Abstract

Despite recent advances in leak detection in water supply systems, previous studies focused mainly on material aspects or orifice opening characteristics. This study evaluated geometric, hydraulic, and hydrodynamic factors influencing on water leaks using three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The simulated discharge coefficient (Cd) had a maximum absolute deviation of 8% compared with experimental data. The results indicated that the variation of Cd as a function of the diameter and orifice size can be attributed to the effect of tube curvature on flow convergence through the orifice. The statistical analysis concluded that the orifice-to-pipe diameter ratio d/D is the best dimensionless parameter that explains this phenomenon, which agreed with the analyses of the streamlines and turbulent eddy dissipation rate in the simulations. Other important dimensionless parameter are the ratio of the pressure head differential at the orifice to the pipe diameter ΔH/D, Reynolds number (R), and the ratio of the pressure head differential at the orifice to the wall thickness ΔH/e, in order of relevance. A set of empirical correlations was elaborated through a nonlinear multiple regression analysis with Reynolds numbers ranging between 12,000 and 52,000, and pressure head differential ranging from 1 to 45 m. This study advances the knowledge of cross-flows through orifices, and the proposed correlations potentially can improve the prediction of water leaks in pipes.

Practical Applications

This study demonstrates the applicability of computational fluid dynamics simulations for understanding the leakage phenomenon in pipes, and obtained a set of empirical correlations that potentially can improve the prediction of leakages in water distribution systems. The authors propose an equation for estimating the discharge coefficient in practical applications. This equation balances the number of terms (three dimensionless coefficients) and accuracy (R2=98%). Although it is dimensionless, the correlation must be used within the established ranges of values to ensure its effectiveness: Reynolds numbers from 12,000 to 52,000, and pressure head differentials from 1 to 45 m.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this study thank all anonymous reviewers for their helpful remarks. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from CNPq, Brazil (Grant BRICS 441115/2016). The first author thanks CAPES, Brazil (Grant 88887.683601/2022), and CNPq (Grants 121184/2020-0 and 129025/2021-6), which supported part of this study.

References

Abdulshaheed, A., F. Mustapha, and A. Ghavamian. 2017. “A pressure-based method for monitoring leaks in a pipe distribution system: A review.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 69 (Mar): 902–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.024.
Alihosseini, M., and P. U. Thamsen. 2019. “Analysis of sediment transport in sewer pipes using a coupled CFD-DEM model and experimental work.” Urban Water J. 16 (4): 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2019.1669187.
Ansys. 2018. Ansys Fluent theory guide. Canonsburg, PA: Ansys, Inc.
Azimi, H., S. Shabanlou, I. Ebtehaj, H. Bonakdari, and S. Kardar. 2017. “Combination of computational fluid dynamics, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and genetic algorithm for predicting discharge coefficient of rectangular side orifices.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 143 (7): 04017015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001190.
Ben-Mansour, R., M. A. Habib, A. Khalifa, K. Youcef-Toumi, and D. Chatzigeorgiou. 2012. “Computational fluid dynamic simulation of small leaks in water pipelines for direct leak pressure transduction.” Comput. Fluids 57 (Jun): 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.12.016.
Besner, M. C., M. Prevost, and S. Regli. 2011. “Assessing the public health risk of microbial intrusion events in distribution systems: Conceptual model, available data, and challenges.” Water Res. 45 (3): 961–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.035.
Boian, R. F., D. O. Macedo, P. J. A. Oliveira, and J. G. Janzen. 2019. “Comparison between FAVAD and general equations to evaluate the leakage lost flow in urban water distribution systems.” Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental 24 (6): 1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-41522019195402.
Cassa, A. M., J. E. van Zyl, and R. F. Laubscher. 2010. “A numerical investigation into the effect of pressure on holes and cracks in water supply pipes.” Urban Water J. 7 (2): 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620903447613.
Colombo, A. F., P. Lee, and B. W. Karney. 2009. “A selective literature review of transient-based leak detection methods.” J. Hydro-environ. Res. 2 (4): 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2009.02.003.
da Silva, M. F., F. V. Gonçalves, and J. G. Janzen. 2022. “Effect of hydraulic and geometric factors upon leakage flow rate in pressurized pipes.” Braz. J. Water Resour. 26 (40): 10057. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.262120210057.
De Marchis, M., and B. Milici. 2019. “Leakage estimation in water distribution network: Effect of the shape and size cracks.” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (Jun): 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2173-4.
El-Zahab, S., and T. Zayed. 2019. “Leak detection in water distribution networks: An introductory overview.” Smart Water 4 (Jun): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40713-019-0017-x.
Erdal, A., and H. Andersson. 1997. “Numerical aspects of flow computation through orifices.” Flow Meas. Instrum. 8 (1): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(97)00017-4.
Farley, M., and S. Trow. 2003. Losses in water distribution networks. London: IWA Publishing.
Ferraiuolo, R., F. De Paola, D. Fiorillo, G. Caroppi, and F. Pugliese. 2020. “Experimental and numerical assessment of water leakages in a PVC-A pipe.” Water 12 (6): 1804. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061804.
Fox, S., J. Boxall, and R. Collins. 2018. “Derivation and validation of a leakage model for longitudinal slits in polyethylene pipes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 144 (7): 04018034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001469.
Franchini, M., and L. Lanza. 2014. “Leakages in pipes: Generalizing Torricelli’s equation to deal with different elastic materials, diameters and orifice shape and dimensions.” Urban Water J. 11 (8): 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2013.868496.
Ghorbanian, V., and L. Ramezani. 2018. Leakage rate uncertainty in water distribution systems with uncertain demands: Impacts on delivery pressures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ginting, B. M. 2019. “Central-upwind scheme for 2D turbulent shallow flows using high-resolution meshes with scalable wall functions.” Comput. Fluids 179 (Jun): 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.11.014.
Greyvenstein, B., and J. E. van Zyl. 2007. “An experimental investigation into the pressure—Leakage relationship of some failed water pipes.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 56 (2): 117–124. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2007.065.
Jimenez Cisneros, B. E., et al. 2014. “Freshwater resources.” In Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and 36 vulnerability. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kato, M., and B. E. Launder. 1993. “The modelling of turbulent flow around stationary and vibrating square cylinders.” In Proc., 9th Symp. on “Turbulent Shear Flows”. Berlin: Springer.
Khulief, Y. A., A. Khalifa, R. B. Mansour, and M. A. Habib. 2012. “Acoustic detection of leaks in water pipelines using measurements inside pipe.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 3 (2): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000089.
Kundu, P. K., I. M. Cohen, and D. R. Dowling. 2012. Fluid mechanics. 6th ed. London: Elsevier.
Leschziner, M. A. 2010. “Reynolds-averaged Navier-stokes methods.” In Encyclopedia of aerospace engineering. New York: Wiley.
Loyseau, X. F., P. G. Verdin, and L. D. Brown. 2018. “Scale-up and turbulence modelling in pipes.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 162 (6): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.12.019.
Martins, N. M. C., A. K. Soares, H. M. Ramos, and D. I. C. Covas. 2016. “CFD modeling of transient flow in pressurized pipes.” Comput. Fluids 126 (Dec): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.12.002.
May, J. 1994. “Leakage, pressure, and control.” In Proc., BICS Int. Conf. on Leakage Control Investigation in Underground Assets. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation.
Menter, F. R. 1994. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.” AIAA J. 32 (8): 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.
Mora-Rodríguez, J., X. Delgado-Galván, J. Ortiz-Medel, H. M. Ramos, V. S. Fuertes-Miquel, and P. A. López-Jiménez. 2015. “Pathogen intrusion flows in water distribution systems: According to orifice equations.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 64 (8): 857–869. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2015.121.
Oliveira, L. C. S., and I. E. Lima. 2022. “Prediction of leakage flow rate from upward water jets bursting at the ground.” Brazilian J. Water Resour. 27 (8): e7. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.272220210139.
Popescu, I. 2014. Computational hydraulics: Numerical methods and modelling. London: IWA Publishing.
Rahman, N. A., N. S. Muhammad, and W. H. M. Wan Mohtar. 2018. “Evolution of research on water leakage control strategies: Where are we now?” Urban Water J. 15 (8): 812–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2018.1547773.
Razvarz, S., R. Jafari, and A. Gegov. 2021. “Flow modelling and control in pipeline systems.” In Studies in systems, decision and control. Berlin: Springer.
Schulz, H. E., J. E. van Zyl, T. Yu, I. E. L. Neto, F. A. S. Filho, N. A. Correa, I. M. Benites, and H. Wang. 2021. “Hydraulics of fluidized cavities in porous matrices: Cavity heights and stability for upward water jets.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 147 (10): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001911.
Schwaller, J., and J. E. van Zyl. 2014. “Implications of the known pressure-response of individual leaks for whole distribution systems.” Procedia Eng. 70 (Feb): 1513–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.166.
Schwaller, J., and J. E. van Zyl. 2015. “Modeling the pressure-leakage response of water distribution systems based on individual leak behavior.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 141 (5): 04014089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000984.
Shao, Y., C. Shipeng, C. Dang, and T. Yu. 2019a. “Effects of leakage points on intrusion volume in a simulated water distribution system.” Water Supply 20 (1): 251–258. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2019.156.
Shao, Y., T. Yao, J. Z. Gong, J. Liu, T. Zhang, and T. Yu. 2019b. “Impact of main pipe flow velocity on leakage and intrusion flow: An experimental study.” Water 11 (1): 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010118.
Shehadeh, M., A. Sharara, M. Khamis, and H. El-Gamal. 2012. “A study of pipeline leakage pattern using CFD.” Can. J. Mech. Sci. Eng. 3 (3): 2012.
SWAN (Smart Water Networks). 2011. Stated NRW (non-revenue water) rates in urban networks. Paris: SWAN.
Tang, Y., D. H. Chan, and D. Z. Zhu. 2017. “Numerical investigation of sand-bed erosion by an upward water jet.” J. Eng. Mech. 143 (9): 04017104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001319.
The World Bank. 2016. The World Bank and the International Water Association to establish a partnership to reduce water losses. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Thornton, J., R. Sturm, and G. Kunkel. 2008. Water loss control. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
van Zyl, J. E., and C. R. I. Clayton. 2007. “The effect of pressure on leakage in water distribution systems.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manage. 160 (2): 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2007.160.2.109.
van Zyl, J. E., A. O. Lambert, and R. Collins. 2017. “Realistic modeling of leakage and intrusion flows through leak openings in pipes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 143 (9): 04017030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001346.
Wilcox, D. C. 2006. Turbulence modeling for CFD. 3rd ed. San Diego: Dcw Industries.
Yang, Y., T. Zhang, and D. Z. Zhu. 2013. “Influence of porous media on intrusion rate into water distribution pipes.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 63 (1): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2013.213.
Yu, T., X. Zhang, E. Lima, I. E. L. Neto, T. Zhang, Y. Shao, and M. Ye. 2019. “Impact of orifice-to-pipe diameter ratio on leakage flow: An experimental study.” Water 11 (10): 2189. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102189.
Zhang, S., G. Chen, Z. Li, and J. Fang. 2022. “Computational fluid dynamics analysis of flammable refrigerant leakage through a microcrack.” Int. J. Refrig. 134 (5): 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.11.018.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 149Issue 6June 2023

History

Received: Nov 21, 2022
Accepted: Mar 10, 2023
Published online: Apr 13, 2023
Published in print: Jun 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 13, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

José Gescilam S. M. Uchôa, S.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-9772 [email protected]
Master’s Student, Dept. of Hydraulics and Sanitation, Univ. of São Paulo, 400 Trabalhador São-Carlense Ave., São Carlos, São Paulo 13.566-590, Brazil. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-9772. Email: [email protected]
Tingchao Yu [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Federal Univ. of Ceará, Campus do Pici, bl. 713, Fortaleza, Ceará 60.451-970, Brazil (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8612-5848. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share