Technical Papers
Jun 21, 2023

Influence of Centrifuge Test Soil-Container Friction on Seismic Sheet-Pile Wall Response in Liquefiable Deposit: Insights from Numerical Simulations

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 9

Abstract

As part of the LEAP (Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis Projects), many centrifuge model tests on a sheet pile retaining wall were conducted at six different centrifuge facilities around the world. Each centrifuge facility used containers of different W/H (width of container/height of wall) ratios to model the same plane strain prototype retaining wall. Predictions of the centrifuge tests that neglected wall friction, assumed plane strain conditions, and used the CycLiq constitutive model, exhibit reasonable general agreement with tests in terms of liquefaction response. However, an overprediction of the median response of sheet pile wall displacement was observed. The study presented in this paper was motivated by a concern that friction on the side walls might be biasing results from model containers with different W/H. A numerical simulation parametric study using FLAC3D is presented to illustrate the potential effects of interface friction and container geometry on the LEAP retaining wall test results. The results show that incorporation of appropriate container geometry and soil-container friction can reduce the error between simulated and experimental sheet pile wall displacements. Soil-container friction is also shown to affect the total earth pressure and especially its distribution on the sheet pile wall, causing the actual tests to deviate from the intended plane strain conditions. For the assessed liquefaction related cases, soil-container friction has the additional effect of significantly restricting the local development of excess pore pressure and subsequent soil deformation, further contributing to its influence on the centrifuge tests. The parametric study indicates that an interface friction angle of 17.6° and W/H>1, 2, and 3 reduced horizontal wall displacements by 50%, 20%, and 10% respectively, compared to simulations neglecting wall friction. Use of containers with large W/H is therefore recommended for future centrifuge experiments.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all of the teams participating in LEAP for sharing the valuable data and also for the insightful discussions. This study received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52022046).

References

Basu, D., R. Pretell, J. Montgomery, and K. Ziotopoulou. 2022. “Investigation of key parameters and issues in simulating centrifuge model tests of a sheet pile wall retaining a liquefiable soil deposit.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 156 (May): 107243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107243.
Bathurst, R. J., and D. J. Benjamin. 1988. “Preliminary assessment of sidewall friction on large-scale wall models in the RMC test facility.” In The application of polymeric reinforcement in soil retaining structures, 181–192. Alphen AAN den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Been, K., and M. G. Jefferies. 1985. “A state parameter for sands.” Géotechnique 35 (2): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99.
Bransby, P. L., and I. A. A. Smith. 1975. “Side friction in model retaining wall experiments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 101 (7): 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000176.
Chang, S. E. 2000. “Disasters and transport systems: Loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake.” J. Transp. Geogr. 8 (1): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00023-X.
El Ghoraiby, M., and M. L. Manzari. 2021. “LEAP-2020: Cyclic direct simple shear tests performed at GWU.” In Dataset: DesignSafe-CI. Seattle: DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-dyph-pf84.
Fang, Y. S., T. J. Chen, R. D. Holtz, and W. F. Lee. 2004. “Reduction of boundary friction in model tests.” Geotech. Test. J. 27 (1): 3–12.
Hayashi, S., K. Kubo, and A. Nakase. 1966. “Damage to harbour structures by the Niigata Earthquake.” Soils Found. 6 (1): 89–112. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1960.6.89.
He, B., J. M. Zhang, W. Li, and R. Wang. 2020. “Numerical analysis of LEAP centrifuge tests on sloping liquefiable ground: Influence of dilatancy and post-liquefaction shear deformation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 137 (Oct): 106288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106288.
Hu, Q., J. M. Zhang, and R. Wang. 2020. “Quantification of dilatancy during undrained cyclic loading and liquefaction.” Comput. Geotech. 128 (2020): 103853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103853.
Hung, W. Y., C. J. Lee, and L. M. Hu. 2018. “Study of the effects of container boundary and slope on soil liquefaction by centrifuge modeling.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.02.012.
Iai, S. 2019. “Evaluation of performance of port structures during earthquakes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 126 (Nov): 105192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.055.
Ishihara, K., K. Yoshida, and M. Kato. 1997. “Characteristics of lateral spreading in liquefied deposits during the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake.” J. Earthquake Eng. 1 (1): 23–55.
Itasca, F. 2013. “Fast Lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimensions.” In Online manual. Minneapolis: Itasca Consulting Group.
Kokkali, P., T. Abdoun, and M. Zeghal. 2018. “Physical modeling of soil liquefaction: Overview of LEAP production test 1 at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.036.
Kutter, B. L., et al. 2018. “LEAP-GWU-2015 experiment specifications, results, and comparisons.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.018.
Kutter, B. L., et al. 2019. “LEAP-UCD-2017 comparison of centrifuge test results.” In Model tests and numerical simulations of liquefaction and lateral spreading, edited by B. L. Kutter, M. T. Manzari, and M. Zeghal, 63–96. New York: Springer.
Kutter, B. L., J. C. Chou, and T. Travasarou. 2008. “Centrifuge testing of the seismic performance of a submerged cut-and-cover tunnel in liquefiable soil.” In Proc., Fourth Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soils Dynamics Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Lee, C. J. 2005. “Centrifuge modeling of the behavior of caisson-type quay walls during earthquakes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 25 (2): 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.011.
Li, Y., C. Luo, J. M. Zhang, F. Liu, and R. Wang. 2022. “Rayleigh wave-shear wave coupling mechanism for large lateral deformation in level liquefiable ground.” Comput. Geotech. 143 (Mar): 104631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104631.
Liu, H., J. M. Zhang, X. Zhang, and R. Wang. 2020. “Seismic performance of a block-type quay wall with liquefiable calcareous sand backfill.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 132 (May): 106092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106092.
Madabhushi, S. P. G., K. Saito, and E. D. Booth. 2013. “EEFIT mission to Haiti following the 12th January 2010 earthquake.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 11 (1): 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9361-z.
Madabhushi, S. S., S. K. Haigh, and G. S. Madabhushi. 2018. “LEAP-GWU-2015: Centrifuge and numerical modelling of slope liquefaction at the University of Cambridge.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.009.
Manzari, M., et al. 2015. LEAP projects: Concept and challenges. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Manzari, M. T., et al. 2018. “Liquefaction experiment and analysis projects (LEAP): Summary of observations from the planning phase.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 714–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.015.
Manzari, M. T., et al. 2020. “LEAP-2017: Comparison of the Type-B numerical simulations with centrifuge test results.” In Model tests and numerical simulations of liquefaction and lateral spreading, 187–218. Berlin: Springer.
McKenna, F., and G. L. Fenves. 2001. “OpenSees manual.” Accessed May 1, 2022. http://OpenSees.berkeley.edu.
Pitilakis, K., and A. Moutsakis. 1989. “Seismic analysis and behaviour of gravity retaining walls—The case of Kalamata Harbour quaywall.” Soils Found. 29 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.29.1.
Reyes, A., M. Yang, A. R. Barrero, and M. Taiebat. 2021. “Numerical modeling of soil liquefaction and lateral spreading using the SANISAND-Sf model in the LEAP experiments.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 143 (Apr): 106613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106613.
Richart, F. E., Jr., J. R. Hall, and R. D. Woods. 1970. Vibrations of soils and foundations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rinne, N. F. 1989. Evaluation of interface friction between cohesionless soil and common construction materials. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Univ. of British Columbia.
Shamoto, Y., J. M. Zhang, and S. Goto. 1997. “Mechanism of large post-liquefaction deformation in saturated sand.” Soils Found. 37 (2): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.37.2_71.
Taylor, R. N. 2018. Geotechnical centrifuge technology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Ueda, K. 2018. LEAP-Asia-2018: Stress-strain response of Ottawa sand in cyclic torsional shear tests. Seattle: DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/DS2D40H.
Ueda, K., and S. Iai. 2018. “Numerical predictions for centrifuge model tests of a liquefiable sloping ground using a strain space multiple mechanism model based on the finite strain theory.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 771–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.015.
Wang, G., and J. Wei. 2016. “Microstructure evolution of granular soils in cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction process.” Granular Matter 18 (3): 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-016-0621-5.
Wang, R., W. Cao, L. Xue, and J. M. Zhang. 2021. “An anisotropic plasticity model incorporating fabric evolution for monotonic and cyclic behavior of sand.” Acta Geotech. 16 (1): 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00984-y.
Wang, R., P. Fu, J. M. Zhang, and Y. F. Dafalias. 2016. “DEM study of fabric features governing undrained post-liquefaction shear deformation of sand.” Acta Geotech. 11 (6): 1321–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0499-8.
Wang, R., J. M. Zhang, and G. Wang. 2014. “A unified plasticity model for large post-liquefaction shear deformation of sand.” Comput. Geotech. 59 (Jun): 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.02.008.
Wang, R., T. Zhu, J. K. Yu, and J. M. Zhang. 2022. “Influence of vertical ground motion on the seismic response of underground structures and underground-aboveground structure systems in liquefiable ground.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 122 (Apr): 104351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104351.
Wang, Z. L., Y. F. Dafalias, and C. K. Shen. 1990. “Bounding surface hypoplasticity model for sand.” J. Eng. Mech. 116 (5): 983–1001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:5(983).
Yao, C., J. Takemura, G. Ma, C. Dai, and Z. An. 2021. “Effect of boundary friction on revere fault rupture propagation in centrifuge tests.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 147 (Aug): 106811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106811.
Yu, J. K., R. Wang, and J. M. Zhang. 2022. “Importance of liquefaction resistance and fabric anisotropy simulation capability in constitutive models for liquiefiable seismic response analysis.” Comput. Geotech. 150 (Oct): 104928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104928.
Zeghal, M. 2019. LEAP-RPI 2020, version 0.91 model specifications. San Diego: Univ. of California.
Zeng, X. 1998. “Seismic response of gravity quay walls. I: Centrifuge modeling.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124 (5): 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:5(406).
Zhang, J. M. 1997. “Cyclic critical stress state theory of sand with its application to geotechnical problems.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Architecture and Building Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Zhang, J. M., D. K. Feng, and W. J. Hou. 2018. “An automated large-scale apparatus for 3-D cyclic testing of soil-structure interfaces.” Geotech. Test. J. 41 (3): 20170129. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170129.
Zhou, Y. G., Q. Ma, K. Liu, and Y. M. Chen. 2021. “Centrifuge model tests at Zhejiang University for LEAP-Asia-2019 and validation of the generalized scaling law.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 144 (May): 106660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106660.
Zhou, Y. G., Z. B. Sun, and Y. M. Chen. 2018. “Zhejiang University benchmark centrifuge test for LEAP-GWU-2015 and liquefaction responses of a sloping ground.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.010.
Zou, Y., J. M. Zhang, and R. Wang. 2020. “Seismic analysis of stone column improved liquefiable ground using a plasticity model for coarse-grained soil.” Comput. Geotech. 125 (Sep): 103690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103690.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: May 29, 2022
Accepted: Apr 12, 2023
Published online: Jun 21, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 21, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rui Wang, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Hydraulic Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Beijing 100084, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Hydraulic Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Beijing 100084, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0628-1275. Email: [email protected]
Jian-Min Zhang [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Hydraulic Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Beijing 100084, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share