Embodied Carbon Analysis of Microtunneling Using Recent Case Histories
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 10
Abstract
With increasing demand for sustainable underground infrastructure and pressure to reduce embodied carbon (EC), microtunneling (MT) has become an increasingly popular trenchless method of installing buried utility tunnels. Life-cycle analyses have shown that trenchless methods cause lower emissions than traditional open-cut construction. However, existing literature specifically considering MT is limited and fails to consider the impact of the entire construction process. In this paper, an approach for calculating the EC of MT is presented. The proposed approach is applied to three recent case histories in the United Kingdom through the development of a bespoke MT EC database in collaboration with industry partners. Total emissions across all three projects (870 m of pipeline) total 1,005 . Production of materials and components is shown to account for an average of 68.5% of EC across the three projects, with most of these emissions coming from the key structural materials, namely concrete and steel. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that the source and production method of steel products have a significant impact on EC. Site activities also make a significant contribution, accounting for an average of 20.5% of total EC. Normalization of the results suggests that MT produces less EC than open-cut pipeline installation and highlighted how increasing drive lengths and reducing the number of shafts can significantly reduce EC. One of the case studies is then used as an example to quantify how the reduction of intermediate launch/reception shafts can reduce overall EC.
Practical Applications
In this paper, an approach for calculating the embodied carbon (EC) of microtunneling (MT) is presented, defining a scope that will enable fair comparison of future projects. The presented methodology also provides a useful reference for readers to find sources for EC factors. The proposed approach is applied to three recent case histories in the United Kingdom through the development of a bespoke MT EC database in collaboration with industry partners. The presented results provide insights into the EC of MT projects in five key areas: (1) the relative contribution of different materials and different construction phases to overall EC, (2) the sensitivity of EC to the method of steel production, (3) the influence of on-site emissions, (4) the comparison of MT to traditional open-cut pipeline construction, and (5) quantifying the environmental benefits of minimizing the number of shafts.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and input of Ward & Burke Construction Ltd for this research. This work was supported by the Royal Academy of Engineering under the Research Fellowship Scheme and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Grant No. EP/T006900/1).
References
Akbarnezhad, A., and J. Xiao. 2017. “Estimation and minimization of embodied carbon of buildings: A review.” Buildings 7 (5): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7010005.
Alsadi, A. A., and J. C. Matthews. 2020. “Evaluation of carbon footprint of pipeline materials during installation, operation, and disposal phases.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (2): 04020005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000422.
Ariaratnam, S. T., K. Piratla, A. A. Cohen, and M. Olson. 2013. “Quantification of sustainability index for underground utility infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (12): A4013002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000763.
Ariaratnam, S. T., and S. S. Sihabuddin. 2009. “Comparison of emitted emissions between trenchless pipe replacement and open cut utility construction.” J. Green Build. 4 (2): 126–140. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.4.2.126.
BSI (British Standards Institute). 2011. Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method. BS EN 15978:2011. London: BSI.
Bueno, G., D. Hoyos, and I. Capellán-Pérez. 2017. “Evaluating the environmental performance of the high speed rail project in the Basque Country, Spain.” Res. Transp. Econ. 62 (May): 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2017.02.004.
Chang, B., and A. Kendall. 2011. “Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of infrastructure construction for California’s high-speed rail system.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 16 (6): 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.04.004.
Chilana, L., A. H. Bhatt, M. Najafi, and M. Sattler. 2016. “Comparison of carbon footprints of steel versus concrete pipelines for water transmission.” J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 66 (5): 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1154487.
DEFRA (Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs). 2021. “UK Government GHG conversion factors for company reporting.” Accessed January 1, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2021.
DEFRA (Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs). 2022. “UK Government GHG conversion factors for company reporting.” Accessed January 1, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2022.
De Wolf, C., F. Pomponi, and A. Moncaster. 2017. “Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice.” Energy Build. 140 (2017): 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075.
Dimoula, V., F. Kehagia, and A. Tsakalidis. 2016. “A holistic approach for estimating carbon emissions of road and rail transport systems.” Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 16 (1): 61–68. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0313.
Gervasio, H., and S. Dimova. 2018. “Model for life cycle assessment (LCA) of buildings. EFI resources: Resource efficient construction towards sustainable design.” Accessed March 3, 2022. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/16cd2d1d-2216-11e8-ac73-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
Hanson, C. S., R. B. Noland, and C. D. Porter. 2016. “Greenhouse gas emissions associated with materials used in commuter rail lines.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 10 (5): 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2014.985859.
Hojjati, A., I. Jefferson, N. Metje, and C. D. F. Rogers. 2018. “Sustainability assessment for urban underground utility infrastructure projects.” In Vol. 171 of Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability, 68–80. London: Thomas Telford.
Huang, L., P. D. Jakobsen, R. A. Bone, Y. Liu, A. Bruland, and C. J. Manquehual. 2020. “The environmental impact of rock support for road tunnels: The experience of Norway.” Sci. Total Environ. 712 (2020): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136421.
International Union of Railways. 2016 “Carbon footprint of railway infrastructure comparing existing methodologies on typical corridors recommendations for harmonized approach.” Accessed February 15, 2023. https://uic.org/IMG/pdf/carbon_footprint_of_railway_infrastructure.pdf.
IStructE (The Institution of Structural Engineers). 2020. “How to calculate embodied carbon.” Accessed February 28, 2022. https://www.istructe.org/resources/guidance/how-to-calculate-embodied-carbon/.
Jackson, D. J., and M. Brander. 2019. “The risk of burden shifting from embodied carbon calculation tools for the infrastructure sector.” J. Cleaner Prod. 223 (2019): 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.171.
Jones, D. C., and P. G. Hammond. 2019. “ICE (Inventory of Carbon and Energy) database V3.0.” Accessed February 28, 2022. http://www.circularecology.com/embodied-energy-and-carbon-footprint-database.html.
Kaushal, V., and M. Najafi. 2020. “Comparative assessment of environmental impacts from open-cut pipeline replacement and trenchless cured-in-place pipe renewal method for sanitary sewers.” Infrastructures 5 (48): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5060048.
Kaushal, V., M. M. Najafi, and R. Serajiantehrani. 2020. “Environmental impacts of conventional open-cut pipeline installation and trenchless technology methods: State-of-the-art review.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (2): 03120001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000459.
Khan, L. R., and K. F. Tee. 2015. “Quantification and comparison of carbon emissions for flexible underground pipelines.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 42 (10): 728–736. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0156.
Kyung, D., D. Kim, S. Yi, W. Choi, and W. Lee. 2017. “Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from sewer pipeline system.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22 (12): 1901–1911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1288-9.
Li, Y., Q. He, X. Luo, Y. Zhang, and L. Dong. 2018. “Calculation of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of urban rail transit systems: A case study of Shanghai Metro.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 128 (May): 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.007.
Lu, H., J. Matthews, and T. Iseley. 2020. “How does trenchless technology make pipeline construction greener? A comprehensive carbon footprint and energy consumption analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 261 (2020): 121215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121215.
Matar, M., H. Osman, M. Georgy, A. Abou-Zeid, and M. Elsaid. 2019. “Evaluating the environmental performance of pipeline construction using systems modelling.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 38 (8): 689–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1605185.
MEGASA (Metalurgia Galaica, SA). 2019. “Environmental product declaration—Carbon steel reinforcing bar.” Accessed March 3, 2023. https://www.megasa.com/data/WebData/Certifications/Certificados/Uk%20%20Irlanda/Seixal/Bre/Se_Bre_Epd/BREGENEPD000141.pdf.
Miyoshi, C., and M. Givoni. 2013. “The environmental case for the high-speed train in the UK: Examining the London–Manchester route.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 8 (Mar): 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2011.645124.
Monfared, M. A. N. 2018. “Comparison of trenchless technologies and open cut methods in new residential land development.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Alberta.
Morita, Y., T. Yamasaki, H. Kato, and N. Shibahara. 2011. “Life cycle assessment method of carbon dioxide emission from railway provision.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. Jpn. 7 (4): 360–367. https://doi.org/10.3370/lca.7.360.
MPA (Mineral Products Association). 2020. “Sustainable development report.” Accessed October 29, 2021. https://mineralproducts.org/MPA/media/root/Publications/2021/MPA_SD_Report_2020.pdf.
MPA Precast (Mineral Product Association Precast). 2020. “Sustainability matters 2020.” Accessed November 11, 2021. https://www.britishprecast.org/Sustainability/Sustainability-Report.aspx.
NIC (National Infrastructure Commission). 2017. “Congestion, capacity, carbon: Priorities for national infrastructure consultation on a national infrastructure assessment.” Accessed February 28, 2022. https://nic.org.uk/studies-reports/national-infrastructure-assessment/national-infrastructure-assessment-1/congestion-capacity-carbon-priorities-for-national-infrastructure/.
Olugbenga, O., N. Kalyviotis, and S. Saxe. 2019. “Embodied emissions in rail infrastructure: A critical literature review.” Environ. Res. Lett. 14 (12): 123002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab442f.
Phillips, B. 2023. “Stoppage induced friction variation in pipe jacking.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Engineering Science, Univ. of Oxford.
Phillips, B. M., R. Royston, B. B. Sheil, and B. W. Byrne. 2019. “Instrumentation and monitoring of a concrete jacking pipe.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019, 457–462. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Centre for Smart Infrastructure & Construction.
Piratla, K. R., S. T. Ariaratnam, and A. Cohen. 2012. “Estimation of emissions from the life cycle of a potable water pipeline project.” J. Manage. Eng. 28 (1): 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000069.
Rehan, R., and D. M. Knight. 2007. “Do trenchless pipeline construction methods reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Preliminary Rep.” Accessed March 29, 2022. https://www.academia.edu/9233679/PRELIMINARY_REPORT_Do_Trenchless_Pipeline_Construction_Methods_Reduce_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.
Rodríguez, R., and F. Pérez. 2021. “Carbon footprint evaluation in tunnelling construction using conventional methods.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 108 (2021): 103704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103704.
Royston, R., B. M. Phillips, B. B. Sheil, and B. W. Byrne. 2016. “Bearing capacity beneath tapered blades of open dug caissons in sand.” In Proc., Civil Engineering Research in Ireland 2016, 473–478. Galway, Ireland: NUI Galway.
Royston, R., B. Sheil, and B. Byrne. 2020. “Monitoring the construction of a large-diameter caisson in sand.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 173 (3): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.19.00266.
Saxe, S., E. Miller, and P. Guthrie. 2017. “The net greenhouse gas impact of the Sheppard Subway Line.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 51 (Mar): 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.007.
Sterling, R., H. Admiraal, N. Bobylev, H. Parker, J. Godard, I. Vähäaho, C. D. F. Rogers, X. Shi, and T. Hanamura. 2012. “Sustainability issues for underground space in urban areas.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plann. 165 (4): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.10.00020.
Templeman, J. O., B. M. Phillips, and B. B. Sheil. 2021. “Cutting shoe design for open caissons in sand: Influence on vertical bearing capacity.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 20 (5): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.20.00218.
Westin, J., and P. Kågeson. 2012. “Can high speed rail offset its embedded emissions?” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 17 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.09.006.
WorldGBC (World Green Building Council). 2019. “Bringing embodied carbon upfront–Coordinated action for the building and construction sector to tackle embodied carbon.” Accessed February 2, 2022. https://www.worldgbc.org/sites/default/files/WorldGBC_Bringing_Embodied_Carbon_Upfront.pdf.
Xu, J., C. Guo, X. Chen, Z. Zhang, L. Yang, M. Wang, and K. Yang. 2018. “Emission transition of greenhouse gases with the surrounding rock weakened—A case study of tunnel construction.” J. Cleaner Prod. 177 (2018): 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.174.
Yue, Y., T. Wang, S. Liang, J. Yang, P. Hou, S. Qu, J. Zhou, X. Jia, H. Wang, and M. Xu. 2015. “Life cycle assessment of high speed rail in China.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 41 (Dec): 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.005.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149 • Issue 10 • October 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 22, 2022
Accepted: May 30, 2023
Published online: Aug 7, 2023
Published in print: Oct 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 7, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.