Improving Rainfall Fields in Data-Scarce Basins: Influence of the Kernel Bandwidth Value of Merging on Hydrometeorological Modeling
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 7
Abstract
Accurate rainfall fields are important for several hydrological and meteorological applications. In poorly instrumented basins, the lack of rain gauges heavily affects the spatial rainfall estimation, yet neither remote sensed nor climate model estimates are good enough for management applications. To tackle this problem, we investigate the impacts of combining both sources of information by varying the kernel bandwidth value of the double smoothing merging algorithm and analyzing the error of the rainfall fields. We explored the correlation between rain gauge density and bandwidth and compared the results against classical geostatistical interpolation methods based solely on in-situ measurements. Propagation of rainfall error into hydrological modelling is usual, and therefore we evaluated the influence of the bandwidth in streamflow simulations implementing two hydrological models. The hydrological evaluation considered the analysis of hydrological signatures rather than just performance metrics. We found that there is a clear correlation between kernel bandwidth and monitoring network density and that the bandwidth also affects hydrological performance. Simple bilinear downscaling did not produce a significant difference in meteorological or hydrological errors, and rain gauge network configuration also impacts the error of the field. We conclude that merging outperforms the results of classical interpolation methods, in some cases by 20% or 50%, suggesting the suitability of the method for being applied in data-scarce domains.
Practical Applications
Reliable rainfall fields are important for estimating water resource availability and other related applications. However, using just rain gauges can misrepresent the estimated spatial variability of the field. Around the world, the number of rainfall gauges has been decreasing, making this task more challenging. Satellite and reanalysis data can help to overcome these problems, but their direct use is also insufficient. Merging the two mentioned data sources (in-situ and reanalysis data) is the option the authors implemented in this work. The authors focused on evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the merging by comparing both rainfall and streamflow observations with estimates simulated by a hydrological model. The authors chose the double smoothing algorithm because it is oriented to enhance rainfall estimates in areas with very sparse rain gauge data, yet we evaluate its behavior in two basins with different monitoring conditions. The authors conclude that the merging outperforms the results of classical interpolation methods, in some cases by 20% or 50%, suggesting the suitability of the method for being applied in data-scarce domains to improve hydrological modelling estimates and use their results in water resource management and planning, in climate classification, and in the study of droughts and floods, among others.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data, code, and models that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the six anonymous reviewers and the editorial board, whose comments helped to improve this work. Moreover, we would like to thank the Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales -IDEAM- and the EU FP7 eartH2Observe project for providing the data for this research. ND would like to thank Joaquin Duque and Helena Gardeazábal for providing emotional and financial support when this research needed it and the fellow researchers of the GIREH group for the constructive discussions about the topic. The research reported in this paper has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for Research Technological development and demonstration under Grant Agreement No. 603608. Moreover, the support from Universidad Nacional de Colombia through digital infrastructure and the financial support of Joaquin Duque & Helena Gardeazábal is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Arnaud, P., C. Bouvier, L. Cisneros, and R. Dominguez. 2002. “Influence of rainfall spatial variability on flood prediction.” J. Hydrol. 260 (1–4): 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00611-4.
Barrett, E. 1975. “The estimation of monthly rainfall from satellite data.” Mon. Weather Rev. 98 (4): 1109–1114.
Beck, H. E., A. I. J. M. Van Dijk, A. de Roo, E. Dutra, G. Fink, R. Orth, and J. Schellekens. 2017a. “Global evaluation of runoff from 10 state-of-the-art hydrological models.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (6): 2881–2903. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2881-2017.
Beck, H. E., A. I. J. M. Van Dijk, V. Levizzani, J. Schellekens, D. G. Miralles, B. Martens, and A. de Roo. 2017b. “MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25° global gridded precipitation (1979–2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (1): 589–615. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-589-2017.
Beck, H. E., N. Vergopolan, M. Pan, V. Levizzani, A. I. J. M. van Dijk, G. P. Weedon, L. Brocca, F. Pappenberger, G. J. Huffman, and E. F. Wood. 2017c. “Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (12): 6201–6217. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6201-2017.
Beck, H. E., N. E. Zimmermann, T. R. McVicar, N. Vergopolan, A. Berg, and E. F. Wood. 2018. “Present and future Köppen–Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution.” Sci. Data 5 (1): 180214. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214.
Beven, K., R. Lamb, P. Quinn, R. Romanowicz, and J. Freer. 1995. “TOPMODEL.” In Computer Models of watershed hydrology, edited by V. P. Singh, 627–668. Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications.
Blöschl, G., and M. Sivapalan. 1995. “Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review.” Hydrol. Processes 9 (3–4): 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090305.
Buytaert, W. 2018. TOPMODEL: Implementation of the hydrological model TOPMODEL in R. CRAN.r-project: London.
Ceccherini, G., I. Ameztoy, C. Hernández, and C. Moreno. 2015. “High-resolution precipitation datasets in South America and West Africa based on satellite-derived rainfall, enhanced vegetation index and digital elevation model.” Remote Sens. 7 (5): 6454–6488. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70506454.
Chappell, A., L. Renzullo, and M. Haylock. 2012. “Spatial uncertainty to determine reliable daily precipitation maps.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117 (Jan): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017718.
Chow, V., D. R. Maidment, and L. Mays. 1988. Applied hydrology. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book.
Cressie, N. A. C. 1994. Statistics for spatial data biometrics. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533238.
Dee, D. P., et al. 2011. “The ERA–interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system.” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137 (656): 553–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828.
Dinku, T., F. Ruiz, S. J. Connor, and P. Ceccato. 2010. “Validation and intercomparison of satellite rainfall estimates over Colombia.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 49 (5): 1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2260.1.
Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and H. V. Gupta. 1992. “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res. 28 (4): 1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985.
Duncan, M. R., B. Austin, F. Fabry, and G. L. Austin. 1993. “The effect of gauge sampling density on the accuracy of streamflow prediction for rural catchments.” J. Hydrol. 142 (1–4): 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90023-3.
Duque-Gardeazábal, N., D. Zamora, and E. Rodríguez. 2018. “Analysis of the kernel bandwidth influence in the double smoothing merging algorithm to improve rainfall fields in poorly gauged basins.” In Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics, 635–642. London: International Water Association. https://doi.org/10.29007/2xp6.
Ehret, U., J. Götzinger, A. Bárdossy, and G. G. S. Pegram. 2008. “Radar-based flood forecasting in small catchments, exemplified by the Goldersbach catchment, Germany.” Int. J. River Basin Manage. 6 (4): 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635359.
Espinoza Villar, J. C., J. Ronchail, J. L. Guyot, G. Cochonneau, F. Naziano, W. Lavado, E. De Oliveira, R. Pombosa, and P. Vauchel. 2009. “Spatio-temporal rainfall variability in the Amazon basin countries (Brazil, Peru, Bolivia, Colombia, and Ecuador).” Int. J. Climatol. 29 (11): 1574–1594. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1791.
García, L. E., D. J. Rodríguez, M. Wijnen, and I. Pakulski. 2016. Earth observations for water resources management: Current use and future opportunities for the water sector. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Grimes, D. I. F., and E. Pardo-Iguzquiza. 2010. “Geostatistical analysis of rainfall.” Geogr. Anal. 42 (2): 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.2010.00787.x.
Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, and P. O. Yapo. 1999. “Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 4 (2): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135).
Heidinger, H., et al. 2012. “TRMM rainfall correction over the Andean Plateau using wavelet multi- resolution analysis.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 33 (14): 4583–4602. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.652315.
Hurtado-Montoya, A. F., and Ó. J. Mesa-Sánchez. 2014. “Reanalysis of monthly precipitation fields in Colombian territory.” Dyna 81 (186): 251. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n186.40419.
IDEAM. 2019. Estudio Nacional del Agua 2018. Ideam, Bogotá: IDEAM.
IDEAM. 2022. “Consulta y Descarga de Datos Hidrometeorológicos [WWW Document].” Accessed November 14, 2020. http://dhime.ideam.gov.co/atencionciudadano/.
Immerzeel, W. W., M. M. Rutten, and P. Droogers. 2009. “Spatial downscaling of TRMM precipitation using vegetative response on the Iberian Peninsula.” Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (2): 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.004.
Jongjin, B., P. Jongmin, R. Dongryeol, and C. Minha. 2016. “Geospatial blending to improve spatial mapping of precipitation with high spatial resolution by merging satellite-based and ground-based data.” Hydrol. Processes 30 (16): 2789–2803. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10786.
Lall, U., Y.-I. Moon, and K. Bosworth. 1993. “Kernel flood frequency estimators: Bandwidth selection and kernel choice.” Water Resour. Res. 29 (4): 1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR02466.
Li, M., and Q. Shao. 2010. “An improved statistical approach to merge satellite rainfall estimates and raingauge data.” J. Hydrol. 385 (1–4): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.023.
Lindström, G., B. Johansson, M. Persson, M. Gardelin, and S. Bergström. 1997. “Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model.” J. Hydrol. 201 (1–4): 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00041-3.
Long, Y., Y. Zhang, and Q. Ma. 2016. “A merging framework for rainfall estimation at high spatiotemporal resolution for distributed hydrological modeling in a data-scarce area.” Remote Sens. 8 (7): 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070599.
López López, P., W. W. Immerzeel, E. A. Rodríguez, G. Sterk, and J. Schellekens. 2018. “Spatial downscaling of satellite-based precipitation and its impact on discharge simulations in the Magdalena River basin in Colombia: Impact of high spatial resolution precipitation on streamflow simulations.” Front. Earth Sci. 6 (Jun): 68. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00068.
Ly, S., C. Charles, and A. Degré. 2011. “Geostatistical interpolation of daily rainfall at catchment scale: The use of several variogram models in the Ourthe and Ambleve catchments, Belgium. Hydrol.” Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (7): 2259–2274. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011.
Muñoz, E., P. Tume, and G. Ortíz. 2015. “Uncertainty in rainfall input data in a conceptual water balance model: Effects on outputs and implications for predictability.” Earth Sci. Res. J. 18 (1): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v18n1.38760.
Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. “River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. 10 (3): 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
Nerini, D., Z. Zulkafli, L.-P. Wang, C. Onof, W. Buytaert, W. Lavado-Casimiro, and J.-L. Guyot. 2015. “A comparative analysis of TRMM–rain gauge data merging techniques at the daily time scale for distributed rainfall–runoff modeling applications.” J. Hydrometeorol. 16 (5): 2153–2168. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0197.1.
Park, N.-W. 2013. “Spatial downscaling of TRMM precipitation using geostatistics and fine scale environmental variables.” In Vol. 2013 of Advances in meteorology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/237126.
Poveda, G., P. R. Waylen, and R. S. Pulwarty. 2006. “Annual and inter-annual variability of the present climate in northern South America and southern Mesoamerica.” Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 234 (1): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.10.031.
Rajagopalan, B., U. Lall, and D. G. Tarboton. 1997. “Evaluation of kernel density estimation methods for daily precipitation resampling.” Stochastic Hydrol. Hydraul. 11 (6): 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428432.
Refsgaard, J. C. 1997. “Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models.” J. Hydrol. 198 (1–4): 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03329-X.
Rodríguez, E., et al. 2020. “Combined use of local and global hydro meteorological data with hydrological models for water resources management in the Magdalena–Cauca Macro Basin–Colombia.” Water Resour. Manage. 34 (7): 2179–2199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02236-5.
Rogelis, M. C., and M. G. F. Werner. 2013. “Spatial interpolation for real-time rainfall field estimation in areas with complex topography.” J. Hydrometeorol. 14 (1): 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-0150.1.
Schellekens, J., et al. 2017. “A global water resources ensemble of hydrological models: The eartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset.” Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9 (2): 389–413. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-389-2017.
Schellekens, J. 2020. “OpenStreams wflow documentation release 1.0RC1 [WWW Document].” Accessed April 26, 2017. http://wflow.readthedocs.org/en/latest/.
Serrat-Capdevila, A., J. B. Valdes, and E. Z. Stakhiv. 2014. “Water management applications for satellite precipitation products: Synthesis and recommendations.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 50 (2): 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12140.
Silverman, B. W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: CRC Press.
Sperna Weiland, F. C., P. Lopez, A. van Dijk, and J. Schellekens. 2015. “Global high-resolution reference potential evaporation.” In Proc., 21st Int. Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 2548–2554. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand.
Todini, E. 2001. “A Bayesian technique for conditioning radar precipitation estimates to rain-gauge measurements.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 5 (2): 187–199. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-187-2001.
Tolson, B. A., and C. A. Shoemaker. 2007. “Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration.” Water Resour. Res. 43 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004723.
Vila, D. A., L. G. G. de Goncalves, D. L. Toll, and J. R. Rozante. 2009. “Statistical evaluation of combined daily gauge observations and rainfall satellite estimates over continental South America.” J. Hydrometeorol. 10 (2): 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1048.1.
Wagner, P. D., P. Fiener, F. Wilken, S. Kumar, and K. Schneider. 2012. “Comparison and evaluation of spatial interpolation schemes for daily rainfall in data scarce regions.” J. Hydrol. 464–465 (Sep): 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.026.
Webster, R., and M. A. Oliver. 2007. Geostatistics for environmental scientists, statistics in practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470517277.
Weedon, G. P., S. Gomes, P. Viterbo, W. J. Shuttleworth, E. Blyth, H. Österle, J. C. Adam, N. Bellouin, O. Boucher, and M. Best. 2011. “Creation of the WATCH forcing data and its use to assess global and regional reference crop evaporation over land during the twentieth century.” J. Hydrometeorol. 12 (5): 823–848. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1369.1.
WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2008. Guide to hydrological practices. WMO 168, Ginebra, Suiza: WMO.
Woldemeskel, F. M., B. Sivakumar, and A. Sharma. 2013. “Merging gauge and satellite rainfall with specification of associated uncertainty across Australia.” J. Hydrol. 499 (Aug): 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.039.
Yang, Y. J., and D. H. Burn. 1994. “An entropy approach to data-collection network design.” J. Hydrol. 157 (1–4): 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90111-2.
Zulkafli, Z., W. Buytaert, C. Onof, B. Manz, E. Tarnavsky, W. Lavado, and J.-L. Guyot. 2014. “A comparative performance analysis of TRMM 3B42 (TMPA) versions 6 and 7 for hydrological applications over Andean–Amazon river basins.” J. Hydrometeorol. 15 (2): 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-094.1.
Zulkafli, Z., D. Nerini, and B. Manz. 2015. Rainmerging: Pixel-point merging functions for precipitation time series (R package). San Francisco: GitHub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18869.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28 • Issue 7 • July 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 15, 2021
Accepted: Feb 7, 2023
Published online: Apr 18, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 18, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.