Features
Jul 26, 2024

Arbitration in Construction Project Disputes over the Last Decade: Bibliometric and Content Analysis

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 4

Abstract

Arbitration has a long history of resolving disputes, particularly in the construction industry. The benefits of arbitration performance and effectiveness were well promoted, along with its adverse issues. This article aims to examine the evolution trends of arbitration over the last decade based on published articles in the Web of Science and Scopus database library using bibliometric and content analysis. To the best awareness, this investigation was instigated by the lack of a comprehensive literature analysis of the published articles. From the 89 shortlisted articles finalized following the PRISMA 2020 protocol, the findings through Biblioshiny and VOSviewer helped answer the article’s objectives on the investigation after harmonizing it with the OpenRefine software. Findings indicated the need for an effective framework to address all the issues of past concern within a single body of knowledge to enhance the performance of arbitration. The findings of this article aim to inform stakeholders in the construction industry about the progression of arbitration performance. Meanwhile, construction industry stakeholders and scholars can investigate ways to enhance arbitration methods with the results to delve into the emphasized themes and at the same time, this analysis method may encourage other researchers to pursue their areas of interest similarly.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Works Cited

Abdul-Malak, M.-A. U., and T. A. Abdulhai. 2017. “Conceptualization of the contractor’s project management group dynamics in claims initiation and documentation evolution.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (3): 15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000229.
Abdul-Malak, M.-A. U., and J. M. K. Hamie. 2019. “Proposed framework for the rendering of construction contract document interpretations by engineering professionals.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000305.
Abdul-Malak, M.-A. U., H. F. Hanano, and H. M. Turman. 2019. “Administration impairments resulting from imbalanced contract conditions: Owner payment default.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (4): 14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000321.
Abu Helw, A., and A. S. Ezeldin. 2020. “Comparative study of the application of public contract laws on construction projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (3): 10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000414.
Abwunza, A. A. 2020. “Influence of fairness perceptions on cooperative behavior in construction arbitration.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (4): 11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000422.
Abwunza, A. A., T. K. Peter, and K. Muigua. 2019. “Effectiveness of arbitration in contractual disputes: Tension between procedural efficiency and award quality.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (2): 8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000290.
Abwunza, A. A., T. K. Peter, and K. Muigua. 2020. “Explaining delays in construction arbitration: A process-control model approach.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000371.
Abwunza, A. A., T. K. Peter, and K. Muigua. 2021a. “Explaining the effectiveness of construction arbitration: An organizational justice perspective.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (3): 17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000479.
Abwunza, A. A., T. K. Peter, and K. Muigua. 2021b. “Explaining time performance of construction arbitration.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (2): 13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000460.
Abwunza, A. A., T. K. Peter, and K. Muigua. 2022. “Explaining the ineffectiveness of construction arbitration.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (2): 13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000541.
Ahmi, A. 2021. Bibliometric analysis for beginners: A starter guide to begin with a bibliometric study using Scopus dataset and tools such as Microsoft Excel, Harzing’s Publish or Perish and VOSviewer software. Changlun, Malaysia: UUM Press.
Ahmi, A. 2022. Bibliometric analysis using R for non-coders. Changlun, Malaysia: UUM Press.
Alozn, A. E., and A. Galadari. 2017. “The arbitrating party utility function: An expected utility approach.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (3): 04517013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000230.
Al Refaie, A. M., A. M. Alashwal, Z. Abdul-Samad, and H. Salleh. 2020. “Weather and labor productivity in construction: A literature review and taxonomy of studies.” Int. J. Prod. Perf. Manage. 70 (4): 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0577.
Arcadis. 2022. “2022 global construction disputes report: Successfully navigating through turbulent times.” Accessed April 5, 2023. https://www.arcadis.com/en/knowledge-hub/perspectives/global/global-construction-disputes-report.
Aria, M., and C. Cuccurullo. 2017. “bibliometrix: An r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis.” J. Informetrics 11 (4): 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
Aria, M., C. Cuccurullo, L. D’Aniello, M. Misuraca, and M. Spano. 2022. “Thematic analysis as a new culturomic tool: The social media coverage on covid-19 pandemic in Italy.” Sustainability 14 (6): 3643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063643.
Aria, M., M. Misuraca, and M. Spano. 2020. “Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of social indicators research.” Social Indic. Res. 149 (3): 803–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3.
Arif, F., and F. Saeed. 2021. “Role of construction project documentation for effective arbitration process.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (2): 04521006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000466.
Besaiso, H., and P. Fenn. 2022. “How international construction arbitrators make their decisions: Status of commercial norms and international construction law.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (9): 04022077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002321.
Besaiso, H., P. Fenn, and M. Emsley. 2018. “Evolution of construction arbitration.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (2): 04518001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000248.
Born, G. B. 2012. International arbitration: Law and practice. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Bornmann, L., and K. Wohlrabe. 2019. “Normalisation of citation impact in economics.” Scientometrics 120 (2): 841–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03140-w.
Bretas, V. P. G., and I. Alon. 2021. “Franchising research on emerging markets: Bibliometric and content analyses.” J. Bus. Res. 133 (Sep): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.067.
Bruner, P. L. 2009. Construction law: The historical perspective. the historical perspective. Chicago: American Bar Association Publishing.
Chaphalkar, N. B., K. C. Iyer, and S. K. Patil. 2015. “Prediction of outcome of construction dispute claims using multilayer perceptron neural network model.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (8): 1827–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.002.
Chern, C. 2016. The law of construction disputes. 3rd ed. Abingdon, OX: Informa Law.
Cheung, S. O., P. T. Chow, and J. K. M. Tse. 2013. “Performance of mediator tactics in building management disputes.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (2): 04014033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000230.
Cheung, S. O., and W. Xu. 2017. “Protection of adjudicators under security of payment legislation.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (3): 04517006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000215.
Chong, H., and R. Mohamad Zin. 2012. “Selection of dispute resolution methods: Factor analysis approach.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 19 (4): 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211237120.
Chou, J.-S., M.-Y. Cheng, and Y.-W. Wu. 2013. “Improving classification accuracy of project dispute resolution using hybrid artificial intelligence and support vector machine models.” Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (6): 2263–2274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.036.
Cobo, M. J., A. G. López-Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Herrera. 2011. “Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools.” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62 (7): 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525.
De Bellis, N. 2009. Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Donthu, N., S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim. 2021. “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines.” J. Bus. Res. 133 (Sep): 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
Fadhlullah Ng, N. K. M., Z. Ismail, and F. Hashim. 2019. “Towards sustainable dispute resolution: A framework to enhance the application of fast track arbitration in the Malaysian construction industry.” Int. J. Sustainable Constr. Eng. Technol. 10 (2): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2019.10.02.009.
Faghih, A., and R. Akhavian. 2019. “A game-theory approach to construction dispute resolution through mediation.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (4): 05019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000325.
Fitriyanti, F., and E. Adly. 2021. “Lessons learned in the use of dispute boards to the settlement of construction service disputes.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (1): 04521041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000508.
Forliano, C., P. De Bernardi, and D. Yahiaoui. 2021. “Entrepreneurial universities: A bibliometric analysis within the business and management domains.” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 165 (Apr): 120522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120522.
Garfield, E., and I. H. Sher. 1993. “Keywords plus™—Algorithmic derivative indexing.” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 44 (5): 298–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199306)44:5%3C298::AID-ASI5%3E3.0.CO;2-A.
Garimella, S. R., and N. A. Siddiqui. 2016. “The enforcement of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses: Contemporary judicial opinion.” Iium Law J. 24 (1): 157–191. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v24i1.228.
Gingras, Y. 2014. Bibliometrics and research evaluation: Uses and abuses. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hansen, S. 2018. “Challenging arbitral awards in the construction industry: Case study of infrastructure disputes.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (1): 06518004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000281.
Hardjomuljadi, S. 2020. “Use of dispute avoidance and adjudication boards.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (4): 03720004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000431.
Hashem, M., M. Mehany, S. Jennings, and S. Kumar. 2022. “Cost control of arbitration in construction projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (2): 04522003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530.
Hood, W. W., and C. S. Wilson. 1999. “The distribution of bibliographic records in databases using different counting methods for duplicate records.” Scientometrics 46 (3): 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459605.
Hood, W. W., and C. S. Wilson. 2003. “Overlap in bibliographic databases.” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54 (12): 1091–1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10301.
Hughes, W., R. Champion, and J. Murdoch. 2015. Construction contracts: Law and management. 5th ed. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
Huh, S. 2022. “Promotion to top-tier journal and development strategy of the annals of laboratory medicine for strengthening its leadership in the medical laboratory technology category: A bibliometric study.” Ann. Lab. Med. 42 (3): 321–330. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2022.42.3.321.
Huma, R., S. Huma, and U. Muhammad. 2022. “Transport emission models: A bibliometric and content analysis.” J. Public Value Admin. Insight 5 (2): 395–423. https://doi.org/10.31580/jpvai.v5i2.2530.
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce). 2021. ICC dispute resolution 2020 statistics. Paris: ICC.
Iyer, K. C., N. B. Chaphalkar, and S. K. Patil. 2018. “Intrinsic factors influencing decision making of arbitrators in dispute resolution of variation claims.” J. Inst. Eng. (India): Ser. A 99 (2): 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0265-z.
Jagannathan, M., and V. S. K. Delhi. 2019. “Litigation proneness of dispute resolution clauses in construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 04519011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000301.
Kebede, S. 2022. “Assessment of causes and settlement mechanisms of construction disputes in public work contracts: An Ethiopian perspective.” Archiv. Civ. Eng. 68 (1): 145–168. https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2022.140161.
Khan, A., J. W. Goodell, M. K. Hassan, and A. Paltrinieri. 2022. “A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers.” Finance Res. Lett. 47 (Part A): 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102520.
Kisi, K. P., N. Lee, R. Kayastha, and J. Kovel. 2020. “Alternative dispute resolution practices in international road construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 04520001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000373.
Krippendorff, K. H. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Larsen, P. O., and M. von Ins. 2010. “The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation index.” Scientometrics 84 (3): 575–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z.
Lee, C. K., M. S. Lee, and R. Thurasamy. 2019. “Using mediation in project disputes based on theory of planned behavior and technology acceptance model.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000361.
Li, K., and S. O. Cheung. 2019. “Unveiling cognitive biases in construction project dispute resolution through the lenses of third-party neutrals.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (11): 04019070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001707.
Littell, J. H., J. Corcoran, and V. Pillai. 2008. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Magklasi, E. 2016. “‘shaky’ times for arbitration clauses: Rethinking business common sense.” Arbitration Int. 32 (1): 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiv067.
Mansour, A. Z., A. Ahmi, O. M. J. Popoola, and A. Znaimat. 2021. “Discovering the global landscape of fraud detection studies: A bibliometric review.” J. Finan. Crime 29 (2): 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2021-0052.
Marques, R. C. 2017. “Is arbitration the right way to settle conflicts in PPP arrangements?” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 05017007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000564.
Mathew, A., and H. Zaidi. 2015. “The philosophy of arbitration.” Int. J. Bus. Econ. Law 8 (4): 104–112.
Mengist, W., T. Soromessa, and G. L. Feyisa. 2019. “Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research.” Sci. Total Environ. 7 (Jan): 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777.
Mohd Danuri, M. S. 2021. Dispute avoidance and resolution procedure for the construction industry. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Univ. of Malaya Press.
Moher, D., D. G. Altman, A. Liberati, and J. Tetzlaff. 2011. “Prisma statement.” Epidemiology 22 (1): 128. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181fe7825.
Nyarko, J. 2019. “We’ll see you in … court! the lack of arbitration clauses in international commercial contracts.” Int. Rev. Law Econ. 58 (Jun): 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2018.12.004.
Ojiako, U. 2022. “The finality principle in construction arbitration: An evolutionary perspective.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 15 (1): 04522035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000591.
Olalekan, O. T., H. L. B. T. Ariffin, K. N. Ali, F. M. Raslim, and M. B. Mohamad. 2021. “Bibliometric analysis of construction dispute.” Malaysian Constr. Res. J. 12 (1): 64–75.
Page, M. J., et al. 2021a. “The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.” BMJ 372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Page, M. J., et al. 2021b. “Prisma 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.” BMJ 372: n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160.
Pahlevan-Sharif, S., P. Mura, and S. N. R. Wijesinghe. 2019. “A systematic review of systematic reviews in tourism.” J. Hospitality Tourism Manage. 39 (Jun): 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.001.
Park, E. 2018. “Court’s intervention on arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction.” J. Korea Trade 22 (4): 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-03-2018-0027.
Pech, G., C. Delgado, and S. P. Sorella. 2022. “Classifying papers into subfields using abstracts, titles, keywords and keywords plus through pattern detection and optimization procedures: An application in physics.” J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 73 (11): 1513–1528. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24655.
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., L. Waltman, and N. J. van Eck. 2016. “Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting.” J. Informetrics 10 (4): 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006.
Petersen, A. M., F. Wang, and H. E. Stanley. 2010. “Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline.” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter. Phys. 81 (3): 036114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.036114.
Rawal, R., and L. Markert. 2020. “Emergency arbitration in investment and construction disputes: An uneasy fit?” J. Int. Arbitration 37 (1): 131–142. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2020005.
Rethlefsen, M. L., S. Kirtley, S. Waffenschmidt, A. P. Ayala, D. Moher, M. J. Page, J. B. Koffel, and P.-S. Group. 2021. “Prisma-s: An extension to the prisma statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews.” Syst. Rev. 10 (1): 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
Saeb, A., M. S. M. Danuri, O. Mohamed, and N. Zakaria. 2021a. “A mechanism for dispute resolution in the Iranian construction industry.” J. Constr. Dev. Countries 26 (1): 205–226. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2021.26.1.10.
Saeb, A., M. S. Mohd Danuri, and O. Mohamed. 2021b. “Selecting the appropriate method for resolving construction disputes in Iran.” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 45 (3): 2017–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00553-z.
Saeb, A., M. S. B. Mohd Danuri, N. B. Zakaria, and O. B. Mohamed. 2019. “A case study of dispute resolution methods pertaining to the construction standard form in Iran.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 16 (3): 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2019.1575937.
Shanman, R. 2017. “Phrase truncation in pubmed searches.” J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 105 (4): 404. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.252.
Sikandar, H., Y. Vaicondam, S. Parveen, N. Khan, and M. I. Qureshi. 2021. “Bibliometric analysis of telemedicine and e-health literature.” Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng. 17 (12): 52–69. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v17i12.25483.
Singh, V. K., P. Singh, M. Karmakar, J. Leta, and P. Mayr. 2021. “The journal coverage of web of science, scopus and dimensions: A comparative analysis.” Scientometrics 126 (6): 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
Song, X., F. Peña-Mora, C. C. Menassa, and C. A. Arboleda. 2011. “Insurance as a risk management tool for ADR implementation in construction disputes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (1): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000401.
Stephenson, D. A. 2003. Arbitration practice in construction contracts. 5th ed. London: Douglas Stephenson and International Thompson Publishing.
Tanielian, A. 2012. “Arbitration still best road to binding dispute resolution.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 5 (2): 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000111.
Tayeh, B. A., W. S. Alaloul, M. H. Alkurdi, Y. I. Abu Aisheh, and M. A. Musarat. 2021. “Evaluation of biases in construction project dispute resolution: Case study.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (1): 05021009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000525.
van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2017. “Citation-based clustering of publications using citnetexplorer and vosviewer.” Scientometrics 111 (2): 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7.
van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2023. Vosviewer manual: Manual for vosviewer version 1.6.19. Leiden, Netherlands: Univerisiteit Leiden.
van Eck, N. J., L. Waltman, R. Dekker, and J. van den Berg. 2010. “A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and vos.” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61 (12): 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421.
Verborgh, R., and M. De Wilde. 2013. Using OpenRefine. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd.
Vieira, E. S., and J. A. N. F. Gomes. 2009. “A comparison of scopus and web of science for a typical university.” Scientometrics 81 (2): 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0.
Visser, M., N. J. van Eck, and L. Waltman. 2021. “Large scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, web of science, dimensions, crossref, and microsoft academic.” Quant. Sci. Stud. 2 (1): 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112.
Wallgren-Lindholm, C. 2013. “Ad hoc arbitration v. institutional arbitration.” In International commercial arbitration, 61–81. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139519779.006.
Wilczewski, M., and I. Alon. 2023. “Language and communication in international students’ adaptation: A bibliometric and content analysis review.” Higher Educ. 85 (6): 1235–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00888-8.
Zant, H. A. 2020. “Efficiency of Palestinian international arbitration chamber.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 13 (9): 2444–2452. https://doi.org/10.37624/IJERT/13.9.2020.2444-2452.
Zhang, J., Q. Yu, F. Zheng, C. Long, Z. Lu, and Z. Duan. 2016. “Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research.” J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67 (4): 967–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16Issue 4November 2024

History

Received: Sep 6, 2023
Accepted: Mar 28, 2024
Published online: Jul 26, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 26, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Centre for Building, Construction and Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Univ. of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3338-1033. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Zolkafli Umi Kalsum, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Centre for Building, Construction and Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Univ. of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Abdul-Samad Zulkiflee, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-2185
Associate Professor, Centre for Building, Construction and Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Univ. of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-2185
Associate Professor, Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Malaysia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8488-6966
Mohd-Danuri Mohd Suhaimi, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Centre for Building, Construction and Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Univ. of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share