Technical Papers
Jan 17, 2023

Inferences of Groundwater Response to Projected Hydroclimatic Changes in North Florida

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

Discerning anthropogenic stressors on groundwater is critical for climate change adaptation to reduce risks and increase resiliency. Long-term groundwater level trends are forecasted and examined at three sites in North Florida using a large ensemble of Global Climate Model (GCM) projections under low and medium emission scenarios. The forecasts indicate groundwater levels are likely to decline from 2020 to 2099. However, the declines are expected to accelerate after 2040s, reaching critical levels by the end of this century. Pumping impact constitutes 10% to 45% of future declines but is amplified by enhanced drought. Examination of distinct influence of rainfall, evapotranspiration (ET), and groundwater pumping on future trends shows highly divergent groundwater response to projected hydroclimatic changes. The future long-term rainfall trend may lead to rising groundwater levels, which may be overshadowed by heightened ET loss driven by climate change and increased groundwater pumping, causing steep declines. This study also reveals poor performance of predictions driven by GCM projections in replicating the timing of high and low levels at the sites influenced by Florida’s peninsular climate due to the limitation of downscaling and bias-correction to capture oscillations in climate cycles driving hydrologic memory. However, groundwater levels are predicted well by a few GCMs at one site influenced primarily by continental climate. Additionally, a multidecadal harmonic analysis exposes presence of centennial periodicity in groundwater levels, which opens a new perspective in the understanding of climate change impacts on groundwater resources. Further investigation is needed to better understand the effect of centennial cycles on future groundwater levels and how these cycles can be incorporated into the downscaling methods. Hence, GCM-based forecasts are recommended to be cautiously utilized for groundwater resource planning when they significantly depart from historical long-term cyclic patterns.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study were derived from the following resources available in the public domain: sjrwmd.com, srwmd.state.fl.us, ncdc.noaa.gov, and usgs.gov.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank SJRWMD staff for helping us with data collection including historical groundwater pumping.

References

Allen, D. M., A. J. Cannon, M. W. Toews, and J. Scibek. 2010. “Variability in simulated recharge using different GCMs.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (10): 2009WR008932. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008932.
Amanambu, A. C., O. A. Obarein, J. Mossa, L. Li, S. S. Ayeni, O. Balogun, A. Oyebamiji, and F. U. Ochege. 2020. “Groundwater system and climate change: Present status and future considerations.” J. Hydrol. 589 (Oct): 125163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125163.
Bellino, J. C., E. L. Kuniansky, A. M. O’Reilly, and J. F. Dixon. 2018. Hydrogeologic setting, conceptual groundwater flow system, and hydrologic conditions 1995–2010 in Florida and parts of Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina. Washington, DC: USGS.
Chang, S., W. Graham, J. Geurink, N. Wanakule, and T. Asefa. 2018. “Evaluation of impacts of future climate change and water use scenarios on regional hydrology.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22 (9): 4793–4813. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4793-2018.
Crosbie, R. S., J. L. McCallum, G. R. Walker, and F. H. S. Chiew. 2012. “Episodic recharge and climate change in the Murray-Darling basin, Australia.” Hydrogeol. J. 20 (2): 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0804-4.
Cuthbert, M. O., T. Gleeson, N. Moosdorf, K. M. Befus, A. Schneider, J. Hartmann, and B. Lehner. 2019. “Global patterns and dynamics of climate–groundwater interactions.” Nat. Clim. Change 9 (2): 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0386-4.
Dams, J., E. Salvadore, T. Van Daele, V. Ntegeka, P. Willems, and O. Batelaan. 2012. “Spatio-temporal impact of climate change on the groundwater system.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 16 (5): 1517–1531. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1517-2012.
Daubechies, I. 1990. “The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis.” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 36 (5): 961–1005. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.57199.
Durden, D., F. Gordu, D. Hearn, L. Meridth, A. Angel, and T. Grubbs. 2019. North Florida southeast Georgia groundwater model v1.1. Technical Rep. No. SJ2019-01. Palatka, FL: St. Johns River Water Management District.
Flato, G., et al. 2014. “Evaluation of climate models.” In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 741–866. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Florida Climate Center. 2022. “An analysis of the beginning, end, length, and strength of Florida’s hot season.” Accessed April 1, 2022. https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/topics/specials/floridas-hot-season.
Garner, G., D. M. Hannah, and G. Watts. 2017. “Climate change and water in the UK: Recent scientific evidence for past and future change.” Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 41 (2): 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316679082.
Gettelman, A., and R. B. Rood. 2016. Demystifying climate models: A users guide to earth system models, 274. New York: Springer.
GFDL (Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory). 2022. “Climate modeling.” Accessed March 1, 2022. https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/climate-modeling/.
Gordu, F., and M. H. Nachabe. 2021. “A physically constrained wavelet-aided statistical model for multi-decadal groundwater dynamics predictions.” Hydrol. Process. 35 (8): e14308. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14308.
Green, T. R., M. Taniguchi, H. Kooi, J. J. Gurdak, D. M. Allen, K. M. Hiscock, H. Treidel, and A. Aureli. 2011. “Beneath the surface of global change: Impacts of climate change on groundwater.” J. Hydrol. 405 (3–4): 532–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.002.
Harley, G. L., J. T. Maxwell, E. Larson, H. D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Henderson, and J. Huffman. 2017. “Suwannee river flow variability 1550–2005 CE reconstructed from a multispecies tree-ring network.” J. Hydrol. 544 (Jan): 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.020.
Holman, I. P., D. M. Allen, M. O. Cuthbert, and P. Goderniaux. 2012. “Towards best practice for assessing the impacts of climate change on groundwater.” Hydrogeol. J. 20 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0805-3.
Hu, W., Y. Q. Wang, H. J. Li, M. B. Huang, M. T. Hou, Z. Li, D. L. She, and B. C. Si. 2019. “Dominant role of climate in determining spatio-temporal distribution of potential groundwater recharge at a regional scale.” J. Hydrol. 578 (Nov): 124042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124042.
Infanti, J. M., B. P. Kirtman, N. G. Aumen, J. Stamm, and C. Polsky. 2020. “Aligning climate models with stakeholder needs: Advances in communicating future rainfall uncertainties for south Florida decision makers.” Earth Space Sci. 7 (7): e2019EA000725. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000725.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2013. “Summary for policymakers.” In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, edited by T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. -K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, C. R., R. Meister, and C. Prudhomme. 2011. “Modelling the effects of climate change and its uncertainty on UK chalk groundwater resources from an ensemble of global climate model projections.” J. Hydrol. 399 (1–2): 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.028.
Jeihouni, E., S. Eslamian, M. Mohammadi, and M. J. Zareian. 2019. “Simulation of groundwater level fluctuations in response to main climate parameters using a wavelet–ANN hybrid technique for the Shabestar plain, Iran.” Environ. Earth Sci. 78 (10): 293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8283-3.
Jyrkama, M. I., and J. F. Sykes. 2007. “The impact of climate change on spatially varying groundwater recharge in the grand river watershed (Ontario).” J. Hydrol. 338 (3–4): 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.036.
Kløve, B., et al. 2014. “Climate change impacts on groundwater and dependent ecosystems.” J. Hydrol. 518 (Oct): 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.037.
Maurer, E. P., H. G. Hidalgo, T. Das, M. D. Dettinger, and D. R. Cayan. 2010. “The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (6): 1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1125-2010.
Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE 50 (3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153.
Moriasi, D. N., M. W. Gitau, N. Pai, and P. Daggupati. 2015. “Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria.” Trans. ASABE 58 (6): 1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715.
Mustafa, S. M. T., M. M. Hasan, A. K. Saha, R. P. Rannu, E. Van Uytven, P. Willems, and M. Huysmans. 2019. “Multi-model approach to quantify groundwater-level prediction uncertainty using an ensemble of global climate models and multiple abstraction scenarios.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 23 (5): 2279–2303. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2279-2019.
Neukum, C., and R. Azzam. 2012. “Impact of climate change on groundwater recharge in a small catchment in the Black Forest, Germany.” Hydrogeol. J. 20 (3): 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0827-x.
Niraula, R., T. Meixner, F. Dominguez, N. Bhattarai, M. Rodell, H. Ajami, D. Gochis, and C. Castro. 2017. “How might recharge change under projected climate change in the western US?: Climate change and recharge.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 44 (20): 10407–10418. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075421.
Nkhonjera, G. K., and M. O. Dinka. 2017. “Significance of direct and indirect impacts of climate change on groundwater resources in the Olifants River basin: A review.” Glob. Planet. Change 158 (Jun): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.09.011.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2021. “Climate models.” Accessed April 1, 2022. https://www.climate.gov/maps-data/primer/climate-models.
Opie, S., R. G. Taylor, C. M. Brierley, M. Shamsudduha, and M. O. Cuthbert. 2020. “Climate–groundwater dynamics inferred from GRACE and the role of hydraulic memory.” Earth Syst. Dyn. 11 (3): 775–791. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-775-2020.
Ou, G., F. Munoz-Arriola, D. R. Uden, D. Martin, C. R. Allen, and N. Shank. 2018. “Climate change implications for irrigation and groundwater in the Republican river basin, USA.” Clim. Change 151 (2): 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2278-z.
Panaou, T., T. Asefa, and M. H. Nachabe. 2018. “Keeping us honest: Examining climate states and transition probabilities of precipitation projections in general circulation models.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (4): 04018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000910.
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Reclamation. 2013. “Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate and hydrology projections: Release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs, prepared by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Services Center, Denver, Colorado.” Accessed January 1, 2022. http://gdo-dcp.ucllnl.org/downscaled_cmip_projections/.
Sanderson, B. M., M. Wehner, and R. Knutti. 2017. “Skill and independence weighting for multi-model assessments.” Geosci. Model Dev. 10 (6): 2379–2395. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2379-2017.
Scibek, J., and D. M. Allen. 2006. “Modeled impacts of predicted climate change on recharge and ground water levels.” Water Resour. Res. 42 (11): W11405. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004742.
Serrat-Capdevila, A., J. B. Valdés, J. G. Pérez, K. Baird, L. J. Mata, and T. Maddock. 2007. “Modeling climate change impacts—and uncertainty—on the hydrology of a riparian system: The San Pedro basin (Arizona/Sonora).” J. Hydrol. 347 (1–2): 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.08.028.
Stoll, S., H. J. Hendricks Franssen, R. Barthel, and W. Kinzelbach. 2011. “What can we learn from long-term groundwater data to improve climate change impact studies?” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 8 (4): 7621–7655. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-7621-2011.
Stute, M., A. Clement, and G. Lohmann. 2001. “Global climate models: past, present and future.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98 (19): 10529–10530. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191366098.
Taylor, R. G., et al. 2013. “Ground water and climate change.” Nat. Clim. Change 3 (4): 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1744.
Torrence, C., and G. P. Compo. 1998. “A practical guide to wavelet analysis.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79 (1): 61. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079%3C0061:APGTWA%3E2.0.CO;2.
Van Lanen, H. A. 2006. “Drought propagation through the hydrological cycle.” In Vol. 308 of Climate variability and change, edited by S. Demuth, A. Gustard, E. Planos, F. Scatena, and E. Servat, 122–127. Wallingford, UK: IAHS Press.
Van Lanen, H. A. J., N. Wanders, L. M. Tallaksen, and A. F. Van Loon. 2013. “Hydrological drought across the world: impact of climate and physical catchment structure.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (5): 1715–1732. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1715-2013.
Van Loon, A. F. 2015. “Hydrological drought explained.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 2 (4): 359–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1085.
Van Loon, A. F., E. Tijdeman, N. Wanders, H. J. Van Lanen, A. J. Teuling, and R. Uijlenhoet. 2014. “How climate seasonality modifies drought duration and deficit.” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 119 (8): 4640–4656. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020383.
Wada, Y., M.-H. Lo, P. J.-F. Yeh, J. T. Reager, J. S. Famiglietti, R.-J. Wu, and Y.-H. Tseng. 2016. “Fate of water pumped from underground and contributions to sea-level rise.” Nat. Clim. Change 6 (8): 777–780. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3001.
Wootten, A., K. Smith, R. Boyles, A. Terando, L. Stefanova, V. Misra, T. Smith, D. Blodgett, and F. Semazzi. 2014. Downscaled climate projections for the Southeast United States—Evaluation and use for ecological applications. Washington, DC: USGS.
Wootten, A., A. Terando, B. J. Reich, R. P. Boyles, and F. Semazzi. 2017. “Characterizing sources of uncertainty from global climate models and downscaling techniques.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 56 (12): 3245–3262. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0087.1.
Wu, W.-Y., M.-H. Lo, Y. Wada, J. S. Famiglietti, J. T. Reager, P. J.-F. Yeh, A. Ducharne, and Z.-L. Yang. 2020. “Divergent effects of climate change on future groundwater availability in key mid-latitude aquifers.” Nat. Commun. 11 (1): 3710. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17581-y.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: May 15, 2022
Accepted: Sep 27, 2022
Published online: Jan 17, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 17, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chief Water Resource Engineer, St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, FL 32177 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0649-7161. Email: [email protected]
Mahmood H. Nachabe, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share