Technical Papers
Jun 7, 2023

A Computational Approach to Smoothen the Abrupt Stiffness Variation along Railway Transitions

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 8

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to smoothen the abrupt stiffness variation along railway transitions and provides a step-by-step design of a multistep transition zone comprising adjoining segments with changing stiffness values. The influence of stiffness on track dynamic response applied to transition zones is investigated analytically, considering a beam on an elastic foundation. Vertical track displacements for varying stiffness values under different combinations of axle loads and speeds are calculated analytically and numerically, and they are found to be in good agreement. The results indicate that stiffer tracks undergo less settlement compared to those having a smaller stiffness. The effect of abrupt stiffness variation at transition sections is analyzed under four-carriage loading that causes considerable differential settlement, which is further exacerbated by increased train speeds. A mathematical process is introduced to determine the optimum stiffness of each segment to ensure a gradual change in stiffness while minimizing the corresponding differential settlement. The proposed methodology is further validated through the finite element modelling approach and worked-out examples epitomizing the effects of stiffness variation along the number of transition steps. From a practical perspective, this study provides a significant extension for design rejuvenation of transition zones by minimizing the differential settlement at any two consecutive transition segments.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, including data for plotting figures and parts of programming.

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out by the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Advanced Technologies in Rail Track Infrastructure (IC170100006 and DP220102862), funded by the Australian Government. The authors thank the Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) for their continuous support and cooperation. The authors also appreciate the insightful collaboration and assistance of the Australasian Centre for Rail Innovation (ACRI) and Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation (SMEC), in particular the comments and thoughtful advice they each provided for the current study.

References

Abadi, T., L. L. Pen, A. Zervos, and W. Powrie. 2019. “Effect of sleeper interventions on railway track performance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (4): 04019009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002022.
Aggestam, E., and J. C. Nielsen. 2019. “Multi-objective optimisation of transition zones between slab track and ballasted track using a genetic algorithm.” J. Sound Vib. 446 (Apr): 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.01.027.
Berggren, E. G., A. M. Kaynia, and B. Dehlbom. 2010. “Identification of substructure properties of railway tracks by dynamic stiffness measurements and simulations.” J. Sound Vib. 329 (19): 3999–4016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.04.015.
Choi, J. 2013. “Influence of track support stiffness of ballasted track on dynamic wheel-rail forces.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (7): 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000543.
Choudhury, D., R. K. Bharti, S. Chauhan, and B. Indraratna. 2008. “Response of multilayer foundation system beneath railway track under cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (10): 1558–1563. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1558).
Chumyen, P., D. Connolly, P. Woodward, and V. Markine. 2022. “The effect of soil improvement and auxiliary rails at railway track transition zones.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 155 (Apr): 107200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107200.
Coelho, B., J. Priest, and P. Hölscher. 2018. “Dynamic behaviour of transition zones in soft soils during regular train traffic.” J. Rail Rapid Transit 232 (3): 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716683078.
Dahlberg, T. 2010. “Railway track stiffness variations—Consequences and countermeasures.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 8 (1): 1–12.
Dimitrovová, Z., and J. Varandas. 2009. “Critical velocity of a load moving on a beam with a sudden change of foundation stiffness: Applications to high-speed trains.” Comput. Struct. 87 (19–20): 1224–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.12.005.
Esmaeili, M., H. Heydari-Noghabi, and M. Kamali. 2018. Numerical investigation of railway transition zones stiffened with auxiliary rails. London: Thomas Telford Ltd.
Esveld, C. 2001. Modern railway track. 2nd ed. Zaltbommel, Netherlands: MRT-Productions.
Frohling, R., H. Scheffel, and W. Ebersöhn. 1996. “The vertical dynamic response of a rail vehicle caused by track stiffness variations along the track.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 25 (S1): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119608969194.
Gallego Giner, I., and A. López Pita. 2009. “Numerical simulation of embankment—Structure transition design.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 223 (4): 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT234.
Galvín, P., A. Romero, and J. Dominguez. 2010. “Vibrations induced by HST passage on ballast and non-ballast tracks.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (9): 862–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.02.004.
Hendry, M. T. 2007. Train-induced dynamic response of railway track and embankments on soft peaty foundations. Saskatoon, Canada: Univ. of Saskatchewan.
Heydari-Noghabi, H., J. N. Varandas, M. Esmaeili, and J. Zakeri. 2017. “Investigating the influence of auxiliary rails on dynamic behavior of railway transition zone by a 3D train-track interaction model.” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 14 (11): 2000–2018. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78253906.
Heydari-Noghabi, H., J. Zakeri, M. Esmaeili, and J. Varandas. 2018. “Field study using additional rails and an approach slab as a transition zone from slab track to the ballasted track.” J. Rail Rapid Transit 232 (4): 970–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409717708527.
Hibbitt, D., B. Karlsson, and P. Sorensen. 2014. Abaqus standard user’s and reference manuals. Vélizy-Villacoublay, France: Dassault Systèmes.
Hu, P., C. Zhang, S. Wen, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Dynamic responses of high-speed railway transition zone with various subgrade fillings.” Comput. Geotech. 108 (Apr): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.12.011.
Huang, H., and B. Brennecke. 2013. “Track stiffness transition zone studied with three-dimensional sandwich track model.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2374 (1): 136–142. https://doi.org/10.3141/2374-16.
Indraratna, B., and T. Ngo. 2018. Ballast railroad design: SMART-UOW approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Indraratna, B., M. B. Sajjad, T. Ngo, A. G. Correia, and R. Kelly. 2019. “Improved performance of ballasted tracks at transition zones: A review of experimental and modelling approaches.” Transp. Geotech. 21 (Dec): 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100260.
Indraratna, B., W. Salim, and C. Rujikiatkamjorn. 2011. Advanced rail geotechnology–Ballasted track. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Karlsson, N., and M. Hjelm. 2016. “Dynamic response of railway bridges subjected to high speed trains—Parametrical case studies.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers Univ. of Technology.
Kennedy, J., P. Woodward, G. Medero, and M. Banimahd. 2013. “Reducing railway track settlement using three-dimensional polyurethane polymer reinforcement of the ballast.” Constr. Build. Mater. 44 (Jul): 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.002.
Kenney, J. 1954. “Steady-state vibrations of beam on elastic foundation for moving load.” J. Appl. Mech. 21 (4): 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4010934.
Kerr, A. D., and B. E. Moroney. 1993. “Track transition problems and remedies.” Bull. Am. Railway Eng. Assoc. 94 (742): 267–298.
Kouroussis, G., D. P. Connolly, and O. Verlinden. 2014. “Railway-induced ground vibrations–a review of vehicle effects.” Int. J. Rail Transp. 2 (2): 69–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2014.897791.
Lamas-Lopez, F., Y.-J. Cui, N. Calon, S. C. D’Aguiar, and T. Zhang. 2017. “Impact of train speed on the mechanical behaviours of track-bed materials.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 9 (5): 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.018.
Lamprea-Pineda, A. C., D. P. Connolly, and M. F. Hussein. 2021. “Beams on elastic foundations—A review of railway applications and solutions.” Transp. Geotech. 33 (Mar): 100696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100696.
Lei, X. 2017. High speed railway track dynamics. Singapore: Springer.
Lei, X., and B. Zhang. 2010. “Influence of track stiffness distribution on vehicle and track interactions in track transition.” J. Rail Rapid Transit 224 (6): 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT318.
Le Pen, L., G. Watson, W. Powrie, G. Yeo, P. Weston, and C. Roberts. 2014. “The behaviour of railway level crossings: Insights through field monitoring.” Transp. Geotech. 1 (4): 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.05.002.
Li, D., and D. Davis. 2005. “Transition of railroad bridge approaches.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (11): 1392–1398. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1392).
Li, D., and E. T. Selig. 1998a. “Method for railroad track foundation design. I: Development.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124 (4): 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:4(316).
Li, D., and E. T. Selig. 1998b. “Method for railroad track foundation design. II: Applications.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124 (4): 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:4(323).
López-Pita, A., P. F. Teixeira, C. Casas, L. Ubalde, and F. Robusté. 2007. “Evolution of track geometric quality in high-speed lines: Ten years experience of the Madrid-Seville line.” J. Rail Rapid Transit 221 (2): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954409JRRT62.
Lundqvist, A., and T. Dahlberg. 2005. “Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers.” J. Rail Rapid Transit 219 (2): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440905X8790.
Luo, Q., M. Wei, Q. Lu, and T. Wang. 2021. “Simplified analytical solution for stress concentration ratio of piled embankments incorporating pile–soil interaction.” Railway Eng. Sci. 29 (2): 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-021-00236-z.
Mishra, D., H. Boler, E. Tutumluer, W. Hou, and J. P. Hyslip. 2017. “Deformation and dynamic load amplification trends at railroad bridge approaches: Effects caused by high-speed passenger trains.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2607 (1): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.3141/2607-07.
Mishra, D., Y. Qian, H. Huang, and E. Tutumluer. 2014a. “An integrated approach to dynamic analysis of railroad track transitions behavior.” Transp. Geotech. 1 (4): 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.07.001.
Mishra, D., E. Tutumluer, H. Boler, J. Hyslip, and T. Sussmann. 2014b. “Railroad track **transitions with multidepth deflectometers and strain gauges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2448 (1): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.3141/2448-13.
Namura, A., and T. Suzuki. 2007. “Evaluation of countermeasures against differential settlement at track transitions.” Q. Rep. RTRI 48 (3): 176–182. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.48.176.
Ngamkhanong, C., Q. Y. Ming, T. Li, and S. Kaewunruen. 2020. “Dynamic train-track interactions over railway track stiffness transition zones using baseplate fastening systems.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 118 (Dec): 104866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104866.
Nicks, J. E. 2009. “The bump at the end of the railway bridge.” Ph.D. thesis, Zachry Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Nimbalkar, S., and B. Indraratna. 2016. “Improved performance of ballasted rail track using geosynthetics and rubber shockmat.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (8): 04016031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001491.
Nimbalkar, S., B. Indraratna, S. K. Dash, and D. Christie. 2012. “Improved performance of railway ballast under impact loads using shock mats.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (3): 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000598.
OneSteel. 2017. Rail track material: Steel rails and Trak-Lok steel sleeper systems. Molendinar, QLD, Australia: Liberty OneSteel.
Paixão, A., J. N. Varandas, E. Fortunato, and R. Calçada. 2018. “Numerical simulations to improve the use of under sleeper pads at transition zones to railway bridges.” Eng. Struct. 164 (Jun): 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.005.
Pita, A. L., P. F. Teixeira, and F. Robuste. 2004. “High speed and track deterioration: The role of vertical stiffness of the track.” J. Rail Rapid Transit 218 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440904322804411.
Plotkin, D., and D. Davis. 2008. Bridge approaches and track stiffness. Washington, DC: USDOT.
Powrie, W., and L. Le Pen. 2016. A guide to track stiffness. Southampton, UK: Univ. of Southampton.
Powrie, W., L. Yang, and C. R. Clayton. 2007. “Stress changes in the ground below ballasted railway track during train passage.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 221 (2): 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954409JRRT95.
Priest, J., and W. Powrie. 2009. “Determination of dynamic track modulus from measurement of track velocity during train passage.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (11): 1732–1740. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000130.
Punetha, P., S. Nimbalkar, and H. Khabbaz. 2020. “Analytical evaluation of ballasted track substructure response under repeated train loads.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (7): 04020093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001729.
Punetha, P., S. Nimbalkar, and H. Khabbaz. 2021. “Simplified geotechnical rheological model for simulating viscoelasto-plastic response of ballasted railway substructure.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 45 (14): 2019–2047. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3254.
Ramos, A., A. G. Correia, B. Indraratna, T. Ngo, R. Calçada, and P. A. Costa. 2020. “Mechanistic-empirical permanent deformation models: Laboratory testing, modelling and ranking.” Transp. Geotech. 23 (Jun): 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100326.
Read, D., and D. Li. 2006. Design of track transitions. Washington, DC: TCRP Research Results Digest.
Real, T., C. Zamorano, C. Hernández, J. García, and J. Real. 2016. “Static and dynamic behavior of transitions between different railway track typologies.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0635-2.
Sadeghi, J., and H. Askarinejad. 2010. “Development of nonlinear railway track model applying modified plane strain technique.” J. Transp. Eng. 136 (12): 1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000173.
Sañudo, R., L. dell’Olio, J. Casado, I. Carrascal, and S. Diego. 2016a. “Track transitions in railways: A review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 112 (Jun): 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.084.
Sañudo, R., M. Miranda, V. Markine, and L. dell’Olio. 2016b. “The influence of train running direction and track supports position on the behaviour of transition zones.” Transp. Res. Procedia 18 (Jan): 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.037.
Selig, E. T., and D. Li. 1994. “Track modulus: Its meaning and factors influencing it.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1470: 47–54.
Shahraki, M., C. Warnakulasooriya, and K. J. Witt. 2015. “Numerical study of transition zone between ballasted and ballastless railway track.” Transp. Geotech. 3 (Jun): 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2015.05.001.
Shan, Y., S. Zhou, B. Wang, and C. L. Ho. 2020. “Differential settlement prediction of ballasted tracks in bridge–embankment transition zones.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (9): 04020075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002307.
Sung, D., S. Chang, and S. Kim. 2020. “Effect of additional anti-vibration sleeper track considering sleeper spacing and track support stiffness on reducing low-frequency vibrations.” Constr. Build. Mater. 263 (Dec): 120140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120140.
Tutumluer, E., Y. Qian, Y. M. Hashash, J. Ghaboussi, and D. D. Davis. 2013. “Discrete element modelling of ballasted track deformation behaviour.” Int. J. Rail Transp. 1 (1–2): 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2013.788361.
Van Dalen, K. 2006. “Ground vibration induced by a high-speed train running over inhomogeneous subsoil: Transition radiation in two-dimensional inhomogeneous elastic systems.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Delft Univ. of Tech.
Walker, R. T., and B. Indraratna. 2018. “Moving loads on a viscoelastic foundation with special reference to railway transition zones.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (11): 04018145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001274.
Wang, H., M. Silvast, V. Markine, and B. Wiljanen. 2017. “Analysis of the dynamic wheel loads in railway transition zones considering the moisture condition of the ballast and subballast.” Appl. Sci. 7 (12): 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7121208.
Woodward, P. K., A. El Kacimi, O. Laghrouche, G. Medero, and M. Banimahd. 2012. “Application of polyurethane geocomposites to help maintain track geometry for high-speed ballasted railway tracks.” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 13 (11): 836–849. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A12ISGT3.
Zarembski, A., and J. Palese. 2003. “Transitions eliminate impact at crossings.” Railway Track Struct. 99 (8): 28–30.
Zhai, W., and H. True. 2000. “Vehicle-track dynamics on a ramp and on the bridge: Simulation and measurements.” Supplement, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 33 (S1): 604–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.1999.12063115.
Zhai, W., S. Wang, N. Zhang, M. Gao, H. Xia, C. Cai, and C. Zhao. 2013a. “High-speed train–track–bridge dynamic interactions—Part II: Experimental validation and engineering application.” Int. J. Rail Transp. 1 (1–2): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2013.791497.
Zhai, W., H. Xia, C. Cai, M. Gao, X. Li, X. Guo, N. Zhang, and K. Wang. 2013b. “High-speed train–track–bridge dynamic interactions—Part I: Theoretical model and numerical simulation.” Int. J. Rail Transp. 1 (1–2): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2013.791498.
Zhang, T.-W., F. Lamas-Lopez, Y.-J. Cui, N. Calon, and S. C. D’Aguiar. 2017a. “Development of a simple 2D model for railway track-bed mechanical behaviour based on field data.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 99 (Aug): 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.005.
Zhang, X., C. Zhao, and W. Zhai. 2017b. “Dynamic behavior analysis of high-speed railway ballast under moving vehicle loads using discrete element method.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (7): 04016157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000871.
Zhang, Y.-J., M. Murray, and L. Ferreira. 1998. “A mechanistic approach for estimation of track modulus.” In Proc., Conf. on Railway Engineering Proc.: Engineering Innovation for a Competitive Edge: Engineering Innovation for a Competitive Edge. Rockhampton, QLD, Australia: Central Queensland Univ. Rockhampton.
Zhou, S., B. Wang, and Y. Shan. 2020. “Review of research on high-speed railway subgrade settlement in soft soil area.” Railway Eng. Sci. 28 (2): 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-020-00214-x.
Zuada Coelho, B. 2011. “Dynamics of railway transition zones in soft soils.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft Univ. of Technology.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 8August 2023

History

Received: Sep 1, 2022
Accepted: Mar 24, 2023
Published online: Jun 7, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 7, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Muhammad Babar Sajjad, S.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-3459
Ph.D. Candidate, Transport Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-3459
Buddhima Indraratna, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
CEng.
CPEng
Distinguished Professor and Director, Transport Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Trung Ngo, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9676-3728
CPEng
Senior Lecturer, Transport Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9676-3728
Richard Kelly, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Chief Technical Principal and General Manager Technical Excellence, Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation (SMEC)-Australia and New Zealand Div., Level 6, 480 St Pauls Terrace, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006, Australia.
Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn, Ph.D., M.ASCE
CPEng
Professor, Transport Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share