “Mix proportioning and performance of a crushed limestone sand-concrete.” J. Build. Mater. Struct. 1 (1): 10. https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v1i1.4.
Malier, Y., and M. Guérinet. 2008. AFGC: Recommendations for the use of self-composition concrete. Paris: French Association of Civil Engineering.
Mizan, M. H., T. Ueda, and K. Matsumoto. 2020. “Enhancement of the concrete-PCM interfacial bonding strength using silica fume.” Constr. Build. Mater. 259 (Oct): 119774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119774.
Momayez, A., M. R. Ehsani, A. A. Ramezanianpour, and H. Rajaie. 2005. “Comparison of methods for evaluating bond strength between concrete substrate and repair materials.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (4): 748–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.027.
Mupparisetty, V. K. R., and F. A. Mohammed. 2022. “Crushed stone dust as a replacement for river sand in self compacting repair mortars—A sustainable solution.” Mater. Today: Proc. 52 (Jan): 1168–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.11.021.
Okamura, H., and M. Ouchi. 2003. “Self-compacting concrete.” J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 1 (1): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.1.5.
Qian, J., C. You, Q. Wang, H. Wang, and X. Jia. 2014. “A method for assessing bond performance of cement-based repair materials.” Constr. Build. Mater. 68 (Oct): 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.048.
Robalo, K., R. do Carmo, H. Costa, and E. Júlio. 2021. “Experimental study on the interface between low cement recycled aggregates concrete and ultra-high durability concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 304 (Oct): 124603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124603.
Sablocrete. 1994. Sand concrete: Characteristics and Use Practices. France: Presses de l’ENPC.
Saleh, F. A. H., N. Kaid, K. Ayed, R. Soltani, and D.-E. Kerdal. 2021. “Mechanical and physical properties of concrete incorporating rubber.” Symposium Paper 349 (Jun): 432–445.
Santos, P. M. D., and E. N. B. S. Júlio. 2011. “Factors affecting bond between new and old concrete.” ACI Mater. J. 108 (4): 449–456.
Santos, P. M. D., E. N. B. S. Júlio, and V. D. Silva. 2007. “Correlation between concrete-to-concrete bond strength and the roughness of the substrate surface.” Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (8): 1688–1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.044.
Semendary, A. A., W. Hamid, I. Khoury, E. P. Steinberg, and K. K. Walsh. 2019. “Experimental investigation of direct tension bond performance of high-strength concrete and ultrahigh-performance concrete connections.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (9): 04019171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002800.
Tao, Y., K. Lesage, K. Van Tittelboom, Y. Yuan, and G. De Schutter. 2022. “Influence of substrate surface roughness and moisture content on tensile adhesion performance of 3D printable concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 126 (Feb): 104350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104350.
Tayeh, B. A., B. H. Abu Bakar, M. A. Megat Johari, and A. M. Zeyad. 2014. “Microstructural analysis of the adhesion mechanism between old concrete substrate and UHPFC.” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 28 (18): 1846–1864. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2014.925386.
Turcry, P., and A. Loukili. 2003. “Différentes approches pour la formulation des bétons autoplaçants: Influence sur les caractéristiques rhéologiques et mécaniques.” Rev. Fr. de Génie Civ. 7 (4): 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/12795119.2003.9692503.
Valikhani, A., A. J. Jahromi, I. M. Mantawy, and A. Azizinamini. 2020. “Experimental evaluation of concrete-to-UHPC bond strength with correlation to surface roughness for repair application.” Constr. Build. Mater. 238 (Mar): 117753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117753.
Valipour, M., and K. H. Khayat. 2020. “Debonding test method to evaluate bond strength between UHPC and concrete substrate.” Mater. Struct. 53 (1): 15. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-1446-6.
Vaysburd, A. M., and J. E. McDonald. 1999. An evaluation of equipment and procedures for tensile bond testing of concrete repairs. Rep. No. REMR-CS-61. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Wu, Z., K. H. Khayat, and C. Shi. 2019. “Changes in rheology and mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete with silica fume content.” Cem. Concr. Res. 123 (Sep): 105786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105786.
Yazdi, M. A., E. Dejager, M. Debraekeleer, E. Gruyaert, K. Van Tittelboom, and N. De Belie. 2020. “Bond strength between concrete and repair mortar and its relation with concrete removal techniques and substrate composition.” Constr. Build. Mater. 230 (Jan): 116900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116900.
Zanotti, C., and N. Randl. 2019. “Are concrete-concrete bond tests comparable?” Cem. Concr. Compos. 99 (May): 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.02.012.
Zhang, Y., P. Zhu, Z. Liao, and L. Wang. 2020. “Interfacial bond properties between normal strength concrete substrate and ultra-high performance concrete as a repair material.” Constr. Build. Mater. 235 (Feb): 117431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117431.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: Aug 3, 2022
Accepted: Feb 10, 2023
Published online: Jun 28, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sciences and Technology Mohamed BOUDIAF, Oran 31000, Algeria (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-9898. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Laboratory of Materials (LabMat), Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Polytechnic School Maurice AUDIN, Oran 31000, Algeria. Email: [email protected]
Djamel-Eddine Kerdal [email protected]
Professor, Laboratory of Structural Mechanics and Stability (LM2SC), Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sciences and Technology Mohamed BOUDIAF, Oran 31000, Algeria. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Nantes Université, Ecole Centrale Nantes, Scientific Research National Center (CNRS), Civil and Mechanical Engineering Research Institute (GeM), UMR 6183, Saint-Nazaire F-44600, France. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-089X. Email: [email protected]
Mohamed Mouli [email protected]
Professor, Laboratory of Materials (LabMat), Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Polytechnic School Maurice AUDIN, Oran 31000, Algeria. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share