Open access
Technical Notes
Jun 12, 2024

Investigation on the Water Depth of Choked Flow due to Bottom Blockages in Circular Open Channels

Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 5

Abstract

Blockage detection in circular open channels (partially filled pipes, e.g., gravity sewer pipes) has gained increasing interest in the water industry. While there have been significant advancements in monitoring technologies for such systems (e.g., smart sewer systems), there is a lack of quantification of the hydraulic impact of partial blockages in circular pipes, which is a limiting factor for cost-effective detection. This study presents and validates a numerical framework to quantify the changes in water depth caused by extended bottom blockages in circular open channels. The analysis is based primarily on continuity and energy conservation with the assumption of a lossless transition at the blockage. The proposed approach can determine the critical blockage height that would induce choking, therefore a change in the upstream depth. It can also calculate the changed upstream water depth for various bottom blockage height values (above the critical height) for both subcritical and supercritical conditions. The proposed approach is numerically implemented and then validated through a series of laboratory experiments under the subcritical flow condition (which is the most common condition for gravity sewer systems). The numerically determined water depth results are consistent with the experimental results, which confirms that the proposed approach can accurately estimate the new upstream depth under the choking condition induced by a bottom blockage in circular open channels. The results contribute to advancing the hydraulic understanding in circular open channels with extended partial blockages, which is useful in the development of smart sewer technologies.

Practical Applications

Spills and overflows out of the gravity sewer system damage the environment and bring risks to public health. The problem is typically caused by partial blockages, which can reduce the flow capacity of the sewer pipe and induce higher-than-designed flow depth on the upstream of the blockage (known as choked flow condition). This study helps water engineers and operators to understand how an extended bottom blockage affects the flow condition just upstream of the blockage in a circular gravity sewer pipe. Charts have been presented to enable the determination of (1) the critical height of an extended bottom blockage that would induce choking; (2) the expected upstream flow depth for blockages with various heights, with a given flow rate under choked flow condition; and (3) the expected upstream flow depth for various flow rates, with a given blockage height under choked flow condition. The results can be used to evaluate the risk of bottom blockage-induced spill for sewer pipes with various sizes, slopes and flow rates (e.g., some may be more tolerant to bottom blockages while some may be more sensitive). This information can then be used to prioritize preventative measures such as sewer depth monitoring or regular cleaning.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Data Availability Statement

The experimental data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research has been supported by the Barwon Region Water Corporation (Geelong, Australia) and Intelligent Water Networks (https://www.iwn.org.au/) through a collaborative research project (Project Code: PJ06416).

References

Almeida, F. C. L., M. J. Brennan, P. F. Joseph, Y. Gao, and A. T. Paschoalini. 2018. “The effects of resonances on time delay estimation for water leak detection in plastic pipes.” J. Sound Vib. 420 (Apr): 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.06.025.
Banasiak, R., and R. Verhoeven. 2008. “Transport of sand and partly cohesive sediments in a circular pipe run partially full.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 134 (2): 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:2(216).
Chaudhry, M. H. 2022. Open-channel flow. 3rd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Clemmens, A. J., M. G. Bos, and J. A. Replogle. 1984. “RBC broad-crested weirs for circular sewers and pipes.” J. Hydrol. 68 (1): 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(84)90220-8.
Clemmens, A. J., T. L. Wahl, M. G. Bos, and J. A. Replogle. 2001. Water measurement with flumes and weirs. Wageningen, Netherlands: International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement.
Covas, D., H. Ramos, and A. B. De Almeida. 2005. “Standing wave difference method for leak detection in pipeline systems.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 131 (12): 1106–1116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:12(1106).
Dennis, J. E., Jr., and R. B. Schnabel. 1996. Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
DeSilva, D., D. Marlow, D. Beale, and D. Marney. 2011. “Sewer blockage management: Australian perspective.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 2 (4): 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000084.
Dey, S. 1998. “Choke-free flow in circular channels with increase in bed elevations.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 124 (6): 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1998)124:6(317).
Diskin, M. H. 1963. “Temporary flow measurement in sewers and drains.” J. Hydraul. Div. 89 (4): 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0000900.
Do, N. C., L. Dix, M. F. Lambert, and M. L. Stephens. 2023. “Proactive detection of wastewater overflows for smart sanitary sewer systems: Case study in South Australia.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 149 (1): 05022016. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5589.
Duan, H.-F., P. J. Lee, A. Kashima, J. Lu, M. S. Ghidaoui, and Y.-K. Tung. 2013. “Extended blockage detection in pipes using the system frequency response: Analytical analysis and experimental verification.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 139 (7): 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000736.
Edmondson, V., M. Cerny, M. Lim, B. Gledson, S. Lockley, and J. Woodward. 2018. “A smart sewer asset information model to enable an ‘Internet of Things’ for operational wastewater management.” Autom. Constr. 91 (Jul): 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.003.
Fenner, R. A., G. McFarland, and O. Thorne. 2007. “Case-based reasoning approach for managing sewerage assets.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manage. 160 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2007.160.1.15.
Häck, M., and J. Wiese. 2006. “Trends in instrumentation, control and automation and the consequences on urban water systems.” Water Sci. Technol. 54 (11–12): 265–272. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.797.
Hasselman, B. 2018. “nleqslv: Solve systems of nonlinear equations.” In R package version 3.3.2. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Henderson, F. M. 1966. Open channel flow. New York: Macmillan.
Hill, D., B. Kerkez, A. Rasekh, A. Ostfeld, B. Minsker, and M. K. Banks. 2014. “Sensing and cyberinfrastructure for smarter water management: The promise and challenge of ubiquity.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 140 (7): 01814002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000449.
Liu, X., and S. Chen. 2022. “Improved modeling of flows in sewer pipes with a novel, well-balanced MUSCL scheme.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 148 (12): 04022024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0002011.
Meniconi, S., H. F. Duan, P. J. Lee, B. Brunone, M. S. Ghidaoui, and M. Ferrante. 2013. “Experimental investigation of coupled frequency and time-domain transient test-based techniques for partial blockage detection in pipelines.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 139 (10): 1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000768.
Mustafa Abro, G. E., B. Jabeen, K. K. Ajodhia, A. Rauf, A. Noman, S. F. ul Huda, and A. AliQureshi. 2019. “Designing smart sewerbot for the identification of sewer defects and blockages.” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 10 (2): 615–619. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100276.
Palmer, H. K., and F. D. Bowlus. 1936. “Adaptation of Venturi flumes to flow measurements in conduits.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 101 (1): 1195–1216. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0004761.
Qian, Y., Z. Zhu David, and B. van Duin. 2022. “Design considerations for high-speed flow in sewer systems.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 148 (9): 03122001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0002004.
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rodríguez, J. P., N. McIntyre, M. Díaz-Granados, and Č. Maksimović. 2012. “A database and model to support proactive management of sediment-related sewer blockages.” Water Res. 46 (15): 4571–4586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.037.
Rousso, B. Z., M. Lambert, and J. Gong. 2023. “Smart water networks: A systematic review of applications using high-frequency pressure and acoustic sensors in real water distribution systems.” J. Cleaner Prod. 410 (Jul): 137193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137193.
Seco, I., A. Schellart, M. Gomez-Valentin, and S. Tait. 2018. “Prediction of organic combined sewer sediment release and transport.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 144 (3): 04018003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001422.
Sievert, C. 2020. Interactive Web-Based Data Visualization with R, plotly, and shiny. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Skipworth Peter, J., J. Tait Simon, and J. Saul Adrian. 1999. “Erosion of sediment beds in sewers: Model development.” J. Environ. Eng. 125 (6): 566–573. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1999)125:6(566).
Stevens, J. C. 1936. “Adaptation of Venturi flumes to flow measurements in conduits.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 101 (1): 1217–1235. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0004742.
Tizmaghz, Z., J. E. Van Zyl, and T. F. P. Henning. 2022. “Consistent classification system for sewer pipe deterioration and asset management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (5): 04022011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001545.
Vatankhah, A. R., and M. Bijankhan. 2010. “Choke-free flow in circular and ovoidal channels.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manage. 163 (4): 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2010.163.4.207.
Vittal, N. 1978. “Direct solution to problems of open channel transitions.” J. Hydraul. Div. 104 (11): 1485–1494. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0005097.
Wang, X., D. P. Palomar, L. Zhao, M. S. Ghidaoui, and R. D. Murch. 2018. “Spectral-based methods for pipeline leakage localization.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 145 (3): 04018089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001572.
Webber, J. L., T. Fletcher, R. Farmani, D. Butler, and P. Melville-Shreeve. 2022. “Moving to a future of smart stormwater management: A review and framework for terminology, research, and future perspectives.” Water Res. 218 (Jun): 118409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118409.
Wenzel Harry, G. 1975. “Meter for sewer flow measurement.” J. Hydraul. Div. 101 (1): 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0004159.
Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.
Wickham, H., R. François, L. Henry, and K. Müller. 2021. “dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation.” In R package version 3.3.2. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Zeng, W., J. Gong, P. R. Cook, J. W. Arkwright, A. R. Simpson, B. S. Cazzolato, A. C. Zecchin, and M. F. Lambert. 2020. “Leak detection for pipelines using in-pipe optical fiber pressure sensors and a paired-IRF technique.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 146 (10): 06020013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001812.
Zeng, W., J. Gong, A. C. Zecchin, M. F. Lambert, B. S. Cazzolato, and A. R. Simpson. 2023. “Reconstructing extended irregular anomalies in pipelines using layer-peeling with optimization.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 149 (1): 04022035. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-13106.
Zeng, W., J. Gong, A. C. Zecchin, M. F. Lambert, A. R. Simpson, and B. S. Cazzolato. 2018. “Condition assessment of water pipelines using a modified layer peeling method.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 144 (12): 04018076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001547.
Zhang, C., J. Gong, A. Simpson, A. Zecchin, and M. Lambert. 2019. “Impedance estimation along pipelines by generalized reconstructive Method of Characteristics for pipeline condition assessment.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 145 (4): 04019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001580.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 150Issue 5September 2024

History

Received: Sep 8, 2023
Accepted: Feb 19, 2024
Published online: Jun 12, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 12, 2024

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Lecturer, School of Engineering, Deakin Univ., Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6344-5993. Email: [email protected]
Joshua S. Sim [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, School of Engineering, Deakin Univ., Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Research Fellow, International WaterCentre, Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith Univ., Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia; formerly, Research Fellow, School of Engineering, Deakin Univ., Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4274-0958. Email: [email protected]
Lloyd H. C. Chua [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Engineering, Deakin Univ., Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share