Case Studies
Jan 24, 2023

Analyzing Groundwater Recharge and Vadose Zone Dynamics by Combining Soil Moisture and Groundwater Level Data with a Numerical Model in Subarctic Conditions

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

Quantitative estimates on the magnitude and dynamics of vadose and groundwater zones in subarctic conditions are rare. Furthermore, knowledge on the constraints of different data on numerical groundwater recharge estimates (i.e., data worth analyses) is limited. We built a process-based three-dimensional hydrological model to describe and analyze the dynamics and magnitude of groundwater recharge, vadose zone, and related key hydrological components in subarctic conditions. Three-year time series of daily groundwater level and soil moisture (five different depths) data were used to identify plausible model realizations. Thereafter, long-term simulations over 6 years were conducted. The model adequately corresponded with the magnitude and dynamics of the observations, even though the simulations and observations occasionally differed. Simulations with several different plausible parameterizations showed how soil moisture and groundwater level fluctuations, as well as recharge estimates, are sensitive to water retention parameter variations, whereas precipitation and evapotranspiration controlled the recharge magnitude. Recharge showed clear interannual variability (annual mean 0.28–0.60 m). The fraction of annual mean recharge over precipitation was 39%–66% during our simulation period. We showed how groundwater level data can set more constraints on the recharge estimates than soil moisture data, and how both of the data types together constrained the recharge estimates the most. We showed how the vadose zone had modest dynamics and storage properties (typically 2%–8% of the total soil water) in terms of the bulk soil water storage. However, the average amount of the air-filled pore space (0.70 m) and water (0.38 m) in the vadose zone were proportional to annual precipitation and evapotranspiration, respectively. Thus, the vadose zone can form an important boundary between the soil surface and groundwater zone, and its role is not highly sensitive to hydrometeorological fluctuations. Data worth analyses provide a potential opportunity to move toward increasingly reliable model-based groundwater recharge estimates and system understanding.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The simulation results are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Natural Resources Institute Finland and Geological Survey of Finland. CSC–IT Center for Science, Finland, is acknowledged for the allocation of computational resources. The three anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for their constructive and detailed comments.

References

Ala-Aho, P., et al. 2021. “What conditions favor the influence of seasonally frozen ground on hydrological partitioning? A systematic review.” Environ. Res. Lett. 16 (4): 043008 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe82c.
Ala-Aho, P., P. M. Rossi, and B. Kløve. 2013. “Interaction of esker groundwater with headwater lakes and streams.” J. Hydrol. 500 (Sep): 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.07.014.
Ala-Aho, P., P. M. Rossi, and B. Kløve. 2015. “Estimation of temporal and spatial variations in groundwater recharge in unconfined sand aquifers using Scots pine inventories.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19 (4): 1961–1976. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1961-2015.
Arola, T., J. Okkonen, and J. Jokisalo. 2016. “Groundwater utilisation for energy production in the nordic environment: An energy simulation and hydrogeological modelling approach.” J. Water Resour. Prot. 8 (6): 642. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2016.86053.
Assefa, K. A., and A. D. Woodbury. 2013. “Transient, spatially varied groundwater recharge modeling.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (8): 4593–4606. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20332.
Bates, P. D., M. S. Horritt, and T. J. Fewtrell. 2010. “A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling.” J. Hydrol. 387 (1–2): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027.
Botero-Acosta, A., M. L. Chu, and C. Huang. 2019. “Impacts of environmental stressors on nonpoint source pollution in intensively managed hydrologic systems.” J. Hydrol. 579 (Dec): 124056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124056.
Christiaens, K., and J. Feyen. 2002. “Constraining soil hydraulic parameter and output uncertainty of the distributed hydrological MIKE SHE model using the GLUE framework.” Hydrol. Processes 16 (2): 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.335.
DHI (Danish Hydraulic Institute). 2017. MIKE SHE—Volume 2: Reference guide. Hørsholm, Denmark: Danish Hydraulic Institute.
FMI. 2021. “Open data—download observations.” Accessed November 10, 2021. https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/download-observations.
Gao, B., D. Yang, Y. Qin, Y. Wang, H. Li, Y. Zhang, and T. Zhang. 2018. “Change in frozen soils and its effect on regional hydrology, upper Heihe basin, northeastern Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau.” Cryosphere 12 (2): 657–673. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-657-2018.
Gleeson, T., Y. Wada, M. F. Bierkens, and L. P. Van Beek. 2012. “Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint.” Nature 488 (7410): 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11295.
Haahti, K., L. Warsta, T. Kokkonen, B. A. Younis, and H. Koivusalo. 2016. “Distributed hydrological modeling with channel network flow of a forestry drained peatland site.” Water Resour. Res. 52 (1): 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018038.
Han, Z., D. Long, Q. Huang, X. Li, F. Zhao, and J. Wang. 2020. “Improving reservoir outflow estimation for ungauged basins using satellite observations and a hydrological model.” Water Resour. Res. 56 (9): e2020WR027590. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027590.
Hargreaves, G. H., and Z. A. Samani. 1985. “Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature.” Appl. Eng. Agric. 1 (2): 96–99. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26773.
He, H., P. E. Jansson, and A. I. Gärdenäs. 2021. “CoupModel (v6.0): An ecosystem model for coupled phosphorus, nitrogen, and carbon dynamics—Evaluated against empirical data from a climatic and fertility gradient in Sweden.” Geosci. Model Develop. 14 (2): 735–761. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-735-2021.
Hendriksson, N., S. Luoma, J. Okkonen, and S. Lukkari. 2018. “Pohjavesien reaktiivinen geokemiallinen ja virtausmallinnus.” In CASE study: Karhinkangas (Reactive transport groundwater modeling, CASE Study: Karhinkangas). Kokkola, Finland: Geological Survey of Finland.
Hill, D. F., E. A. Burakowski, R. L. Crumley, J. Keon, J. M. Hu, A. A. Arendt, K. Wikstrom Jones, and G. J. Wolken. 2019. “Converting snow depth to snow water equivalent using climatological variables.” Cryosphere 13 (7): 1767–1784. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1767-2019.
Hunter, N. M., M. S. Horritt, P. D. Bates, M. D. Wilson, and M. G. Werner. 2005. “An adaptive time step solution for raster-based storage cell modelling of floodplain inundation.” Adv. Water Resour. 28 (9): 975–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.03.007.
Irannezhad, M., A. K. Ronkanen, and B. Kløve. 2015. “Effects of climate variability and change on snowpack hydrological processes in Finland.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 118 (Oct): 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.06.009.
Jarvis, N. J. 1989. “A simple empirical model of root water uptake.” J. Hydrol. 107 (1–4): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90050-4.
Jyrkama, M. I., and J. F. Sykes. 2007. “The impact of climate change on spatially varying groundwater recharge in the grand river watershed (Ontario).” J. Hydrol. 338 (3–4): 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.036.
Khaleel, R., and E. J. Freeman. 1995. Variability and scaling of hydraulic properties for 200 area soils. Richland, WA: Westinghouse Hanford Co.
Kikuchi, C. 2017. “Toward increased use of data worth analyses in groundwater studies.” Ground Water 55 (5): 670–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12562.
Kuusisto, E. 1980. “On the values and variability of degree-day melting factor in Finland.” Hydrol. Res. 11 (5): 235–242. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1980.0011.
Laine-Kaulio, H., S. Backnäs, T. Karvonen, H. Koivusalo, and J. J. McDonnell. 2014. “Lateral subsurface stormflow and solute transport in a forested hillslope: A combined measurement and modeling approach.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (10): 8159–8178. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015381.
Leaf, A. T. 2017. “Using models to identify the best data: An example from northern Wisconsin.” Groundwater 55 (5): 641–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12561.
Loritz, R., H. Gupta, C. Jackisch, M. Westhoff, A. Kleidon, U. Ehret, and E. Zehe. 2018. “On the dynamic nature of hydrological similarity.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22 (7): 3663–3684. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3663-2018.
Luoma, S., and J. Okkonen. 2014. “Impacts of future climate change and Baltic sea level rise on groundwater recharge, groundwater levels, and surface leakage in the Hanko aquifer in Southern Finland.” Water 6 (12): 3671–3700. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6123671.
Madsen, H. 2000. “Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model using multiple objectives.” J. Hydrol. 235 (3–4): 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00279-1.
Mathias, S. A., J. P. Sorensen, and A. P. Butler. 2017. “Soil moisture data as a constraint for groundwater recharge estimation.” J. Hydrol. 552 (Sep): 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.040.
McKenzie, J. M., C. I. Voss, and D. I. Siegel. 2007. “Groundwater flow with energy transport and water–ice phase change: Numerical simulations, benchmarks, and application to freezing in peat bogs.” Adv. Water Resour. 30 (4): 966–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.08.008.
Okkonen, J. 2011. Groundwater and its response to climate variability and change in cold snow dominated regions in Finland: Methods and estimations. Oulu, Finland: Univ. of Oulu.
Okkonen, J., P. Ala-Aho, P. Hänninen, M. Hayashi, R. Sutinen, and P. Liwata. 2017. “Multi-year simulation and model calibration of soil moisture and temperature profiles in till soil.” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 68 (6): 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12489.
Okkonen, J., and B. Kløve. 2010. “A conceptual and statistical approach for the analysis of climate impact on ground water table fluctuation patterns in cold conditions.” J. Hydrol. 388 (1–2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.015.
Okkonen, J., and B. Kløve. 2011. “A sequential modelling approach to assess groundwater–surface water resources in a snow dominated region of Finland.” J. Hydrol. 411 (1–2): 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.09.038.
Paalijärvi, M., and J. Okkonen. 2014. Karhinkankaan ja Sivakkokankaan vedenhankintatutkimukset ja pohjavedenvirtausmallinnus 2011-2014 (Groundwater Investigations and Groundwater Flow Model of Karhinkangas and Sivakkokangas Aquifers during the Period 2011-2014). Kokkola, Finland: Geological Survey of Finland.
Paalijärvi, M., and T. Valjus. 2014. Karhinkankaan ja Sivakkokankaan pohjavesialueiden geologisen rakenteen selvitys 2009-2012 (geological structure investigation of Karhinkangas and Sivakkokangas Aquifers in 2009-2012). Kokkola, Finland: Geological Survey of Finland.
Rosas, J., O. Lopez, T. M. Missimer, K. M. Coulibaly, A. H. Dehwah, K. Sesler, L. R. Lujan, and D. Mantilla. 2014. “Determination of hydraulic conductivity from grain-size distribution for different depositional environments.” Ground Water 52 (3): 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12078.
Scanlon, B. R., R. W. Healy, and P. G. Cook. 2002. “Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge.” Hydrogeol. J. 10 (1): 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0176-2.
Schaap, M. G., F. J. Leij, and M. T. Van Genuchten. 2001. “Rosetta: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions.” J. Hydrol. 251 (3–4): 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00466-8.
Schroeder, P. R., T. S. Dozier, P. A. Zappi, B. M. McEnroe, J. W. Sjostrom, and R. L. Peyton. 1994. The hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model: Engineering documentation for Version 3. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development.
Seck, A., C. Welty, and R. M. Maxwell. 2015. “Spin-up behavior and effects of initial conditions for an integrated hydrologic model.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (4): 2188–2210. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016371.
Šimůnek, J., M. T. Van Genuchten, and M. Sejna. 2005. The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Riverside, CA: Univ. of California-Riverside Research.
Šimůnek, J., M. T. Van Genuchten, and M. Sejna. 2008. “Development and applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD software packages and related codes.” Vadose Zone J. 7 (2): 587–600. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0077.
Sjöberg, Y., A. Jan, S. L. Painter, E. T. Coon, M. P. Carey, J. A. O’Donnell, and J. C. Koch. 2021. “Permafrost promotes shallow groundwater flow and warmer headwater streams.” Water Resour. Res. 57 (2): e2020WR027463. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027463.
Sorensen, J. P. R., J. W. Finch, A. M. Ireson, and C. R. Jackson. 2014. “Comparison of varied complexity models simulating recharge at the field scale.” Hydrol. Processes 28 (3): 2091–2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9752.
Tracy, F. T. 2007. “Three-dimensional analytical solutions of Richards’ equation for a box-shaped soil sample with piecewise-constant head boundary conditions on the top.” J. Hydrol. 336 (3–4): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.011.
Turunen, M., G. Gurarslan, J. Šimůnek, and H. Koivusalo. 2020a. “What is the worth of drain discharge and surface runoff data in hydrological simulations?” J. Hydrol. 587 (Aug): 125030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125030.
Turunen, M., E. Turtola, M. T. Vaaja, J. Hyväluoma, and H. Koivusalo. 2020b. “Terrestrial laser scanning data combined with 3D hydrological modeling decipher the role of tillage in field water balance and runoff generation.” Catena 187 (Apr): 104363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104363.
Turunen, M., L. Warsta, M. Paasonen-Kivekäs, J. Nurminen, L. Alakukku, M. Myllys, and H. Koivusalo. 2015. “Effects of terrain slope on long-term and seasonal water balances in clayey, subsurface drained agricultural fields in high latitude conditions.” Agric. Water Manage. 150 (Mar): 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.12.008.
Twarakavi, N. K. C., J. Šimůnek, and S. Seo. 2008. “Evaluating interactions between groundwater and vadose zone using the HYDRUS-based flow package for MODFLOW.” Vadose Zone J. 7 (2): 757–768. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0082.
van Dam, J. C., and R. A. Feddes. 2000. “Numerical simulation of infiltration, evaporation and shallow groundwater levels with the Richards equation.” J. Hydrol. 233 (1–4): 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00227-4.
van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (5): 892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.
Vehviläinen, B. 1992. Snow cover models in operational watershed forecasting. Washington, DC: National Board of Waters.
Vrugt, J. A., W. Bouten, and A. H. Weerts. 2001. “Information content of data for identifying soil hydraulic parameters from outflow experiments.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65 (1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.65119x.
Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, S. C. Dekker, S. Sorooshian, T. Wagener, and W. Bouten. 2006. “Application of stochastic parameter optimization to the Sacramento soil moisture accounting model.” J. Hydrol. 325 (1–4): 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.041.
Wagener, T., and H. V. Gupta. 2005. “Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 19 (6): 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0006-5.
Warsta, L. 2011. “Modelling water flow and soil erosion in clayey, subsurface drained agricultural fields.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Aalto Univ.
Warsta, L., T. Karvonen, H. Koivusalo, M. Paasonen-Kivekäs, and A. Taskinen. 2013. “Simulation of water balance in a clayey, subsurface drained agricultural field with three-dimensional FLUSH model.” J. Hydrol. 476 (10): 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.053.
Wu, S. H., P. E. Jansson, and X. Y. Zhang. 2011. “Modelling temperature, moisture and surface heat balance in bare soil under seasonal frost conditions in China.” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 62 (11): 780–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01397.x.
Xie, Y., P. G. Cook, C. T. Simmons, D. Partington, R. Crosbie, and O. Batelaan. 2018a. “Uncertainty of groundwater recharge estimated from a water and energy balance model.” J. Hydrol. 561 (Jun): 1081–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.010.
Xie, Y., R. Crosbie, J. Yang, J. Wu, and W. Wang. 2018b. “Usefulness of soil moisture and actual evapotranspiration data for constraining potential groundwater recharge in semiarid regions.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (7): 4929–4945. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023257.
Yu, P. S., T. C. Yang, and S. J. Chen. 2001. “Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall–runoff model.” J. Hydrol. 244 (1–2): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00328-6.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: Jun 1, 2022
Accepted: Nov 21, 2022
Published online: Jan 24, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 24, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Researcher Scientist, Natural Resources Unit, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Tietotie 4, Jokioinen FI-31600, Finland (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-2951. Email: [email protected]
Jarkko Okkonen [email protected]
Senior Researcher, Water Management Solutions Unit, Geological Survey of Finland, P.O. Box 97, Kokkola FI-67101, Finland. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share