Scholarly Papers
Jul 26, 2024

Arbitration of Disputes in the Construction Industry

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 4

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the main economic sectors in Iran, significantly impacting the country’s growth and prosperity. The dynamism, complexity, and conflict of interest in the construction industry lead to increasing conflicts and disputes in construction projects. Disputes usually arise due to ambiguity in contract documents, changes in quantities and specifications, contradictions in contract documents, and delays in fulfilling financial and contractual obligations. These disputes must be resolved promptly to avoid any negative impact on the project’s time and cost and the viability of its economic relationships in the future. Arbitration has been used as a dispute resolution method as it is a faster and more cost-effective method of dispute resolution than litigation. Furthermore, contractors prefer arbitration for dispute resolution in international construction contracts because it saves time and money and avoids litigation in local courts. The article examines the concept of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution method and its application in the construction industry of Iran, with a specific focus on the country’s arbitration law. In this research, in addition to examining the structure, rules, and regulations governing dispute arbitration in Iran, 12 semistructured interviews were used to review and criticize dispute resolution by arbitration method in Iran’s construction industry. Surveys indicate that Iran’s domestic and international arbitration laws are harmonized with international laws partly. The legislator in Iran has considered appropriate powers for the arbitrator, and according to the existing laws, arbitration awards are recognized and implemented in domestic courts. The current procedures under the arbitration law and the reasons for the minimal use of arbitration compared to the number of lawsuits filed in Iran’s judicial courts have been examined, and the effective factors in this matter have been identified. Finally, some recommendations have been provided for the development and progress of arbitration in Iran.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

List of Statutes

Civil Procedure Law Act of 2000 (in Persian),
General Condition of Contract, Code 4311, 1999 (in Persian), Plan and Budget Organization.
International Commercial Arbitration Law Act of 1997 (in Persian).

Works Cited

Abad, Z. S. 2023. “An economic analysis of Iran’s 2017 judicial system reforms: Ways with long-term effects to improve judicial system’s litigation delay.” Opole Stud. Admin. Law 21 (1): 9–31.
Abwunza, A. A., T. K. Peter, and K. Muigua. 2020. “Explaining delays in construction arbitration: A process-control model approach.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 04520003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000371.
Acharya, N. K., Y. D. Lee, and J. K. Kim. 2006. “Critical construction conflicting factors identification using analytical hierarchy process.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 10 (3): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824057.
ACIC (Arbitration Center of Iran Chamber). 2023. “Arbitration rules and regulations of Iran.” Accessed May 13, 2023. https://en.arbitration.ir/index.php.
Al-Humaidi, H. M. 2013. “Arbitration in Kuwait: Study of current practices and suggestions for improvements.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolution Eng. Constr. 6 (1): 03013001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000128.
Allen, M. 2011. “Construction disputes on the rise.” Constr. Law J. 27 (6): 525.
Alsheikh, E. A. 2011. Distinctions between the concept’s mediation, conciliation, sulh and arbitration in Shari’ah law. Arab Law Q. 25: 367–400. https://doi.org/10.1163/157302511X596212.
Barough, A. S., M. V. Shoubi, C. N. Preece. 2013. “Evaluating the effectiveness of mediation and arbitration processes in resolving disputes in the Malaysian construction industry.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. (IJCE) 2 (1): 21–28.
Besaiso, H., P. Fenn, and M. Emsley. 2018. “Evolution of construction arbitration.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (2): 04518001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000248.
Chan, E. H., and H. C. Suen. 2005. “Dispute resolution management for international construction projects in China.” Manage. Decis. 43 (4): 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510593576.
Chan, E. H., H. C. Suen, and C. K. Chan. 2006. “MAUT-based dispute resolution selection model prototype for international construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (5): 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:5(444).
Fakih, K. 2011. “A historical analysis of arbitration.” SOBIE 2011: 67.
Gad, G. M., and J. S. Shane. 2017. “Culture-risk-trust model for dispute-resolution method selection in international construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (4): 04517020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000242.
Gad, G. M., J. S. Shane, K. C. Strong, and J. Choi. 2016. “Rethinking trust in construction contract formation: Dispute resolution method selection.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 8 (3): 04516003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000191.
Gemmell, A. J. 2007. “Commercial arbitration in the Islamic middle east.” Santa Clara J. Int’l L. 5 (1): 169–193.
Harris, E. C. 2013. “Middle East major construction programmes mitigating the delivery risk.” Accessed November 30, 2018. http://middleeastbusiness.com/middle-east-major-construction-programmes/.
Hasanpour, T., and O. A. Entekhabian. 2021. “Investigating the institutional arbitration in Iranian law with an approach to the foundations of its legitimacy.” Fiqh Islamic Law Stud. 65 (17): 31–54.
Hatimipour, M., and N. Ebrahimi. 2020. “Investigating the nature, position and performance of Tehran Regional Arbitration Center.” Legal Res. 44 (19): 345.
IPO (Iranian Privatization Organization). 2023. “In-charge of setting prices and ceding shares to the general public of the Iranian government.” Accessed December 1, 2023. https://en.ipo.ir/.
Jiang, H., P. Lin, M. Qiang, and Q. Fan. 2015. “A labor consumption measurement system based on real-time tracking technology for dam construction site.” Autom. Constr. 52 (Apr): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.004.
Kaklauskas, A., V. Keršulienė, and V. Urbanavičienė. 2008. “Determination of rational method for resolution of disputes with the help of multi-criteria negotiation decision support system for real estate.” In Proc., 25th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction. Vilnius, Lithuania: Vilnius Gediminas Technical Univ.
Li, H., D. Arditi, and Z. Wang. 2015. “Determinants of transaction costs in construction projects.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 21 (5): 548–558. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.897973.
Lu, W., L. Zhang, and J. Pan. 2015. “Identification and analyses of hidden transaction costs in project dispute resolutions.” Int. J. Proj. Manage. 33 (3): 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.009.
Makarem, A., M. A. Abdul-Malak, and I. Srour. 2012. “Managing the period preceding the calling for a DAB’s decision.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, 71–79. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.008.
Marques, R. C. 2017. “Is arbitration the right way to settle conflicts in PPP arrangements?” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 05017007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000564.
Marzouk, M., L. El-Mesteckawi, and M. El-Said. 2011. “Dispute resolution aided tool for construction projects in Egypt.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 17 (1): 63–71. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.554165.
Moghadam, A., and A. M. Mehboob. 2016. “The legal structure of the arbitration system: Single or dual system?” Private Law Res. 5 (16): 9–29. https://doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2016.6739.
Ojiako, U., M. Chipulu, A. Marshall, and T. Williams. 2018. “An examination of the ‘rule of law’ and ‘justice’ implications in Online Dispute Resolution in construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (2): 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.10.002.
Olanrewaju, A., P. J. Anavhe, and H. C. Chu. 2023. “Disputes and claim management during the COVID-19 crisis: The lessons learned.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 15 (1): 04522054. https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-843.
PBO (Plan and Budget Organization). 2023. “Governmental department of the Government of Iran.” Accessed January 1, 2024. hrefwettps://www.mporg.ir/en.
Pena-Mora, F. A., C. E. Sosa, and D. S. McCone. 2003. Introduction to construction dispute resolution. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8CZ3CTJ.
Peng Wong, W., H. F. Gholipour, and E. Bazrafshan. 2012. “How efficient are real estate and construction companies in Iran’s close economy?” Int. J. Strategic Property Manage. 16 (4): 392–413. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2012.740513.
Rashidi, O., I. Amini, and R. Skinny. 2020. “Interpretation of the mandatory arbitration clause.” Private Law Res. 9 (32): 53–81. https://doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2020.40179.2138.
Rostami, V., and F. Ashtiani. 2020. “A comparison between compulsory arbitration and the principles of the constitution and legal system in Iran.” J. Public Law Thoughts 9 (1): 7.
Saeb, A. 2019. “Enhancement of dispute resolution mechanism in the Iranian construction industry.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Construction and Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Univ. of Malaya.
Saeb, A., M. S. M. Danuri, O. Mohamed, and N. Zakaria. 2021. “A mechanism for dispute resolution in the Iranian construction industry.” J. Constr. Dev. Countries 26 (1): 205–226. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2021.26.1.10.
SEO (Securities and Exchange Organization). 2023. “The arbitration board of the Iranian securities and exchange organization.” Accessed December 12, 2023. https://davari.seo.ir/Index.html.
Shokrani, M. 2018. “Institutional arbitration versus ad hoc arbitration: Chinese and Iranian perspectives.” J. Adv. Res. Social Sci. Humanities 3 (4): 148–153.
Stipanowich, T. J., and J. R. Lamare. 2014. “Living with ADR: Evolving perceptions and use of mediation, arbitration, and conflict management in fortune 1000 corporations.” Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 19: 1.
Storskrubb, E. 2016. “Alternative dispute resolution in the EU: Regulatory challenges.” Eur. Rev. Private Law 24 (1): 7–31. https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2016002.
Taheri, S., and H. Sharif Olyaei. 2020. “Compulsory arbitration and its implications in Iranian law.” Leg. Educ. Govah Bi-Q. J. 6 (1): 177–212.
Tanielian, A. 2012. “Arbitration still best road to binding dispute resolution.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 5 (2): 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000111.
TRAC (Tehran Regional Arbitration Center). 2023. “Institutional support for the management of domestic and international arbitration proceedings.” Accessed March 15, 2023. https://trac.ir/vis-pre-moot-rules/.
Zaneldin, E. K. 2020. “Investigating the types, causes and severity of claims in construction projects in the UAE.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 20 (5): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484863.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16Issue 4November 2024

History

Received: Aug 16, 2023
Accepted: Feb 13, 2024
Published online: Jul 26, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 26, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Amir Zand Pazandi
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Central Tehran Branch, Tehran 1469669191, Iran.
Farrokh Forootan [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Central Tehran Branch, Tehran 1469669191, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Towhid Pourrostam
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Central Tehran Branch, Tehran 1469669191, Iran.
Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Architecture, and Art, Science and Research Branch, Tehran 1477893855, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-7127

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share