Technical Papers
Sep 28, 2023

Building Synthetic Bathymetries for Unsurveyed Reservoirs: Hydrologically Conditioned Cubic Spline Interpolation

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 12

Abstract

Despite their importance in social, economic, and hydroecological terms, numerous dams and reservoirs spread worldwide lack bathymetric or even storage data of any kind. This scarcity of minimal storage and morphology data represents an obstacle to evaluating the current functions and impacts of these artificial reservoirs, hindering planning efforts for their future development or removal and limiting hydrologic, hydrodynamic, or water quality modeling efforts on dammed watersheds. Although some global databases provide records with basic information on the location and surface extent of large reservoirs—including attributes such as dam height, total storage capacity, or even storage curves—bathymetries remain rarely available. Surveying bathymetric data is challenging and expensive, especially in the least-developed countries, regions experiencing war conflicts, or remote areas exposed to natural risks. This article presents a method for deriving synthetic bathymetries using cubic spline spatial interpolation. The method uses a digital terrain model (DTM) surrounding the reservoir as the only required input, assuming geomorphological and hydrological continuity and imposing longitudinal depth controls to the interpolation process. In comparison with a sample of 12 vessel-based reservoir bathymetric surveys, available from the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), the synthetic bathymetries resulting from this interpolation method show bias performances within a range of ±25% and Kling–Gupta efficiencies (KGE) over 0.5. Except for vessel-based bathymetric surveys, any indirect depth estimation method that applies remote sensing or interpolation is susceptible to some level of uncertainty and varied reliability. However, cubic spline spatial interpolation can produce bathymetric models with a reasonable level of accuracy depending on the projected application. The performance levels suggest that the proposed method can produce synthetic bathymetries that offer valuable information for early-stage hydrological or environmental studies or assessments. Some potential applications include initial evaluations involving problems like dam failure and dam removal or restoration, where bathymetric data play a relevant role as an input of hydrological, hydraulic, environmental, and risk simulations. In prefeasibility or conceptual stages, these types of projects and assessments can tolerate higher levels of uncertainty in the input data before making decisions to proceed to advanced stages of assessment, design, construction, restoration, or demolition. The method offers a low-cost and time-efficient alternative solution if vessel-based bathymetric surveys or remote sensing techniques turn out to be unfeasible for future studies or assessments in data-scarce regions. Reliable synthetic bathymetric interpolation turns out to be especially valuable in remote or dangerous sites posing physical risks, social conflicts, or any other safety threats for field surveys.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the vessel-based bathymetric surveys used in this study are publicly available in the USBR Technical Service Center website (https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir.html). Digital elevation models from the 12 reservoirs analyzed are publicly available on the USGS website (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/-4f70aa9fe4b058caae3f8de5). The code that supports the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Jeffery S. Horsburgh from Utah State University for his helpful suggestions regarding the manuscript and particularly the results section. The authors also acknowledge the support received from the Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations to the work of Dr. Bastidas Pacheco evaluating dam break modeling scenarios in Afghanistan, which inspired the method presented in response to a real problem faced during his work.

References

Agostinho, A. A., F. M. Pelicice, and L. C. Gomes. 2008. “Dams and the fish fauna of the Neotropical region: Impacts and management related to diversity and fisheries.” Braz. J. Biol. 68 (4): 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842008000500019.
Akima, H. 1996. “Algorithm 761: Scattered-data surface fitting that has the accuracy of a cubic polynomial.” ACM Trans. Math. Software 22 (3): 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1145/232826.232856.
Arsen, A., J. F. Crétaux, M. Berge-Nguyen, and R. A. del Rio. 2013. “Remote sensing-derived bathymetry of Lake Poopó.” Remote Sens. 6 (1): 407–420. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6010407.
Badenko, V., N. Badenko, A. Nikonorov, D. Molodtsov, V. Terleev, J. Lednova, and V. Maslikov. 2016. “Ecological aspect of dam design for flood regulation and sustainable urban development.” In Proc., MATEC Web of Conf., 73. St. Petersburg, Russia: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic Univ. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167303003.
Bastidas Pacheco, C. J. 2018. Dam break modeling: Qargha and Darunta dams. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization.
Boulange, J., N. Hanasaki, D. Yamazaki, and Y. Pokhrel. 2021. “Role of dams in reducing global flood exposure under climate change.” Nat. Commun. 12 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20704-0.
Brando, V. E., J. M. Anstee, M. Wettle, A. G. Dekker, S. R. Phinn, and C. Roelfsema. 2009. “A physics based retrieval and quality assessment of bathymetry from suboptimal hyperspectral data.” Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (4): 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.12.003.
Brown, P. H., D. Tullos, B. Tilt, D. Magee, and A. T. Wolf. 2009. “Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective.” J. Environ. Manage. 90 (3): 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.025.
Conrad, O., B. Bechtel, M. Bock, H. Dietrich, E. Fischer, L. Gerlitz, J. Wehberg, V. Wichmann, and J. Böhner. 2015. “System for automated geoscientific analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4.” Geosci. Model Dev. 8 (7): 1991–2007. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015.
De Boor, C. 1980. “A practical guide to splines.” Math. Comput. 34 (149): 325–326. https://doi.org/10.1137/1022106.
Donato, G., and S. Belongie. 2002. “Approximation methods for thin plate spline mappings and principal warps.” In Proc., 7th European Conf. on Computer Vision ECCV 2002, edited by A. Heyden, G. Sparr, M. Nielsen, and P. Johansen, 21–31. Berlin: Springer.
Fairfield, J., and P. Leymarie. 1991. “Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models.” Water Resour. Res. 27 (5): 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1029/90WR02658.
Ferrari, R. 1999a. “Anderson ranch reservoir: 1998 sedimentation survey.” Accessed May 1, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Anderson%20Ranch%20Sediment%20Survey%201998.pdf.
Ferrari, R. 1999b. “Prineville reservoir: 1998 sedimentation survey.” Accessed February 15, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Prineville%20Reservoir%201998%20Sedimentation%20Survey.pdf.
Ferrari, R. 2001a. “Beulah reservoir: 2000 sedimentation survey.” Accessed February 18, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Beulah%20ResSurvey%202000%20Reservoir%20Survey.pdf.
Ferrari, R. 2001b. “Warm springs reservoir: 2000 reservoir survey.” Accessed February 15, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Warm%20Springs%20Reservoir%202000%20Reservoir%20Survey.pdf.
Ferrari, R. 2005. “Glendo reservoir: 2003 sedimentation survey.” Accessed February 15, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Glendo%20Reservoir%202003%20Sedimentation%20Survey.pdf.
Ferrari, R. 2008a. “El Vado reservoir: 2007 sedimentation survey.” Accessed February 8, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/El%20Vado%20Reservoir%202007%20Sedimentation%20Survey.pdf.
Ferrari, R. 2008b. “Elephant butte reservoir: 2007 sedimentation survey.” Accessed April 12, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Elephant%20Butte%20Reservoir%202007%20Sedimentation%20Survey.pdf.
Ferrari, R. 2012. “Gibson reservoir: 2009 bathymetric survey.” Accessed April 8, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Gibson%20Reservoir%202009%20Bathymetric%20Survey.pdf.
Ferrari, R. 2014. “Theodore Roosevelt lake: 2013 sedimentation survey.” Accessed January 16, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Theodore%20Roosevelt%20Lake%202013%20Sedimentation%20Survey.pdf.
Ferrari, R., and S. Nuanes. 2005. “Tiber reservoir–Lake Elwell: 2002 survey.” Accessed February 20, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Tiber%20Reservoir%20-%20Lake%20Elwell%202002%20Survey.pdf.
Ferrari, R., and S. Nuanes. 2007. “Millerton Lake: 2004 survey.” Accessed March 22, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir/Millerton%20Lake%202004%20Survey.pdf.
Fookes, P. G. 1997. “Geology for engineers: The geological model, prediction and performance.” Q. J. Eng. Geol. 30 (4): 293–424. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1997.030.P4.02.
Franke, R. 1982. “Smooth interpolation of scattered data by local thin plate splines.” Comput. Math. Appl. 8 (4): 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(82)90009-8.
Fu, B. J., B. F. Wu, Y. H. Lü, Z. H. Xu, J. H. Cao, D. Niu, G. S. Yang, and Y. M. Zhou. 2010. “Three Gorges project: Efforts and challenges for the environment.” Prog. Phys. Geogr. 34 (6): 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133310370286.
Garrity, C. P., and D. R. Soller. 2009. Database of the geologic map of North America: Adapted from the Map by J.C. Reed, Jr. and others (2005). Washington, DC: USGS.
Gerrard, A. J. 1988. Rocks and landforms. London: Unwin Hyman.
Getirana, A., H. C. Jung, and K. H. Tseng. 2018. “Deriving three dimensional reservoir bathymetry from multi-satellite datasets.” Remote Sens. Environ. 217 (Nov): 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.030.
Grill, G., et al. 2019. “Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers.” Nature 569 (7755): 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9.
Gupta, H. V., H. Kling, K. K. Yilmaz, and G. F. Martinez. 2009. “Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modeling.” J. Hydrol. 377 (1–2): 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003.
Guth, P. L., et al. 2021. “Digital elevation models: Terminology and definitions.” Remote Sens. 13 (18): 3581. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183581.
Haber, J., F. Zeilfelder, O. Davydov, and H. P. Seidel. 2001. “Smooth approximation and rendering of large scattered data sets.” In Proc., IEEE Visualization, edited by T. Ertl, K. Joy, and A. Varshney, 341–347. New York: IEEE.
Hutchinson, J. N. 2001. “The fourth Glossop lecture: Reading the ground: Morphology and geology in site appraisal.” Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 34 (1): 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh.34.1.7.
Hutchinson, M. F. 1989. “A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits.” J. Hydrol. 106 (3–4): 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90073-5.
Hutchinson, M. F. 2011. ANUDEM v5.3–User guide (Issue August). Canberra, ACT, Australia: The Australian National Univ.
Knoben, W. J. M., J. E. Freer, and R. A. Woods. 2019. “Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 23 (10): 4323–4331. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019.
Lehner, B., et al. 2011. “High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management.” Front. Ecol. Environ. 9 (9): 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1890/100125.
Li, Y., H. Gao, M. F. Jasinski, S. Zhang, and J. D. Stoll. 2019. “Deriving high-resolution reservoir bathymetry from ICESat-2 prototype photon-counting LiDar and Landsat imagery.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 57 (10): 7883–7893. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2917012.
Li, Y., H. Gao, G. Zhao, and K. H. Tseng. 2020. “A high-resolution bathymetry dataset for global reservoirs using multi-source satellite imagery and altimetry.” Remote Sens. Environ. 244 (Jul): 111831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111831.
McCartney, M. 2009. “Living with dams: Managing the environmental impacts.” Water Policy 11 (1): 121–139. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2009.108.
Messager, M. L., B. Lehner, G. Grill, I. Nedeva, and O. Schmitt. 2016. “Estimating the volume and age of water stored in global lakes using a geo-statistical approach.” Nat. Commun. 7 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13603.
Misra, A., Z. Vojinovic, B. Ramakrishnan, A. Luijendijk, and R. Ranasinghe. 2018. “Shallow water bathymetry mapping using support vector machine (SVM) technique and multispectral imagery.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 39 (13): 4431–4450. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1421796.
Mondal, S., and P. P. Patel. 2018. “Examining the utility of river restoration approaches for flood mitigation and channel stability enhancement: A recent review.” Environ. Earth Sci. 77 (Mar): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7381-y.
Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 50 (3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153.
Moriasi, D. N., M. W. Gitau, N. Pai, and P. Daggupati. 2015. “Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria.” Trans. ASABE 58 (6): 1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715.
Mulligan, M., et al. 2021. “Global dam watch: Curated data and tools for management and decision making.” Environ. Res. Infrastruct. Sustainability 1 (3): 033003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac333a.
Mulligan, M., A. van Soesbergen, and L. Sáenz. 2020. “GOODD, a global dataset of more than 38,000 georeferenced dams.” Sci. Data 7 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0362-5.
Odhiambo, B. K., and S. K. Boss. 2004. “Integrated echo sounder, GPS, and GIS for reservoir sedimentation studies: Examples from two Arkansas lakes.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 40 (4): 981–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01061.x.
Pratomo, D. G., and B. F. E. Putranto. 2019. “Analysis of the green light penetration from airborne LiDAR bathymetry in shallow water area.” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 389 (1): 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/389/1/012003.
Press, W., S. Tukolsky, W. Vetterling, and B. Flannery. 2007. Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing. 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Qicai, L. 2011. “Influence of dams on river ecosystem and its countermeasures.” J. Water Resour. Prot. 3 (1): 60–66. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2011.31007.
Rogelis, M. C., M. Werner, N. Obregón, and N. Wright. 2016. “Hydrological model assessment for flood early warning in a tropical high mountain basin.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2016 (Mar): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-30.
Schönfelder, L. H., T. H. Bakken, K. Alfredsen, and A. G. Adera. 2017. Application of HYPE in Norway, Assessment of the hydrological model HYPE as a tool to support the implementation of EU water framework directive in Norway. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF Energy Research.
Schulz, C., and W. M. Adams. 2019. “Debating dams: The world commission on dams 20 years on.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 6 (5): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1369.
Sharma, V. K. 2010. Introduction to process geomorphology. London: CRC Press.
Spath, H. 1995. Two dimensional spline interpolation algorithms. Milton Park, AB: Taylor and Francis Group.
Sutanudjaja, E. H., et al. 2018. “PCR-GLOBWB 2: A 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model.” Geosci. Model Dev. 11 (6): 2429–2453. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2429-2018.
Tarboton, D. 2015. Terrain analysis using digital elevation models TauDem v.5.3 (5.3). Logan, UT: Utah State Univ.
Towner, J., H. L. Cloke, E. Zsoter, Z. Flamig, J. M. Hoch, J. Bazo, E. C. De Perez, and E. M. Stephens. 2019. “Assessing the performance of global hydrological models for capturing peak river flows in the Amazon basin.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 23 (7): 3057–3080. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3057-2019.
Tseng, K. H., C. K. Shum, J. W. Kim, X. Wang, K. Zhu, and X. Cheng. 2016. “Integrating Landsat imageries and digital elevation models to infer water level change in Hoover dam.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 9 (4): 1696–1709. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2500599.
UNOPS (United Nations Office for Project Services) and UN Environment. 2017. Proyecto Jalisco Sostenible Cuenca Río Verde, México. Yangon, Myanmar: UNOPS.
USBR (United States Bureau of Reclamation). 1992. Lake Pleasant: 1992 reservoir survey. Washington, DC: USBR.
USBR (United States Bureau of Reclamation) Technical Service Center. 2022. “Technical reports—Reservoir surveys.” Accessed January 21, 2023. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/reservoir.html.
USGS. 2017. “1/3rd arc-second digital elevation models (DEMs)—USGS national map 3DEP downloadable data collection.” Accessed January 22, 2023. https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/4f70aa9fe4b058caae3f8de5.
Waltham, T. 2005. “Tectonics.” In Geomorphology for engineers, edited by P. G. Fookes, E. M. Lee, and G. Milligan. Dunbeath, UK: Whittles Publishing.
Wang, J., et al. 2022. “GeoDAR: Georeferenced global dams and reservoirs dataset for bridging attributes and geolocations.” Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14 (4): 1869–1899. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1869-2022.
Wang, Y. J., C. Z. Qin, and A. X. Zhu. 2019. “Review on algorithms of dealing with depressions in grid DEM.” Ann. GIS 25 (2): 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2019.1604571.
World Commission on Dams. 2000. Dams and development: A new framework for decision making: The report of the world commission on dams. Oxford, UK: Earthscan Publications.
Zhu, S., et al. 2019. “A new digital lake bathymetry model using the step-wise water recession method to generate 3D lake bathymetric maps based on DEMs.” Water 11 (6): 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061151.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28Issue 12December 2023

History

Received: Jul 25, 2022
Accepted: Jul 26, 2023
Published online: Sep 28, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Camilo J. Bastidas Pacheco, S.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-439X [email protected]
Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State Univ., 8200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-8200 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-439X. Email: [email protected]
Independent Researcher and Consultant, Water Resources and Disaster Risk Modeling, 20544 Ventura Blvd. #103, Woodland Hills, CA 91364. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4558-7645. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share